Approved Materials - Reston Community Center
Approved Materials - Reston Community Center
Approved Materials - Reston Community Center
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
March 18, 2013 Board of Governors Finance Committee Meeting Report<br />
Public Comment<br />
Bill Morrissette, <strong>Reston</strong> resident, indicated that he is speaking on behalf of the Baron Cameron dog<br />
park, which he uses regularly. He said that he knows that there is a Long Range Planning Meeting<br />
scheduled next week regarding Baron Cameron Park. He is interested in knowing the timeline with<br />
respect to Baron Cameron Park being changed from its current situation to a recreation center.<br />
Leila said that the Fairfax County Park Authority owns Baron Cameron Park. On May 7, 2013 they will<br />
have their first public meeting for the community to discuss the park in its totality. The master planning<br />
process for the park will take careful consideration of the existing use of the park, which currently includes<br />
field users, the dog park community and garden plot users. To Leila’s knowledge, it is not in the Park<br />
Authority’s plan to displace any of those parties. In fact, it is in the Park Authority and RCC’s interest to<br />
improve the park and its amenities. Bill explained that he also represents soccer players since he works<br />
with many of them in the construction business. He is a small business construction owner. He said that<br />
despite the fact that he’s a builder, he does not love everything that’s being built in <strong>Reston</strong>. He has<br />
opposed much of it. He used to sit in the <strong>Reston</strong> Town <strong>Center</strong> and enjoy the sunlight. As buildings have<br />
gone up, shade has replaced the sunlight. He misses the old <strong>Reston</strong> Town <strong>Center</strong> and all the sunlight.<br />
His friends in the construction business (including himself) are developing in <strong>Reston</strong> and he supports the<br />
construction business, but he’s concerned with the amount of development happening in <strong>Reston</strong>. He<br />
thinks <strong>Reston</strong> is losing sight of what was an important design element when it was founded. He moved to<br />
<strong>Reston</strong> for the low-profile lifestyle. Now he’s concerned that we’re only 5-6 years away from being a city<br />
like Arlington, which might make folks move out of <strong>Reston</strong>. Bill asked about the format of the March 25<br />
meeting. Leila said that we will be specifically discussing amenities of a potential indoor recreation center.<br />
Bill said that he is also concerned with environmental responsibility, such as putting fields on the roof or<br />
including green walls. He said that if RCC does build a new facility, he hopes that the Board pursues an<br />
environmentally friendly design. Also, Bill indicated that he supports the poor in terms of lower rates and<br />
RCC subsidies. He thinks RCC should keep children’s rates the same but raise adult rates. He also<br />
suggested offering a 3-month pass to non-<strong>Reston</strong> residents. He thinks that will boost revenue. He added<br />
that the name of his company is Forrester and that they are an elite company that is about to build a 16-<br />
million dollar data center on Sunrise Valley Drive. However, he believes in family and nature first.<br />
Marsha Parkinson, Herndon resident and dog park user, asked if RSVPs were required for the March<br />
25 meeting. Leila said they were requested. Marsha asked about public input submitted via e-mail. Leila<br />
confirmed that we are keeping a volume of all of those public input comments. That public record is<br />
shared with and reviewed with the Board.<br />
Marsha asked if the public could see where the rec center will be located. Leila said that we haven’t<br />
reached that point in the process yet. Leila said that if the public votes to proceed with the new facility,<br />
she hopes the construction itself will go quickly, but we currently do not have any plans or even a footprint<br />
for the facility. She added that the Park Authority is interested in pursuing a range of usages, including<br />
current uses and new uses.<br />
There was general discussion about how to keep open space while also providing for current and new<br />
use of the land. Leila indicated that the RCC footprint would likely be 2-5 acres of a total 68 acres of<br />
usage. Leila said we want to be environmentally sensitive. Any amenities in a potential RCC facility would<br />
need to complement the Park Authority amenities, as well as our own amenities at other RCC facilities.<br />
Bill P. added that the Board is in the process of determining if RCC can pursue this opportunity for a new<br />
building and where it would be. No decisions have been made yet. Bill Morrissette wants to ensure it is a<br />
LEED project. Leila agreed and said that was a County initiative for all County facilities. Bill Morrissette<br />
asked about future opportunities for input. Leila explained that the public is invited to all Board meetings,<br />
which are publicized on our website, in our buildings, in the media and in several other places.<br />
Marsha Parkinson asked about an old proposal to put an indoor rec center at Brown’s Chapel Park. Leila<br />
responded that there was discussion in 2009 about putting a center at Brown’s Chapel Park. That was a<br />
considerably smaller parcel of land, was in closer proximity to residential neighborhoods, and the existing<br />
space included robustly used baseball fields and picnic areas. Baron Cameron fields are comparatively<br />
underutilized and the area of that park is larger and farther away from neighborhoods. Transportation<br />
issues are much better at Baron Cameron in terms of traffic egress and ingress. The proposed Brown’s<br />
Chapel facility was a much larger facility. A lot of the issues with Browns Chapel do not exist at Baron<br />
- 4 -