the-truth-about-cancer

the-truth-about-cancer the-truth-about-cancer

andrew.j.green
from andrew.j.green More from this publisher
06.01.2015 Views

The Truth About Cancer like oxygen action and works as against cancer. Another component would be cancer is an acidic process. So in an alkaline environment cancer does not do well. So there’s many common characteristics that cancer has. One of those is that it is an obligate glucose metabolizer. So if you can reduce the amount of simple sugars you are effectively going to be reducing the food supply to the cancer and that’s the reason I made that comment that we want to reduce the amount of sugar. Now I use, for example, when we give IV fluids to cancer patients through our treatments sometimes I’ll use dextrose, D5W. Now that’s sugar. So why would I use sugar Because I use it as a Trojan horse. So there’s only five things that can enter into a cancer cell. There’s water, there’s vitamin C, there’s sugar, rubidium and caesium [ph]. And as you know that glucose, sugar, and vitamin C, the receptor sites for sugar and vitamin C are identical, morphologically identical. So when you actually give vitamin C to an individual intravenously the cancer sees that as sugar. It opens it up and allows the sugar to come in. So I use that sugar as a Trojan horse to put vitamin C and other types of things. I kind of use it as insulin potentiated type technique. I used to use insulin potentiated low dose chemotherapy. I stopped using that 15 years ago. 1999 was the last time I used low dose insulin potentiated chemotherapy. But I still use sugar as a Trojan horse to get certain things into the cancer. Patrick Quillin who wrote, Beating Cancer with Nutrition, a very good friend of mine, in his book says that 42 – 46 percent of cancer patients die of cachexia, of malnutrition. How many oncologists are addressing malnutrition. No one. In fact, what do they do They give people Ensure, which is sugar and you know that cancer is an obligate glucose metabolizer. It needs sugar to survive. In fact, one of the techniques is to reduce the amount of sugar so that it can’t feed the cancer. But they’re actually giving gasoline to the fire and then expecting to put out the fire. You can’t put out a fire with gasoline. So that’s 42 to 46 percent. Now if you look at other statistics, what does a cancer patient actually die of They usually end up dying from some type of an opportunistic infection—pneumonia or whatever, urinary tract infection becomes septic, whatever. They also die of multi organ system failure because the tumor burden is so great the system can’t keep up, the entire blood disgraces that result from this. So really when you look at it cancer has never really killed anybody. It’s the sequelae of cancer. It’s the consequences of cancer that actually kill people. And if we can start to, one, understand what’s causing cancer, because cancer is not caused by—why does one person get cancer and another person doesn’t The Quest for The Cures Page 54

Episode 2: Are You Immune Like I said, there’s a genetic cause. And there’s—the one thing that I believe that this current administration, it may only be the one thing that they’ve done right—okay, that’s opinion and I’ll refrain from being political here—but there was a presidential report, presidential cancer report, that came out in 2010 and they admitted for the first time that I know of in the history of medicine that cancer is an environmental issue and they need to look at more environmental causes of cancer. And this was a 250-some page report which we have available on our website for download for free. But its—the essence of it, I mean this 250-some page report, the essence of it is they recognize that the number one cause of cancer is environmental and there has not been adequate addressing of that cause. Nobody’s ever said that before and that’s exactly the answer. Again, all disease, not just cancer, is a deficiency of some type of a nutrient or it’s a toxicity and it’s dissolved as a toxicity. It can be a toxicity plus a deficiency, or it can just be the toxicity but if you can address those two things then you’ve got a chance of actually resolving the situation. Dr. Patrick Quillin: Instead of saying seven minutes, doctor gives a prescription, we need a new system that says what’s the underlying cause Let’s see if we can nip this thing in the bud. Etiology is the official scientific phrase that says let’s look at the patient’s diet. Do they have mercury poisoning How much sleep are you getting Let’s look at pesticides, look at your bowel habits. We could spend the rest of the time just talking about the 100 trillion organisms in our gut. They’re called commensal. Commensal is eating at the dinner table with us. And The Quest for The Cures Page 55

