Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Episode 3: Franken-Foods & Cancer Causers<br />
Ty: Let me ask you this, one of <strong>the</strong> common arguments that you<br />
get from those that are producing <strong>the</strong> GMO crops is that we need<br />
this to feed <strong>the</strong> world.<br />
Jeffrey Smith: No, no, <strong>the</strong>y need it to pay <strong>the</strong>ir salaries. GMOs are so<br />
inept at feeding <strong>the</strong> world that <strong>the</strong> biggest paper in <strong>the</strong> world, <strong>the</strong> biggest<br />
study, more than 400 scientists sponsored by <strong>the</strong> UN and signed on by<br />
more than 58 countries concluded that <strong>the</strong> current generation of GMOs<br />
has nothing to offer feeding <strong>the</strong> hungry world, eradicating poverty, or<br />
creating sustainable agriculture. That’s <strong>the</strong> ISTAD report. In fact, <strong>the</strong><br />
Union of Concerned Scientists study showed that it actually doesn’t<br />
increase yields and <strong>the</strong> USDA recent study verified that GMOs do not<br />
increase yields, and in many cases, reduce yields. Now not only do <strong>the</strong>y<br />
not increase yields but <strong>the</strong>y concentrate <strong>the</strong> ownership of agriculture.<br />
They bind farmers in a cycle of dependence on agricultural inputs like<br />
Round-Up. They also disallow farmers from saving seeds year after<br />
year. And by spraying <strong>the</strong> Round-Up on <strong>the</strong> Round-Up ready crops it<br />
kills all <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r plant bio diversity. We call it weeds in this country.<br />
They call it food in <strong>the</strong> developing country because <strong>the</strong>y eat a lot of<br />
those greens as part of <strong>the</strong>ir biodiversity so it’s not designed properly for<br />
feeding <strong>the</strong> hungry world. And it’s really an accident prone, very<br />
dangerous technology, which we think by it’s very nature is linked to<br />
diseases.<br />
The process of genetic engineering—you take a gene from one species.<br />
You make millions of copies, put it into a gene gun, shoot that gun into a<br />
plate of millions of cells and clone <strong>the</strong> cell into a plant. So now every<br />
single cell of that plant has that gene in it but also it’s caused massive<br />
collateral damage, two to four percent of <strong>the</strong> DNA is different mostly<br />
mutated. So you could have hundreds or thousands of mutations up and<br />
down <strong>the</strong> DNA. Now that means that you can turn on genes, shut off<br />
genes, or change <strong>the</strong> levels of gene expression. Now that can be<br />
extremely dangerous for diseases and disorders, allergens, etc.,<br />
because you can have toxins go up, allergens go up, Monsanto’s corn<br />
has a gene that was switched on that produces an allergen. Monsanto’s<br />
soy has as much as seven times <strong>the</strong> amount of a known soy allergen.<br />
You can end up switching on an oncogene causing a carcinogen to<br />
flourish or an increased level of a <strong>cancer</strong> causing compound. You can<br />
also change all of <strong>the</strong> secondary metabolites or <strong>the</strong> natural produced by<br />
<strong>the</strong> plant which we’re now discovering today can fight <strong>cancer</strong>. But we<br />
know like just a handful of <strong>the</strong>m. But even before we understand <strong>the</strong>m<br />
and catalog <strong>the</strong>m we’re changing all that with genetic engineering<br />
because when you change it at <strong>the</strong> DNA level you change all <strong>the</strong>se<br />
different expressions at that higher level.<br />
The Quest for The Cures Page 85