dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark
dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark
dk nkf - Nordisk Konservatorforbund Danmark
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
physical evidence through replacement, restoration<br />
and wear on the work done by Peter Mann, amongst<br />
others, acknowledging that there was no “nice<br />
comfortable middle road, a compromise, on which<br />
everyone could agree” [4] but that open discussion,<br />
thinking through all the options before any<br />
interventive treatment of an object took place, was<br />
the responsible way forward. “Ideally all the options<br />
should be explored by a team of conservator, curator<br />
and if possible a Devil’s Advocate.”[5]<br />
A restoration approach for some objects, where the<br />
gain in information outweighed the loss of evidence or<br />
where the evidence was preserved in another similar<br />
object, was advocated by Moncrieff and continued<br />
by Suzanne Keene, head of collections care. They<br />
recommended selecting new objects for operation<br />
on a case by case basis, letting the importance and<br />
condition of the object and the quality of the evidence<br />
for an earlier state guide the decision, with restoration<br />
matching the quality of the original. In addition, Keene<br />
conducted a survey of the already working machines<br />
in the Science Museum and found that, out of 140<br />
objects, only 2 were in such condition that they needed<br />
to be removed from operation. It was felt that the rest<br />
should continue to be operated; since a decision had<br />
already been made historically to compromise the<br />
primary evidence, losing the function as well would<br />
render the object valueless. A maintenance programme<br />
and record-keeping system for the working objects<br />
was instituted; unfortunately, as this was only practice<br />
recommended but not enforced or carried out by the<br />
conservation and collections care section, the practice<br />
quite soon drifted to a stop. It wasn’t until 2008 that<br />
a maintenance manual, training manual and working<br />
exhibits database was completed and fully integrated<br />
into the responsibilities of the metals conservator at the<br />
museum.<br />
By 1997, the pragmatic approach to the conservation<br />
of scientific and industrial objects was well-entrenched<br />
at the Science Museum. In a paper presented to<br />
the Industrial Collections Care and Conservation<br />
conference held in Cardiff, 9-11 April 1997, Hazel<br />
Newey, now head of conservation, discussed the<br />
approach and how it appertained to working exhibits<br />
and replicas. While the Science Museum still had no<br />
written policy on the appropriateness of operating<br />
104<br />
objects from its collections, the practice had not<br />
ceased, even if , in the intervening years, fewer<br />
objects than in the past were working exhibits. Poor<br />
maintenance, neglect and careless handling were less<br />
a factor for the decreasing number than the need for<br />
increased resources. “The resource implications of<br />
caring for industrial collections becomes higher than<br />
anticipated because of the cost of storage, maintenance<br />
and display.” [6] Objects such as vehicles which<br />
required higher levels of maintenance in order to<br />
remain functioning as opposed to those such as models<br />
of engines gradually became static exhibits.<br />
However, the decision-making process for selecting<br />
an object for operation had developed along the lines<br />
advocated by Mann and Moncrieff . Whereas once<br />
an iconic object might be chosen to be operated, as<br />
was the case for the 1888 Benz, the oldest car in<br />
Britain, which was acquired in 1913, fully restored<br />
in 1957 and entered in the Brighton Run where it was<br />
damaged after running out of petrol and crashing<br />
into an MG saloon, the conservation in 1997 of<br />
the first petrol-engined motor car to run on British<br />
roads, the 1895 Panhard et Levassor, produced a<br />
static exhibit with its original paintwork and engine<br />
condition revealed. The assessment of the extent of<br />
the 1997 conservation project was undertaken by<br />
curator together with conservator with the historic<br />
and iconic value of the object one of the primary<br />
criteria for final use.<br />
The Guidelines for Operation:<br />
the Management Tool<br />
By 2007, there were only 101 exhibits designated<br />
as working in the Science Museum at South<br />
Kensington. These were often historic models, with<br />
a number of full-sized engines, run on compressed<br />
air or mechanical drive. But only two vehicles in<br />
the collection remained in running order. These two,<br />
the 1904 Krieger electric Brougham and the 1958<br />
Dennis F12 pump escape fire engine, stored at the<br />
Science Museum’s large objects store in Wroughton,<br />
had both entered the collection in working order.<br />
The Kreiger came in 2003 on loan and the Dennis<br />
was acquired straight from owner in 2005. The<br />
conservation staff was made responsible for the<br />
maintenance and for the operation of the vehicles