Hist and Proj Operating Receipts FY 2011 2 17 2010 - DC Water
Hist and Proj Operating Receipts FY 2011 2 17 2010 - DC Water Hist and Proj Operating Receipts FY 2011 2 17 2010 - DC Water
Long-Term Operational and Financial lssues Currently, there are a number of important emerging issues that we are closely monitoring to ensure reliable and efficient service to our customers. We continue to broaden our planning horizon for projects or operational changes that may be necessary to address regulatory as well as other emerging issues. Capital lmprovement Program lnflationary lncreases The economic recession that has been and continues to be experienced by all industries has had an impact on all aspects of construction. Energy costs have materially retreated from there highs of only a few years ago. Major development projects have also fallen to records lows due to lack of available financing. Unemployment is at records highs. How all of this will impact the future costs of our CIP is yet to be determined. While these are challenging times, we recognize the magnitude of the multiple challenges facing us and our customers as we attempt to maintain our infrastructure and meet the requirements of the regulatory and government mandates. We will continue to monitor the complex environment we are operating in and assess its impact on our CIP planning and budget. Funding for Chesapeake Bay Restoration lnitiatives The Virginia and Maryland Legislatures have provided revenues to support nutrient removal. ln the State of Maryland, the Bay Restoration Fund was established through a tax on each water, sewer and septic bill which raises approximately $66 million a year. The General Assembly of Commonwealth of Virginia provide grants through a State Water Quality lmprovement Fund to support environmental projects for nutrient control costs, and has dedicated $50 million a year for the fund. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania recently passed a bond referendum which provides $400 million in bond issuance to support various water, sewer and wastewater investments throughout the Commonwealth. Several environmental, Fairfax, Virginia, Montgomery and Prince George's Counties of Maryland, as well as other organizations have supported federal funding for Blue Plains Nitrogen Removal project. DC WSA will continue to work with these groups to get additional federal funding for BIue Plains for FY 201 1. We will also continue to support and urge the District of Columbia Government to provide similar local mechanisms as our neighboring states to assist the DC retail ratepayers in keeping their rates down. tv-33
Water and Sewer System Facility Planning ln 2009, DC WASA completed two very significant infrastructure assessment and planning efforts. The first, the Water System Facility Plan, assessed all water system infrastructures and made prioritized recommendations for improvements to the water pumping, transmission, storage and distribution systems. This document provÍded the basis for a ramp up, beginning in FY 2010, of the replacement of one percent of the water infrastructure per year. The second, the Sewer System Facility Plan culminated a five year effort involving sewer inspection and condition assessment, development of a sewer GIS and database, hydraulic monitoring and modeling to assess system capacity and the development of prioritized activities for system improvement. This Sewer System Facilities Plan identified a significant increase in funding needed for sewer infrastructure improvements. This increased funding will ramp up beginning in FY 2010 with full program implementation in FY 2015. tv-34
- Page 71 and 72: People Working Together to Make A D
- Page 73 and 74: DC WASA's contractor lost workday c
- Page 75 and 76: District of Columbia Water and Sewe
- Page 77 and 78: District of Columbia Water and Sewe
- Page 79 and 80: Regional Macro-Economics DC WASlt's
- Page 81 and 82: KEY FACTS There appears to be a dir
- Page 83 and 84: FY 2010 Revised Budget ($ooo's¡ CA
- Page 85 and 86: Comoarative Exoenditures ($000's) F
- Page 87 and 88: ACCOUNTING AND BUDGET PROCESSES Bas
- Page 89 and 90: FY 2O1l Budget Galendar Month Event
- Page 91 and 92: WASA Key Flr,ltr,¡cnl PorlctEs DEB
- Page 93 and 94: Financing and Reserue Policies ln F
- Page 95 and 96: Gustomer Demand and Demographics -
- Page 97 and 98: DCCommercialWater Denund rr. Commer
- Page 99 and 100: and implementation of successful pr
- Page 101 and 102: - DC WASA changed banks on Septembe
- Page 103 and 104: Raúes. The proposed rate and fee a
- Page 105 and 106: The proposed monthly IAC charge for
- Page 107 and 108: under the program by DDOE and to mi
- Page 109 and 110: CSO LTCP Spending by Year 123.3 y4.
