09.01.2015 Views

October 2003 - International Brotherhood of Teamsters

October 2003 - International Brotherhood of Teamsters

October 2003 - International Brotherhood of Teamsters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

help in securing government funding for security and<br />

other related costs that they had to back <strong>of</strong>f support <strong>of</strong><br />

legislation that would take away our collective bargaining<br />

rights. We also attacked the issue on a political<br />

front—boycotting political fundraising events sponsored<br />

by lobbyists, and in some cases, former members<br />

<strong>of</strong> Congress who had received labor support in<br />

the past. It’s my understanding that the entire CESTA<br />

campaign has been taken down.<br />

Q. Is this something that workers in the<br />

airline industry should stop worrying<br />

about<br />

A. No. We have to be vigilant. There are powerful members<br />

<strong>of</strong> Congress who are not airline worker friendly.<br />

Given the chance, they will revive this issue when they<br />

think the time is right.<br />

Q. What part did the <strong>Teamsters</strong> play in<br />

thwarting this attempt to rob airline<br />

workers <strong>of</strong> their rights<br />

A. We were in the thick <strong>of</strong> the fight. General President<br />

H<strong>of</strong>fa made several Capitol Hill visits to members <strong>of</strong><br />

Congress. We cranked up our field operation and got<br />

Teamster members to call, write, visit and e-mail their<br />

Representatives and Senators.<br />

Q. What are the other big issues the<br />

<strong>Teamsters</strong> are tackling for airline<br />

workers on the legislative front<br />

A. Security training for flight attendants; closing the gaps<br />

in security for cargo airlines and pilots; assuring that<br />

airline workers get the due process, privacy and confidentiality<br />

protections they deserve when they undergo<br />

criminal background checks; flight attendant certification;<br />

preventing cabotage (point-to-point delivery in the<br />

U.S.) for air cargo; requiring foreign repair stations to<br />

meet the same safety requirements (including drug and<br />

alcohol testing) that U.S. stations do.<br />

Teamster Tells Congress:<br />

“Arm Cargo Pilots”<br />

Local 1224 Secretary-Treasurer<br />

Testified Before Aviation<br />

Subcommittee<br />

A dangerous loophole was left in<br />

legislation arming airline pilots<br />

that left thousands <strong>of</strong> planes vulnerable<br />

to terrorism. As a result,<br />

the <strong>Teamsters</strong> have been lobbying<br />

Congress to arm cargo pilots.<br />

Last year, Congress voted in<br />

favor <strong>of</strong> allowing passenger and<br />

cargo pilots to voluntarily be<br />

armed to defend the cockpit. But<br />

in conference at the 11th hour,<br />

cargo pilots were left out <strong>of</strong> the legislation, leaving a<br />

gaping hole in a layer <strong>of</strong> national security.<br />

Dan Graves, Secretary-Treasurer <strong>of</strong> Local 1224 in<br />

Wilmington, Ohio, testified on May 8, <strong>2003</strong> before<br />

the House Aviation Subcommittee in favor <strong>of</strong> arming<br />

the cargo pilots.<br />

“This is not a labor issue or a company policy<br />

issue; this is an issue <strong>of</strong> national security,” Graves<br />

said. “And you, as members <strong>of</strong> Congress, are compelled<br />

to protect the American people on the ground,<br />

not just the passenger customers, from these airplanes.”<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> his testimony and further lobbying,<br />

the legislation, part <strong>of</strong> the FAA Reauthorization Bill,<br />

has passed the Senate and House <strong>of</strong> Representatives,<br />

as well as a conference committee. The House and<br />

Senate will deliver a final vote after the August<br />

recess.<br />

“Unlike passenger aircraft, cargo aircraft do not<br />

have Federal Air Marshals, trained cabin crew, or<br />

determined passengers to run interference should an<br />

attack occur. Cargo planes also do not have reinforced<br />

cockpit doors or screens to monitor what’s<br />

happening in the back <strong>of</strong> the aircraft,” Graves said.<br />

He testified that cargo pilots are “inherently more vulnerable<br />

to hijacking, so it is imperative that we be<br />

armed to defend not just ourselves but American citizens<br />

on the ground.”<br />

With new warnings <strong>of</strong> hijackings, Congress<br />

should pay special attention to the legislation at<br />

hand.<br />

November <strong>2003</strong> <strong>Teamsters</strong> Airline Journal 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!