Hist and Proj Operating Receipts FY 2011 2 17 2010 - DC Water
Hist and Proj Operating Receipts FY 2011 2 17 2010 - DC Water Hist and Proj Operating Receipts FY 2011 2 17 2010 - DC Water
Recent economic projections of the DC economy from various expert sources vary. However, the presence of the federal government along with announcements of new offices and projections for an increase in the federal workforce help to mitigate the loss of commercial and District govemment customers. Major Accomplishments The FY 2009 - 2018 financial plan and Board policy set out severalfinancial and organizational goals to be accomplished in FY 2009. During FY 2009, DC WASA met or exceeded the financial goals set out by the Board and the FY 2008 - 2017 financial plan. Senior debt service coverage, reserve levels, and budget performance met or surpassed Board policies, as discussed in more detail below. * DC WASA Board policy requires senior debt service coverage of at least 140 percent, greater than the indenture requirement of 120 percent. DC WASAS senior debt seruice coverage in FY 2009 was at 297 percent, reflecting implementation of the Board's policy of gradual and predictable rate increases and lower than projected capital spending. Senior debt service coverage will decline to 148 percent in FY 2018 as capital spending and related debt issuance increase. Subordinate debt service coverage (subordinate debt service includes DC WASA's subordinated lien revenue bonds, DC WASA's share of the District of Columbia general obligation debt, Little Seneca Reservoir debt, and Jennings Randolph Reservoir debt) in FY 2009 was at 161 percent. DC WASA is required to have 100 percent coverage of subordinate debt service. Combined debt service coverage was at 134 percent in FY 2009. * DC WASA utilized $25 million of the rate stabilization fund in FY 2009,leaving a remaining balance of $28.6 million in the fund. This utilization of RSF reduced the FY 2009 DC retail rate increase by approximately 9.5 percent. * DC WASA Board undertook an in-depth review of the size of the existing operating reserve to ensure strong levels of operating cash to provide emergency contingency funds and liquidity, while maintaining DC WASA's strong credit rating. The Board concluded that the appropriate level of operating reserve should be 120 days of budgeted operations and maintenance costs. ln FY 2009 the DC WASA Board approved revised financial policies requiring cash reserves (excluding the rate stabilization fund) to be the greater of to 120 days' operating and maintenance expenses or $125.5 million. DC WASA consísfently met this goal during FY 2009, with an average daily balance during the year of $130.7 million, $5.2 million greater than the Board's policy. * DC WASA continued its strong operating budget performance in FY 2009. Operating cash receipts were below budget by $11.5 million, or 3.3 percent; operating expenditures are $25.4 million, or 7.0 percent, less than the Board-revised budget. During FY 2009, DC WASA experienced lower than anticipated costs for electricity and chemicals driven by the decline in market prices rv-9
and implementation of successful procurement strategies. DC WASA also had significant savings in debt service costs related to lower than expected financing costs on the new debt successfully issued in February 2009 in a turbulent financial market. Overtime spending was reduced from a high of $8.7 million in FY 1997 (or 15 percent of payroll) to $5.1million in Fy 2009, or 10 percent. The lmpervious Surface Area Charge (lAC) was implemented in May 2009 to recover the cost of the Combined Sewer Overflow Long-Term Control Plan (CSO LTCP). The twenty-year CSO LTCP, whose terms are outlined in a consent decree executed in March 2005, is projected to cost $2.2 billion. See "Combined Sewer Overflow Long-Term Control Plan" in Section V, Rates and Revenues for additional details on the projected rate impact of the plan. - The IAC is a more equitable rate structure because