Proposed Title 1: - Queen's University
Proposed Title 1: - Queen's University Proposed Title 1: - Queen's University
during fluid interaction with feldspathic host rocks (Mernagh et al., 1994), thus indicating that ore metals deposition is also controlled by lithology composition. Subsequent to their formation, the uranium deposits in the SAVMF have been affected by late alteration fluid event related to both near and far-field tectonic events that formed much of the secondary U minerals. These late events may represent incursion and circulation of meteoric water through structurally reactivated fault zones (e.g. Kotzer and Kyser, 1995) that remain areas of preferential fluid flow (e.g. Fayek and Kyser, 1997). 187
CHAPTER 5 GENERAL DISCUSSION 5.1. Introduction Results presented in the preceding chapters contribute in understanding the Proterozoic tectonic evolution and U mineralizing system in successor basins in the Beaverlodge area of Northern Saskatchewan, Canada, and the South Alligator River area of the Northern Territories, Australia. Based on structural, geochemical, geochronological and petrographic relationships, this research has evaluated the character and formation of U deposits in successor basins by detailing the relative timing relationships between deformation and fluid events, elucidating the timing, nature and origin of ore-forming fluids, identifying critical key structural and geochemical factors controlling U mineralization, and presenting a conceptual genetic model for U mineralization in successor basin areas (Fig. 5.1.). The following elucidates the general models for uranium mineralizing systems in Paleoproterozoic successor basins, compares them with the unconformity-related uranium mineralization in the younger, U-rich Athabasca and Kombolgie basins and discusses the potential implication for uranium metallogeny and exploration strategy in others Paleoproterozoic successor basins in Finland and Guyana. 188
- Page 155 and 156: stable isotope geochemistry, U-Pb g
- Page 157 and 158: coincident with the initiation of s
- Page 159 and 160: plasma mass spectrometry (LA-HR-ICP
- Page 161 and 162: The Coronation Hill deposit occupie
- Page 163 and 164: arsenides, nickel selenide and copp
- Page 165 and 166: No corrections were made to the 238
- Page 167 and 168: which was interpreted as being asso
- Page 169 and 170: porphyry and coated by Chl 1 formin
- Page 171 and 172: Mineralized breccias showing quartz
- Page 173 and 174: SOUTH ALLIGATOR RIVER GROUP EL SHER
- Page 175 and 176: A Carbonaceous Shale B Src 1 Qtz 1
- Page 177 and 178: A Granite Qtz 0 fragments Qtz 0 B M
- Page 179 and 180: chemical composition as a result of
- Page 181 and 182: Sample I.D SiO 2 CaO FeO ThO 2 MnO
- Page 183 and 184: site occupancy (Cathelineau, 1988).
- Page 185 and 186: Mineral values Temperature Fluid va
- Page 187 and 188: Corrected ratios Apparent ages ( ±
- Page 189 and 190: G H Figure 4.12. U-Pb concordia dia
- Page 191 and 192: Figure 4.13. Pb-Pb isochron diagram
- Page 193 and 194: and 4.12B), and to 207 Pb/ 206 Pb a
- Page 195 and 196: 160 o C at Coronation Hill. The tem
- Page 197 and 198: Figure 4.15. Conceptual genetic mod
- Page 199 and 200: of the Koolpin Formation, while dep
- Page 201 and 202: at ca. 1820 Ma, approximately 40 My
- Page 203 and 204: culminating with the formation of R
- Page 205: deposits is related to fluids deriv
- Page 209 and 210: ed-bed strata and associated volcan
- Page 211 and 212: character of the fluid that formed
- Page 213 and 214: 5.2.1.2. Metamorphic-related uraniu
- Page 215 and 216: during brecciation or reduction as
- Page 217 and 218: ca. 1820 Ma that triggered reactiva
- Page 219 and 220: Plutons Event at 1.4 Ga (Barinek et
- Page 221 and 222: Kolari-Kittila Province Kuusamo Pro
- Page 223 and 224: The uranium deposits in various pro
- Page 225 and 226: Fig. 5.6. Distribution of the Rorai
- Page 227 and 228: Roraima Basin, similar to what is o
- Page 229 and 230: etween ca. 2.3 Ga and 1.9 Ga. Later
- Page 231 and 232: REFERENCES Adams, J., 1989. Postgla
- Page 233 and 234: Ashton, K.E., 2010. The Gunnar Mine
- Page 235 and 236: Bowles, J.F.W., 1990. Age dating of
- Page 237 and 238: Cuney, M.L., 2005. World-class unco
- Page 239 and 240: deposits in the Athabasca Basin, Sa
- Page 241 and 242: Hartlaub, R.P., Heaman, L.M., Chack
- Page 243 and 244: Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sas
- Page 245 and 246: Kyser, K., and Cuney, M., 2008. Geo
- Page 247 and 248: two-sided oblique-slip collisional
- Page 249 and 250: Creek Geosyncline: in ‘The minera
- Page 251 and 252: Piper, J.D.A., 2004. Discussion on
- Page 253 and 254: 99.Sheppard SMF and Gilg HA 1996. S
- Page 255 and 256: Proceedings Darwin Conference 1984
CHAPTER 5<br />
GENERAL DISCUSSION<br />
5.1. Introduction<br />
Results presented in the preceding chapters contribute in understanding the<br />
Proterozoic tectonic evolution and U mineralizing system in successor basins in the<br />
Beaverlodge area of Northern Saskatchewan, Canada, and the South Alligator River area of<br />
the Northern Territories, Australia. Based on structural, geochemical, geochronological and<br />
petrographic relationships, this research has evaluated the character and formation of U<br />
deposits in successor basins by detailing the relative timing relationships between<br />
deformation and fluid events, elucidating the timing, nature and origin of ore-forming<br />
fluids, identifying critical key structural and geochemical factors controlling U<br />
mineralization, and presenting a conceptual genetic model for U mineralization in successor<br />
basin areas (Fig. 5.1.).<br />
The following elucidates the general models for uranium mineralizing systems in<br />
Paleoproterozoic successor basins, compares them with the unconformity-related uranium<br />
mineralization in the younger, U-rich Athabasca and Kombolgie basins and discusses the<br />
potential implication for uranium metallogeny and exploration strategy in others<br />
Paleoproterozoic successor basins in Finland and Guyana.<br />
188