the-truth-about-cancer

the-truth-about-cancer the-truth-about-cancer

andrew.j.green
from andrew.j.green More from this publisher
06.01.2015 Views

The Truth About Cancer Dr. Rashid Buttar: Exactly! And that’s the question that when you ask a person the logical answer is, yeah, I’d fire the mechanic. So then why aren’t they firing the doctors because that’s exactly what the doctors are doing. They’ve got a problem, they’re covering it up with a drug to cover up the symptoms so the person doesn’t feel or experience the negative which is the body’s own mechanism of information saying, hey, caution, there’s a problem. And that’s what cancer is. It’s a caution. Cancer is a problem that is telling you that there’s a real problem but it’s a problem that is like a slap in the face. It’s not somebody saying, hey, wake up. It’s more like a punch to the face saying, wake up, but people sometimes don’t get that and they start to panic and they do more worse things for their own body, i.e.—and we can go into the details of this if you want to, but you know what I’m talking about where they’re starting to—radiation’s bad for any healthy person. Why Because it suppresses the immune system and causes ______ [00:26:53] to form so that cells mutate and you end up getting cancer. So now if somebody has cancer what do you do You put them into that very same thing that you know is going to cause cancer. Now radiation is supposed to kill the cancer, that’s the philosophy. But then you’re also going to cause more mutation to the healthy cells and cause a worsening of the effect just like pouring gasoline on a fire. So in the next 20 – 30 years this will be the first mainstay approach. And in fact, if it was a first mainstay approach that doctors would use we wouldn’t be in the healthcare crisis that we are in, not only in our own country, but internationally speaking. People would be healthier. There would be less disease. There would be less pathology that we would have to deal with. But that’s not the case. Why Because they seem to think that taking a drug and covering up a symptom is a better option. You got a pile of horse manure in your hair. What are you going to do Well, the logical thing would be take the manure out and get rid of it. But instead they put a carpet down. Well, it’s still kind of lumpy. Then they flatten it. Well, I can still smell it. And then they spray some air freshener here. This is like one drug over another drug over another drug over another drug trying to deal with the symptom side effects of the first drug and the second drug, third drug. And finally they’re like the person just deteriorates. No matter what you say when you put a carpet over that manure, you spray air freshener, you put perfume out there, you burn a match, whatever the case is, the problem is still there. You’ve only covered it up. Ty: So in other words, you’re saying that—and this is specifically in the treatment of cancer here I’m talking about—conventional methods of treating cancer, which would be chemo and the radiation and the surgery, they’re really the equivalent of taking a The Quest for The Cures Page 20

Episode 1: The Cancer Pandemic hammer and smashing the check engine light or taking a carpet and covering up the manure but they haven’t really solved the problem. They’ve just covered up the symptom. Dr. Rashid Buttar: Absolutely! In fact, Patrick Quillin who wrote, Beating Cancer with Nutrition, is a very good friend of mine. In his book says that 42 – 46 percent of cancer patients die of cachexia, of malnutrition. How many oncologists are addressing malnutrition No one. In fact, what do they do They give people Ensure, which is sugar. And you know that cancer is an obligate glucose metabolizer. It needs sugar to survive. In fact, one of the techniques is to reduce the amount of sugar so that it can’t feed the cancer. But they’re actually giving gasoline to the fire and then expecting you to put out the fire. You can’t put out a fire with gasoline. So that’s 42 to 46 percent. Now if you look at other statistics, what does a cancer patient actually die of They usually end up dying from some type of an opportunistic infection—pneumonia, whatever, urinary tract infection becomes septic, whatever. They also die of multi organ system failure because the tumor burden is so great, the system can’t keep up with the entire blood disgraces that result from this. So really when you look at it cancer has never really killed anybody. It’s the sequelae of cancer. It’s the consequences of cancer that actually kill people. Dr. Veronique Desaulniers: It doesn’t make sense to poison and to radiate and to cut a body that’s already sick in the first place. People don’t get sick because they have cancer. They’re already sick and then they develop cancer. So if you start trying to poison and put these horrific things into a person’s body that’s already weak and sick in the first place you’re not going to get very good results. And statistics show us that. The Quest for The Cures Page 21

Episode 1: The Cancer Pandemic<br />

hammer and smashing <strong>the</strong> check engine light or taking a carpet<br />

and covering up <strong>the</strong> manure but <strong>the</strong>y haven’t really solved <strong>the</strong><br />

problem. They’ve just covered up <strong>the</strong> symptom.<br />

Dr. Rashid Buttar: Absolutely! In fact, Patrick Quillin who wrote,<br />

Beating Cancer with Nutrition, is a very good friend of mine. In his book<br />

says that 42 – 46 percent of <strong>cancer</strong> patients die of cachexia, of<br />

malnutrition. How many oncologists are addressing malnutrition No<br />

one. In fact, what do <strong>the</strong>y do They give people Ensure, which is sugar.<br />

And you know that <strong>cancer</strong> is an obligate glucose metabolizer. It needs<br />

sugar to survive. In fact, one of <strong>the</strong> techniques is to reduce <strong>the</strong> amount<br />

of sugar so that it can’t feed <strong>the</strong> <strong>cancer</strong>. But <strong>the</strong>y’re actually giving<br />

gasoline to <strong>the</strong> fire and <strong>the</strong>n expecting you to put out <strong>the</strong> fire. You can’t<br />

put out a fire with gasoline. So that’s 42 to 46 percent.<br />

Now if you look at o<strong>the</strong>r statistics, what does a <strong>cancer</strong> patient actually<br />

die of They usually end up dying from some type of an opportunistic<br />

infection—pneumonia, whatever, urinary tract infection becomes septic,<br />

whatever. They also die of multi organ system failure because <strong>the</strong> tumor<br />

burden is so great, <strong>the</strong> system can’t keep up with <strong>the</strong> entire blood<br />

disgraces that result from this. So really when you look at it <strong>cancer</strong> has<br />

never really killed anybody. It’s <strong>the</strong> sequelae of <strong>cancer</strong>. It’s <strong>the</strong><br />

consequences of <strong>cancer</strong> that actually kill people.<br />

Dr. Veronique Desaulniers: It doesn’t make sense to poison and to<br />

radiate and to cut a body that’s already sick in <strong>the</strong> first place. People<br />

don’t get sick because <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>cancer</strong>. They’re already sick and <strong>the</strong>n<br />

<strong>the</strong>y develop <strong>cancer</strong>. So if you start trying to poison and put <strong>the</strong>se<br />

horrific things into a person’s body that’s already weak and sick in <strong>the</strong><br />

first place you’re not going to get very good results. And statistics show<br />

us that.<br />

The Quest for The Cures Page 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!