dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark
dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark
dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Degradation of modern synthetic polymers in<br />
museums and environmental assessment with<br />
EWO dosimetry<br />
Introduction<br />
The initial production of modified and synthetic<br />
polymers was a part of the major scientific progress in<br />
the 19 th and first part of 20 th century. Modification of<br />
cellulose to produce cellulose nitrate was discovered<br />
around 1850 and cellulose acetate about 15 years<br />
later. The first truly synthetic polymer, Bakelite, was<br />
discovered in 1907. The advances in material science<br />
in the second part of the 20 th century resulted in a<br />
great increase in the use of synthetic polymers for<br />
all kinds of industrial products, but also in the work<br />
of artists and conservators. Museums and galleries<br />
today possess objects made from the thousands of<br />
different plastics that have been produced and also<br />
use a large range of plastics for objects conservation<br />
purposes. It has been observed that some plastics<br />
deteriorate faster than many other items in museums<br />
collections and have useful lifetimes of 5 – 25 years [1] .<br />
The degradation mechanisms of synthetic polymers<br />
differ, but generally it involves photochemical<br />
reactions with UV excitation of molecules in the<br />
polymer and following quenching and chemical<br />
conversions when the conditions are “favourable”. [2]<br />
The mechanisms of the chemical conversions often<br />
include acidic or oxidative agents, such as e.g. O 3<br />
for the initial oxidation of elastomers or “rubbers”,<br />
and reaction rates usually depend on humidity, which<br />
can participate in the degradation process in complex<br />
chemical and physical ways, and on temperature.<br />
Guidelines for the conservation of different polymeric<br />
materials have been formulated based on knowledge<br />
about their degradation mechanisms, e.g. the removal<br />
of autocatalytic NO 2 by absorbers in the packing of<br />
cellulose nitrate materials or the removal of oxygen,<br />
and other oxidants, from storage bags with objects<br />
made from rubbers and polyurethane foam [1] . In<br />
exhibition or storage rooms preventive environmental<br />
terJe grøntoFt and susana Lopez-aparicio<br />
control can be more difficult and / or costly. Whichever<br />
level of control is possible it is important to be able<br />
to assess the expected environmental degradation<br />
effects on exposed objects. The easiest way to do this<br />
is by using a sacrificial material, or dosimeter, which<br />
reacts much faster than the museum object and for<br />
which the amount of degradation after exposure at<br />
the location of interest can be measured. To be able to<br />
assess the effects of the environment on the objects of<br />
interest the effect on the dosimeter must be calibrated<br />
towards the effect on the real objects. When the<br />
dosimeter consists of a similar kind of material as the<br />
objects, calibration may be performed by comparing<br />
the reaction rates of dosimeter and objects. For all<br />
dosimeters calibration can be performed by comparing<br />
the specific effects of the environmental parameters<br />
on the dosimeter and on objects in the collection.<br />
The PPO/EWO – Early Warning<br />
Organic dosimeter<br />
One such existing dosimeter that can be used to<br />
evaluate the environmental effect on modern synthetic<br />
polymers is the EWO (Early Warning Organic)<br />
dosimeter (Figure 1) developed by the Norwegian<br />
Institute for Air research in the previous EU project<br />
MASTER.<br />
This dosimeter measures the actual effect of the<br />
environment on a synthetic polymer and can be<br />
exposed in any small (e.g. a sachet for a small<br />
object) or large (e.g. an exhibition room) location.<br />
The dosimeter is simply placed at the location to be<br />
evaluated for three months and returned to NILU<br />
who will provide a results diagram and report that<br />
shows the measured condition compared to tolerable<br />
levels for the location as generally evaluated by<br />
conservation scientists. The active substance in the<br />
59