05.01.2015 Views

Page 1 of 99 CHAPTER-VII 10/3/2008 http://10.21.217.2 ...

Page 1 of 99 CHAPTER-VII 10/3/2008 http://10.21.217.2 ...

Page 1 of 99 CHAPTER-VII 10/3/2008 http://10.21.217.2 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

COMMITTEE ON HOME AFFAIRS<br />

I. Composition <strong>of</strong> the Committee<br />

7. Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees are constituted under Rule 268 <strong>of</strong> the Rules <strong>of</strong> Procedure<br />

for Conduct <strong>of</strong> Business in the Rajya Sabha. Each <strong>of</strong> the Standing Committees is related to the Ministries/Departments as<br />

specified in the Third Schedule to the Rules <strong>of</strong> Procedure. As per Part-I <strong>of</strong> the Third Schedule, there are eight such<br />

Committees under the administrative control <strong>of</strong> Rajya Sabha Secretariat. 16 such Committees, as mentioned in Part-II <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Schedule are with the Lok Sabha Secretariat. These Committees are constituted by the respective Presiding Officers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

two Houses <strong>of</strong> Parliament. The Committee on Home Affairs, (2005), one <strong>of</strong> such Committees, was constituted on 5 th<br />

August, 2005 with <strong>10</strong> Members from Rajya Sabha and 21 from Lok Sabha. The Committee was reconstituted w.e.f. 5 th<br />

August, 2006. The Committee has two Ministries under his jurisdiction, namely, the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs and the<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Development <strong>of</strong> North Eastern Region (DONER).<br />

7.2 The Committee consisted <strong>of</strong> the following Members: —<br />

1. Smt. Sushma Swaraj — Chairperson<br />

RAJYA SABHA<br />

2. Shri V. Narayanasamy<br />

3. Shri Rishang Keishing<br />

4. Shri R.K. Dhawan<br />

5. Shri S.S. Ahluwalia<br />

6. Shri N. Jothi<br />

7. Shri Janeshwar Mishra<br />

8. Shri Satish Chandra Misra<br />

3 9. Shri Sitaram Yechury<br />

4 <strong>10</strong>. Shri Sanjay Raut<br />

COMMITTEE ON HOME AFFAIRS<br />

(Constituted on 5 August 2005)<br />

LOK SABHA<br />

11. Shri L.K. Advani<br />

12. Shri S.K. Bwiswmuthiary<br />

13. Shri C.K. Chandrappan<br />

14. Shri Biren Singh Engti<br />

15. Shri Rahul Gandhi<br />

16. Shri Tapir Gao<br />

17. Shri T.K. Hamza<br />

18. Shri Naveen Jindal<br />

19. Shri Ajit Jogi<br />

20. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.M. Kader Mohideen<br />

21. Shri Tek Lal Mahato<br />

22. Shri Sachin Pilot<br />

23. Shri Ashok Kumar Pradhan<br />

24. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Ramadass<br />

25. Shri G. Karunakara Reddy<br />

26. Shri Baju Ban Riyan<br />

27. Dr. H.T. Sangliana<br />

28. Choudhary Bijendra Singh<br />

29. Shri Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh<br />

30. Shri Braja Kishore Tripathy


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

31. Shri Beni Prasad Verma<br />

1. Smt. Sushma Swaraj — Chairperson<br />

COMMITTEE ON HOME AFFAIRS<br />

(Re-constituted on 5 August 2006)<br />

RAJYA SABHA<br />

2. Shri V. Narayanasamy<br />

3. Shri Rishang Keishing<br />

4. Shri R.K. Dhawan<br />

5. Shri S.S. Ahluwalia<br />

6. Shri Janeshwar Mishra<br />

7. Shri Prasanta Chatterjee<br />

8. Shri N. Jothi<br />

9. Shri Satish Chandra Misra<br />

<strong>10</strong>. Shri Sanjay Raut<br />

LOK SABHA<br />

11. Shri L.K. Advani<br />

12. Dr. Rattan Singh Ajnala<br />

13. Shri Ilyas Azmi<br />

14. Km. Mamata Banerjee<br />

15. Smt. Sangeeta Kumari Singh Deo<br />

16. Shri Biren Singh Engti<br />

17. Shri Tapir Gao<br />

18. Shri T.K. Hamza<br />

19. Shri Raghunath Jha<br />

20. Shri Naveen Jindal<br />

21. Shri Ajit Jogi<br />

22. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.M. Kader Mohideen<br />

23. Shri Ram Chandra Paswan<br />

24. Shri Sachin Pilot<br />

25. Shri Ashok Kumar Pradhan<br />

26. Shri G. Karunakara Reddy<br />

∗ 27. Shri M. Rajamohan Reddy<br />

28. Shri Baju Ban Riyan<br />

29. Choudhary Bijendra Singh<br />

30. Shri Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh<br />

31. Shri Mohan Singh<br />

II. Subjects selected for examination<br />

7.3.0 The Committee on Home Affairs had the following subjects 5 for examination during the year:-<br />

Sl.<br />

Ministry/Department<br />

Subject<br />

No.<br />

1. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs Administration <strong>of</strong> Union Territories<br />

2. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs/ Ministry <strong>of</strong> Internal Security and Economic and<br />

DoNER<br />

Infrastructural Development in NER.<br />

7.4.0 In addition to the above subjects, Hon’ble Chairman, Rajya Sabha also referred the following Bills to the<br />

Committee for examination:-<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Date <strong>of</strong> reference<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the Bill


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 3 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

1. 03.08.2006 The Sashastra Seema Bal Bill, 2006<br />

2. 22.12.2006 The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Bill, 2006<br />

7.4.1 Besides, the Committee had also inherited the Protection <strong>of</strong> Human Rights (Amendment) Bill, 2005 and the<br />

Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Victims) Bill, 2005 from its predecessor.<br />

III. Constitution <strong>of</strong> Sub-Committees <strong>of</strong> the Committee on Home Affairs<br />

7.5 During 2006, no sub-Committee was constituted.<br />

IV. Review <strong>of</strong> work done<br />

(a) Sittings <strong>of</strong> the Committee<br />

7.6 Statement showing the dates <strong>of</strong> sittings <strong>of</strong> the Committee held during the period under review, the duration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sittings, the number <strong>of</strong> Members present and the subjects discussed are given in Annexure <strong>VII</strong>.<br />

7.7 The Committee had not interacted with any foreign delegation during the period under review.<br />

(b) Sitting <strong>of</strong> Sub-Committees<br />

7.8 During the period under review no sittings <strong>of</strong> Sub-Committees were held, as no Sub-Committees were constituted.<br />

(c) Material and Memoranda furnished to the Committee<br />

7.9 Voluminous notes/documents were received from the concerned Ministries/Departments on the subjects/Bills and<br />

examined by the Committee.<br />

7.<strong>10</strong> A large number <strong>of</strong> memoranda were received from the non-<strong>of</strong>ficials on different subjects/Bills examined by the<br />

Committee. Those Memoranda were sent to the concerned Ministries for their comments.<br />

(d) Study Visits<br />

7.11 The Committee had undertaken a study visit to Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Nagaland and Meghalaya from 1 to 7<br />

February 2006 to assess the Internal Security and Economic and Infrastructural Development in North-Eastern Region.<br />

7.12 The Committee did not constitute study groups to make on-the-spot study <strong>of</strong> local <strong>of</strong>fices, institutions, projects etc.<br />

during the period reported upon.<br />

(e) Evidences Taken<br />

7.13 Eighteen (18) evidences were taken during the period under review and verbatim record <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the sittings were<br />

kept.<br />

V. Reports Presented<br />

(a) Reports<br />

7.14 During 2006, the Committee presented/laid the following Reports to the Council/House:—<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

