08.01.2015 Views

Joel A Lewis Youth Against Fascism.pdf

Joel A Lewis Youth Against Fascism.pdf

Joel A Lewis Youth Against Fascism.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE LENINIST GENERATION<br />

first publication of the YWL contained a sober article lamenting that American workers<br />

had "the least developed class consciousness of any proletariat the world over" and had<br />

"not even begun to think in terms of class consciousness and revolution." 179 The typical<br />

American outlook was not defined primarily by class, but a dominant culture centred on<br />

optimistic constructions of "Americanism." 180 In adapting themselves to the international<br />

outlook, strategies and constraints of the YCI, the YWL had a difficult time coping with<br />

the national realities of American political culture linked with its massive economic<br />

growth.<br />

Like the British YCL, the YWL utilized militant and often sarcastic revolutionary language<br />

intended to dispel illusions youth held concerning their nation. The YWL regularly<br />

invoked rhetoric like "the So-called Land of Opportunity" to expose the realities of<br />

American society under capitalism as obscured by the Americanization movement. 181<br />

The YWL hoped that over time they could "make the American working class revolutionary<br />

in thought, desires and action" by actively "educating and organizing" young<br />

workersthrough industrial struggles. 182 As the twenties progressed, the YWL changed the<br />

format of The Young Worker from a "refined magazine" into a militant newspaper<br />

intended to "educate [YCLers] in the [revolutionary] struggle." 183 Instead of adapting to<br />

the unique elements of American political and youth culture, the YWL continually<br />

embraced a strict international class outlook in accordance to YCI resolutions and<br />

strategies.<br />

The YWL, much like the YCLGB, focussed their primary political energies inward on<br />

the ideological and factional struggles that plagued the Worker's (Communist) Party<br />

(WCP). In a 1938 article in the Young Communist Review, Gil Green took a sobering<br />

look at the early years of the YWL, commenting of the organization's factionalized and<br />

largely isolated existence. 184 Green lamented that throughout the twenties the YWL<br />

remained "a narrow organization with the central task of aiding the Party." 185 Just as the<br />

YCLGB took a lead in internal disputes, the YWL "played no small part in giving active<br />

forces to the Party and in helping it cleanse itself of all corrupt [ideological] alien elements<br />

and influences," including "the expulsion of the Trotzkyites and Lovestonites." 186<br />

Unlike the YCLGB, the YWL had few socialist opponents to blame for their lack of<br />

success. Green admitted that the YWL used "American exceptionalism" and inner-party<br />

struggles as an excuse for perpetuating its isolated existence:<br />

1930 ushered in a new period of sharpening class struggles. It was this crisis of capitalist<br />

economy which caused a special crisis within the ranks and leadership of the YCL.<br />

The new conditions in the country necessitated a new approach; a new outlook, new tactics<br />

and perspectives. One period had come to a close. A new one had begun. The YCL<br />

did not fully understand that its continued isolation from the majority of youth could no<br />

longer be explained by objective conditions or by the requisites of the Party situation.<br />

The factional struggle was over; the Party was united ideologically and organizationally.<br />

Sectarian isolation had become the main danger for the YCL. 187<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!