the-truth-about-cancer

Episode 3: Franken-Foods & Cancer Causers
Ty: Oh, so since they’re not significantly different than normal
food it doesn’t—they don’t need to tell us that they’re doing this to
us.
Jeffrey Smith: They don’t need to tell us, they don’t need to test it.
They can just put it on the market and assume that it’s safe. And if they
want to do tests they can do tests. And if they don’t want to—and the
tests that they do tobacco science, completely rigged to avoid finding
problems. We catch the red handed.
Ty: So the only testing is required are self tests that they submit
and then, of course, it’s going to—
Jeffrey Smith: They can submit them if they want and they usually—if
they do submit just summaries they will never give a reviewer enough
information to determine safety. The tests typically on animals end in 90
days. So you feed an animal a rat, for example, let’s say 33 percent of
it’s diet is a genetically modified corn for 90 days. And if it looks good
after 90 days you feed it to humans for their entire lives. Now a research
team headed by Dr. Seralini decided to extend the study of 90 days to
two years, the approximate lifespan of a rat. Now Seralini had been
reviewing the submissions to France and to the European union by
Monsanto and saw that Round-Up ready corn fed to rats showed more
than 50 different statistically significant changes in the animals
compared to the control. And Monsanto said, oh, there’s no problem.
And Seralini says, what do you mean there’s no problem This is very
serious and published it showing that there was very significant signs of
toxicity. So he secretly extended the study using the same type of rats,
the same control group size, but many, many more parameters that they
tested for and starting after the 90 days in the next month the first rat
started to get tumors. And by the end up to 80 percent of the female rats
had tumors, almost all of them mammary gland tumors, up to 50 percent
of male rats had tumors compared to far less in the controls.
Ty: I’m blown away from that information from Jeffrey Smith. I
really believe that this is unconscionable that the actual Seralini
studies showed 80 percent of the female rates, 50 percent of the
male rats got cancerous tumors from eating this genetically
modified corn, which by the way is in everything. Now why do we
not label genetically modified organisms in the United States
except for Vermont which recently passed the new GMO labeling,
nobody else labels them. Why not it’s because of what’s called
the substantially equivalent doctrine. This was authored by a man
named Michael Taylor who was an attorney for Monsanto in the
‘90s. and he said that since genetically modified organisms are
substantially equivalent to food that we don’t need to test them.
The Quest for The Cures Page 65