06.01.2015 Views

Tong Tana - Bruno Manser Fonds

Tong Tana - Bruno Manser Fonds

Tong Tana - Bruno Manser Fonds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Switzerland – speaking of<br />

wood – with disdain!<br />

rg – The SHIV (Schweizerischer Sägereiund<br />

Holzindustrie-Verband, the Swiss association<br />

of sawmills and wood manufacturers)<br />

and the WVS (Waldwirtschaft Verband<br />

Schweiz, the Swiss forestry association) have<br />

published their annual reports of 1998. The<br />

reports are full of all kinds of snide remarks.<br />

The WVS states that the issue of labelling according<br />

to origin has been resolved by the Q-<br />

label propagated by the WVS, 85% of the<br />

wood having to be from Swiss forests. We<br />

then asked ourselves: what about the remaining<br />

15% and what about foreign wood which<br />

... priori cannot receive a Q-label Three<br />

years ago the same circles were fighting<br />

against the so-called discrimination of wood<br />

by a mandatory declaration. And now this<br />

should not be the case anymore with a onesided<br />

declaration of wood which is 85% worthy<br />

of getting a Q-label<br />

rg – Emil Mosimann, president of the SHIV,<br />

formulated his “realistic demands” for the<br />

favourable development of basic conditions<br />

for the wood manufacturing industry in the association’s<br />

annual report. Apart from fair<br />

transport conditions, research capacity at universities,<br />

a good presence at the Expo 2001<br />

and “hopefully” at Sion 2006, he called for<br />

“fair certifying partners (a. o. WWF, Pro<br />

Natura, Greenpeace, BMF, etc. – the Ed.)<br />

who are primarily interested in the actual state<br />

of the forest and forestry, not in selling labels.”<br />

The gentlemen responsible for the policies of<br />

the association never tire in repeating the<br />

same phrases about the eco-product wood<br />

over and over again like a mantra and at the<br />

same time shooting verbally at its potential<br />

partners. As long as such gentlemen do not<br />

disappear from the stage the goodwill of a<br />

wide range of consumers can (unfortunately)<br />

hardly be strengthened towards using native<br />

wood.<br />

rg – The newspaper “Neue Zürcher<br />

Zeitung” dated June 8, 1999, printed a supplement<br />

on the subject of paper manufacturing.<br />

Under the title “The forest and paper –<br />

widespread misunderstandings due to bad information”<br />

the CEO of the paper factory<br />

Biberist AG, Jürg Müller, could contribute his<br />

personal truths. Müller formulated statements<br />

such as, “Whereas in some countries outside<br />

Europe more wood is cut than can grow back<br />

in the same time span, the world’s forest land<br />

is increasing” or “There is no global lack of<br />

wood, on the contrary, in order to keep the<br />

forests in balance more wood has to be<br />

felled”. Furthermore, “It does not make sense<br />

to forbid the renewal of a forest under the<br />

pretext of wanting to save forests. It is just as<br />

misleading to leave forests in their original<br />

state without considering the economical<br />

difficulties of the owners of the forests; environmental<br />

protection should show consideration<br />

for the economy.” The fact that the latter<br />

point stated by Müller is still a common one at<br />

the end of the 20 th century seems to be clear.<br />

The assumption that economy has priority<br />

over environmental protection does not really<br />

show competence in someone who feels entitled<br />

to write about “widespread misunderstandings<br />

due to bad information on paper<br />

and the forest”.<br />

rg – The carpenters’ journal “Schreinerzeitung”<br />

dated March 25, 1999, published<br />

its views on the calls for the boycott of tropical<br />

wood under the title “The use of tropical<br />

wood: the facts”. According to the opinion of<br />

the “Schreinerzeitung”, such renunciations<br />

point in the wrong direction when measured<br />

against the main reasons for the destruction of<br />

the tropical forests – mismanagement and<br />

social ills in the tropical wood producing<br />

countries. Alleviation can only be achieved<br />

through development aid in those areas<br />

under the condition that the aid be used for<br />

the given purpose and not disappear into<br />

the pockets of corrupt government officials!<br />

That the wood industry is interwoven with the<br />

interests of a privileged class of politicians,<br />

that the land rights of local peoples are disregarded<br />

and that corruption is daily fare,<br />

are, unfortunately, all facts. The “Schreinerzeitung”<br />

indirectly confirms these facts – it just<br />

sees the use of development money as the<br />

problem...<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!