09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

selection documents from the definition <strong>of</strong> franchise agreements, allowing a<br />

franchisor to issue the former prior to the latter.<br />

B. Exemptions<br />

The general policy behind the disclosure requirement is to provide prospective<br />

franchisees with information relating to the franchise, the franchise system, and<br />

the costs <strong>of</strong> operating and establishing a franchised business. There are a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> provisions in place in all regulated Canadian jurisdictions whereby<br />

franchisors may be exempt from delivering a disclosure document to a<br />

prospective franchisee or financial statements in conjunction with the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> a disclosure document. 79 The question facing Manitoba at the<br />

moment is whether the ability to exempt certain franchisors from the<br />

requirement to provide financial statements, or to implement other exemptions<br />

from the requirements <strong>of</strong> legislation or regulations is appropriate. 00<br />

I. General Exemptions from Legislation or Regulations<br />

Broadly speaking, general exemptions from franchise legislation and regulations<br />

exempt a party selling or renewing a franchise in certain circumstances from<br />

having to provide disclosure documents. The question facing Manitoba under<br />

this heading is whether the ability to implement exemptions from the<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> legislation or regulations is appropriate.<br />

Every regulated jurisdiction in Canada has implemented general exemptions.<br />

Section 5 <strong>of</strong> the Alberta Franchises Act, 81 s. 5 (7) <strong>of</strong> Ontario's Arthur Wishart Act<br />

(Franchise Disclosure), 2000, and s. 5(7) <strong>of</strong> P.E.I.'s Franchises Act cover the<br />

authorized exemptions in each province. Since every regulated jurisdiction in<br />

Canada contains exemptions, Manitoba should not be the exception. The fact<br />

that each Act contains exemptions does not mean that a potential franchisee<br />

will be forced to purchase a franchise without sufficient information about the<br />

business. For example, s. 5(7)(c) <strong>of</strong> the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise<br />

Disclosure), 2000 states that disclosure requirements will not be enforced in the<br />

grant <strong>of</strong> an additional franchise to an existing franchisee if:<br />

• That additional franchise is substantially the same as the existing<br />

franchise that the franchisee is operating; and<br />

79<br />

80<br />

81<br />

Paul D. Jones & Daniel F. So, "Houdini's Franchise <strong>Law</strong>: Exclusions and Exemptions to<br />

Disclosure in Canada," (Paper presented to the Ontario Bar Association's 6th Annual<br />

Franchising Conference: The Domino Effect, November 2006) [OBA Continuing Legal<br />

Education: Toronto, 2006] at 25.<br />

Manitoba <strong>Law</strong> Reform Commission, supra note 14 at 51.<br />

R.S.A. 2000, c. F-23, s. 5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!