06.01.2015 Views

U.S. NAVY SALVAGE REPORT DEEPWATER HORIZON ... - ESSM

U.S. NAVY SALVAGE REPORT DEEPWATER HORIZON ... - ESSM

U.S. NAVY SALVAGE REPORT DEEPWATER HORIZON ... - ESSM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Response<br />

Chapter 7 - Lessons Learned<br />

The following Lessons Learned were generated by SUPSALV government staff after the<br />

conclusion of the operation. Internal <strong>ESSM</strong> lessons learned are identified in the <strong>ESSM</strong><br />

Operation Report, Appendix A.<br />

7-1 OPERATIONS<br />

• Near Shore Skimming Operations - Poor communication between Task Force leaders<br />

and SUPSALV , resulting in a lack of operational control of assets:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Task Force Commanders continually tried to deploy MARCO Class V skimmers<br />

beyond their sea keeping ability or transit speed limitations to return for crew rest.<br />

An Oil Transfer Bladder was torn during offloading due to mishandling when<br />

SUPSALV personnel were not present. Task Forces were trained in the use of<br />

offloading systems by SUPSALV but no trained personnel stayed in place longer<br />

than 1-2 weeks.<br />

MARCO Class V skimmers are more effective skimming, as designed, in a “V”<br />

boom configuration vice the “free skimming” or even scouting mode often ordered<br />

by Task Force leaders.<br />

SUPSALV operators used their personal cell phones to communicate their<br />

locations and Task Force assignments to SUPSALV managers. There was no<br />

formal communication plan that included SUPSALV at the IC level.<br />

Recommend distributing Operation Guides (CONOPS) upfront to entire Chain of<br />

Operational Command. Also recommend Task Force Leaders not be given control of<br />

SUPSALV equipment without the requirement to work with SUPSALV personnel in<br />

deciding deployment strategy of the assets. SUPSALV also needs to be included in IC<br />

communication plans during future operations.<br />

• Due to the aforementioned communication issues with Task Forces, recommend a<br />

SUPSALV representative be designated to each Incident Command Post to approve and<br />

track use/transfer of assets and provide valuable technical advice to decision makers.<br />

• Many near-shore skimmers, especially MARCO Class V systems, often traveled long<br />

distances in search of oil, only to be in the wrong place. Offshore VOSS skimmers were<br />

rarely assigned based on the most efficient use of their capability, wasting many hours<br />

searching for oil as well. Recommend mandatory, real time aerial spotting with direct<br />

communication to skimming forces. It is important to use available helicopters to support<br />

clean-up operations vice other interests and that there is a clear communication plan<br />

between skimmers and spotters. Skimming is only as effective as the oil spotting and<br />

communication.<br />

7-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!