10.11.2012 Views

dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark

dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark

dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

physical evidence through replacement, restoration<br />

and wear on the work done by Peter Mann, amongst<br />

others, acknowledging that there was no “nice<br />

comfortable middle road, a compromise, on which<br />

everyone could agree” [4] but that open discussion,<br />

thinking through all the options before any<br />

interventive treatment of an object took place, was<br />

the responsible way forward. “Ideally all the options<br />

should be explored by a team of conservator, curator<br />

and if possible a Devil’s Advocate.”[5]<br />

A restoration approach for some objects, where the<br />

gain in information outweighed the loss of evidence or<br />

where the evidence was preserved in another similar<br />

object, was advocated by Moncrieff and continued<br />

by Suzanne Keene, head of collections care. They<br />

recommended selecting new objects for operation<br />

on a case by case basis, letting the importance and<br />

condition of the object and the quality of the evidence<br />

for an earlier state guide the decision, with restoration<br />

matching the quality of the original. In addition, Keene<br />

conducted a survey of the already working machines<br />

in the Science Museum and found that, out of 140<br />

objects, only 2 were in such condition that they needed<br />

to be removed from operation. It was felt that the rest<br />

should continue to be operated; since a decision had<br />

already been made historically to compromise the<br />

primary evidence, losing the function as well would<br />

render the object valueless. A maintenance programme<br />

and record-keeping system for the working objects<br />

was instituted; unfortunately, as this was only practice<br />

recommended but not enforced or carried out by the<br />

conservation and collections care section, the practice<br />

quite soon drifted to a stop. It wasn’t until 2008 that<br />

a maintenance manual, training manual and working<br />

exhibits database was completed and fully integrated<br />

into the responsibilities of the metals conservator at the<br />

museum.<br />

By 1997, the pragmatic approach to the conservation<br />

of scientific and industrial objects was well-entrenched<br />

at the Science Museum. In a paper presented to<br />

the Industrial Collections Care and Conservation<br />

conference held in Cardiff, 9-11 April 1997, Hazel<br />

Newey, now head of conservation, discussed the<br />

approach and how it appertained to working exhibits<br />

and replicas. While the Science Museum still had no<br />

written policy on the appropriateness of operating<br />

104<br />

objects from its collections, the practice had not<br />

ceased, even if , in the intervening years, fewer<br />

objects than in the past were working exhibits. Poor<br />

maintenance, neglect and careless handling were less<br />

a factor for the decreasing number than the need for<br />

increased resources. “The resource implications of<br />

caring for industrial collections becomes higher than<br />

anticipated because of the cost of storage, maintenance<br />

and display.” [6] Objects such as vehicles which<br />

required higher levels of maintenance in order to<br />

remain functioning as opposed to those such as models<br />

of engines gradually became static exhibits.<br />

However, the decision-making process for selecting<br />

an object for operation had developed along the lines<br />

advocated by Mann and Moncrieff . Whereas once<br />

an iconic object might be chosen to be operated, as<br />

was the case for the 1888 Benz, the oldest car in<br />

Britain, which was acquired in 1913, fully restored<br />

in 1957 and entered in the Brighton Run where it was<br />

damaged after running out of petrol and crashing<br />

into an MG saloon, the conservation in 1997 of<br />

the first petrol-engined motor car to run on British<br />

roads, the 1895 Panhard et Levassor, produced a<br />

static exhibit with its original paintwork and engine<br />

condition revealed. The assessment of the extent of<br />

the 1997 conservation project was undertaken by<br />

curator together with conservator with the historic<br />

and iconic value of the object one of the primary<br />

criteria for final use.<br />

The Guidelines for Operation:<br />

the Management Tool<br />

By 2007, there were only 101 exhibits designated<br />

as working in the Science Museum at South<br />

Kensington. These were often historic models, with<br />

a number of full-sized engines, run on compressed<br />

air or mechanical drive. But only two vehicles in<br />

the collection remained in running order. These two,<br />

the 1904 Krieger electric Brougham and the 1958<br />

Dennis F12 pump escape fire engine, stored at the<br />

Science Museum’s large objects store in Wroughton,<br />

had both entered the collection in working order.<br />

The Kreiger came in 2003 on loan and the Dennis<br />

was acquired straight from owner in 2005. The<br />

conservation staff was made responsible for the<br />

maintenance and for the operation of the vehicles

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!