Report No. and Dates <strong>of</strong><br />

Presentation/Laying<br />

Rajya Sabha Lok Sabha<br />

118<br />

09.03.2006 09.03.2006<br />

119<br />

19.05.2006 19.05.2006<br />

120<br />

19.05.2006 19.05.2006<br />

Subject<br />

The Protection <strong>of</strong> Human Rights (Amendment) Bill,<br />

2005.<br />

Demands for Grants (2006-2007) <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Home Affairs.<br />

Demands for Grants (2006-2007) <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

DoNER<br />

Examination <strong>of</strong> Administration <strong>of</strong> Union Territories


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 4 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

121<br />

02.08.2006 02.08.2006<br />

122<br />

13.12.2006 13.12.2006<br />

(Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Pondicherry &<br />

Chandigarh).<br />

The Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and<br />

Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Victims) Bill, 2005.<br />

(b) Action Taken Reports<br />

7.15 The Committee did not present any Action Taken Report on the Action Taken by the Government on the<br />

Recommendations contained in its Reports.<br />

(c)<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> action taken by Government on the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee in its earlier<br />

Reports:<br />

No action in view <strong>of</strong> the fact stated in 7.15 above.<br />

7.16 Minutes <strong>of</strong> sittings <strong>of</strong> the Committee on Home Affairs relating to all the Reports were presented/laid to the<br />

Council/House along with the relevant Reports.<br />

VI. Summary <strong>of</strong> Recommendations<br />

(a) 118 th Report (The Protection <strong>of</strong> Human Rights (Amendment) Bill, 2005)<br />

7.17 The Committee recommended that in the proposed amendment, the words “Chief Justice <strong>of</strong> the Supreme Court”<br />

may be substituted by the words “Chief Justice <strong>of</strong> India”.<br />

7.18 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that an express provision needed to be incorporated in the amendment to clear the<br />

apprehensions and doubts that the Chairperson may tend to misuse the power in making excessive delegation. The<br />

Committee, therefore, recommended that in sub-section (4) <strong>of</strong> Section 3 <strong>of</strong> the Principal Act, the words “except judicial<br />

functions” may be added after the words “such powers and discharge such functions <strong>of</strong> the Commission”.<br />

7.19 The Committee recommended that the amendment proposed in sub-section (2) <strong>of</strong> Section 4 <strong>of</strong> the principal Act<br />

may be dropped in the light <strong>of</strong> the deliberations held on this issue.<br />

7.20 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the State Governments while so opting for the Chairperson and/ or Member<br />

(s), may tend to by-pass the Selection Committee. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the following proviso may<br />

be added after the proposed amendment i.e., insertion <strong>of</strong> a new sub-section (6) :<br />

“Provided that every appointment made under this sub-section shall be made after obtaining the<br />

recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Committee referred to in sub-section (1) <strong>of</strong> Section 22 in respect <strong>of</strong> the State for<br />

which common Chairperson or Member or both, as the case may be, is proposed to be appointed.”<br />

7.21 The Committee while reiterating its observation made in respect <strong>of</strong> the proposed amendment to sub-section (2) <strong>of</strong><br />

Section 4 <strong>of</strong> the principal Act, recommended that the amendment proposed to sub-section (2) <strong>of</strong> Section 22 <strong>of</strong> the principal<br />

Act may be dropped.<br />

7.22 Clause I, the Enacting Formula and the Title were adopted with some changes which were <strong>of</strong> consequential or<br />

drafting in nature, namely substitution <strong>of</strong> the calendar and republic years, “2005” and Fifty-sixth” by “2006” and “Fiftyseventh”,<br />

respectively.<br />

(b) 119 th Report {The Demands for Grants (2006-2007) <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs}<br />

Revamping <strong>of</strong> Civil Defence<br />

7.23 Civil Defence is an important and integral part <strong>of</strong> the defence <strong>of</strong> the country. Particularly during times <strong>of</strong> war Civil<br />

Defence Organisation has a vital role in guarding and protecting the people and supporting civil administration. The<br />

Committee had appreciated that NDMA proposed to have relook at the scheme <strong>of</strong> Revamping <strong>of</strong> Civil Defence and integrate<br />

it into the National Disaster Management. The Committee agreed that civil defence is the right organisation to be involved in<br />

Disaster Management. It however felt that unduly long time had been taken for revamping the Civil Defence System. The<br />

Committee therefore recommended that the issue may be got cleared from the NDMA Committee and the Non-Plan<br />

Expenditure Committee and the final plan <strong>of</strong> action may be prepared for revamping the Civil Defence in the shortest possible<br />

time schedule. The Committee also recommended that funds for the scheme may be allocated at RE 2006-07 stage and the


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 5 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

scheme may be implemented during the current financial year.<br />

Modernisation <strong>of</strong> Fire Services<br />

7.24 The Committee regretted that as in the case <strong>of</strong> the scheme <strong>of</strong> Revamping <strong>of</strong> Civil Defence, the scheme <strong>of</strong><br />

Modernisation <strong>of</strong> Fire Services too could not take <strong>of</strong>f last year inspite <strong>of</strong> a provision <strong>of</strong> Rs. 134.26 crore in BE 2005-06. The<br />

Committee took a serious view <strong>of</strong> the fact that new schemes were initiated, allocations were made and they did not take <strong>of</strong>f<br />

due to procedural and administrative delays. Although fire services in the country are primarily the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

States/Municipal Committees/ Corporations, the services across the country were abysmally below the International<br />

Standards. The Committee desired that Modernisation <strong>of</strong> Fire services which is a comprehensive scheme should be equipped<br />

with modern technology, gadgets and infrastructure. The Committee while expressing concern over delay <strong>of</strong> one year in<br />

implementing the scheme urged upon the Government to get the scheme cleared in a definite time frame from NDMA and<br />

Planning Commission and make necessary allocation at RE 2006-07 stage. The Committee also urged upon the Ministry to<br />

implement the scheme during the current fiscal year.<br />

Modernisation <strong>of</strong> Prisons<br />

7.25 The Committee expressed its serious concern over the laxity <strong>of</strong> some States in implementing the scheme.<br />

Improving the conditions <strong>of</strong> prisons had been a widely discussed topic in the public domain. There is no two opinion that<br />

prisons in the country need to be humanized. Infrastructure and living conditions inside the prisons need to be improved. The<br />

present scheme <strong>of</strong> the Government, if implemented in the right earnest, would go a long way in improving the conditions, if<br />

not completely change the face <strong>of</strong> the Prisons. The Committee would therefore like the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs to<br />

coordinate closely with the State Governments and impress upon them the need for timely and effective implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

the Scheme. The Committee recommended that the additional allocation for the purpose may be made at the RE stage. The<br />

Committee agreed that the scheme needs to be extended for two years, as desired by the Ministry so that the full amount <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.1800 crore was utilised.<br />

Bodoland Territorial Council<br />

7.26 The allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs. <strong>10</strong>0 crore made for the development <strong>of</strong> BTC is a separate package announced by the<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> India as per the agreement. But the Committee was not in agreement with the practice <strong>of</strong> making this<br />

provision out <strong>of</strong> the allocation made to NLCPR. NLCPR being an accumulation <strong>of</strong> unspent balance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>10</strong>% earmarked in<br />

the Budget by various Ministries/Departments, is primarily a development fund; using it for other schemes is a negation <strong>of</strong><br />

the rationale behind the creation <strong>of</strong> the Fund. NLCPR has a very limited reserve and if this Rs. <strong>10</strong>0 crore is provided out <strong>of</strong><br />

this Fund for BTC, the fund would get depleted. The Committee felt that the NLCPR being a fund for development <strong>of</strong> NE<br />

