07.01.2015 Views

Navigation guide Refugee populations in the UK: Algerians - ICAR

Navigation guide Refugee populations in the UK: Algerians - ICAR

Navigation guide Refugee populations in the UK: Algerians - ICAR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This proposal was f<strong>in</strong>ally approved by <strong>the</strong> European Council <strong>in</strong> December 2003. The f<strong>in</strong>al text resembles<br />

<strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al Dubl<strong>in</strong> Convention even more closely than <strong>the</strong> proposal and may well be implemented more<br />

effectively than <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al regulation. 4<br />

The Dubl<strong>in</strong> Convention replaced an exist<strong>in</strong>g bilateral agreement on return of asylum seekers between<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> and France (often called <strong>the</strong> ‘gentleman’s agreement’) signed <strong>in</strong> 1995. There has been<br />

considerable debate <strong>in</strong> parliament on whe<strong>the</strong>r this agreement was replaced by Dubl<strong>in</strong>, or was allowed to<br />

lapse by <strong>the</strong> Labour government. Once it became clear that <strong>the</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> Convention was not perform<strong>in</strong>g<br />

as well as had been hoped, <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> government attempted to renegotiate <strong>the</strong> bilateral agreement 3 .<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> situation of <strong>the</strong> Red Cross centre at Sangatte complicated <strong>the</strong> issue and this bilateral<br />

agreement has still not been signed.<br />

1 ECRE (2001) Comments from <strong>the</strong> European Council on <strong>Refugee</strong>s and Exiles on <strong>the</strong> Proposal for a Council<br />

Regulation establish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> criteria and mechanisms for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Member State responsible for exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

an asylum application lodged <strong>in</strong> one of <strong>the</strong> Member States by a third country national, ECRE, London; European<br />

Commission (2000) Commission Staff Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper Revisit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> Convention SEC (2000) 522.<br />

2 The Convention came <strong>in</strong>to force <strong>in</strong> September 1997 and its use for <strong>Algerians</strong> was shaken by <strong>the</strong> case of<br />

Detention<br />

Aitsegeur. Follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of asylum<br />

<strong>the</strong> House<br />

seekers<br />

of Lords judgement <strong>in</strong> this case <strong>the</strong> Convention virtually ceased to apply to<br />

<strong>Algerians</strong>. The Danish <strong>Refugee</strong> Council undertook <strong>the</strong> only comprehensive empirical analysis of <strong>the</strong> work<strong>in</strong>gs of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> Convention from 1997 to 2000 (Danish <strong>Refugee</strong> Council, 2001, Analysis of <strong>the</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> Convention,<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce available <strong>the</strong> early at http://www.flygtn<strong>in</strong>g.dk/publikationer/rapporter/dubl<strong>in</strong>/dubl<strong>in</strong>.pdf 1990s, Algerian asylum seekers have been more likely [accessed to be deta<strong>in</strong>ed 4 May than 2004]). asylum This seekers study<br />

of gives o<strong>the</strong>r no nationalities <strong>in</strong>dication of (see separate statistics nationality section). groups 57<br />

but reveals that <strong>in</strong> 1998 and 1999, approximately 20% of all<br />

asylum applications to <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> were <strong>in</strong>vestigated under <strong>the</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> Convention.<br />

3 The question of renegotiation was first discussed at <strong>the</strong> Anglo-French summit <strong>in</strong> Cahors on 9 February 2001<br />

(Guardian 6.2.01) but this was unsuccessful.<br />

4 Collyer (2004 forthcom<strong>in</strong>g).<br />

Anti-terrorism legislation<br />

From 2000 onwards, <strong>Algerians</strong> have been disproportionately affected by anti-terrorism legislation and its<br />

implementation.<br />

There have been two important acts:<br />

• The Terrorism Act (2000) def<strong>in</strong>ed terrorism as an <strong>in</strong>ternational issue for <strong>the</strong> first time and proscribed a<br />

number of organisations <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Algerian Groupe Islamique Armée (GIA), (added to Schedule 2).<br />

• The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act (2001) related terrorism explicitly to immigration and<br />

asylum (<strong>in</strong> part 4) and allowed for <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite detention without charge for <strong>in</strong>dividuals ‘suspected’ by <strong>the</strong><br />

Home Secretary of be<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>ked to terrorism.<br />

The French government has been openly critical of <strong>the</strong> British and German positions on grant<strong>in</strong>g asylum to<br />

members of <strong>the</strong> Algerian Islamist opposition s<strong>in</strong>ce soon after <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> conflict <strong>in</strong> Algeria. 58 The<br />

Terrorism Act (2000) was an acknowledgement of <strong>the</strong>ir criticism. The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security<br />

Act (2001) was a direct response to <strong>the</strong> events of 11 September 2001 and went fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> grant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

Home Secretary considerable powers. The majority of <strong>in</strong>dividuals deta<strong>in</strong>ed under both of <strong>the</strong>se acts have<br />

57 Home Office statistical bullet<strong>in</strong>s (1990 – 2001).<br />

58 In October 1994, <strong>the</strong> French M<strong>in</strong>ister of <strong>the</strong> Interior, Charles Pasqua was openly critical of <strong>the</strong> British and German<br />

governments for not act<strong>in</strong>g on his request to ban <strong>the</strong> FIS (Le Monde 4.10.94).<br />

<strong>Navigation</strong> <strong>guide</strong> to refugee <strong>populations</strong>: <strong>Algerians</strong><br />

©<strong>ICAR</strong> 2004, moral rights Michael Collyer<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!