- Page 111 and 112: 14. Projected decrease in IAC reven
- Page 113 and 114: Wholesale - DC WASA's wholesale cus
- Page 115 and 116: O p e rati n g Ex pen d itu res As
- Page 117 and 118: the District of Columbia government
- Page 119 and 120: . Wholesale Capital Payments - Appr
- Page 121: Indenture-Required Operating Reserv
- Page 125 and 126: and a poss¡ble 2,215 customers wer
- Page 127 and 128: Revenues The proposed FY 2010 recei
- Page 129 and 130: consumption and rate increases, and
- Page 131 and 132: * DC WASA's share of the District's
- Page 133 and 134: FY 2009. The commercial paper progr
- Page 135 and 136: Capital Financing Program, Cash Pos
- Page 137 and 138: Cash Position & Reserwes Cash balan
- Page 139 and 140: Long-Term Operational and Financial
- Page 141 and 142: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER & SEWER
- Page 143 and 144: 450,000 Historical & Projected Cash
- Page 145 and 146: Hi$orical and Projected Billed Cons
- Page 147 and 148: RECENT & PROPOSED RATE & FEE CHANGE
- Page 149 and 150: $35.00 AVERAGE CAP CUSTOMER MONTHLY
- Page 151 and 152: Fy20,0 RArE-:::il:=: PR,P'SED RA'E
- Page 153 and 154: RECENT & PROPOSED RATE & FEE CHANGE
- Page 155 and 156: FY 2OO9 - FY 2018 FINANCIAL PLAN PR
- Page 157 and 158: FY 2O1O - FY 2018 FINANCIAL PLAN PR
- Page 159 and 160: POTENTIAL IMPACT OF CSO LONG.TERM C
- Page 161 and 162: WHY RATE INCREASES ARE NEEDED, cont
- Page 163 and 164: WHY RATE INCREASES ARE NEEDED, cont
- Page 165 and 166: WASA,S RETAIL RATES ARE COMPARABLE
- Page 167 and 168: DC WASA'S RETAIL RATES ARE COMPARAB
- Page 169 and 170: FY 2009 - FY 2018 Capital lmproveme
- Page 171 and 172: more w¡dely disposed of at reduced
Long-Term Operational <strong>and</strong> Financial lssues<br />
Currently, there are a number of important emerging issues that we are closely monitoring to ensure reliable <strong>and</strong> efficient service to<br />
our customers. We continue to broaden our planning horizon for projects or operational changes that may be necessary to address<br />
regulatory as well as other emerging issues.<br />
Capital lmprovement Program lnflationary lncreases<br />
The economic recession that has been <strong>and</strong> continues to be experienced by all industries has had an impact on all aspects of<br />
construction. Energy costs have materially retreated from there highs of only a few years ago. Major development projects have also<br />
fallen to records lows due to lack of available financing. Unemployment is at records highs. How all of this will impact the future costs<br />
of our CIP is yet to be determined. While these are challenging times, we recognize the magnitude of the multiple challenges facing<br />
us <strong>and</strong> our customers as we attempt to maintain our infrastructure <strong>and</strong> meet the requirements of the regulatory <strong>and</strong> government<br />
m<strong>and</strong>ates. We will continue to monitor the complex environment we are operating in <strong>and</strong> assess its impact on our CIP planning <strong>and</strong><br />
budget.<br />
Funding for Chesapeake Bay Restoration lnitiatives<br />
The Virginia <strong>and</strong> Maryl<strong>and</strong> Legislatures have provided revenues to support nutrient removal. ln the State of Maryl<strong>and</strong>, the Bay<br />
Restoration Fund was established through a tax on each water, sewer <strong>and</strong> septic bill which raises approximately $66 million a year.<br />
The General Assembly of Commonwealth of Virginia provide grants through a State <strong>Water</strong> Quality lmprovement Fund to support<br />
environmental projects for nutrient control costs, <strong>and</strong> has dedicated $50 million a year for the fund. The General Assembly of the<br />
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania recently passed a bond referendum which provides $400 million in bond issuance to support various<br />
water, sewer <strong>and</strong> wastewater investments throughout the Commonwealth. Several environmental, Fairfax, Virginia, Montgomery <strong>and</strong><br />
Prince George's Counties of Maryl<strong>and</strong>, as well as other organizations have supported federal funding for Blue Plains Nitrogen<br />
Removal project. <strong>DC</strong> WSA will continue to work with these groups to get additional federal funding for BIue Plains for <strong>FY</strong> 201 1. We<br />
will also continue to support <strong>and</strong> urge the District of Columbia Government to provide similar local mechanisms as our neighboring<br />
states to assist the <strong>DC</strong> retail ratepayers in keeping their rates down.<br />
tv-33
Change language