States, should be used for the purpose for which it was created. The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs might therefore decide on<br />

allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs.<strong>10</strong>0 crore for BTC out <strong>of</strong> their resources.<br />

Pensionary benefits to CPO personnel<br />

7.27 The Committee was at a loss to understand as to why the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance was not acceding to the request <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs for continuing the same pensionary benefits to Central Police Organisations (CPOs) as was<br />

applicable to the Army personnel. The duties performed by most <strong>of</strong> the CPOs’ personnel are, more or less, similar to that <strong>of</strong><br />

the Army. The Committee, therefore, endorsed the proposal <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs for continuance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pensionary benefits to the personnel <strong>of</strong> Central Police Organisations (CPOs) as in case <strong>of</strong> the Army personnel. The<br />

Committee recommended that the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs may once again take up the matter with the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance<br />

and that Ministry may favourably consider the proposal at the earliest.<br />

Relief and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Kashmiri Migrants<br />

7.28 The Committee regretted to observe that the Government was not serious in fully utilising the amount allocated at<br />

BE stage for rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> J & K migrants. When Central Government had made the allocation, State like J & K should<br />

have come forward with the schemes for utilising the money, particularly in view <strong>of</strong> its being a terrorist savaged State. The<br />

Committee further observed that the State Government should not have any hesitation in formulating the schemes for which<br />

Central Government was prepared to allocate necessary funds. The Committee, therefore, reiterated its recommendation<br />

made in its 112 th Report (para 8.3, page 15) on Demands for Grants (2005-06) that the full amount allocated for the<br />

rehabilitation schemes for the J&K migrants should be utilised. The Committee also urged upon the Government to impress<br />

upon the J & K Government to come forward with schemes in time and implement them without delay.<br />

Multipurpose National Identity Cards Scheme


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 6 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

7.29 ‘The importance <strong>of</strong> the Mulit-purpose National Identity Card Scheme (MNICs) in a country like India with<br />

thousands <strong>of</strong> kilometres <strong>of</strong> porous International Border and with the large presence <strong>of</strong> illegal immigrants posing a grave<br />

threat to the internal security, need not be overemphasized. The Committee was, however, disappointed at the pace <strong>of</strong><br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the pilot project. If the pilot project itself was taking such a long time, preparation <strong>of</strong> MNICs for all the<br />

citizens might take several more years. The Committee, therefore, urged upon the Government to accord high priority to the<br />

Scheme and accelerate completion <strong>of</strong> the Pilot Project within a specific time frame rather than dragging it endlessly. The<br />

Committee was confident that based on the experience gathered in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Pilot Scheme for the last two<br />

and a half years, the government would be in a position to evolve time bound action plan for implementation <strong>of</strong> the scheme at<br />

the national level’.<br />

Naxalism<br />

7.30 The Committee expressed its serious concern over the growing influence <strong>of</strong> naxalites all over the country and felt<br />

that it was no more a law and order problem and posed a threat to internal security as was evident from their declaration <strong>of</strong><br />

Compact Revolutionary Zone or Red Corridor from Nepal to Tamil Nadu, almost a third <strong>of</strong> the country’s total<br />

area.<br />

7.31 In that context, it found pertinent to mention the Prime Minister’s observation in a meeting <strong>of</strong> the CMs <strong>of</strong> Naxal<br />

affected States held on 13 th April, 2006 in New Delhi, that:<br />

“... It would not be an exaggeration to say that the problem <strong>of</strong> naxalism is the single biggest internal<br />

security challenge ever faced by our country...”<br />

7.32 There was, therefore, an urgent need to curb the naxal activities with an iron hand and simultaneously address the<br />

associated economic problem. There needs to be more seriousness in implementing the programmes for developing the<br />

infrastructure in the affected districts; to improve the economic conditions <strong>of</strong> the citizens; and winning back the confidence <strong>of</strong><br />

those, who are alienated from the mainstream <strong>of</strong> the society and aligning with the naxals. The Committee recounted that in<br />

its earlier reports, it had impressed upon the Ministry to adopt a holistic approach in tackling the naxal menace. The<br />

Committee would once again like to reiterate its recommendation to the<br />

effect.<br />

Modernisation <strong>of</strong> Police Forces<br />

7.33 The Committee was constrained to learn that the scheme <strong>of</strong> such a magnitude and importance had not been<br />

implemented in the Union Territories though it has been implemented in the States. The Committee felt that the scheme<br />

should have been taken up on a priority basis and the proposed allocation could have been made a part <strong>of</strong> the budgetary<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> 2006-07, if the necessary processing was done well in time. The Committee hoped that necessary allocation<br />

would be made at RE stage in 2006-07 and the scheme would take <strong>of</strong>f in the current financial year.<br />

Delhi Police<br />

7.34 The Committee while appreciating the efforts being made by Delhi Police to improve its functioning and also to<br />

improve its image, felt that there was still a lot <strong>of</strong> room for improvement. The Committee recommended that Delhi Police<br />

should conduct a survey on the perception <strong>of</strong> the people about it. Senior <strong>of</strong>ficers should undertake surprise and disguised<br />

visits to police stations and deploy decoy complainants and observe the behaviors <strong>of</strong> the personnel there. It would give Delhi<br />

Police important inputs about effectiveness <strong>of</strong> its various steps at the ground level, trying to improve its functioning and its<br />

interface with the public.<br />

Crime against Women<br />

7.35 The way crime is perpetrated against women in Delhi and the feeling that women were not safe and secure in the<br />

National Capital Region did not give a positive picture about the National Capital Territory (NCT) <strong>of</strong> Delhi to the rest <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world. This perception would have a negative impact on the women tourists visiting India. The Committee felt that the crime<br />

against women seems to have acquired serious proportions and was anguished to note that all efforts made in this regard by<br />

Delhi Police have failed to bring substantial change in the situation. It was legally as well as morally binding upon the law<br />

enforcement agency to make sincere efforts in nabbing the perpetrators <strong>of</strong> crime against women and see to it that punishment<br />

is handed down in such a way as to set an example to deter potential <strong>of</strong>fenders. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the<br />

lackluster style <strong>of</strong> functioning <strong>of</strong> the police force is greatly responsible for not instilling a sense <strong>of</strong> security and confidence<br />

amongst the women in Delhi. The Committee, therefore, recommended that adequate women police personnel should be<br />

deployed in police stations and at other places considered vulnerable for women. Investigation <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> crime against


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 7 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

women should be completed within a definite time frame so that conviction <strong>of</strong> the delinquent is secured without losing time.<br />

The Committee also recommended that Delhi Police should launch a drive to educate women in self-defence through posters<br />

and pamphlets and also launch awareness campaigns amongst women about their proactive approach in dealing with the<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> atrocities committed against them. The Committee further recommended that Delhi Police should address this issue<br />

with utmost sincerity and honesty by adopting all necessary measures.<br />

7.36 The Committee was also given to understand that a large number <strong>of</strong> women are working in Call Centers in NCR<br />

and travel long distance from their place <strong>of</strong> residence to their place <strong>of</strong> work at odd hours. Cases <strong>of</strong> rapes and atrocities on<br />

such women employees had been reported from certain places. The Committee, therefore, desired that Delhi Police should<br />

take all precautionary measures to ensure that such incidents do not happen in NCT <strong>of</strong> Delhi. The Committee also felt that<br />

there is a need for gender sensitization among Delhi Police personnel and all efforts may be made for ensuring attitudinal<br />

change amongst Delhi Police personnel.<br />

Housing<br />

7.37 The Committee felt that proper housing facilities for police personnel particularly at the level <strong>of</strong> Constable and<br />

