Joel A Lewis Youth Against Fascism.pdf
Joel A Lewis Youth Against Fascism.pdf
Joel A Lewis Youth Against Fascism.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
YOUTH AGAINST FASCISM<br />
sons" about unity; the YCL was now using "numerous occasions publicly" to criticize<br />
their past mistakes and to show "its sincere and consistent efforts to achieve unity." 144<br />
The NSL and SLID capitalized upon the success of the AYC to advance their proposals<br />
for amalgamation. In September, 1935 communist and socialist student representatives<br />
met to recommend "immediate unification… to their respective conventions" to<br />
create the American Student Union. 145 The YCL propagated that they would not ask<br />
students to adopt "a Communist program," but that they wished only for the ASU to be<br />
"opposed to war and fascism" since American students could all agree on a minimal<br />
program of "struggle for the defence of peace." 146 Upon returning from the YCI Congress<br />
in Moscow, Gill Green praised the ASU initiative as a "merger that will create tremendous<br />
enthusiasm in the ranks of youth and attract thousands who today remain outside of<br />
our respective organizations." Green contended that youth unity stemmed from mutual<br />
recognition that fascism threatened "the very existence of humanity, of culture and of<br />
progress." 147<br />
Joint youth activities produced dramatic results that were not previously possible.<br />
After the student Armistice Day protests of 1935, the YCL observed the "anti-war<br />
movement is too powerful, too militant and purposeful to be evaded" which culminated<br />
in a series of meetings with President Roosevelt and "a greater spirit of cooperation from<br />
school administrators." 148 The YCL contended the ASU was vital for "the whole growing<br />
peoples movement against fascism and war;" it represented a true "coalition of every<br />
progressive force on campus against every reactionary force or interest affecting the<br />
student body." 149 The ASU quickly became the most influential Popular Front youth<br />
organization in the United States.<br />
The YCL and YPSL achieved poor results in unity initiatives between their organizations<br />
outside of the ASU and AYC. The YPSL dismissed many of the YCL's proposals<br />
for amalgamation. Gil Green outlined a unity program intended to create a "genuine nonparty<br />
youth organization." The unified league would utilize "the greatest diversity of<br />
organizational forms." International affiliation would "be decided democratically by both<br />
organizations after joint discussion." 150 Kuusinen urged the YCL and YPSL to reject<br />
their "separate identity," forming a new league that would reject "the principles of<br />
democratic centralism," opting instead for a "self-imposed discipline" and a "greater<br />
degree of autonomy." Under the unity proposals, the YCL and the YPSL would "cease to<br />
exist," leaving only a "single unified youth league" in the United States. 151<br />
The YPSL exhibited an extremely hostile and unreceptive attitude towards the YCL's<br />
proposals. Ironically, the YPSL was shifting its outlook towards traditional Leninist<br />
outlooks it had previously scorned the YCL for. The YPSL mocked Gil Green in its<br />
press, referring to him as "Ex-Revolutionary Green." They further denounced his new<br />
positions for rejecting the YCL's "working-class character" and for asserting that a new<br />
organization should "cease to be a disciplined movement." 152 A similar article from the<br />
Young Circle League asserted the YPSL was correct in rejecting YCL unity. The Young<br />
94