75 Integrating Membrane Transport with Male Gametophyte ... - TAIR
75 Integrating Membrane Transport with Male Gametophyte ... - TAIR
75 Integrating Membrane Transport with Male Gametophyte ... - TAIR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
271 Scarecrow-like Protein SCL14 Interacts <strong>with</strong> TGA Factors and Functions as an Essential Coactivator<br />
of as-1-dependent Transcription<br />
Tanja Siemsen, Corinna Thurow, Benjamin Fode, Ralf Weigel, Christiane Gatz<br />
University of Goettingen, Untere Karspuele 2, 37073 Goettingen, Germany<br />
Plant defense signalling molecule salicylic acid (SA) as well as xenobiotic stress cues like 2.4D (dichlorphenoxy<br />
acetic acid) and the herbicide paraquat induce a number of defense genes containing the cis regulatory element activation<br />
sequence-1 (as-1). As-1 type cis elements are bound by basic/leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors of the TGA<br />
family. In order to identify factors regulating TGA activity, a yeast protein interaction screen <strong>with</strong> Arabidopsis thaliana<br />
TGA2 as bait and an Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA library was performed and led to the identification of SCARECROW-<br />
LIKE protein 14. Functional analysis in scl14 knock out plants revealed that SCL14 is required for the expression of<br />
the “truncated” CaMV 35S promoter, which contains the as-1 element as the only regulatory sequence. Chromatin<br />
immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments revealed 2.4D-enhanced association of SCL14 and TGA2 to the as-1 element<br />
in planta. As the activity of known as-1-containing promoters like the GST6 and the PR-1 promoter was not altered, a<br />
whole genome microarray analysis was carried out to identify endogenous promoters that required SCL14 for expression.<br />
Two genes that were down-regulated in the scl14 mutant were further analysed. ChIP analysis showed recruitment of<br />
SCL14 and TGA2 to these promoters. In the tga2tga5tga6 background, SCL14 showed no in vivo binding to its target<br />
promoters, supporting the model that SCL14 is tethered to the promoter by its interaction <strong>with</strong> as-1-bound TGA factors,<br />
where it functions as a transcriptional co-activator.<br />
272 Signalling Pathways Involved in the “defense, no death” Phenotypes of Arabidopsis<br />
Mutants dnd1 and dnd2<br />
Ruth Genger 2 , Grace Jurkowski 1 , John McDowell 3 , Andrew Bent 2<br />
1<br />
Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison WI 53706, 2 Department of Plant<br />
Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison WI 53706, 3 Fralin Center for Biotechnology, Virginia<br />
Tech, Blacksburg VA 24061<br />
Plant disease resistance pathways have as key mediators the signaling molecule salicylic acid (SA) and the two plant hormones<br />
ethylene and jasmonic acid. Numerous studies have demonstrated various levels of antagonism between these defense signaling<br />
pathways, indicative of crosstalk. The Arabidopsis “defense, no death” (dnd) mutants dnd1 and dnd2(hlm1) exhibit constitutive<br />
activation of plant defenses (including expression of defense marker genes), elevated SA levels, and enhanced resistance to<br />
biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens. In addition, they exhibit no, or a greatly reduced, hypersensitive response to avirulent<br />
pathogens. These phenotypes result from mutations in two separate cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels, AtCNGC2 or AtCNGC4<br />
respectively. We generated and characterized double and triple mutants in the dnd1 and dnd2 genetic backgrounds using wellcharacterized<br />
mutant alleles of NPR1, SID2 (EDS16), NDR1, and EIN2 to evaluate in greater detail the contributions of the<br />
wild-type genes DND1 and DND2/HLM1 <strong>with</strong> regard to known defense signaling cascades. We found that both SID2 and NPR1<br />
were required for resistance of dnd1 and dnd2 to virulent and avirulent Pseudomonas syringae and virulent Hyaloperonospora<br />
parasitica, indicating a requirement for signaling through SA. Although mutation of NPR1 did not affect SA levels in dnd1, SID2<br />
was required for increased SA levels in dnd1. EIN2 was not required for resistance of dnd1 or dnd2 to P. syringae or H. parasitica,<br />
or for increased SA levels in dnd1. Mutation of ein2 compromised resistance of dnd1 to the necrotroph Botrytis cinerea. NDR1<br />
was required for resistance of dnd1 and dnd2 to avirulent P. syringae expressing avrRpt2, and resistance of dnd1 to virulent<br />
H. parasitica. However, for resistance to virulent P. syringae, NDR1 was required in the dnd2 background, but not in the dnd1<br />
background, indicating a rare difference in defense signaling between dnd1 and dnd2. NDR1 was required for increased SA levels<br />
in the dnd1 background. At the molecular level, we noted that npr1 and sid2 mutations reduced/eliminated constitutive PR-1<br />
gene expression of dnd1 plants, but intriguingly induced PDF1.2 expression. This suggests that the defense signaling activated<br />
by DND1 or DND2 mutations uses SA-mediated NPR1-dependent pathways as the default pathway, but when SA or NPR1 are<br />
not available, defense signaling is diverted toward PDF1.2 expression. None of the double mutants showed restoration of the<br />
loss-of-HR phenotype, indicating at least partly separate control of the HR from the other phenotypes of dnd1 and dnd2.