Head Constable would go a long way in improving their efficiency particularly their attitude and behaviour. The Committee<br />

expressed its deep anguish over the laxity shown by Delhi Police in improving the satisfaction level in the housing <strong>of</strong> Delhi<br />

Police personnel particularly at lower level. Inspite <strong>of</strong> serious concern expressed by the Committee in the earlier years and<br />

recommendations made for improvement, there was no perceptible change in the situation. Housing was one <strong>of</strong> the basic<br />

requirements, particularly for people working in an organisation like Delhi Police and it should be made available to the<br />

extent possible. The Committee also expressed its concern that inspite <strong>of</strong> facing problem from several fronts in meeting the<br />

housing requirement they had not been able to set up the Delhi Police Housing Corporation. Housing Corporation would be<br />

an important step in the direction <strong>of</strong> solving the problem and the Committee strongly recommended that it might be<br />

established during the current financial year. The allocation made for housing in the current year i.e. Rs.55 crore might be<br />

fully utilized in the construction and purchase <strong>of</strong> housing units. The Committee was happy to learn that Rs. <strong>10</strong>0 crore were<br />

going to be made available every year for housing <strong>of</strong> Delhi Police personnel from out <strong>of</strong> the new scheme likely to be<br />

launched i.e. Modernisation <strong>of</strong> Police Forces in UTs. The allocation could not be made for this scheme at BE 2006-07 due to<br />

procedural delay and the Committee had already made its observation in para 16.4 supra. Since the scheme had already<br />

been approved, the Committee desired that allocation might be made for the scheme and Delhi Police might finalise its<br />

proposal for utilisation <strong>of</strong> the amount likely to be made available to<br />

it.<br />

(c) 120 th Report (The Demands for Grants (2006-2007) <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Development <strong>of</strong> North Eastern Region)<br />

Non-lapsable Central Pool <strong>of</strong> Resources (NLCPR)<br />

7.38 The Committee observed that NLCPR being a developmental corpus, it should be used for various development<br />

projects <strong>of</strong> the region but was constrained to note that special packages were also met from out <strong>of</strong> this fund. Any allocation<br />

from it for some other purpose was impermissible. The Committee, therefore, recommended that Government should stop<br />

such practice and make separate allocation for special packages.<br />

7.39 The Committee found that very important Ministries/Departments from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> NER such as<br />

Ministries/Departments <strong>of</strong> Science & Technology, Biotechnology and Space in the list <strong>of</strong> exempted Ministries/Departments.<br />

These Ministries/Departments could play an important role in the development <strong>of</strong> NER. Keeping in view the forest cover <strong>of</strong><br />

the region, the bio-diversity development could be given a boost through the involvement <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Science &<br />

Technology and Department <strong>of</strong> Biotechnology. Likewise, the Department <strong>of</strong> Space, which had given matching contribution<br />

along with NEC for development <strong>of</strong> NESAC, Shillong, could also contribute significantly for the development <strong>of</strong> NER.<br />

These exempted Ministries/Departments should be reviewed by the Government and considered for the purpose <strong>of</strong> spending<br />

ten percent <strong>of</strong> their GBS for the development <strong>of</strong> NER. The Committee hoped that the assurance given by the Secretary<br />

would be fulfilled at the earliest.<br />

7.40 The Committee did not agree with the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance <strong>of</strong> its plan to enable the NE States to raise loans from<br />

the open market. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view that these States would not be able to raise loans from the market.<br />

The prevailing atmosphere in the NE region too was not conducive for private investment. The Committee therefore,<br />

reiterates its earlier observation that non-budgeting <strong>of</strong> loan component <strong>of</strong> Central assistance to States is not a viable<br />

proposition for the special category States <strong>of</strong> NER and recommended that the budgeting <strong>of</strong> loan component may be<br />

provided.<br />

North Eastern Council (NEC)


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 8 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

7.41 The Committee noted with concern that the Tenth Plan outlay for NEC had not been adhered to till 2006-07 even<br />

though it was the terminal year <strong>of</strong> the plan. The final allocation made in each year putting together left a gap <strong>of</strong> Rs. 988.5 cr.<br />

Had this amount been allocated, all the projects could have been completed The explanation <strong>of</strong> the Secretary, NEC that a<br />

host <strong>of</strong> projects were languishing from scarcity <strong>of</strong> funds could be understood from the fact that the expenditure on the<br />

projects had been around hundred percent all the years. The Committee failed to understand why the Planning Commission<br />

made outlay for the Plan period and did not adhere to it while allocating it every year. This was not the right approach,<br />

particularly in view <strong>of</strong> requirement <strong>of</strong> funds for the development <strong>of</strong> NER. The Committee, therefore, strongly recommended<br />

that the amount required for completion <strong>of</strong> the projects in the current financial year, which was also a terminal year for Tenth<br />

Plan, might be made at RE stage.<br />

7.42 The Committee was also given to understand that there was no proper mechanism to ensure monitoring the quality<br />

in the execution <strong>of</strong> the project <strong>of</strong> NEC. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the monitoring mechanism might be<br />

strengthened to ensure quality in the execution <strong>of</strong> the projects.<br />

Advocacy and Publicity<br />

7.43 The Committee appreciated the positive attitude <strong>of</strong> the States in coming up with proposals for capacity<br />

enhancement and hoped that this approach would be maintained all through in implementing the schemes successfully. The<br />

Committee also noted that under the Advocacy and Publicity, more than ninety five percent expenditure <strong>of</strong> the allocation had<br />

been made and the Ministry had also indicated that several activities had been taken up at various places in the country. The<br />

Committee, however, felt that more needed to be done under this scheme until the entire region was brought into the<br />

mainstream <strong>of</strong> the economy. More innovative programmes might be undertaken and the Ministry might approach the<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance for higher allocations, if it was needed.<br />

Externally Aided Projects (EAPs)<br />

7.44 The externally aided projects, if implemented in the right earnest, would go a long way in improving the<br />

infrastructure in the North East. The final report on phase I <strong>of</strong> the NE Urban Development Project may be processed and<br />

examined at the earliest and the project proposals may be prepared soon. The Ministry should make all efforts to ensure that<br />

Phase I goes through this year. As regards the NE State Road Project, the Committee desired that the submission <strong>of</strong> draft<br />

Report be completed at the earliest and efforts be made to see that the project takes <strong>of</strong>f this year. The study <strong>of</strong> NE Trade and<br />

Investment Creation Initiative may be got completed at the earliest so that other processes could be taken up. In regard to the<br />

