PR Firm Rankings - Odwyerpr.com
PR Firm Rankings - Odwyerpr.com
PR Firm Rankings - Odwyerpr.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FEATURE<br />
Facebook marketing program draws public backlash<br />
By Jon Gingerich<br />
Social media giant Facebook has<br />
once again pushed the boundaries<br />
of its privacy policy, this time<br />
drawing the ire of millions of users, consumer<br />
rights groups and even members of<br />
Congress in the process.<br />
In April, Facebook debuted a program<br />
that shares users’ personal information<br />
with a select partnership of third-party<br />
web sites. Called “Instant<br />
Personification,” the program automatically<br />
customizes sites visited by<br />
Facebook users to fit that user’s preexisting<br />
profile data. Third-party sites are fed<br />
the user’s account name, friends list and<br />
about as much information as the social<br />
network has on the user, regardless of<br />
whether they planned to divulge this data<br />
to the site or not.<br />
Pandora and Yelp are a few of the popular<br />
third-party sights that have currently<br />
signed on to participate in the Instant<br />
Personification feature. A user who visits<br />
Yelp, for example, is told the site is using<br />
their Facebook data to “personalize your<br />
experience.”<br />
Online petition groups have formed to<br />
speak out against the new Facebook feature,<br />
both on the social network site as<br />
well as from organizations such as<br />
MoveOn and online resource blog allfacebook.<strong>com</strong>.<br />
Most have been critical of<br />
the Instant Personification feature, which<br />
they see as a privacy policy gone awry<br />
for the sake of runaway marketing purposes.<br />
Facebook spokespersons claim the<br />
Instant Personification program only uses<br />
information already made publicly available<br />
on the network, and users can optout<br />
of this feature at any time.<br />
Critics claim the opt-out process is<br />
cumbersome and confusing. Many have<br />
suggested instead that the program<br />
should exist as an “opt-in” service that<br />
users proactively choose to be a part of.<br />
“Facebook’s Instant Personalization<br />
service is a great attempt at providing a<br />
more social experience within websites<br />
from the moment the user arrives, while<br />
simultaneously sacrificing a user’s right<br />
to privacy,” said Nick ONeill, Founder of<br />
Social Times, Inc.<br />
“The <strong>com</strong>pany should have made this<br />
service opt-in from the beginning, not<br />
opt-out.”<br />
Critics also point out that while users<br />
can opt-out of Instant Personification,<br />
some information will be still be visible<br />
when friends on the site participate in the<br />
service.<br />
The debate has since moved into the<br />
political arena. Senator Chuck Schumer<br />
(D-NY), who has publicly blasted<br />
Facebook’s actions regarding the new<br />
program, recently told CNN that he plans<br />
to petition the FTC to devise new rules<br />
regarding what social media sites are<br />
allowed to do with its users’ information.<br />
This isn’t the first time Facebook’s privacy<br />
policy have <strong>com</strong>e into question. In<br />
2007 the site drew fire when it debuted its<br />
infamous Beacon program, an advertising<br />
targeting platform that published<br />
users’ purchases from other sites on individuals’<br />
profile news feeds. Public backlash<br />
to the program was high, and several<br />
class action lawsuits were filed before<br />
Facebook removed the service from its<br />
site in 2009.<br />
The social network site is also currently<br />
criticized for making it impossible to<br />
hide certain profile details, such as user<br />
name and location. <br />
14 MAY 2010 WWW.ODWYER<strong>PR</strong>.COM