09.01.2015 Views

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

UTGB Vol 5.pdf - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102 Underneath the Golden Boy<br />

Although these two cases are examples <strong>of</strong> a franchisee requesting the deposit<br />

back after receiving a disclosure document, they serve to demonstrate how<br />

easily a franchisor can abuse the franchisee by refusing to refund the dep<strong>of</strong>it.<br />

The defendant in Scott went as far as to argue that Scott had contracted with<br />

another party and that, consequently, it did not have the deposit. If Manitoba's<br />

franchise legislation was to require a refundable deposit before a disclosure<br />

document is issued, not only will a franchisee be exposing himself to potential<br />

abuse but he also will be paying money into an enterprise he knows very little<br />

about. Considering that the purpose <strong>of</strong> such legislation is to protect franchisees<br />

and help them make an informed decision, this provision would seriously<br />

endanger that goal. Therefore, Manitoba should not allow franchisors to claim<br />

refundable deposits before issuing disclosure documents.<br />

However, since franchisors may still be desirous <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> a franchisee's<br />

legitimate interest, an alternative is required. After all, preparing disclosure<br />

documents and providing franchisees with other informational materials comes<br />

at a cost to franchisors. Thus, Manitoba legislation should allow franchisors to<br />

request that franchisees make a deposit, in trust, with their own lawyers as a<br />

show <strong>of</strong> faith. This deposit should not exceed 5% <strong>of</strong> the total franchise fee, up<br />

to a maximum <strong>of</strong> $5 000, since doing otherwise would be too onerous for<br />

franchisees. In including this requirement, fanchise legislation would ensure<br />

franchisors still receive assurance <strong>of</strong> a franchisee's legitimate interest, while at<br />

the same time protecting the franchisee's money from unscrupulous franchisors.<br />

This deposit could then be used towards the franchise fee or as a retainer for the<br />

franchisee's legal costs.<br />

ii. Confidentiality Agreements<br />

The purpose behind Confidentiality Agreements is to protect franchisors.<br />

Developing a successful franchise system can only come about as a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

expenditure <strong>of</strong> considerable time and money by the franchisor. Each element <strong>of</strong><br />

the system, from the development <strong>of</strong> the products and services to the<br />

advertising fund and marketing program, contains valuable information<br />

proprietary to the franchisor. With so much invested in the business system, the<br />

franchisor may require that the franchisee keep the franchise system strictly<br />

confidential. 70 A typical confidentiality clause may look as follows:<br />

The franchisee acknowledges that its knowledge <strong>of</strong> the operation <strong>of</strong> the Franchised<br />

Business will be derived from the information disclosed to the directors, <strong>of</strong>ficers,<br />

employees and agents <strong>of</strong> the Franchisee by the Franchisor pursuant to this agreement<br />

and that certain <strong>of</strong> such information, including, without limitation the contents <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Manual, is proprietary, confidential and a trade secret <strong>of</strong> the franchisor. The<br />

Franchisee agrees that it shall maintain absolute confidentiality <strong>of</strong> such information<br />

70 Zaid, supra note 67 at 20.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!