the-truth-about-cancer
the-truth-about-cancer the-truth-about-cancer
The Truth About Cancer septic shock occurs because of gram negative bacteria produce a polysaccharide kind of a carbohydrate that’s toxic to the human and people die from that. The death rate today is still in the range of 40 to 50 percent with septic shock. In those days it was like 90 percent. Well, these people in Uruguay at an intensive care—what we would call an intensive care unit today had learned about coffee enemas from the conventional medical world, started treating their patients with coffee enemas and had great success. We published it in a peer review journal. We have a translation that was originally published in Spanish, almost like 90 percent reversal with septic shock. That should have changed the way hospitalists treat septic shock all over the world was ignored because it was folksy. It wasn’t high tech even then in 1941 – 42. So we have dozens of articles. Kelly collected them, dozens of articles from the mainstream, peer reviewed medical literature and discussing the use of enemas, coffee enemas, other types of colonics, and the successful treatment of all kinds of illnesses. So he incorporated them into his practice and it helped and he added other things like liver flushes and colon cleanses and juice fasts and skin brushing which is an all naturopathic technique to get them the lymphatics to work better, kidney flushes, all kinds of techniques that we still use today. I went through over 10 thousand of Kelly’s records, interviewed over a thousand of his patients, evaluated 455 of his advanced cancer patients who had done well, evaluated 50 at great length representing 26 different types of cancer. Some of these patients we actually saw in our own immunology clinic. Well doctor, that’s really amazing. I wish we had film of this of Dr. Good examining these Kelly patients, writing notes in the official hospital records with his white coat and a stethoscope. We put it together in monograph form. I did the writing. I did the research. He was my mentor. So I evaluated 50 patients with 26 different types of cancer all poor prognosis or terminal or advanced who enjoyed extraordinary responses that could only be attributed to Dr. Kelly’s nutritional program, put this together in monograph form 1986, finished my immunology fellow. Now here I have Dr. Good as my mentor, the most published author in the history of medicine—50 books to his credit. He was either editor or co-writer of 50 books, over two thousand papers, couldn’t get it published. The general response were one of two. First, a lot of the editors didn’t believe it. In fact, I have some letters in my office from editors who warned Dr. Good this had to be a scam, fraudulent and I had conned him or something like that even though we saw the patients in our own clinic and Dr. Good knew they were real. The other thing is editors would say this is real but if it’s real it’s the most extraordinary thing in medicine but it’s also the most controversial, a nutritional approach to cancer. This is 1986 where to mention nutrition and cancer in the same sentence was tantamount to a felony. And the The Quest for The Cures Page 152
Episode 6: What Would Doc Do editor said this would be the end of my publishing career—The American Cancer Society, the National Institute of Health, the National Cancer Institute will make sure that I can’t feed my children so they would pass. We tried—I tried for two years, couldn’t get it published, eventually put it away, but finally in 2010 we published it, updated, rewritten with a long introduction by me updating it to 2010. Now at that point Dr. Good was not at Sloan-Kettering. I finished my immunology fellowship. We had a long talk, went out to dinner. And he said something very interesting. I don’t have it on tape so I can’t confirm it. But he said, you know, some of these cases are so extraordinary like five year survivor of pancreatic cancer, which he had never seen. His own second wife, or first—one of this former wives—he’s been married three times—had died of pancreatic cancer within two months when he was president of Sloan-Kettering. He couldn’t save his own wife. She died quickly. He said you’re showing me these cases. He said, I don’t know how Kelly’s doing this. I’ve never seen anything like this and I’m president of Sloan-Kettering. I mean, he said, people come from all over the world for my advice about cancer. You know, the whole Iranian crisis began because of Dr. Good. The shah [ph] of Iran got sick so he wanted the best physician in the world to come evaluate him so he picked Robert Good, flew Robert Good in his private jet, the shah’s private jet, to Iran. Dr. Good examined him and within—he was a brilliant clinician as well as researcher. Within 10 minutes made the diagnosis. He said you got gallbladder cancer. He said you got to come to New York. So he came to New York and New York Hospital and that’s when the Iranian revolution began. Ty: I had no idea. Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez: No one knows this at all. No one knows that the Iranian revolution began because of Robert Good, president of Sloan-Kettering, my mentor. Kelly himself had cancer and when he was trying to fight his own battle—you know, he was an orthodontist by training… Ty: What type of cancer did he have Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez: He had pancreatic cancer. Now I spoke to his doctor and said when I first did my research 30 years ago they were still alive. They never biopsied. They said he was too unstable. They couldn’t—they didn’t want to bring him to surgery. And this is before CAT scans. It was in the early 1960s. But they did x-rays. He had tumors in both lungs, fluid in his lungs, tumor in his hip. In fact, he always walked with a limp because the tumor had eaten through his hip bone. He had a tumor in his heart which is rare for pancreatic cancer. It was in his bone. And they said there was nothing we could do. They The Quest for The Cures Page 153
- Page 101 and 102: Episode 4: Spoiled Rotten breath mi
- Page 103 and 104: Episode 4: Spoiled Rotten trauma th
- Page 105 and 106: Episode 4: Spoiled Rotten bloody to
- Page 107 and 108: Episode 4: Spoiled Rotten thrombose
- Page 109 and 110: Episode 4: Spoiled Rotten cause the
- Page 111 and 112: Episode 4: Spoiled Rotten Ty: So an
- Page 113 and 114: Episode 4: Spoiled Rotten Ty: So ra
- Page 115 and 116: Episode 4: Spoiled Rotten good he m
- Page 117 and 118: Episode 4: Spoiled Rotten Episode
- Page 119 and 120: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer [M
- Page 121 and 122: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer Dr
- Page 123 and 124: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer UC
- Page 125 and 126: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer KC
- Page 127 and 128: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer Ot
- Page 129 and 130: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer Ty
- Page 131 and 132: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer Ch
- Page 133 and 134: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer Dr
- Page 135 and 136: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer an
- Page 137 and 138: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer th
- Page 139 and 140: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer th
- Page 141 and 142: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer be
- Page 143 and 144: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer in
- Page 145 and 146: Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer
- Page 147 and 148: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do [Music
- Page 149 and 150: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do they
- Page 151: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do nothin
- Page 155 and 156: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do the ho
- Page 157 and 158: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do cells.
