07.01.2015 Views

Proposed Title 1: - Queen's University

Proposed Title 1: - Queen's University

Proposed Title 1: - Queen's University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2005). U mineralization is controlled by structures that have been reactivated, which are<br />

favorable sites for fluid circulation (Schultz, 1991; Tourigny, 2002).<br />

Fracture-Controlled<br />

Mobilized U Mineralization<br />

(Perched)<br />

Lake<br />

U Mineralization<br />

at unconformity<br />

(Basin-hosted)<br />

Unconformity<br />

Pelitic<br />

Gneiss<br />

Vein & Breccia<br />

U mineralization<br />

basement-hosted<br />

Pelitic<br />

Gneiss<br />

Granitic<br />

Gneiss<br />

Graphitic<br />

Pelitic Gneiss<br />

Arkosic<br />

Gneiss<br />

Quartzite<br />

Figure 1.3. Genetic model for unconformity-type U deposit (modified from Cuney and<br />

Kyser, 2008).<br />

Unconformity-type U deposits in the Athabasca and Kombolgie basins formed at ca.<br />

1600 Ma and 1675 Ma, respectively, (Alexandre et al., 2006; Polito et al., 2012).<br />

Temperatures were 200 o C and involved the interaction of oxidizing, saline basinal fluids<br />

carrying U 6+ with either reducing basement rock types (basement-hosted, Fig. 1.3) or<br />

reducing fluids from the basement (sediment-hosted, Fig. 1.3), thereby precipitating U 4+ at<br />

the unconformity (e.g. Hoeve and Quirt, 1984; Kotzer and Kyser, 1995; Cuney et al.,<br />

2005). Unconformity-type U deposits in the Athabasca and Kombolgie basins have<br />

produced up to 35% of the world U production (e.g. Ruzicka, 1996; Ghandi, 2007),<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!