Batch User Guide produced by CRIF - Janata Bank

Batch User Guide produced by CRIF - Janata Bank Batch User Guide produced by CRIF - Janata Bank

rupalibank.org
from rupalibank.org More from this publisher
09.01.2015 Views

(therefore more than one FI code) under the same code. Please note : each FI will provide its own FI ID for a specific Subject. This naturally means, that, if the same Subject is a client of more than one FI, they will have multiple FIs providing codes to the System. This is perfectly fine, as the System will recognize the Subject as the same, and remember the unique codes that each FI use to identify that Subject, as well as assign a unique CB code that does not change depending on the FI (see graphical example to the right). By the same token, an FI with multiple branches might not able to recognize the same Subject across different branches, therefore in the monthly contribution, it could occur that the SAME Subject is contributed more than one times with DIFFERENT FI ids. While this should be avoided if possible, the System will be able in most cases to recognize the Subject as the same subject, and remember all the unique codes that the specific FI uses to identify that Subject (see graphical example below). What is EXTREMELY important is to remember that, while the same Subject can have more than one FI ID, two DIFFERENT subjects CANNOT have the SAME unique ID number. In the case of multiple Borrowers on the same Contract, each Borrower is a separate Subject, and one is indicated as the Borrower, the second as the Co-Borrower. In the case of Contract unique ID, since each contract can belong only to one FI (and to one branch of the FI), there will always be one and only one FI ID for each contract. There cannot be multiple FIs reporting on the same contract (by default), nor multiple FI Id numbers for the same contract. Let‟s spend a moment to be clear on what is a Contract, and the related Unique ID. Let‟s say Md. Shafiqul Islam is a client of the institution FI1. Let‟s say in FI1, he has a checking account, an overdraft protection on the checking account, and a term loan. In this case, the checking account is not a form of credit from the bank to the Subject and therefore is NOT a contract in our sense. The overdraft protection, however, is a form of credit. Therefore it is a Contract in our definition, and it is given a unique code (let‟s say 112). The term loan is another Contract. Even though it refers to the same Subject with the same FI, it is a separate loan and therefore has its own unique code (let‟s say 251). 10 of 92

Therefore, please make sure that even if they belong to the same Subject at the same institution, each Contract must have its own, separate code. It is also important to note that FI‟s must contribute only the current month‟s situation of their contracts. It is the system itself that compiles automatically the history with each monthly contribution. It is of fundamental importance that the data relating to all Subjects (whether borrowers, coborrowers, or guarantors) and credit lines are sent to CIB together with the bank or financial institution‟s unique codes (e.g. subject identification code or contract identification code). This allows the authorized employees of the bank or financial institution to gain access to their customers‟ records in the CIB credit reporting system using the lending institution‟s own internal codes. Furthermore, these are the codes that allow each contract in the contract file to be connected to the appropriate subjects in the subject file. It is also important to note that three different types of borrower/guarantor are allowed: Value Description 1 Individuals 2 Sole Trader 3 Companies The correct identification as Individual, Sole Trader and Company must be made when sending data to CIB via batch, and when making online enquiries about new credit line applications. 3.8 ARE THERE ANY SPECIAL CASES THAT REQUIRE A DIFFERENT MANAGEMENT Yes there are. However, we strongly suggest that users familiarize themselves with the rest of the document (section 6) that deals with the usual cases first, and only deal with these special cases when needed, as they are mostly exceptions. Without a clear understanding of the rest of the document, otherwise, this section will appear quite confusing to most readers. For this reason, we have put these special cases as an addendum at the end of this guide. 11 of 92

(therefore more than one FI code) under the same code.<br />

Please note : each FI will provide its own FI ID for a specific Subject. This naturally means, that,<br />

if the same Subject is a client of more than one FI, they will have multiple FIs providing codes to<br />

the System. This is perfectly fine, as the System will recognize the Subject as the same, and<br />

remember the unique codes that each FI use to identify that Subject, as well as assign a unique<br />

CB code that does not change depending on the FI (see graphical example to the right).<br />

By the same token, an FI with multiple branches might not able to recognize the same Subject<br />

across different branches, therefore in the monthly contribution, it could occur that the SAME<br />

Subject is contributed more than one times with DIFFERENT FI ids. While this should be avoided<br />

if possible, the System will be able in most cases to recognize the Subject as the same subject,<br />

and remember all the unique codes that the specific FI uses to identify that Subject (see<br />

graphical example below).<br />

What is EXTREMELY important is to remember that, while the same Subject can have more than<br />

one FI ID, two DIFFERENT subjects CANNOT have the SAME unique ID number. In the case of<br />

multiple Borrowers on the same Contract, each Borrower is a separate Subject, and one is<br />

indicated as the Borrower, the second as the Co-Borrower.<br />

In the case of Contract unique ID, since each contract can belong only to one FI (and to one<br />

branch of the FI), there will always be one and only one FI ID for each contract. There cannot be<br />

multiple FIs reporting on the same contract (<strong>by</strong> default), nor multiple FI Id numbers for the same<br />

contract.<br />

Let‟s spend a moment to be clear on what is a Contract, and the related Unique ID. Let‟s say Md.<br />

Shafiqul Islam is a client of the institution FI1. Let‟s say in FI1, he has a checking account, an<br />

overdraft protection on the checking account, and a term loan. In this case, the checking account<br />

is not a form of credit from the bank to the Subject and therefore is NOT a contract in our sense.<br />

The overdraft protection, however, is a form of credit. Therefore it is a Contract in our definition,<br />

and it is given a unique code (let‟s say 112). The term loan is another Contract. Even though it<br />

refers to the same Subject with the same FI, it is a separate loan and therefore has its own<br />

unique code (let‟s say 251).<br />

10 of 92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!