Proposed Title 1: - Queen's University
Proposed Title 1: - Queen's University Proposed Title 1: - Queen's University
Figure 3.11. Conceptual genetic model for U mineralization in the Beaverlodge area. A: Deposition of the Murmac Bay Group sediments in a tectonically active fault-bounded basin is followed by mylonitization during the Arrowsmith Orogen. B: Mylonites reactivated during late stages of the Arrowsmith Orogen resulting in formation of cataclasite and early tensional vein-type U 2 mineralization. Hydraulic fracturing in response to fluid generation via 121
decompression and hydration reactions was the mechanism of veins formation. U was transported as uranyl-carbonate-fluoride complexes. C: At Gunnar, U 3 was derived from magmatic fluids from the Gunnar granite. PO -3 4 and F - were important ore transporting complexes. D: Reactivation of fault zones during early regional metamorphism of the Trans- Hudson or post-peak Thelon-Taltson Orogen resulted in massive brecciation at shallow structural levels. Metamorphic-hydrothermal U-mineralizing fluids derived from dehydration of hydrous minerals during metamorphism ascended upward along deep fractures and decompression caused decrease in the solubility of the carbonate complexes promoting U deposition. E: During the Paleoproterozoic, the Martin Lake Basin and associated alkaline mafic dikes formed and hydrothermal U 5 -mineralizing solutions resulted in magmatichydrothermal degassing along pre-existing fractures. F: Ore-forming brines from the Athabasca Basin descended along fractures in the basement rocks and U 6 deposition was via reduction through interaction between oxidizing basinal brines and reduced metamorphic basement lithologies. G: Post-ore incursion and circulation of meteoric water through structurally reactivated fault zones that remain a zone of preferential fluid circulation. H: Erosion of the Athabasca and part of Martin Lake basin rocks and weathering of the deposit resulted in the recent formation of secondary uranium minerals and late alteration veins. Deposition of the 2.33 Ga Murmac Bay Group sediments (Hartlaub and Ashton, 1998) was followed by intrusion of the ca. 2321±3 Ma Gunnar granite (Evoy, 1969; Hartlaub et al., 2004a), which hosts the granite-related metasomatic-type U 3 uranium mineralization (Fig. 3.11C). The timing of this mineralization is constrained between the age of the granite (ca. 2321±3 Ma) and the brecciation event (1850 Ma; Dieng et al., 2011) that overprinted the granite-related U-mineralization at Gunnar. δ 18 O, δ 13 C and δ 2 H isotopic compositions of syn-ore Cal 5 calcite and Chl 5 chlorite (Figs. 3.7 and 3.8) indicate that U 3 mineralization has ore-forming components consistent with derivation from magmatic fluids (Fig. 3.11C). The strong negative Eu anomaly in U 3 uraninite indicates retention of plagioclase during albitization of the granite. Collectively, these results demonstrate that fluids involved in the metasomatic alteration of the Gunnar granite could 122
- Page 89 and 90: Mylonites were then reactivated at
- Page 91 and 92: and thrusting during the 1.94-1.92
- Page 93 and 94: Beaverlodge area (Morelli et al., 2
- Page 95 and 96: dikes (Ernst and Buchan, 2001b) and
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 2.15: Distribution of 207 Pb
- Page 99 and 100: CHAPTER 3 GENESIS OF MULTIFARIOUS U
- Page 101 and 102: eccia-type. The other styles of min
- Page 103 and 104: The basement consist of Neoarchean
- Page 105 and 106: of essentially unmetamorphosed arko
- Page 107 and 108: WDX X-ray spectrometers at Carleton
- Page 109 and 110: 3.4. Results 3.4.1. Paragenesis of
- Page 111 and 112: are derived from their chlorite cry
- Page 113 and 114: Figure 3.4. Photomicrographs of typ
- Page 115 and 116: 3.4J). Py 6 Pyrite and Cpy 5 chalco
- Page 117 and 118: mineralization varies from 25.70 to
- Page 119 and 120: 6137APt71 60.67 13.73 4.59 6.48 0.0
- Page 121 and 122: Fig. 3.6A). The Ca may result from
- Page 123 and 124: Sample ID 1 ± 2 ± 3.a ± 4 ± 5.a
- Page 125 and 126: Stable isotopic O and C composition
- Page 127 and 128: Sample ID Deposit Mineral Mineral v
- Page 129 and 130: equilibrium with a fluid having δ
