U.S. NAVY SALVAGE REPORT DEEPWATER HORIZON ... - ESSM
U.S. NAVY SALVAGE REPORT DEEPWATER HORIZON ... - ESSM U.S. NAVY SALVAGE REPORT DEEPWATER HORIZON ... - ESSM
Chapter 3: Tasking and Funding 6/09/10 Final SUPSALV protective boom laid totaling 63,200 feet. 7/15/10 BP installed capping stack on well. Leak secured 7/29/10 Demobilization of SUPSALV’s offshore skimmers begins 8/16/10 Demobilization of SUPSALV’s near-shore skimmers begins 9/13/10 First return shipment of equipment 9/20/10 Last equipment completes decontamination. Navy issues final SITREP. 10/04/10 Last SUPSALV personnel and equipment depart Gulf Region. Table 3-1. Key Deepwater Horizon Events and Dates 3-3 Beach and Gulf Response Task As mentioned in Chapter 1, SUPSALV’s support to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill was initiated based on 27 April 2010 verbal orders and a 28 April message confirmation. Specifically, the On- Scene Coordinator, USCG Sector New Orleans, requested immediate SUPSALV support in response to the pollution incident in the Gulf. The specified requirement was for oil spill control and recovery equipment and operating personnel. This request immediately generated “Prepare for Shipment” orders for both CONUS ESSM facilities for major portions of SUPSALV’s deployable OSR gear. Two SUPSALV Oil Pollution Program Engineers and senior ESSM staff immediately deployed. They arrived in the Gulf and began preparing for the equipment arrival. En route, the destination for equipment and personnel was changed from Houma, LA to Gulfport, MS. SUPSALV directed trucks to the Naval Construction Battalion Center, Gulfport, MS before further redirecting them to State Pier, Gulfport, MS, which would soon become the official “Navy Asset Staging Area”. SUPSALV’s earliest tasking was to prevent damage to Mississippi’s off shore islands. This focus was later expanded to provide coverage west to Venice, LA, the central Gulf coast of Mississippi and Alabama, and east to Pensacola, FL. As the operation continued, SUPSALV began deploying its Vessel of Opportunity Skimmer Systems (VOSS) in support of source control operations. SUPSALV managed these operations from the State Pier in Gulfport where they installed command vans and maintenance vans and stored the equipment until it was issued. A collection of USCG tasking messages and Requests for Assistance (RFA) documents are provided as Appendix B. 3-4 Well Head/Houston Engineering Tasking and Underwater Survey Task SUPSALV Deputy, Michael Dean, reported to the BP Crisis Center in Houston on 2 May to be the conduit for Department of Defense assistance requests. He and CAPT Keenan rotated in that role throughout the duration of the incident. In this role, the SUPSALV representative meet daily with BP engineering teams and identified what role Navy could play in supporting the operation. One of the tasks identified and later accomplished was for SUPSALV to perform an underwater survey of the oil rig to aid in the Justice Department investigation. 3-2
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Response 3-5 Funding Process As the operation progressed and funds were consumed, SUPSALV would notify the Unified Area Command when the balance was low, and additional funds were authorized to cover foreseeable future operations. Funding is summarized in Table 3-2. Date Amount Task 02 May 2010 $ 3.5M Initial tasking 21 May 2010 $ 3.75M Mod 2 – increased funds and extended duration 18 June 2010 $ 5.5M Mod 3 – increased funds and extended duration 02 July 2010 $ 0.138M Mod 4 – Requested support to test advanced skimming technologies 21 July 2010 $ 8.524M Mod 5 – increase funds and extended duration Total: $ 21.412M Table 3-2. USCG Funding Authorization Dates and Amounts Funds provided used to replace equipment removed from service and determined to be beyond economical repair (BER) at the end of the operation are listed in Appendix B. 3-6 Replacement of Items Beyond Economical Repair vs. Rental Rates Reimbursement for the operation was a subject of great discussion between Unified Area Command (UAC), the National Pollution Funds Center (NPFC), and SUPSALV from the beginning of the operation. Rental rates, based on a depreciation formula to capture recapitalization costs, are specifically allowed but not prescribed in Section VIII (c) of the Interagency Agreement (addressed in Section 3-1). In determining the applicability of rental rates, past practice was consulted. Typically, for smaller routine operations, the Navy had not charged rental rates to the Coast Guard. Rental rates were last used for the Exxon Valdez response, which was after the Interagency Agreement went into effect but predated OPA-90. Subsequently SUPSALV's practice has been to apply rental rates and charge non-government entities for use of SUPSALV equipment. By Mid-June the issue of rental rates and replenishment of items BER had not been resolved. On June 21, SUPSALV had been maintaining a rental rates spreadsheet and forwarded it to the Coast Guard requesting action. SUPSALV made the case that the existing funding Request for Assistance (RFA) and its modifications to support SUPSALV’s operation had been structured to support ongoing operational expenses and did not include recapitalization/depreciation of deployed gear. As of June 21, the rental rate charges were accumulating at a rate of $2M per week with a total of $16M accumulated to date. These figures were forwarded to the Coast Guard on 21 June requesting a funding document to provide separate funding for recapitalization. Over the following month negotiations resulted in a solution that allowed for documenting the condition of demobilized equipment and determination that the equipment was damaged BER. 213RR forms were prepared for equipment identified as BER. This included: all 42” and 26” oil containment boom that had been in the water for greater than 60 days, all deployed NOFI Current Buster Vessel Skimming Systems, and a 50,000 gallon oil recovery bladder that had been damaged during decontamination. The UAC required an approved USCG inspector actually see the equipment SUPSALV claimed to be BER and concur with the assessment. 3-3
- Page 1: SH285-AA-RPT-010 0910-LP-111-8218 U
- Page 5 and 6: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Respons
- Page 7 and 8: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Respons
- Page 9 and 10: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Respons
- Page 11 and 12: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Respons
- Page 13 and 14: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Respons
- Page 15: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Respons
- Page 18 and 19: Chapter 2: Command and Organization
- Page 20 and 21: Chapter 2: Command and Organization
- Page 22 and 23: Chapter 2: Command and Organization
- Page 24 and 25: Chapter 2: Command and Organization
- Page 28 and 29: Chapter 3: Tasking and Funding Pict
- Page 30 and 31: Chapter 4: Mobilization Class V ski
- Page 32 and 33: Chapter 5: Operations Figure 5-1. O
- Page 34 and 35: Chapter 5: Operations • DWH oil w
- Page 36 and 37: Chapter 5: Operations 5-2 Near Shor
- Page 38 and 39: Chapter 5: Operations Resource Coor
- Page 40 and 41: Chapter 5: Operations Figure 5-9. V
- Page 42 and 43: Chapter 5: Operations The VOSS crew
- Page 44 and 45: Chapter 5: Operations Figure 5-13.
