dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark
dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark
dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages between analog preservation materials and digitized films.<br />
Analog film Digitized film<br />
Permanence<br />
Long-term preserved, > 500 years in<br />
cold storage �<br />
Not preserved<br />
more than 10-15 years<br />
Costs<br />
High expenses today, but low in the<br />
future �<br />
Smaller expenses today, but high expenses for<br />
conversion and storage of data in the future<br />
Availability<br />
Low-technology<br />
Data always available � High-technology<br />
Availability of data uncertain<br />
Resolution Pictures with high resolution �<br />
Pictures with lower resolution depending on<br />
scan and media<br />
Technology<br />
Out-dated?<br />
Analog film material might not be<br />
produced in the future<br />
�<br />
New technology<br />
But the future for digital formats is uncertain<br />
Fashion<br />
Not in fashion<br />
And not followed by funding � In fashion and followed by funding �<br />
Accessibility None or almost no accessibility � Great accessibility, if distributed on the Internet �<br />
using 2 K resolution (2000 lines) is counted on as<br />
an acceptable resolution. One hour of a 2 K scan<br />
takes up one terabyte.<br />
Technology<br />
Not all conditions, however, are in favor of analog<br />
film preservation. The production of 35 and 16 mm<br />
film material may simply end, which will close<br />
down analog film preservation altogether.<br />
On the other hand, even though digitized films deal<br />
with new technologies, there are no guaranties that<br />
for example tapes, play-back machines or software<br />
will be produced or supported in the years to come.<br />
Fashion and accessibility<br />
Producing analog preservation materials is not<br />
fashionable today, and it is hard to get financial<br />
support for it. In comparison with digitization it is<br />
understandable, when considering the possibilities,<br />
which digitized films give. Digitization of film<br />
allows for easy accessibility and incredibly wide<br />
possibilities for increasing the knowledge of cultural<br />
heritage worldwide.<br />
Preservation plan<br />
Scenario 1:<br />
If the sponsored films are printed, they will be<br />
preserved in the long term. But they will not be<br />
easily accessible and it will only be possible to view<br />
the films in the cinema.<br />
Scenario 2:<br />
If the sponsored films are only digitized, we can not<br />
ensure long-term preservation of the materials. We<br />
will encounter massive problems in dealing with<br />
digital storage, preservation of tapes and playback<br />
machines etc.<br />
Scenario 3:<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
In the case of both analog printing and digitization,<br />
the films will both be preserved in the long term and<br />
accessible. This is the preferable solution, but also<br />
incredibly expensive.<br />
If no financial support can be found for scenario<br />
3, a mix of scenario 2 and 3 may be an acceptable<br />
solution. The best and most interesting film must<br />
of course be printed and preserved on analog<br />
preservation materials and they must be digitized<br />
and afterwards communicated though the Internet<br />
if the copyrights allow it. All sponsored film on<br />
cellulose nitrate must be carefully selected and all<br />
worthy of preservation must be printed.<br />
In the case of materials of lesser interest, part<br />
digitization may be a solution. Examples could be<br />
digitized as an appetizer with the possibilities for<br />
further digitization and preservation if funding is<br />
raised.<br />
It is obvious that if the sponsor company still<br />
exists, they might be interested in supporting the<br />
preservation of their own films.<br />
93