- Page 159 and 160: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do coatin
- Page 161 and 162: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do compon
- Page 163 and 164: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do Ty: I
- Page 165 and 166: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do So the
- Page 167 and 168: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do The me
- Page 169 and 170: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do to do
- Page 171 and 172: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do Ty: [W
- Page 173 and 174: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do or alm
- Page 175 and 176: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do What w
- Page 177 and 178: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do keto
- Page 179 and 180: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do which
- Page 181 and 182: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do Ty: Th
- Page 183 and 184: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do Ty: We
- Page 185 and 186: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do 48 hou
- Page 187 and 188: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do take y
- Page 189 and 190: Episode 6: What Would Doc Do The
- Page 191 and 192: Episode 7: How to Survive and Thriv
- Page 193 and 194: Episode 7: How to Survive and Thriv
- Page 195 and 196: Episode 7: How to Survive and Thriv
- Page 197 and 198: Episode 7: How to Survive and Thriv
- Page 199 and 200: Episode 7: How to Survive and Thriv
- Page 201 and 202: Episode 7: How to Survive and Thriv
The Truth About Cancer<br />
septic shock occurs because of gram negative bacteria produce a<br />
polysaccharide kind of a carbohydrate that’s toxic to <strong>the</strong> human and<br />
people die from that. The death rate today is still in <strong>the</strong> range of 40 to 50<br />
percent with septic shock. In those days it was like 90 percent. Well,<br />
<strong>the</strong>se people in Uruguay at an intensive care—what we would call an<br />
intensive care unit today had learned <strong>about</strong> coffee enemas from <strong>the</strong><br />
conventional medical world, started treating <strong>the</strong>ir patients with coffee<br />
enemas and had great success. We published it in a peer review<br />
journal. We have a translation that was originally published in Spanish,<br />
almost like 90 percent reversal with septic shock. That should have<br />
changed <strong>the</strong> way hospitalists treat septic shock all over <strong>the</strong> world was<br />
ignored because it was folksy. It wasn’t high tech even <strong>the</strong>n in 1941 –<br />
42. So we have dozens of articles. Kelly collected <strong>the</strong>m, dozens of<br />
articles from <strong>the</strong> mainstream, peer reviewed medical literature and<br />
discussing <strong>the</strong> use of enemas, coffee enemas, o<strong>the</strong>r types of colonics,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> successful treatment of all kinds of illnesses. So he incorporated<br />
<strong>the</strong>m into his practice and it helped and he added o<strong>the</strong>r things like liver<br />
flushes and colon cleanses and juice fasts and skin brushing which is an<br />
all naturopathic technique to get <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> lymphatics to work better,<br />
kidney flushes, all kinds of techniques that we still use today.<br />
I went through over 10 thousand of Kelly’s records, interviewed over a<br />
thousand of his patients, evaluated 455 of his advanced <strong>cancer</strong> patients<br />
who had done well, evaluated 50 at great length representing 26<br />
different types of <strong>cancer</strong>. Some of <strong>the</strong>se patients we actually saw in our<br />
own immunology clinic. Well doctor, that’s really amazing. I wish we had<br />
film of this of Dr. Good examining <strong>the</strong>se Kelly patients, writing notes in<br />
<strong>the</strong> official hospital records with his white coat and a stethoscope. We<br />
put it toge<strong>the</strong>r in monograph form. I did <strong>the</strong> writing. I did <strong>the</strong> research.<br />
He was my mentor. So I evaluated 50 patients with 26 different types of<br />
<strong>cancer</strong> all poor prognosis or terminal or advanced who enjoyed<br />
extraordinary responses that could only be attributed to Dr. Kelly’s<br />
nutritional program, put this toge<strong>the</strong>r in monograph form 1986, finished<br />
my immunology fellow. Now here I have Dr. Good as my mentor, <strong>the</strong><br />
most published author in <strong>the</strong> history of medicine—50 books to his credit.<br />
He was ei<strong>the</strong>r editor or co-writer of 50 books, over two thousand papers,<br />
couldn’t get it published. The general response were one of two. First, a<br />
lot of <strong>the</strong> editors didn’t believe it. In fact, I have some letters in my office<br />
from editors who warned Dr. Good this had to be a scam, fraudulent and<br />
I had conned him or something like that even though we saw <strong>the</strong><br />
patients in our own clinic and Dr. Good knew <strong>the</strong>y were real.<br />
The o<strong>the</strong>r thing is editors would say this is real but if it’s real it’s <strong>the</strong> most<br />
extraordinary thing in medicine but it’s also <strong>the</strong> most controversial, a<br />
nutritional approach to <strong>cancer</strong>. This is 1986 where to mention nutrition<br />
and <strong>cancer</strong> in <strong>the</strong> same sentence was tantamount to a felony. And <strong>the</strong><br />
The Quest for The Cures Page 152