World Bank study on natural resources, water & environment nexus for development and growth, efforts may be made to<br />

complete the study on all aspects positively in this financial year.<br />

Vision NER: 2020<br />

7.45 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the vision document being a 15 year perspective plan for integrated and<br />

holistic development <strong>of</strong> NER through the process <strong>of</strong> participatory planning, must provide for concerted efforts to tap the<br />

potential and strengths <strong>of</strong> the region, remove weaknesses and be prepared in consultation with all the stakeholders. Sports<br />

and textiles are two sectors that have tremendous potential <strong>of</strong> growth in the NE region. Prowess <strong>of</strong> Sports Persons <strong>of</strong> the<br />

region has been manifested at various national and international levels. The need is for providing the ideal environment and<br />

infrastructure for allowing this talent to grow. Textiles are one <strong>of</strong> the most important thrust areas not only to earn foreign<br />

exchange but also to provide employment to a large number <strong>of</strong> people particularly to the rural artisans. Thus sports and<br />

textiles are two major strength <strong>of</strong> the region and need to be given special thrust in the Document. The Committee also<br />

recommended that establishment <strong>of</strong> a national level sports school and an institute like National Institute <strong>of</strong> Fashion<br />

Technology in NER should be included in the Vision Document 2020.<br />

Civil Aviation in NER<br />

7.46 The Committee was not happy with the way the issue <strong>of</strong> air connectivity in the North-Eastern Region had been<br />

handled, particularly by the Planning Commission. It was surprising that the Planning Commission had taken more than five<br />

years to process the proposals for airports at Passighat & Teju in Arunachal Pradesh and even after five years, no decision<br />

had been taken and ‘in-principle’ approval had not been given. The Committee observed that such delays were one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

factors for which the North-Eastern Region has remained backward. The real potential and the strengths available in the<br />

region have not been properly tapped and air connectivity is no exception to this. Such casual approach and bureaucratic<br />

delays only create heart burning amongst the people <strong>of</strong> the region. When the Committee visited North East early this year,<br />

several people who met the Committee sought to know as to how long they have to wait for implementation <strong>of</strong> these<br />

projects. The Committee took strong note <strong>of</strong> this nonchalant approach and recommended that the Planning Commission<br />

should clear the projects without further delay to enable the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Civil Aviation and the State Governments to<br />

implement the projects at the earliest.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 9 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

7.47 The Committee appreciated the problem involved in this regard and also in regard to the demand for pilots and<br />

engineers from the private sector. However, the problem <strong>of</strong> air connectivity in the North-Eastern Region could not be<br />

ignored just because <strong>of</strong> this. As a short-term measure, the Government might take up the matter with the Indian Air Force to<br />

provide some air force pilots and engineers until a permanent arrangement is made. For solving the problem on a long-term<br />

basis, the Ministry might discuss the issue <strong>of</strong> setting up a Pilot Training Institute at Lilabari with Ministry <strong>of</strong> Civil Aviation at<br />

the earliest. Necessary allocation might also be made for starting the Institute at the Revised Estimate stage. The<br />

Government might also include this in the ‘Vision Document 2020’.<br />

Health Care in NER<br />

7.48 The Committee found it quite unusual that even after fifty-nine years <strong>of</strong> independence there are States which did<br />

not have even one medical college and that the demand for the same was quite justified. Setting up <strong>of</strong> a medical college,<br />

besides providing trained medical graduates, would also bring with it better medical facilities and health infrastructure. The<br />

States without medical colleges would all the more require such facilities besides getting medical graduates. The Committee<br />

strongly recommended that at least one medical college in each <strong>of</strong> the States <strong>of</strong> Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram and Nagaland<br />

might be set up. That should be considered on priority basis and allocation may be made at RE stage. That might also be<br />

included in the Vision Document, 2020.<br />

Ropeway at Tawang<br />

7.49 The Committee was dismayed at the extraordinary delay in the commencement <strong>of</strong> work on the project inaugurated<br />

by no less than the President <strong>of</strong> India. Such delays and procrastination breeds resentment amongst the people <strong>of</strong> the region<br />

against the administration. The Committee, therefore, urged upon the Government to seek early sanction for the project and<br />

complete the same in the shortest possible time frame.<br />

National Bamboo Mission<br />

7.50 The Committee agreed that in view <strong>of</strong> the conducive climatic condition and heavy rainfall, the Bamboo Mission<br />

would boost the plantation <strong>of</strong> bamboo in the region, which would certainly help the sagging economy <strong>of</strong> the NE states. The<br />

Committee wanted early implementation <strong>of</strong> National Bamboo Mission in the region so that the Ministry <strong>of</strong> DoNER and NEC<br />

could accelerate projects under the Mission. The Ministry and NEC might, therefore, took up the matter with the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture for early approval <strong>of</strong> the Mission.<br />

(d) 121st Report (Examination <strong>of</strong> “Administration <strong>of</strong> Union Territories”)<br />

Administrative Setup<br />

7.51 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that as A&N Islands, which was headed by a Lieutenant Governor, had no public<br />

representative to supervise, to consider or to monitor the functions <strong>of</strong> the Government apart from the Lieutenant Governor, it<br />

could at least had a Pradesh Council. It was also <strong>of</strong> the view that Panchayati Raj could not be a substitute for the Pradesh<br />

Council. PRIs would look after the execution <strong>of</strong> policies and programmes under Part IX (Article 243 G) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution,<br />

whereas the Pradesh Council would review and supervise the functioning <strong>of</strong> the Government.<br />

7.52 The Committee was also given to understand that there were problems <strong>of</strong> increasing unemployment and<br />

urbanization, law and order, bootlegging. The Committee felt that these were directly connected with development. When<br />

the State is administered by <strong>of</strong>ficers only, there is no scope for monitoring and overseeing the working <strong>of</strong> the Administration<br />

and ultimately development is affected. When development is not taking place, people suffer leading to increase in crime<br />

rate. These issues can be solved only by people’s participation in governance through their elected<br />

representatives.<br />

7.53 The Committee, during its visit to Andaman & Nicobar Islands, noted the immensity <strong>of</strong> tsunami devastation and<br />

the problem <strong>of</strong> shortage <strong>of</strong> staff. Had there been a Legislative Assembly the relief operation would have been addressed in a<br />

better manner. The Committee was, therefore, <strong>of</strong> the firm view that there was a strong justification for setting up <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Legislative Assembly for the Andaman & Nicobar Islands. It therefore, recommended to the Government to take necessary<br />

steps in this direction.<br />

7.54 Until a final decision is taken for setting up a Legislative Assembly, some kind <strong>of</strong> monitoring mechanism was<br />

required. Therefore, the Committee recommended that the Pradesh Council may be revived immediately. This is all the<br />

more necessary because the administration <strong>of</strong> the entire UT <strong>of</strong> Andaman & Nicobar Islands could not be left to the Panchayat<br />

Raj Institutions. These were only local self-governing institutions and they could not be a substitute for a legislative set up.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> <strong>10</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

7.55 The Committee also took note <strong>of</strong> the fact that consequent upon the Seventy Third and Seventy- fourth Amendments<br />

to the Constitution, though the participation <strong>of</strong> the people in planning & execution <strong>of</strong> developmental works in the UT started<br />

at the grass-root level, the process <strong>of</strong> delegation <strong>of</strong> powers & functions to PRIs had been very slow. The subjects apportioned<br />

to them were limited and even in those areas the transfer had not been complete. The Committee, therefore, recommended<br />

that local bodies might be delegated more powers and functions without further delay so that they could meet the people’s<br />

aspirations. Further the Committee recommended that those bodies should be supported by adequate staff, finance and other<br />

logistics.<br />

Sociological Set up<br />

7.56 The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the fact that there were five primitive tribes in the whole <strong>of</strong> Andaman & Nicobar<br />

