08.01.2015 Views

Part Two - Office of Construction and Facilities Management

Part Two - Office of Construction and Facilities Management

Part Two - Office of Construction and Facilities Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Incorporate opportunities for assuring a higher degree <strong>of</strong> building system<br />

performance in the design, construction, <strong>and</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> new VA<br />

facilities.<br />

• Analyze opportunities for retr<strong>of</strong>itting existing VA facilities with high <br />

performance building systems. <br />

• Specifically consider systematic approaches to the renovation <strong>of</strong> <br />

specialized areas in VA hospitals. <br />

• Implement <strong>and</strong> test reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) pilot programs<br />

for selected VA healthcare facility types <strong>and</strong> operations.<br />

• Develop, test, <strong>and</strong> assess operational commissioning programs for<br />

optimizing operations at a range <strong>of</strong> VA healthcare delivery <strong>and</strong> facility<br />

types.<br />

• Develop, test, <strong>and</strong> assess recommissioning <strong>and</strong> retrocommissioning<br />

programs for the existing VA portfolio <strong>of</strong> healthcare facilities.<br />

Each supporting activity is detailed below. In addition, the committee<br />

recommends that each organizational element involved in evaluation <strong>of</strong> facility<br />

operation <strong>and</strong> maintenance decision-making identify <strong>and</strong> describe specific<br />

performance metrics <strong>and</strong> data requirements for all its activities.<br />

Recommendation A, New Building System Performance: Incorporate<br />

opportunities for assuring a higher level <strong>of</strong> building system performance in<br />

the design, construction, adaptation, <strong>and</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> new VA facilities.<br />

This recommendation applies to all facilities serving all levels <strong>of</strong> patient care <strong>and</strong><br />

acuity in the VA system. The following are recommended as considerations in<br />

upgrading VA st<strong>and</strong>ards to achieve this goal.<br />

• Incorporating the performance goal <strong>of</strong> accommodating future alterations<br />

with minimum disruption <strong>and</strong> cost. For example, components <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mechanical or electrical system that cannot be economically or physically<br />

changed should be sized for a range <strong>of</strong> activities, a previously agreed to<br />

set <strong>of</strong> performance criteria that would accommodate more than the initial<br />

spatial configuration.<br />

• Add a level <strong>of</strong> performance specificity to current VA st<strong>and</strong>ards for all<br />

building systems, including their maintenance. For example, current VA<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards say, “steam traps shall be readily available for ease <strong>of</strong><br />

maintenance.” This language seems self-explanatory but does not <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

any specifics for what ease <strong>of</strong> maintenance means or what readily<br />

available means. Such instructions should be tied to a specific test<br />

procedure or a specific set <strong>of</strong> design requirements that define availability<br />

<strong>and</strong> ease <strong>of</strong> maintenance.<br />

• In the selection <strong>of</strong> materials, specifically consider their maintenance <strong>and</strong><br />

cleaning requirements.<br />

FINAL DRAFT <strong>Part</strong> 2-27<br />

June 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!