09.01.2015 Views

October 2003 - International Brotherhood of Teamsters

October 2003 - International Brotherhood of Teamsters

October 2003 - International Brotherhood of Teamsters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Safety and Health<br />

Airlines Reject Security Training for Crewmembers<br />

Much-Needed Training Devalued by Airlines<br />

By Nancy Garcia, <strong>International</strong> Representative<br />

Flight attendants and flight deck crew don’t have an option when it comes to dealing with an<br />

emergency situation onboard an aircraft, whether it be fighting a fire in the cabin, aborting a<br />

take<strong>of</strong>f, opening an emergency exit or operating a defibrillator to save a passenger having a<br />

heart attack. Nor do they have the choice <strong>of</strong> opting out <strong>of</strong> emergency training, including<br />

hands-on or simulator training.<br />

The airlines, however, want flight attendants and pilots to be able to opt out <strong>of</strong> another<br />

type <strong>of</strong> training that will protect passengers and their own safety—crew<br />

security training.<br />

They have<br />

apparently<br />

forgotten all<br />

about September<br />

11 and why they<br />

just received $2.9<br />

billion from the<br />

federal<br />

government for<br />

security costs.<br />

Airlines have been lobbying Congress to make crew security<br />

training voluntary. They also want it to be unpaid and taken<br />

on the crewmembers own time. They have apparently forgotten<br />

all about September 11 and why they just received $2.9 billion<br />

from the federal government for security costs. With pilots<br />

locked behind the reinforced door and flight attendants left<br />

alone in the cabin to respond to a threat, crews need training to<br />

coordinate an appropriate response and flight attendants need<br />

additional training to defend themselves and their passengers.<br />

In mid-June, air carriers and the Air Transport Association<br />

(a trade organization made up <strong>of</strong> about 30 airlines) were successful<br />

in having an amendment attached to the Federal<br />

Aviation Administration (FAA) Reauthorization Act in the House<br />

that would weaken previously legislated security training<br />

requirements. This amendment was not included in the companion<br />

Senate Bill, therefore a Congressional Conference<br />

Committee met in July to work out compromise language.<br />

Unfortunately, the Conference Committee was unable to<br />

work out a compromise. Democrats on the Committee thought<br />

they would be negotiating a bipartisan report to reauthorize<br />

aviation programs, but when they got to the conference meeting,<br />

they found that Republicans purposely scheduled it at a time to prevent little or no debate<br />

on a report that bore little resemblance to either the House or Senate bills on several important<br />

provisions. The Democrats refused to sign the Conference Report, but it will, nonetheless,<br />

go to the floors <strong>of</strong> both the Senate and the House for a vote.<br />

The Conference Report guts the mandatory cabin crew security training requirements,<br />

making the training voluntary—all at a time when U.S. intelligence agencies are warning <strong>of</strong><br />

plans by the al Qaeda terrorist network to hijack more U.S. planes. The conference report further<br />

jeopardizes aviation safety by allowing the privatization <strong>of</strong> our air traffic control system. It<br />

also grants foreign cargo carriers a special interest exemption to evade cabotage laws by<br />

allowing point-to-point domestic service between Anchorage, Alaska and the lower 48 states.<br />

The Airline Division and the IBT Government Affairs Department are working diligently to<br />

defeat the Conference Report and to ensure that security training remains mandatory and that<br />

it includes the program elements necessary to prepare all crewmembers to respond to any<br />

level <strong>of</strong> threat on an aircraft. Their lives, and the lives <strong>of</strong> their passengers may depend on it.<br />

We will not let the air carriers and our legislators forget 9/11 and the lives <strong>of</strong> our fellow airline<br />

employees lost that day.<br />

8 <strong>Teamsters</strong> Airline Journal November <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!