Islands. They fulfilled the essential characteristics <strong>of</strong> tribals. The Committee understood the compulsion <strong>of</strong> the Government<br />

in integrating the tribal communities into the mainstream <strong>of</strong> the society. This is a sociological process, which needs to be<br />

addressed through the process <strong>of</strong> time only. However, the Committee noted that the tribes were living amidst reserved forest<br />

land. These tribals, might at some point <strong>of</strong> time in future come out and mix up with the civilised society. Therefore, some<br />

provision had to be made so that when they enter the civilised world, they should be given an opportunity to use the forest<br />

land and do the farming. While preserving the uniqueness <strong>of</strong> the tribals, the process <strong>of</strong> integration into the mainstream <strong>of</strong> the<br />

society may continue as per requirement at a particular point <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

Administrative Issues<br />

7.57 The Committee felt that the proposal <strong>of</strong> the Island Administration for creation <strong>of</strong> new district and sub-divisions<br />

would help in delegation and decentralization <strong>of</strong> powers necessary for quick decision-making. The Committee recommended<br />

that the demand <strong>of</strong> the Administration might be examined on priority. The new District and sub-divisions would help the<br />

local administration in catering to the needs <strong>of</strong> people, in an efficient manner and in the quickest possible time.<br />

Need for helicopters<br />

7.58 The Committee understood the gigantic task <strong>of</strong> the administration <strong>of</strong> 572 islands spread over 800 kms. They need<br />

sufficient vehicles for transportation and aerial route is the only available means for inter-island transportation. The<br />

Committee, therefore, recommended that the proposal for acquisition <strong>of</strong> two helicopters might be approved at the earliest.<br />

That would help the administration in providing necessary help to the people besides making the helicopters available for<br />

inter-island transport on a regular basis.<br />

Personnel Administration<br />

7.59 The Committee noted the difficulty being faced by the Administration due to shortage <strong>of</strong> staff in providing relief &<br />

rehabilitation and completion <strong>of</strong> other ongoing projects. Such a large number <strong>of</strong> vacancies for such a small administrative<br />

setup was a matter <strong>of</strong> concern particularly when relief and rehabilitation work was to be done on war footing. The<br />

Committee recommended that the Finance Ministry’s blanket ban on recruitment for the UT should be reconsidered. The<br />

Government should also look into the issue <strong>of</strong> delay in filling up <strong>of</strong> vacancies and take steps to expedite the<br />

same.<br />

Tourism in the Islands<br />

7.60 The Committee desired that the objectives set in the Tenth Five-Year Plan such as ec<strong>of</strong>riendly & environmentally<br />

sustainable tourism, development <strong>of</strong> new tourism activities/products and marketing the Islands as eco-tourism destination,<br />

etc. should be achieved. The schemes taken up needed to be implemented on a priority basis for achieving the objectives as<br />

this would generate employment besides strengthening tourism. The Committee also recommended that 2006-2007 being the<br />

terminal year <strong>of</strong> the Tenth Five-Year Plan, all-out efforts might be made so that no activity taken up remains<br />

incomplete.<br />

7.61 The Committee desired that the Government should address both the short-term and medium-term objectives and<br />

take necessary steps for taking up and completion <strong>of</strong> all the proposals in a definite timeframe.<br />

7.62 Andaman & Nicobar Islands are the ultimate unexplored destination <strong>of</strong> India’s tourism. Once they are open to<br />

tourists there is no doubt that the islands would become one <strong>of</strong> the tourism attractions in the world. Despite having very good<br />

tourism potential, India has not tapped it well. A&N Islands were a good example <strong>of</strong> this. There are many countries in the<br />

world which thrive on tourism and India is not able to make use <strong>of</strong> the potential. The Committee was however happy to note<br />

that things are moving in the right direction with the opening up <strong>of</strong> more islands in A&N Islands. By opening up islands,


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

more investment would flow in and tourism will develop which ultimately leads to economic growth <strong>of</strong> the islands and the<br />

country. The Committee desired that the proposal <strong>of</strong> opening more islands for tourism might be got cleared from the Cabinet<br />

at the earliest.<br />

Air connectivity<br />

7.63 The vast potential <strong>of</strong> international tourists can only be tapped if there is world class airport and other infrastructure.<br />

Air connectivity and tourism are inter-linked and inter-dependent. A&N Islands, being remotely and strategically located,<br />

need better air connectivity both domestic and international for better tourist arrivals. The Committee recommended that the<br />

Ministry should take steps to declare Vir Savarkar Airport as an International Airport as a step towards projecting A & N<br />

Islands as an attractive tourist destination. The Committee also recommended that to begin with the Government could make<br />

the stopover for Chennai-Bangkok & Chennai-Singapore flights at the Islands. It also urges upon the Administration to<br />

complete the expansion work <strong>of</strong> the airport expeditiously, thus making it capable for operation <strong>of</strong> wide-bodied aircraft. The<br />

Committee was also <strong>of</strong> the view that the other proposals in the strategy for post-tsunami tourism promotion, if implemented,<br />

would go a long way in the promotion and strengthening <strong>of</strong> tourism in Andaman & Nicobar Islands, particularly the proposal<br />

relating to introduction <strong>of</strong> flights from various cities to Port Blair would go a long way in attracting tourists from different<br />

destinations <strong>of</strong> the country to the Islands. The Committee desired that the above proposals may be taken up on top priority.<br />

Agriculture and Fishery<br />

7.64 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that considering the vast potential <strong>of</strong> fisheries, shrimp, crab and prawn, concerted<br />

efforts need be made to explore the potential by diversifying fishing to Shrimp, Crab and Prawn culture. The issue <strong>of</strong><br />

identification <strong>of</strong> suitable areas for coastal shrimp culture may be pursued with Central Institute <strong>of</strong> Brackishwater Aquaculture<br />

(CIBA). That was necessary in view <strong>of</strong> scarcity <strong>of</strong> freshwater in the Islands. The Committee noted that land available in the<br />

Islands was very less and its optimum use should be made. Besides diversifying farming practices, efforts should also be<br />

made to increase productivity. Efforts being made to utilise vacant hilly land for plantation, spices, crops, etc., might be<br />

intensified as these are eco-friendly and they grow naturally. Similarly, diversification <strong>of</strong> agriculture by encouraging<br />

plantation <strong>of</strong> cash crops such as cashew nuts, spices, and coconut in the Islands might prove to be a panacea for improving<br />

the economic condition <strong>of</strong> the farmers and the tribals living in the region.<br />

Statehood to Pondicherry<br />

7.65 The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the views expressed by a section <strong>of</strong> the society in Pondicherry and felt that the<br />

sentiments <strong>of</strong> the people and the people’s elected representatives could not be ignored. The overwhelming view <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong><br />

them was in favour <strong>of</strong> Statehood to the Union Territory <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry with Special Category status. The Committee felt that<br />

the aspirations <strong>of</strong> the people have to be respected. The Committee took due note <strong>of</strong> the views <strong>of</strong> the Ministry that it would<br />

not be a viable State economically. But the Committee could not be oblivious to the fact that when Goa graduated into a<br />

State, there were apprehensions that Goa might not sustain as a State because <strong>of</strong> its weak financial base. But, Goa had<br />

proved it otherwise. Further, Pondicherry had a Legislative Assembly with elected representatives.<br />

7.66 The Committee was also given to understand that Pondicherry Government appointed a Committee to go into its<br />

viability as a State and the then Chief Secretary <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry had submitted the Report; the Report was examined and it<br />

was agreed, in principle, by the Government that it would bring forward a Bill in the Parliament to grant Special Category<br />

