08.01.2015 Views

A critical appraisal of South Africa's market-based land reform policy

A critical appraisal of South Africa's market-based land reform policy

A critical appraisal of South Africa's market-based land reform policy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6: LRAD projects in Limpopo<br />

The group first heard about the LRAD<br />

programme at a local meeting organised<br />

by the Polokwane Municipality at which<br />

the DLA Provincial Director spoke about<br />

LRAD. They also heard about it on the<br />

radio. The Provincial Director is from the<br />

area and helped by advising them ‘as a<br />

local woman’ (interview 36). The group<br />

applied some time in early 2002 and was<br />

told the project was approved around July<br />

<strong>of</strong> the same year, although according to<br />

DLA records it was approved on 2 August<br />

2002. However, at the time <strong>of</strong> the interview<br />

in March 2003, the project participants<br />

had not yet received the transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>land</strong> or started production.<br />

Members <strong>of</strong> the group travelled at their<br />

own initiative and cost to the DLA <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

in Polokwane to make and follow up on<br />

the applications. The project members<br />

incurred a lot <strong>of</strong> transport costs travelling<br />

to the DLA <strong>of</strong>fice and felt that the process<br />

was slow and inefficient with ‘a lot <strong>of</strong><br />

hassles’ (interview 19). This contributed to<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> group members dropping out<br />

when they saw no progress in the project.<br />

The LRAD application itself went reasonably<br />

smoothly; problems seem to have<br />

arisen with registering a trust and the<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> title on the property.<br />

The members <strong>of</strong> the group rejected the<br />

agents appointed by DLA to register the<br />

trust and this caused some tensions<br />

between the group and the DLA Project<br />

Officer whom the Chairperson <strong>of</strong> the<br />

group referred to as ‘unco-operative and<br />

rude’ (interview 19). The Chairperson<br />

complained that she was instructed by the<br />

Project Officer to sign blank forms that she<br />

was told were for the change <strong>of</strong> ownership,<br />

but at the time <strong>of</strong> the interview the group<br />

had still not been able to take occupation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the farm. She was also asked to sign a<br />

form to confirm receipt <strong>of</strong> the grant<br />

money, but refused to sign, as the group<br />

had received no money.<br />

The group members are unemployed<br />

although they have an existing project on<br />

some <strong>land</strong> close to Mankweng and have<br />

managed to sell some produce to a local<br />

school. They have no experience <strong>of</strong><br />

commercial farming, but have been doing<br />

subsistence farming.<br />

The ‘own contribution’ <strong>of</strong> the beneficiaries<br />

to the project was in the form <strong>of</strong><br />

labour and calculated at R5 000 per<br />

person, making a total <strong>of</strong> R150 000. They<br />

did not get any loan or make any contribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> assets. Each beneficiary was<br />

allocated the minimum grant <strong>of</strong> R20 000<br />

and these grants were combined to give<br />

the group access to R600 000. The project<br />

is to acquire a 24ha farm from a white <strong>land</strong><br />

owner for the asking price <strong>of</strong> R280 000, an<br />

amount that had been confirmed by a<br />

valuer as a fair <strong>market</strong> price. The balance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the grant is to be used for the purchase<br />

<strong>of</strong> a vehicle and other equipment needed<br />

for the project.<br />

Production has not started as the <strong>land</strong><br />

transfer has not gone through, but it is the<br />

intention <strong>of</strong> the project to grow mealies<br />

and other vegetables for their own use and<br />

to sell locally.<br />

Vaalkop<br />

Vaalkop is a 1 897ha piece <strong>of</strong> <strong>land</strong> that<br />

was part <strong>of</strong> a mission station owned by the<br />

Catholic Church. It is located about 30km<br />

south west <strong>of</strong> Polokwane in the former<br />

home<strong>land</strong> <strong>of</strong> Lebowa. There has been a<br />

community living on the <strong>land</strong> for generations.<br />

They are descendents <strong>of</strong> the early<br />

converts who came to stay close to the<br />

church. No interview was conducted with<br />

the beneficiaries, but information was<br />

obtained from the DoA and DLA<br />

(interviews 32 and 33).<br />

The LRAD project was initiated by the<br />

church that approached DLA for assistance<br />

when it wished to dispose <strong>of</strong> the <strong>land</strong> to<br />

the community living there. The <strong>land</strong> was<br />

donated by the church and all those already<br />

living on it are listed by DLA as the<br />

LRAD beneficiaries. This project has by<br />

far the largest number <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries <strong>of</strong><br />

DLA-implemented LRAD projects in<br />

Limpopo, accounting for 203 out <strong>of</strong> a<br />

total <strong>of</strong> 251 (that is, over 80%) (Makharamedzha<br />

2002).<br />

The own contribution by the beneficiaries<br />

was in the form <strong>of</strong> their labour and<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!