U.S. NAVY SALVAGE REPORT DEEPWATER HORIZON ... - ESSM
U.S. NAVY SALVAGE REPORT DEEPWATER HORIZON ... - ESSM
U.S. NAVY SALVAGE REPORT DEEPWATER HORIZON ... - ESSM
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Response<br />
Chapter 1 - Introduction<br />
1-1 Well Damage and Spill Details<br />
Deepwater Horizon (DWH), a Dynamically Positioned Class 3 (DP3) column-stabilized Mobile<br />
Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU) was owned by Transocean and leased to BP. The oil drilling rig<br />
was positioned 50 miles offshore Southwest Louisiana in the “Macondo Prospect”, Mississippi<br />
Canyon Block 252 site. On 20 April 2010, after completing drilling of the Macondo well (drilled<br />
to 18,000 feet below sea level) and cementing the final production casing, the rig exploded and<br />
burned. Eleven workers were killed and 17 others were injured.<br />
On 21 April, the fire on the rig continued to burn and United States Coast Guard (USCG) Rear<br />
Admiral Mary Landry estimated potential environmental threat from the well was 8,000 barrels<br />
per day (bbls/day) of crude oil. On 22 April the rig sank, coming to rest on the seafloor in 5,100<br />
FSW, 1,300 feet from the wellhead. The marine riser was damaged and broke as the rig toppled.<br />
The blow out preventers failed and oil/gas spewed from the well. At that point, BP estimated a<br />
spillage rate of 1,000 bbls/day.<br />
On 23 April, the incident was federalized and a National Incident Command Structure (NICS)<br />
initiated. On 27 April, using an in-place Interagency Agreement, USCG verbally requested<br />
NAVSEA Supervisor of Salvage (SUPSALV) to support the oil pollution response and commence<br />
moving oil spill response (OSR) equipment from continental Emergency Ship Salvage Material<br />
(<strong>ESSM</strong>) bases to the Gulf of Mexico. SUPSALV and its <strong>ESSM</strong> contractor began their response.<br />
Figure 1-1 is a timeline that depicts the key events associated with SUPSALV’s response.<br />
1-2 SUPSALV Tasking and Response Summary<br />
On 28 April, the verbal request from the USCG was followed up by a U.S. Coast Guard Marine<br />
Safety Unit (MSU) Morgan City tasking message. This message cited the USCG – USN<br />
Interagency Agreement of 15 September 1980 and the National Oil and Hazardous Substance<br />
Pollution Contingency Plan as justification for the tasking. The Federal On-Scene Coordinator<br />
(OSC), USCG Sector New Orleans, requested immediate NAVSEA USN Supervisor of Salvage<br />
support in response to the sunken MODU Deepwater Horizon and the ongoing pollution incident<br />
In the Gulf of Mexico. The task estimated a 30-day commitment and requested underwater<br />
engineering and remotely operated vehicle (ROV) support as well.<br />
On the evening of 27 April, SUPSALV issued verbal orders to its <strong>ESSM</strong> contractor, Global,<br />
Phillips, Cartner (GPC), to prepare oil pollution response gear for shipping to the Gulf Coast. As<br />
of 29 April, 53 truckloads of gear had left the <strong>ESSM</strong> bases at Cheatham Annex and Port<br />
Hueneme and the first two government staff members and 19 GPC contractors had arrived in<br />
Gulfport, Mississippi.<br />
1-1