it provides a better allocation of cost responsibility, relating the costs to the proportionate contribution of each customer (or the amount of the runoff). - Prior to implementation of the IAC an extensive outreach and education campaign was completed to improve understanding of the environmental impacts of wet weather runoff and the importance of the CSO LTCP. * DC WASA implemented a retail water and sewer rate increase of 7.5 percent in FY 2009 to recover increase revenue requirements of $20.9 million. Even with this change, an additional $25 million in revenues was required and available due to the existence to the rate stabilization fund. As noted earlier, and this fund helped to mitigate rate shock and reduced the needed retail rate increase by approximately 9.5 percent in FY 2009. ln addition, the Board approved a retailwater and sewer rate increase of 9.0 percent effective October 1, 2010 as well as en increase in the Right of Way and PILOT fees to recover the full costs of these fees charged to DC WASA by the District of Columbia government. The rate changes are mainly due to the increase in debt service cost to finance the capital improvement plan. An additional use of $28.0 million from the rate stabilization is anticipated in FY 2010, avoiding an additional retail rate increase of approximately 11 percent. For the ninth consecutive year, DC WASA received the Government Finance Officers' Award for Distinguished Budget Presentation for its FY 2010 budget submission. DC WASA also received its twelfth unqualified audit opinion for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 and received the twelfih GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. Given that the District Drinking water is compliant with federal standards for lead and there are competing essential infrastructure needs throughout the District, in FY 2009 the Board made changes to the Lead Service Replacement (LSR) Program. We have established a management approach and structure that allow us to continue to replace lead service lines in conjunction with DC WASA ongoing water main the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) projects, while also ensuring customer participation. We will also continue to monítor the performance of the program to determine if any adjustments are warranted. Through FY tv- 10
- Page 47 and 48: In FY 2009, we completed a study of
- Page 49 and 50: DC WASA's ten-year capital improvem
- Page 51 and 52: • Local and Minority Business Rev
- Page 53 and 54: target for replacement of non-stand
- Page 55 and 56: DC WASA continues to invest in wate
- Page 57 and 58: Anacostia and Rock Creek Park, and
- Page 59 and 60: modification to the permit reducing
- Page 61 and 62: ELECTRICITY PRICING (ALL-IN-COST) $
- Page 63 and 64: carbon footprint legislation and re
- Page 65 and 66: • Automated Fuel Tracking - to fa
- Page 67 and 68: (AWWA) verifies that the growing re
- Page 69 and 70: Total Rewards Statements - During F
- Page 71 and 72: People Working Together to Make A D
- Page 73 and 74: DC WASA's contractor lost workday c
- Page 75 and 76: District of Columbia Water and Sewe
- Page 77 and 78: District of Columbia Water and Sewe
- Page 79 and 80: Regional Macro-Economics DC WASlt's
- Page 81 and 82: KEY FACTS There appears to be a dir
- Page 83 and 84: FY 2010 Revised Budget ($ooo's¡ CA
- Page 85 and 86: Comoarative Exoenditures ($000's) F
- Page 87 and 88: ACCOUNTING AND BUDGET PROCESSES Bas
- Page 89 and 90: FY 2O1l Budget Galendar Month Event
- Page 91 and 92: WASA Key Flr,ltr,¡cnl PorlctEs DEB
- Page 93 and 94: Financing and Reserue Policies ln F
- Page 95 and 96: Gustomer Demand and Demographics -
- Page 97: DCCommercialWater Denund rr. Commer
- Page 101 and 102: - DC WASA changed banks on Septembe
- Page 103 and 104: Raúes. The proposed rate and fee a
- Page 105 and 106: The proposed monthly IAC charge for
- Page 107 and 108: under the program by DDOE and to mi
- Page 109 and 110: CSO LTCP Spending by Year 123.3 y4.
