Book 2 - Ebu
Book 2 - Ebu
Book 2 - Ebu
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Guidelines on gender-ethical reporting<br />
Special focus: Facts, trends and impacts of media coverage<br />
about women in government<br />
In order to improve the practice of journalism, to make it more inclusive and diverse,<br />
it is necessary to adopt critical forms of journalism and writing, beginning with the<br />
following insights:<br />
• Society took a long time to take the struggle for women’s rights seriously. The lack<br />
of consideration for history and the progress made hinders understanding and<br />
access of women to public office, particularly to the highest public office of the<br />
presidency or prime minister.<br />
• Women began to hold public office and political positions much later than their<br />
male counterparts. This is due to the delay in defining women as subjects with<br />
rights and recognizing their capability for decision-making, holding professional<br />
and leadership positions.<br />
• One of the most common recurrences in interviews or articles about women is<br />
how they balance their domestic tasks while holding public office. This is one<br />
of the ways in which journalists remind women that they have to fulfil society’s<br />
expectation of them as mothers, wives and caregivers of the family. The standards<br />
for men are markedly different: they are not asked about fatherhood or what they<br />
do to fulfil their family responsibilities.<br />
• Journalists should be mindful of the ways in which they describe women and<br />
men so as not to make the mistake of using stereotypes that reinforce cultural<br />
inequalities between women and men. The paths to political posts or public office<br />
are diverse and the use of stereotypes can blur the real journeys individuals have<br />
made to power positions.<br />
• To contend that only men should address “hard” issues such as politics and<br />
government contributes to an absence of female voices on these topics, leading to<br />
a lack of diversity in positions and proposals. Many women are active participants<br />
in academic research and in different “hard” issue areas. They are part of the pool<br />
of experts who could be interviewed or quoted.<br />
• The masculinisation of certain character traits and continual references to<br />
masculinity in power narrows the possibilities for women’s action. This tends<br />
to imply that women have of necessity to exude behaviour associated with<br />
masculinity in order to become decision-makers, as if this were the only way to<br />
participate in or to exercise power.<br />
• When a female leader’s role in the family or private life is mentioned, she is<br />
not only reminded of her absences or errors that are affecting “normal” family<br />
development and what is expected of her, she is also concomitantly being warned<br />
of the limits to progress that exist for her.<br />
• Media reports on women in politics tend to focus on details such as their dress<br />
style, wardrobe, diet and physical appearance, an approach that trivializes them,<br />
devalues their work in public office and damages their credibility.<br />
53