- Page 46 and 47: Chapter 5: Operations Figure 5-14.
- Page 48 and 49: Chapter 5: Operations Ship Island,
- Page 50 and 51: Chapter 5: Operations used alternat
- Page 52 and 53: Chapter 5: Operations Remotely Oper
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter 5: Operations 5-6.2 Evidenc
- Page 56 and 57: Chapter 5: Operations Figure 5-21.
- Page 59 and 60: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Respons
- Page 61 and 62: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Respons
- Page 63: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Respons
- Page 66 and 67: Chapter 7: Lessons Learned • MARC
- Page 68 and 69: Chapter 7: Lessons Learned unaware
- Page 70 and 71: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 72 and 73: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
- Page 74 and 75: Final Report, SONS Deepwater Horizo
Chapter 3: Tasking and Funding<br />
6/09/10 Final SUPSALV protective boom laid totaling 63,200 feet.<br />
7/15/10 BP installed capping stack on well. Leak secured<br />
7/29/10 Demobilization of SUPSALV’s offshore skimmers begins<br />
8/16/10 Demobilization of SUPSALV’s near-shore skimmers begins<br />
9/13/10 First return shipment of equipment<br />
9/20/10 Last equipment completes decontamination. Navy issues final SITREP.<br />
10/04/10 Last SUPSALV personnel and equipment depart Gulf Region.<br />
Table 3-1. Key Deepwater Horizon Events and Dates<br />
3-3 Beach and Gulf Response Task<br />
As mentioned in Chapter 1, SUPSALV’s support to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill was initiated<br />
based on 27 April 2010 verbal orders and a 28 April message confirmation. Specifically, the On-<br />
Scene Coordinator, USCG Sector New Orleans, requested immediate SUPSALV support in<br />
response to the pollution incident in the Gulf. The specified requirement was for oil spill control<br />
and recovery equipment and operating personnel.<br />
This request immediately generated “Prepare for Shipment” orders for both CONUS <strong>ESSM</strong><br />
facilities for major portions of SUPSALV’s deployable OSR gear. Two SUPSALV Oil Pollution<br />
Program Engineers and senior <strong>ESSM</strong> staff immediately deployed. They arrived in the Gulf and<br />
began preparing for the equipment arrival. En route, the destination for equipment and personnel<br />
was changed from Houma, LA to Gulfport, MS. SUPSALV directed trucks to the Naval<br />
Construction Battalion Center, Gulfport, MS before further redirecting them to State Pier,<br />
Gulfport, MS, which would soon become the official “Navy Asset Staging Area”.<br />
SUPSALV’s earliest tasking was to prevent damage to Mississippi’s off shore islands. This focus<br />
was later expanded to provide coverage west to Venice, LA, the central Gulf coast of Mississippi<br />
and Alabama, and east to Pensacola, FL. As the operation continued, SUPSALV began<br />
deploying its Vessel of Opportunity Skimmer Systems (VOSS) in support of source control<br />
operations.<br />
SUPSALV managed these operations from the State Pier in Gulfport where they installed<br />
command vans and maintenance vans and stored the equipment until it was issued. A collection<br />
of USCG tasking messages and Requests for Assistance (RFA) documents are provided as<br />
Appendix B.<br />
3-4 Well Head/Houston Engineering Tasking and Underwater Survey Task<br />
SUPSALV Deputy, Michael Dean, reported to the BP Crisis Center in Houston on 2 May to be<br />
the conduit for Department of Defense assistance requests. He and CAPT Keenan rotated in<br />
that role throughout the duration of the incident. In this role, the SUPSALV representative meet<br />
daily with BP engineering teams and identified what role Navy could play in supporting the<br />
operation. One of the tasks identified and later accomplished was for SUPSALV to perform an<br />
underwater survey of the oil rig to aid in the Justice Department investigation.<br />
3-2