10.11.2012 Views

dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark

dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark

dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to identify the period in which one could expect to find<br />

a higher incidence of canvases with a strong potential<br />

for shrinkage. The initial British export ban of the<br />

relevant technology and Danish protectionist customs<br />

regulations affected the import of foreign linen as<br />

well as yarns for part of the 19 th century. This means<br />

that the occurrence of industrially produced canvases<br />

in Denmark would hypothetically show a delay in<br />

date, compared for instance to British equivalents.<br />

An investigation of paintings in the collections of<br />

Aarhus Kunstmuseum and Statens Museum for Kunst,<br />

produced throughout the 19 th century, does indeed seem<br />

to corroborate this hypothesis (see below) showing an<br />

occurrence of tenting in Danish paintings delimited<br />

to the last two thirds of the century. An awareness of<br />

this is of course important when assessing a given<br />

19 th century painting canvas in terms of its potential<br />

response to treatment.<br />

The industrialisation of canvas<br />

production in Denmark<br />

In the second half of the 18 th century and during<br />

the 19 th century the spinning of yarn and weaving<br />

of textiles slowly changed from hand to machine<br />

production. England was one of the first countries to<br />

take up the change, while Denmark more reluctantly<br />

followed.<br />

Cotton and short wool fibres were the easiest fibres<br />

to spin mechanically. This is due to their elasticity<br />

and relatively short length compared to flax and<br />

hemp strands. The mechanisation started 1764 with<br />

the invention by James Hargreaves of the hand<br />

driven Spinning Jenny, which made it possible for<br />

one person to spin 16 spindles at a time. In 1769<br />

this was followed by the water-driven Spinning<br />

Frame invented by Richard Arkwright, a machine<br />

that consisted of rollers turning at different speed,<br />

which made it possible to spin stronger cotton yarns<br />

that could be used as warp yarns.<br />

The change from hand to machine spinning of flax<br />

was a much longer process due to problems with the<br />

long stiff fibre strands and their natural gum content.<br />

This was no problem for the hand spinner, who often<br />

used saliva in the process. This softened the gum and<br />

made it easy for the strands to slide between each<br />

other, thus it was possible to spin flax yarns in all<br />

possible qualities. In the beginning it was only possible<br />

to machine spin coarse yarns that could be used for<br />

sail cloths and coarse canvas. The first attempts dates<br />

back to around 1790, where a method for dry spinning<br />

flax was patented in England. Later wet spinning was<br />

introduced, something that made it possible to spin<br />

flax in thin and shinny qualities that were usable for<br />

fine linen. It was a French engineer Philippe de Girard,<br />

who in 1810 took out a patent for the invention that<br />

introduced a soaking of the flax fibres in hot alkaline<br />

solution prior to spinning. In 1814 the inventions were<br />

patented in England, but probably not used very much.<br />

James Kay (1825) is normally the person credited for<br />

inventing the wet spinning of flax. According to his<br />

method the flax strand were soaked in cold water for 6<br />

hours prior to spinning. Later, hot water came into use<br />

for wet spinning of flax.<br />

In Denmark the policy was to protect and nurse the<br />

household production as late as into the 1820s. It<br />

was not until 1843 that the first spinning mill in<br />

Denmark was established at Svanholm, sponsored<br />

by the government who had realized that power<br />

spinning was the way forward. But the factory was<br />

greeted with great suspicion, as the quality of its<br />

products was claimed to be too poor and the yarns<br />

too coarse. By general agreement only hand spun<br />

flax could make fine yarns due to the saliva used in<br />

the spinning process [7]. The fact remains that the<br />

factory closed again in 1851.<br />

According to the contemporary writer O.J. Rawert<br />

(1844) the change from hand to machine spinning<br />

of flax fibres had a significant effect on the resulting<br />

yarn and canvas: not only were the dry spun yarns<br />

more frayed and contaminated with remains of tow.<br />

They also had less actual substance in the threads, and<br />

canvas woven of these yarns would absorb 30% more<br />

water than canvas woven of yarns spun by hand [8].<br />

Nonetheless, the machine-spun flax did become more<br />

popular in Denmark during the 1840s and 50s and<br />

an increasing amount of spun flax and linen fabrics<br />

was imported. In the period 1837-1855 the import of<br />

linen goods quadrupled while the import of spun flax<br />

rose by 20 times. The import of unhackled flax fell<br />

accordingly, showing how the domestic preparation<br />

and spinning of flax was being superseded [9]. In the<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!