- Page 111 and 112: 14. Projected decrease in IAC reven
- Page 113 and 114: Wholesale - DC WASA's wholesale cus
- Page 115 and 116: O p e rati n g Ex pen d itu res As
- Page 117 and 118: the District of Columbia government
- Page 119 and 120: . Wholesale Capital Payments - Appr
- Page 121 and 122: Indenture-Required Operating Reserv
- Page 123 and 124: Water and Sewer System Facility Pla
- Page 125 and 126: and a poss¡ble 2,215 customers wer
- Page 127 and 128: Revenues The proposed FY 2010 recei
- Page 129 and 130: consumption and rate increases, and
- Page 131 and 132: * DC WASA's share of the District's
- Page 133 and 134: FY 2009. The commercial paper progr
- Page 135 and 136: Capital Financing Program, Cash Pos
- Page 137 and 138: Cash Position & Reserwes Cash balan
- Page 139 and 140: Long-Term Operational and Financial
- Page 141 and 142: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER & SEWER
- Page 143 and 144: 450,000 Historical & Projected Cash
- Page 145 and 146: Hi$orical and Projected Billed Cons
- Page 147 and 148: RECENT & PROPOSED RATE & FEE CHANGE
Recent economic projections of the <strong>DC</strong> economy from various expert sources vary. However, the presence of the federal<br />
government along with announcements of new offices <strong>and</strong> projections for an increase in the federal workforce help to mitigate the<br />
loss of commercial <strong>and</strong> District govemment customers.<br />
Major Accomplishments<br />
The <strong>FY</strong> 2009 - 2018 financial plan <strong>and</strong> Board policy set out severalfinancial <strong>and</strong> organizational goals to be accomplished in <strong>FY</strong> 2009.<br />
During <strong>FY</strong> 2009, <strong>DC</strong> WASA met or exceeded the financial goals set out by the Board <strong>and</strong> the <strong>FY</strong> 2008 - 20<strong>17</strong> financial plan. Senior<br />
debt service coverage, reserve levels, <strong>and</strong> budget performance met or surpassed Board policies, as discussed in more detail below.<br />
* <strong>DC</strong> WASA Board policy requires senior debt service coverage of at least 140 percent, greater than the indenture requirement of<br />
120 percent. <strong>DC</strong> WASAS senior debt seruice coverage in <strong>FY</strong> 2009 was at 297 percent, reflecting implementation of the<br />
Board's policy of gradual <strong>and</strong> predictable rate increases <strong>and</strong> lower than projected capital spending. Senior debt service coverage<br />
will decline to 148 percent in <strong>FY</strong> 2018 as capital spending <strong>and</strong> related debt issuance increase. Subordinate debt service<br />
coverage (subordinate debt service includes <strong>DC</strong> WASA's subordinated lien revenue bonds, <strong>DC</strong> WASA's share of the District of<br />
Columbia general obligation debt, Little Seneca Reservoir debt, <strong>and</strong> Jennings R<strong>and</strong>olph Reservoir debt) in <strong>FY</strong> 2009 was at 161<br />
percent. <strong>DC</strong> WASA is required to have 100 percent coverage of subordinate debt service. Combined debt service coverage was<br />
at 134 percent in <strong>FY</strong> 2009.<br />
* <strong>DC</strong> WASA utilized $25 million of the rate stabilization fund in <strong>FY</strong> 2009,leaving a remaining balance of $28.6 million in the<br />
fund. This utilization of RSF reduced the <strong>FY</strong> 2009 <strong>DC</strong> retail rate increase by approximately 9.5 percent.<br />
* <strong>DC</strong> WASA Board undertook an in-depth review of the size of the existing operating reserve to ensure strong levels of operating<br />
cash to provide emergency contingency funds <strong>and</strong> liquidity, while maintaining <strong>DC</strong> WASA's strong credit rating. The Board<br />
concluded that the appropriate level of operating reserve should be 120 days of budgeted operations <strong>and</strong> maintenance costs. ln<br />
<strong>FY</strong> 2009 the <strong>DC</strong> WASA Board approved revised financial policies requiring cash reserves (excluding the rate stabilization fund) to<br />
be the greater of to 120 days' operating <strong>and</strong> maintenance expenses or $125.5 million. <strong>DC</strong> WASA consísfently met this goal<br />
during <strong>FY</strong> 2009, with an average daily balance during the year of $130.7 million, $5.2 million greater than the Board's<br />
policy.<br />
* <strong>DC</strong> WASA continued its strong operating budget performance in <strong>FY</strong> 2009. <strong>Operating</strong> cash receipts were below budget by<br />
$11.5 million, or 3.3 percent; operating expenditures are $25.4 million, or 7.0 percent, less than the Board-revised budget. During<br />
<strong>FY</strong> 2009, <strong>DC</strong> WASA experienced lower than anticipated costs for electricity <strong>and</strong> chemicals driven by the decline in market prices<br />
rv-9