Status to Pondicherry. However, that proposal was shelved.<br />

7.67 Looking at the practical point <strong>of</strong> view, the Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that Pondicherry, as a Union Territory, was a<br />

big handicap for the Chief Minister to function. Most <strong>of</strong> the administrative powers were vested in the Lieutenant-Governor<br />

and files were cleared by him.<br />

7.68 Taking into account all these factors, the Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the issue <strong>of</strong> Statehood to Pondicherry<br />

needed to be considered in a holistic manner. The Committee, therefore recommended that Government may consider<br />

granting Statehood to Pondicherry with Special Category Status.<br />

B-II Category Status to Pondicherry<br />

7.69 The city <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry, which is also the capital <strong>of</strong> the UT <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry has been undergoing a rapid<br />

transformation. It has all the characteristics <strong>of</strong> a developed urban agglomeration. The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the fact that<br />

the population <strong>of</strong> urban agglomeration <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry exceeded 5.05 lakhs as per the Census <strong>of</strong> 2001. The rapid growth <strong>of</strong><br />

administration, industrialization, educational institutions; the population <strong>of</strong> urban agglomeration exceeding five lakhs; the<br />

floating population <strong>of</strong> about one lakh per day, justify the grant <strong>of</strong> B II status to Pondicherry. The Committee was also given<br />

to understand that Port Blair and Panaji were granted B II status, even though their population was less than that <strong>of</strong>


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 12 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Pondicherry. The Committee expressed its concern over the discriminatory attitude shown towards Pondicherry. When Port<br />

Blair and Panaji had been granted B II status, the Committee could not buy the argument given by the Government in respect<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pondicherry. B II status, besides increasing HRA to Government employees would also enhance the status <strong>of</strong> the city.<br />

The city would be able to get urban development schemes and more opportunities for development. The Committee<br />

therefore strongly recommended that Government might grant B II status to Pondicherry city for the purpose <strong>of</strong> payment <strong>of</strong><br />

HRA. The Committee urged upon the Government that the relaxation made in the case <strong>of</strong> the cities <strong>of</strong> Port Blair and Goa in<br />

this regard may also be extended to Pondicherry so that the <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> the Central/UT Government are adequately<br />

compensated for their expenditure on housing.<br />

Recognition <strong>of</strong> Scheduled Tribes in Pondicherry<br />

7.70 The Committee expressed its concern that even though the UT Administration <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry had been<br />

recommending for recognition <strong>of</strong> the Scheduled Tribes, the Registrar General <strong>of</strong> India had not taken any positive decision so<br />

far. His views on five criteria were not pragmatic and hence might be dispensed with. The Committee also noted that the<br />

above mentioned tribes existed in UT <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry even before its independence in 1954, as per the reports <strong>of</strong> Backward<br />

Classes Commission <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that RGI was procrastinating the matter. Keeping in<br />

view the existence <strong>of</strong> Scheduled Tribes as identified by the Government <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry, Backward classes commission and<br />

the Ethnographic study <strong>of</strong> Dr. Subramniyan Naidu, the Committee recommended notification by Government <strong>of</strong> the five<br />

Scheduled Tribes identified by the UT Administration <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry in terms <strong>of</strong> Articles 342 read with Article 366 (25) <strong>of</strong><br />

the Constitution.<br />

Election to Panchayati Raj Institutions<br />

7.71 The Committee expressed its deep concern over the fact that in spite <strong>of</strong> the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs)<br />

having been granted constitutional status, and under Articles 243 (K) and (L) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution regular elections are<br />

required to be held to the panchayats every five years, elections thereto had not been held in Pondicherry for the last 30<br />

years. In this connection, the Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the constitutional provision under Article 243 E (3). The Committee<br />

took strong exception to the non-compliance <strong>of</strong> the constitutional obligation. The Committee was happy to learn that the<br />

order conducting elections to Panchayati Raj Institutions had been issued<br />

recently.<br />

Perspective Plan for Tourism Development<br />

7.72 The Committee felt that in view <strong>of</strong> the historical significance and geographical location, Pondicherry has the<br />

potential to develop into a good tourist destination. The Committee appreciated the efforts being made by the Pondicherry<br />

Government in making it as an ideal tourist destination. Airports are an important ingredient for growth <strong>of</strong> tourism and in that<br />

direction the Committee recognizes the necessity <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry and Karaikal airports. The Committee recommended that<br />

the Central Government should make all efforts for early operationalisation <strong>of</strong> the Pondicherry Airport and establishing <strong>of</strong><br />

Karaikal Airport. The Committee also recommended that the development <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry and Karaikal Ports and Art and<br />

Craft Village in Murungapakkam might be taken up and completed at the earliest as these would give good infrastrucutral<br />

support required for tourism. Construction <strong>of</strong> Star Hotels might also be taken up and the development <strong>of</strong> Medical Tourism<br />

might be emphasized.<br />

Agriculture & Irrigation<br />

7.73 The Committee expressed its concern over the fast declining net area sown and low agricultural productivity in the<br />

last ten years. Productivity remaining static, land degradation, poor soil management and excessive exploitation <strong>of</strong> water<br />

resources indicate the poor health <strong>of</strong> agriculture sector. The proposal <strong>of</strong> the UT <strong>of</strong> Pondicherry to open Uzhavar<br />

Udhaviyagams (Farmers’ Help Centres) was a path-breaking solution to the ills ailing the farm sector. The Committee was<br />

happy to learn that the plan had been implemented and felt that it should be pursued in the right perspective.<br />

Fishery Development<br />

7.74 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that early action was needed to bring the people belonging to agricultural and<br />

fishermen communities affected by Tsunami, back to normalcy. Some rehabilitation measures had already been taken. That<br />

time sufficient infrastructure was in place so that they could start leading normal life. The Committee desired that the<br />

comprehensive plan for modernizing fishing activities initiated by the Government might be implemented at the earliest. For<br />

promotion <strong>of</strong> shrimp culture clearance <strong>of</strong> Aquaculture Authority might be obtained at the earliest. Identification <strong>of</strong> cultivable<br />

land might be completed soon so that shrimp culture could be developed at the earliest.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 13 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in Andaman & Nicobar Islands<br />

7.75 The tsunami tidal waves had caused widespread devastation in the Islands resulting in loss <strong>of</strong> human life as well as<br />

livestock besides loss <strong>of</strong> property. The Committee felt that considering the magnitude <strong>of</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> life and property,<br />

whatever rehabilitation that had been provided would not match the loss caused by the natural calamity. But the relief<br />

provided could mitigate the suffering though the scares might not be removed permanently. However, the Government<br />

should not leave any stone unturned to ensure early rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> the affected people and to undertake reconstruction<br />

process to ensure that they start their normal life at the earliest. The Committee understood that the Government had taken<br />

up several relief measures. In regard to construction <strong>of</strong> permanent houses, the Committee felt that the permanent shelters<br />

should be at locations which are high on ground near the earlier habitations as the livelihood <strong>of</strong> the people requires them to<br />

continue residing there. Similarly, while constructing the houses, use <strong>of</strong> local material such as bamboo, wood, etc., should be<br />

preferred as they are earthquake-resistant and give better protection from sun. The Committee also took note <strong>of</strong> the fact that<br />

some people, who met the Committee during its visit, desired that money may be provided to their families so that they can<br />

construct their houses themselves. This was a better proposition because it would have engaged the families in the<br />

reconstruction work till the completion <strong>of</strong> the construction. The Government might, therefore, consider providing them<br />

financial help besides other required material to enable the families engage themselves in the reconstruction<br />

work.<br />

7.76 The Committee had noted that revival package for small traders consisted <strong>of</strong> waiver <strong>of</strong> loans and interest thereon,<br />

etc. The Committee recommended that the Government may consider increasing the package <strong>of</strong> Rs. 57.15 crore further. It<br />

also recommended that the Government may consider providing interest-free fresh loans for at least two years to enable them<br />

to start their business afresh. Though the Government had given compensation for loss <strong>of</strong> agricultural crops which is now<br />

