09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104 Underneath the Golden Boy<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> "franchise agreement." Accordingly, and unlike Ontario, these<br />

agreements may be entered into in advance <strong>of</strong> a disclosure document being<br />

given. 75 If the franchise is a turnkey operation, where the franchisor is in charge<br />

<strong>of</strong> development and selection <strong>of</strong> premises and the franchisee simply has to<br />

unlock the door to begin operating its business, no site selection agreement is<br />

needed. However, when the franchisee is partially or completely responsible for<br />

choosing and developing the location, a site selection agreement will be<br />

needed. 76<br />

A site selection agreement is a breed <strong>of</strong> commitment agreement. Under a<br />

commitment letter, the supposed franchisee's pre,opening obligation is to<br />

procure premises for the franchised business. The site selection agreement may<br />

impose certain site and lease criteria and approvals with which the franchisee<br />

must comply in order to move forward with the development <strong>of</strong> the franchise.<br />

Often, the site selection agreement requires the franchisor to review it promptly<br />

and to approve or reject the site. 77<br />

The ULCC recommends that an agreement which is restricted to designation <strong>of</strong><br />

a location should be able to be entered into prior to disclosure and should<br />

therefore be exempt from disclosure. A prospective franchisee would not be<br />

prejudiced in this regard. 76 Consequently, s. 10 <strong>of</strong> the UFA states that an<br />

agreement is not a franchise agreement or any other agreement relating to the<br />

franchise if the agreement only contains terms in respect <strong>of</strong> designating a<br />

location, site or territory for a prospective franchisee.<br />

In theory, receiving the site selection agreement before the disclosure document<br />

could be beneficial for the franchisee. This is because rather than having to<br />

become familiar with a very large document prior to signing the Franchise<br />

Agreement, the franchisee will have more time to consider each document<br />

separately. Consequently, allowing a franchisor to issue a site selection<br />

document prior to the disclosure document will result in a franchisee being able<br />

to make a well,informed decision. In other words, having become well<br />

acquainted with both documents due to the added reading time, a franchisee<br />

will be more informed when making the decision to purchase. Thus, Manitoba's<br />

legislation should follow Alberta, P.E.I. and the ULCC and exclude site<br />

75<br />

Larry Weinberg, "Franchise <strong>Law</strong> e LERT - Canadian Franchise <strong>Law</strong> Legislative<br />

Updates/' online: Cassels Brock Resources .<br />

76<br />

Zaid, supra note 67 at 14.<br />

77<br />

Kevin M. Shelley & Jonathan J. TorontoJ "Preliminary Agreements: How to Avoid<br />

Unintended Contractual Obligations," (Fall 2005) 25:2 Franchise <strong>Law</strong> Journal 47 at 53; or<br />

online: Franchise <strong>Law</strong> Journal .<br />

78<br />

Levitt, supra note 64.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!