U.S. NAVY SALVAGE REPORT DEEPWATER HORIZON ... - ESSM
U.S. NAVY SALVAGE REPORT DEEPWATER HORIZON ... - ESSM U.S. NAVY SALVAGE REPORT DEEPWATER HORIZON ... - ESSM
Chapter 7: Lessons Learned unaware of this blanket permit. Recommendation is to have transportation, weight handing, and lay down capabilities more visible throughout the IC organization. • Managers on-scene were inundated by requests to evaluate or comment on technology to be sold and/or tested for use in response operations. These requests often came from higher authority, requiring answer, on behalf of vendors/inventors/interested citizens who had appealed to them. The situation proved a major distraction and an added workload. The problem was largely resolved by the organization and funding of a special team called the Inter-Agency Technology Assessment Panel (IATAP) formed to handle these requests. Recommend convening this type of panel early on for response operations with such public interest. 7-3 SAFETY • Air monitoring guidance for offshore operations was not received in a timely fashion. OSV’s were hired for skimming operations at the source but not provided this capability. UAC/ICs need to disseminate thorough guidance before deploying assets. OSV’s should be provided with the capability or means to acquire it through the contract. SUPSALV must also ensure proper air monitoring devices and respirators are available to operators in accordance with these safety regulations prior to deployment and include it in their Operations Guide (CONOPS). • Proper guidance and rescue personnel were not provided for wildlife encounters offshore prior to deployment. The guidance given after the fact was insufficient, instructing operators to merely contain oily wildlife and wait for rescue personnel to arrive 8-10 hours offshore at which point animals such as sea turtles would be deceased. 7-4 FINANCIAL • There was no method for reimbursement in place for the replacement of government owned equipment that was damaged beyond economical repair during response operations. Numerous meetings and many man-hours were necessary to define a workable process acceptable to all parties. Recommend the USN and USCG agree to a standardized process for all future operations. 7-4
FINAL REPORT SONS DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL GULF OF MEXICO 27 April–24 September 2010 Prepared by: GPC, A Joint Venture P.O. Box JK Williamsburg, VA 23187 Contract No. N00024-07-D-4130 Delivery Order No. 0679 Sponsored by: Naval Sea Systems Command 1333 Isaac Hull Avenue, SE (Mail Stop 1072) Washington Navy Yard, DC 20376 18 November 2011
- Page 18 and 19: Chapter 2: Command and Organization
- Page 20 and 21: Chapter 2: Command and Organization
- Page 22 and 23: Chapter 2: Command and Organization
- Page 24 and 25: Chapter 2: Command and Organization
- Page 26 and 27: Chapter 3: Tasking and Funding 6/09
- Page 28 and 29: Chapter 3: Tasking and Funding Pict
- Page 30 and 31: Chapter 4: Mobilization Class V ski
- Page 32 and 33: Chapter 5: Operations Figure 5-1. O
- Page 34 and 35: Chapter 5: Operations • DWH oil w
- Page 36 and 37: Chapter 5: Operations 5-2 Near Shor
- Page 38 and 39: Chapter 5: Operations Resource Coor
- Page 40 and 41: Chapter 5: Operations Figure 5-9. V
- Page 42 and 43: Chapter 5: Operations The VOSS crew
- Page 44 and 45: Chapter 5: Operations Figure 5-13.
- Page 46 and 47: Chapter 5: Operations Figure 5-14.
- Page 48 and 49: Chapter 5: Operations Ship Island,
- Page 50 and 51: Chapter 5: Operations used alternat
- Page 52 and 53: Chapter 5: Operations Remotely Oper
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter 5: Operations 5-6.2 Evidenc
- Page 56 and 57: Chapter 5: Operations Figure 5-21.
- Page 59 and 60: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Respons
- Page 61 and 62: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Respons
- Page 63: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Respons
- Page 66 and 67: Chapter 7: Lessons Learned • MARC
- Page 70 and 71: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 72 and 73: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 74 and 75: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 76 and 77: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 78 and 79: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 80 and 81: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 82 and 83: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 84 and 85: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 86 and 87: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 88 and 89: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 90 and 91: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 92 and 93: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 94 and 95: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 96 and 97: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 98 and 99: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 100 and 101: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 102 and 103: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 104 and 105: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 106 and 107: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 108 and 109: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 110 and 111: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 112 and 113: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 114 and 115: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 116 and 117: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
FINAL <strong>REPORT</strong><br />
SONS <strong>DEEPWATER</strong> <strong>HORIZON</strong> OIL SPILL<br />
GULF OF MEXICO<br />
27 April–24 September 2010<br />
Prepared by:<br />
GPC, A Joint Venture<br />
P.O. Box JK<br />
Williamsburg, VA 23187<br />
Contract No.<br />
N00024-07-D-4130<br />
Delivery Order No.<br />
0679<br />
Sponsored by:<br />
Naval Sea Systems Command<br />
1333 Isaac Hull Avenue, SE (Mail Stop 1072)<br />
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20376<br />
18 November 2011
Change language