Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Episode 5: Eating Away at Cancer<br />
UCLA, that were in <strong>the</strong> biosphere and <strong>the</strong> whole thing was <strong>about</strong> <strong>the</strong>y<br />
were going to grow <strong>the</strong> food that <strong>the</strong>y used. And so it’s going to be a<br />
self-sustained environment and <strong>the</strong>y weren’t getting anything in or out of<br />
it. They’d have to grow what <strong>the</strong>y needed.<br />
Well, <strong>the</strong>y ended up growing—<strong>the</strong>y had something go wrong and <strong>the</strong>y<br />
couldn’t grow enough food for <strong>the</strong>m. So <strong>the</strong>y had to ration what <strong>the</strong>y ate<br />
to have less food. And while <strong>the</strong>y were hungry and all <strong>the</strong>y found<br />
remarkable physiological and psychological changes that were very<br />
positive and that really spawned <strong>the</strong> whole calorie restriction movement,<br />
you know, <strong>the</strong> calorie restriction, fasting movement, and so on. So<br />
calorie restriction with optimal nutrition <strong>the</strong>re’s now been more than two<br />
thousand studies in virtually every organism, single cell organism, all <strong>the</strong><br />
way up to primates and even in humans now that suggest that this is<br />
positive for physiology.<br />
That it actually is kind of like if you would say if <strong>the</strong>re was a fountain of<br />
youth it would extend life, delay disease, enhance performance,<br />
optimize weight, increase mental clarity and start going down <strong>the</strong> list of<br />
things that are beneficial from doing this approach. So if you now take<br />
calorie restriction and you add optimal nutrition most people would<br />
agree that if you ate less calories but you max out <strong>the</strong> nutrients and get<br />
all <strong>the</strong>se 51 that we’re talking <strong>about</strong> at <strong>the</strong> same time that it has got to<br />
be better for you than ei<strong>the</strong>r eating a lot of calorically dense food or a<br />
little bit of calorically dense food. You see what I’m saying. So that piece<br />
is a very important piece of <strong>the</strong> puzzle.<br />
There’s a really cool study in Journal of Nutrition in 2001. It’s four<br />
groups of mice, genetically altered mice, altered to be more susceptible<br />
to disease. So <strong>the</strong> first group of mice was—<strong>the</strong>y call it <strong>the</strong> all you could<br />
eat group. So <strong>the</strong>y gave it all <strong>the</strong> food it could eat all <strong>the</strong> time so it<br />
grazed all <strong>the</strong> time. They also added corn oil to <strong>the</strong> situation. So <strong>the</strong>se<br />
mice live an average of 232 days, so 232 on <strong>the</strong> average. And so <strong>the</strong><br />
second group, same kind of mice, same feeding method but all <strong>the</strong>y did<br />
was instead of corn <strong>the</strong>y gave fish oil—okay, fish oil and <strong>the</strong>y lived an<br />
average of 100 days longer, okay, just adding <strong>the</strong> fish oil. There’s still<br />
garbage food underneath if you think <strong>about</strong> it. So <strong>the</strong> third group was<br />
<strong>the</strong> calorie restriction where <strong>the</strong>y take <strong>the</strong> same food, same feeding<br />
method but <strong>the</strong>y actually cut <strong>the</strong> calorie of <strong>the</strong> food by 40 percent. They<br />
lived an average of 200 days longer than <strong>the</strong> 232 day controlled just by<br />
eating less of unhealthy food <strong>the</strong>y were eating. Okay.<br />
And <strong>the</strong> last of <strong>the</strong> four groups was <strong>the</strong> calorie restriction group<br />
combined with fish oil and this group lived an average of 400 days<br />
longer than <strong>the</strong> 232 day control. So 600 and something days versus 200<br />
and something days. So that’s a fascinating little study. And as I always<br />
The Quest for The Cures Page 123