The Truth About Cancer<br />

like oxygen action and works as against <strong>cancer</strong>. Ano<strong>the</strong>r component<br />

would be <strong>cancer</strong> is an acidic process. So in an alkaline environment<br />

<strong>cancer</strong> does not do well. So <strong>the</strong>re’s many common characteristics that<br />

<strong>cancer</strong> has. One of those is that it is an obligate glucose metabolizer. So<br />

if you can reduce <strong>the</strong> amount of simple sugars you are effectively going<br />

to be reducing <strong>the</strong> food supply to <strong>the</strong> <strong>cancer</strong> and that’s <strong>the</strong> reason I<br />

made that comment that we want to reduce <strong>the</strong> amount of sugar. Now I<br />

use, for example, when we give IV fluids to <strong>cancer</strong> patients through our<br />

treatments sometimes I’ll use dextrose, D5W. Now that’s sugar. So why<br />

would I use sugar Because I use it as a Trojan horse.<br />

So <strong>the</strong>re’s only five things that can enter into a <strong>cancer</strong> cell. There’s<br />

water, <strong>the</strong>re’s vitamin C, <strong>the</strong>re’s sugar, rubidium and caesium [ph]. And<br />

as you know that glucose, sugar, and vitamin C, <strong>the</strong> receptor sites for<br />

sugar and vitamin C are identical, morphologically identical. So when<br />

you actually give vitamin C to an individual intravenously <strong>the</strong> <strong>cancer</strong><br />

sees that as sugar. It opens it up and allows <strong>the</strong> sugar to come in. So I<br />

use that sugar as a Trojan horse to put vitamin C and o<strong>the</strong>r types of<br />

things. I kind of use it as insulin potentiated type technique. I used to<br />

use insulin potentiated low dose chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy. I stopped using that 15<br />

years ago. 1999 was <strong>the</strong> last time I used low dose insulin potentiated<br />

chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy. But I still use sugar as a Trojan horse to get certain<br />

things into <strong>the</strong> <strong>cancer</strong>.<br />

Patrick Quillin who wrote, Beating Cancer with Nutrition, a very good<br />

friend of mine, in his book says that 42 – 46 percent of <strong>cancer</strong> patients<br />

die of cachexia, of malnutrition. How many oncologists are addressing<br />

malnutrition. No one. In fact, what do <strong>the</strong>y do They give people Ensure,<br />

which is sugar and you know that <strong>cancer</strong> is an obligate glucose<br />

metabolizer. It needs sugar to survive. In fact, one of <strong>the</strong> techniques is<br />

to reduce <strong>the</strong> amount of sugar so that it can’t feed <strong>the</strong> <strong>cancer</strong>. But<br />

<strong>the</strong>y’re actually giving gasoline to <strong>the</strong> fire and <strong>the</strong>n expecting to put out<br />

<strong>the</strong> fire. You can’t put out a fire with gasoline. So that’s 42 to 46 percent.<br />

Now if you look at o<strong>the</strong>r statistics, what does a <strong>cancer</strong> patient actually<br />

die of They usually end up dying from some type of an opportunistic<br />

infection—pneumonia or whatever, urinary tract infection becomes<br />

septic, whatever. They also die of multi organ system failure because<br />

<strong>the</strong> tumor burden is so great <strong>the</strong> system can’t keep up, <strong>the</strong> entire blood<br />

disgraces that result from this. So really when you look at it <strong>cancer</strong> has<br />

never really killed anybody. It’s <strong>the</strong> sequelae of <strong>cancer</strong>. It’s <strong>the</strong><br />

consequences of <strong>cancer</strong> that actually kill people. And if we can start to,<br />

one, understand what’s causing <strong>cancer</strong>, because <strong>cancer</strong> is not caused<br />

by—why does one person get <strong>cancer</strong> and ano<strong>the</strong>r person doesn’t<br />

The Quest for The Cures Page 54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!