09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

during and after the term <strong>of</strong> this agreement and that it shall ensure that such persons<br />

will not use any such information in any other business or in any manner. 71<br />

It should be noted that protecting franchise trade secrets and confidential<br />

information benefits franchisees as well as the franchisor. Franchisees would<br />

lose much <strong>of</strong> the economic value <strong>of</strong> their business if the information they rely<br />

upon to operate their franchise became publicly available such that others could<br />

easily duplicate the franchise business and then compete with actual<br />

franchisees. n<br />

From a franchisor's perspective, requesting that a franchisee sign a<br />

confidentiality agreement before providing any disclosure is rather sensible. This<br />

is because a franchisor will want to be sure that a franchisee will not steal any<br />

secrets from the franchise, or refuse to sign the franchise agreement and then<br />

open a competing store. From a franchisee's perspective, signing a<br />

confidentiality agreement prior to receiving a disclosure document makes no<br />

difference whatsoever. There is nothing at risk. The ULCC recommends that<br />

confidentiality agreements should be able to be entered into prior to disclosure<br />

and states that a prospective franchisee would not be prejudiced in this regard. 73<br />

Therefore, to protect franchisors from unscrupulous franchisees that want to<br />

steal trade secrets, Manitoba's legislation should allow franchisors to issue<br />

confidentiality agreements before providing disclosure.<br />

If Manitoba chooses to follow a format similar to Ontario's legislation, a<br />

franchisor would be in violation <strong>of</strong> the Act by having the prospective franchisee<br />

sign a confidentiality agreement before they receive a proper disclosure<br />

document. Section 5 (1) (a) <strong>of</strong> the Ontario Act requires that a disclosure<br />

document must be provided 14 days prior to the signing <strong>of</strong> any agreement.<br />

Consequently, Manitoba would have to follow Alberta, P.E.I. and the ULCC<br />

and specifically permit such pre disclosure confidentiality agreements by<br />

excluding confidentiality agreements from the definition <strong>of</strong> a franchise<br />

agreement. 74<br />

iii. Site selection agreements<br />

Unlike the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, the P.E.l. and<br />

Alberta Acts as well, as the UFA, exclude site selection agreements from the<br />

71<br />

Daniel F. So, Canadian Franchise <strong>Law</strong> Handbook, (Markham: LexisNexis Canada Inc.,<br />

2005) at 143.<br />

72<br />

MarkS. VanderBroek & Christian B. Turner, "Protecting and Enforcing Franchise Trade<br />

Secrets," (Spring 2006) 25:4 Franchise <strong>Law</strong> ]oumal191 at 192.<br />

73<br />

Uniform <strong>Law</strong> Conference <strong>of</strong> Canada, Uniform Franchise Act with Commentary, online:<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> Annual Meetings, 2004 Regina, Commercial <strong>Law</strong> Documents<br />

at 15.<br />

14<br />

Levitt, supra note 53 at 20.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!