10.11.2012 Views

dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark

dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark

dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

y strong acidity created as an effect of sunlight<br />

(UV radiation). [13]<br />

Eva Lundwall at The Swedish National Heritage<br />

Board documented one example where woollen<br />

curtains were destroyed because of flameproofing<br />

chemicals. Because of uneven application the fibres<br />

were partially very brittle. Water cleaning of the<br />

curtains resulted in colour change and generated a<br />

gas with a bad smell. [14]<br />

Doreen Rockliff and Nancy Kerr tested commonly<br />

used water soluble flame retardants on cotton fabrics<br />

with accelerated ageing. They found that the flame<br />

retardants were required in a very high percentage<br />

(11-15 weight percent of the fabric) which can be<br />

stressful for the fibre. Results showed that none of<br />

them were ideal for usage on textiles. Immediate<br />

effects of a flame retardant containing borax,<br />

boric acid and diammonium phosphate appeared<br />

as a surface of crystallized material on the fabric.<br />

Another flame retardant (FlameGard DSH) based<br />

on inorganic ammonium salts caused an increase in<br />

the hygroscopic nature of the fabric. The shrinkage<br />

of the fabrics was small and probably due to the<br />

submersion of the fabric in a water based solution. It<br />

even seems as though the flame retardant somewhat<br />

reduced the shrinkage. Other changes were loss of<br />

stiffness and a small change in Ph. The effect shown<br />

after accelerated ageing were some changes in<br />

colour of the dyed fabrics. Undyed fabrics became<br />

either darker or paler. It also stiffened the fabric<br />

which got a crisp feel. [15]<br />

Preservation and conservation<br />

Flame retardants cause a real problem for<br />

conserving and preserving textiles. They are not<br />

only a problem for conservation treatments, but<br />

especially for the preservation of the textiles in<br />

general as they cause accelerated degradation<br />

of fibres that are not fully reversible, if at all.<br />

The best way for long term preservation of a<br />

fabric with a flame retardant treatment is to keep<br />

it in a stable and good climate, with a good stable<br />

temperature and relative humidity and as low UV<br />

radiation as possible, and if possible in a pollution<br />

free environment. It is still very probable that acids<br />

will form no mater what conditions there are in a<br />

room or storage. But whereas pollution is a difficult<br />

thing to control, temperature and direct sunlight is<br />

not.<br />

Since inorganic flame retardants are hygroscopic,<br />

a treatment with these on textiles can result in<br />

two types of damages. In a dry climate they can<br />

act dehydrating and in a humid climate they will<br />

dampen the textile. The latter scenario can result in<br />

mould growth or fungi attacks.<br />

Application in excessive amounts is required for<br />

many flame retardants which changes the character<br />

and properties of the fabric. This is especially true of<br />

the inorganic flame retardants, which can sometimes<br />

require an amount of over 15 weight percent of the<br />

fabric. It stiffens and changes the quality of drape and<br />

feel and is not suitable for lightweight fabrics that have<br />

been chosen for its fine drape or soft feel. Lightweight<br />

fabrics have a higher tendency to catch fire and burn<br />

and therefore require a higher weight percent of flame<br />

retardant than a high dense fabric. [15]<br />

Additive flame retardants are more likely to migrate<br />

and contaminate adjacent objects as they are not<br />

bound to the textile fibre structure. Therefore they<br />

should not be kept close to metal containing objects<br />

(unless gold). The same goes for plastics which<br />

often have been given a flame retardant additive<br />

during manufacture.<br />

Problems in conservation are also health related<br />

which needs to be taken into account. Flame<br />

retardants are not necessarily more dangerous<br />

than other chemicals which are sometimes found<br />

in textiles, such as pesticides and fungicides. Any<br />

chemical that has been put on to a textile can cause<br />

severe health damage to anyone who handles the<br />

object. Textile fibres that have come loose from the<br />

fabric can easily be inhaled and thereby damage the<br />

lungs. Personal protective equipment (PPE) that<br />

includes a protective particle mask, gloves, goggles<br />

and a white cotton coat is very important. Proper<br />

PPE needs to always be worn when dealing with old<br />

textiles as they can contain numerous chemicals.<br />

PPE is also very important when hanging up or<br />

taking down a textile object, for instance a tapestry.<br />

It is also important to wear rubber gloves and an<br />

apron when washing since the dirty washing water<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!