- Page 131 and 132: Syn-ore Chl 8 chlorite sampled from
- Page 133 and 134: Figure 3.9. Binary diagrams showing
- Page 135 and 136: Figure 3.10. Chondrite-normalized R
- Page 137 and 138: Retrograde metamorphism Early vein
- Page 139: contents in syn-ore Chl 4 chlorite
- Page 143 and 144: mineralizations, which upgraded the
- Page 145 and 146: metamorphic origin of the main U 4
- Page 147 and 148: y the abundance of Ap 1 apatite and
- Page 149 and 150: of late fluid events that have affe
- Page 151 and 152: CHAPTER 4 FLUID EVOLUTION AND GENES
- Page 153 and 154: 1990, 1991; Wyborn et al., 1990). H
- Page 155 and 156: stable isotope geochemistry, U-Pb g
- Page 157 and 158: coincident with the initiation of s
- Page 159 and 160: plasma mass spectrometry (LA-HR-ICP
- Page 161 and 162: The Coronation Hill deposit occupie
- Page 163 and 164: arsenides, nickel selenide and copp
- Page 165 and 166: No corrections were made to the 238
- Page 167 and 168: which was interpreted as being asso
- Page 169 and 170: porphyry and coated by Chl 1 formin
- Page 171 and 172: Mineralized breccias showing quartz
- Page 173 and 174: SOUTH ALLIGATOR RIVER GROUP EL SHER
- Page 175 and 176: A Carbonaceous Shale B Src 1 Qtz 1
- Page 177 and 178: A Granite Qtz 0 fragments Qtz 0 B M
- Page 179 and 180: chemical composition as a result of
- Page 181 and 182: Sample I.D SiO 2 CaO FeO ThO 2 MnO
- Page 183 and 184: site occupancy (Cathelineau, 1988).
- Page 185 and 186: Mineral values Temperature Fluid va
- Page 187 and 188: Corrected ratios Apparent ages ( ±
- Page 189 and 190: G H Figure 4.12. U-Pb concordia dia
decompression and hydration reactions was the mechanism of veins formation. U was<br />
transported as uranyl-carbonate-fluoride complexes. C: At Gunnar, U 3 was derived from<br />
magmatic fluids from the Gunnar granite. PO -3 4 and F - were important ore transporting<br />
complexes. D: Reactivation of fault zones during early regional metamorphism of the Trans-<br />
Hudson or post-peak Thelon-Taltson Orogen resulted in massive brecciation at shallow<br />
structural levels. Metamorphic-hydrothermal U-mineralizing fluids derived from dehydration<br />
of hydrous minerals during metamorphism ascended upward along deep fractures and<br />
decompression caused decrease in the solubility of the carbonate complexes promoting U<br />
deposition. E: During the Paleoproterozoic, the Martin Lake Basin and associated alkaline<br />
mafic dikes formed and hydrothermal U 5 -mineralizing solutions resulted in magmatichydrothermal<br />
degassing along pre-existing fractures. F: Ore-forming brines from the<br />
Athabasca Basin descended along fractures in the basement rocks and U 6 deposition was via<br />
reduction through interaction between oxidizing basinal brines and reduced metamorphic<br />
basement lithologies. G: Post-ore incursion and circulation of meteoric water through<br />
structurally reactivated fault zones that remain a zone of preferential fluid circulation. H:<br />
Erosion of the Athabasca and part of Martin Lake basin rocks and weathering of the deposit<br />
resulted in the recent formation of secondary uranium minerals and late alteration veins.<br />
Deposition of the 2.33 Ga Murmac Bay Group sediments (Hartlaub and Ashton,<br />
1998) was followed by intrusion of the ca. 2321±3 Ma Gunnar granite (Evoy, 1969;<br />
Hartlaub et al., 2004a), which hosts the granite-related metasomatic-type U 3 uranium<br />
mineralization (Fig. 3.11C). The timing of this mineralization is constrained between the<br />
age of the granite (ca. 2321±3 Ma) and the brecciation event (1850 Ma; Dieng et al., 2011)<br />
that overprinted the granite-related U-mineralization at Gunnar. δ 18 O, δ 13 C and δ 2 H<br />
isotopic compositions of syn-ore Cal 5 calcite and Chl 5 chlorite (Figs. 3.7 and 3.8) indicate<br />
that U 3 mineralization has ore-forming components consistent with derivation from<br />
magmatic fluids (Fig. 3.11C). The strong negative Eu anomaly in U 3 uraninite indicates<br />
retention of plagioclase during albitization of the granite. Collectively, these results<br />
demonstrate that fluids involved in the metasomatic alteration of the Gunnar granite could<br />
122