Tong Tana - Bruno Manser Fonds
Tong Tana - Bruno Manser Fonds
Tong Tana - Bruno Manser Fonds
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Switzerland – speaking of<br />
wood – with disdain!<br />
rg – The SHIV (Schweizerischer Sägereiund<br />
Holzindustrie-Verband, the Swiss association<br />
of sawmills and wood manufacturers)<br />
and the WVS (Waldwirtschaft Verband<br />
Schweiz, the Swiss forestry association) have<br />
published their annual reports of 1998. The<br />
reports are full of all kinds of snide remarks.<br />
The WVS states that the issue of labelling according<br />
to origin has been resolved by the Q-<br />
label propagated by the WVS, 85% of the<br />
wood having to be from Swiss forests. We<br />
then asked ourselves: what about the remaining<br />
15% and what about foreign wood which<br />
... priori cannot receive a Q-label Three<br />
years ago the same circles were fighting<br />
against the so-called discrimination of wood<br />
by a mandatory declaration. And now this<br />
should not be the case anymore with a onesided<br />
declaration of wood which is 85% worthy<br />
of getting a Q-label<br />
rg – Emil Mosimann, president of the SHIV,<br />
formulated his “realistic demands” for the<br />
favourable development of basic conditions<br />
for the wood manufacturing industry in the association’s<br />
annual report. Apart from fair<br />
transport conditions, research capacity at universities,<br />
a good presence at the Expo 2001<br />
and “hopefully” at Sion 2006, he called for<br />
“fair certifying partners (a. o. WWF, Pro<br />
Natura, Greenpeace, BMF, etc. – the Ed.)<br />
who are primarily interested in the actual state<br />
of the forest and forestry, not in selling labels.”<br />
The gentlemen responsible for the policies of<br />
the association never tire in repeating the<br />
same phrases about the eco-product wood<br />
over and over again like a mantra and at the<br />
same time shooting verbally at its potential<br />
partners. As long as such gentlemen do not<br />
disappear from the stage the goodwill of a<br />
wide range of consumers can (unfortunately)<br />
hardly be strengthened towards using native<br />
wood.<br />
rg – The newspaper “Neue Zürcher<br />
Zeitung” dated June 8, 1999, printed a supplement<br />
on the subject of paper manufacturing.<br />
Under the title “The forest and paper –<br />
widespread misunderstandings due to bad information”<br />
the CEO of the paper factory<br />
Biberist AG, Jürg Müller, could contribute his<br />
personal truths. Müller formulated statements<br />
such as, “Whereas in some countries outside<br />
Europe more wood is cut than can grow back<br />
in the same time span, the world’s forest land<br />
is increasing” or “There is no global lack of<br />
wood, on the contrary, in order to keep the<br />
forests in balance more wood has to be<br />
felled”. Furthermore, “It does not make sense<br />
to forbid the renewal of a forest under the<br />
pretext of wanting to save forests. It is just as<br />
misleading to leave forests in their original<br />
state without considering the economical<br />
difficulties of the owners of the forests; environmental<br />
protection should show consideration<br />
for the economy.” The fact that the latter<br />
point stated by Müller is still a common one at<br />
the end of the 20 th century seems to be clear.<br />
The assumption that economy has priority<br />
over environmental protection does not really<br />
show competence in someone who feels entitled<br />
to write about “widespread misunderstandings<br />
due to bad information on paper<br />
and the forest”.<br />
rg – The carpenters’ journal “Schreinerzeitung”<br />
dated March 25, 1999, published<br />
its views on the calls for the boycott of tropical<br />
wood under the title “The use of tropical<br />
wood: the facts”. According to the opinion of<br />
the “Schreinerzeitung”, such renunciations<br />
point in the wrong direction when measured<br />
against the main reasons for the destruction of<br />
the tropical forests – mismanagement and<br />
social ills in the tropical wood producing<br />
countries. Alleviation can only be achieved<br />
through development aid in those areas<br />
under the condition that the aid be used for<br />
the given purpose and not disappear into<br />
the pockets of corrupt government officials!<br />
That the wood industry is interwoven with the<br />
interests of a privileged class of politicians,<br />
that the land rights of local peoples are disregarded<br />
and that corruption is daily fare,<br />
are, unfortunately, all facts. The “Schreinerzeitung”<br />
indirectly confirms these facts – it just<br />
sees the use of development money as the<br />
problem...<br />
14