Rs. 22,231 per hectare, that was a pittance considering the fact that agricultural land had become saline and uncultivable and<br />

barren. It could no longer be used for any agricultural activities and even grass would not grow. Therefore, the Government<br />

should consider providing some package for permanent rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> the farmers whose agricultural land is no longer<br />

useful. The package might also contain providing assistance for business or employment.<br />

7.77 The Committee felt that the request <strong>of</strong> the people in the islands for employment to at least one person in each<br />

affected family needed to be considered. A one-time creation <strong>of</strong> employment opportunities would give permanent relief to<br />

the families. Besides that, filling up <strong>of</strong> 3000 vacant posts would also cover a large number <strong>of</strong> people. The Committee,<br />

therefore, recommended that the Government may consider these proposals immediately and take decisions thereon.<br />

Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in Pondicherry<br />

7.78 The Committee noted that about 800 hectares <strong>of</strong> agricultural land as well as crops were affected by the tidal waves<br />

in Pondicherry. Much <strong>of</strong> the land might remain permanently unfit for farming. The relief given might not give permanent<br />

compensation to the affected people. In all the cases <strong>of</strong> permanent loss <strong>of</strong> land, the Committee suggested that the<br />

Government may consider raising the compensation appropriately.<br />

7.79 After Tsunami, many farmers had been severely affected with many children getting orphaned. Though<br />

Government had provided relief package and rehabilitation, it might also consider providing permanent compensation in the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> reservation in employment to such victims. This was all the more necessary in the case <strong>of</strong> orphaned<br />

children.<br />

7.80 In regard to construction <strong>of</strong> permanent houses, the Committee expressed its concern that out <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong>, 061 houses,<br />

only 341 houses had been completed so far and it felt that way it was going to take a long time for completing all the houses.<br />

The Committee recommended that the pace <strong>of</strong> construction might be increased and all the houses may be completed within a<br />

definite time-frame. Land acquisition for construction <strong>of</strong> houses may be completed at the earliest so that construction may<br />

start at the earliest.<br />

7.81 The World Bank aided project was an appreciable effort <strong>of</strong> the international agency. Government might monitor<br />

the project so that targets were achieved within the given time-frame.<br />

Legislature for Chandigarh<br />

7.82 The Committee noted the view <strong>of</strong> the Home Secretary that the present arrangement was working satisfactorily.<br />

However, when the Committee visited Chandigarh, various political leaders and general public informed that there was no<br />

forum to ventilate their grievances. The Committee was also constrained to learn that it is very difficult for the general public<br />

to meet the Administrator and that they felt that the present arrangement is not able to solve their problems. The Committee<br />

was <strong>of</strong> the view that the Municipal Corporation cannot solve all the problems <strong>of</strong> the people and the Advisory Council cannot<br />

help things to the extent people want their aspirations to be fulfilled. Thus, there needed to be some mechanism by which<br />

people have better access to the administration and which can address and redress their grievances. Such mechanism, besides


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 14 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

solving the problems <strong>of</strong> the people, would also fulfil their aspirations. Therefore, keeping in view the aspirations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

people’s representatives and the general public at large, the Committee recommended that some kind <strong>of</strong> arrangement should<br />

be put in place in the UT <strong>of</strong> Chandigarh which should be easily accessible to the public and which could effectively and<br />

adequately redress their grievances.<br />

Metropolitan Planning Committee<br />

7.83 The Committee noted that the Metropolitan Planning Committee could go a long way in solving the problems <strong>of</strong><br />

the people <strong>of</strong> Chandigarh and fulfilling their aspirations. Even though the Metropolitan Planning Committee was not the<br />

ultimate solution to the elected legislative body, it could, to a large extent, address the problems <strong>of</strong> the masses. The<br />

Committee suggested that suitable legislation might be brought in at the earliest so that steps may be initiated for setting up<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Metropolitan Planning Committee.<br />

Advisory Council to Administrator<br />

7.84 The Committee understood that infrequent meetings <strong>of</strong> the Advisory Council to Administrator might be causing<br />

problems in redressing the grievances <strong>of</strong> the people. In the absence <strong>of</strong> a legislative body, at least, other bodies such as the<br />

Advisory Council should be given the necessary teeth to address the people’s grievances. The Committee agreed with the<br />

Home Secretary that the Council should meet more frequently. The Committee, therefore, suggested that necessary steps<br />

might be taken in that direction to ensure that the Council meets more frequently. The Committee also agreed with the view<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Home Secretary that members <strong>of</strong> the Advisory Council should be adequately empowered. It recommended that the<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs should take necessary steps to redefine the powers and functions <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the Advisory<br />

Council and steps may also be taken to give more powers to the Council as such. As regards the suggestion <strong>of</strong> Home<br />

Secretary that the Council needed to be broad-based, the Committee had not received any concrete proposal from the<br />

Ministry. The Committee, however, felt that the issue needed to be deliberated upon and steps taken in this direction too.<br />

Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong> Chandigarh<br />

7.85 The Committee was constrained to learn from the Mayor and Councillors <strong>of</strong> Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong> Chandigarh<br />

that it had more responsibilities with limited authority and financial resources. The Committee had noted the MCC’s request<br />

for a share <strong>of</strong> 23 per cent <strong>of</strong> the tax revenue. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that a municipal body functions closest to the<br />

people and needs to solve problems at the quickest possible time. For this purpose, it required sufficient resources. The<br />

Committee recommended that the Union Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs might discuss the issue with the Mayor and Councillors<br />

<strong>of</strong> MCC on its requirement <strong>of</strong> resources for a better upkeep <strong>of</strong> the city. Steps might be taken for early implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Second Delhi Finance Commission recommendations for devolution <strong>of</strong> 17 per cent share <strong>of</strong> tax revenue until the Third Delhi<br />

Finance Commission takes a decision on the proposed devolution <strong>of</strong> 23 per cent tax revenue.<br />

7.86 The Committee understood that the Zila Parishad and the Panchayati<br />

Raj Institutions (PRIs) in 18 villages would come to an end should the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> Municipal Corporation <strong>of</strong> Chandigarh<br />

be extended to these villages. And in the absence <strong>of</strong> any demand from the 18 villages for extension <strong>of</strong> jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

MCC into their areas and the orientation <strong>of</strong> MCC being urban, these villages might lose their rural identity without entailing<br />

any benefits and urban taxation <strong>of</strong> the municipality may add to their woes. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the<br />

rural identity <strong>of</strong> the 18 villages might not be disturbed.<br />

Scheduled Caste Certificates<br />

7.87 The Committee was constrained to note that such an important issue had been kept unresolved for so long and the<br />

people belonging to the SC community had to suffer. Such issues needed to be attended to without delay. The Committee<br />

trusted that Home Secretary would stick to the assurance made before the Committee and the issue would be resolved<br />

immediately.<br />

Career Prospects & Other Grievances <strong>of</strong> Government Teachers in the UT<br />

7.88 The Committee gathered that the Chandigarh Administration was either ignorant <strong>of</strong> or non-responsive to the<br />

problems and issues <strong>of</strong> Government Teachers. Such inept handling <strong>of</strong> their problem would demoralise them. The Committee<br />

recommended that the problems faced by the teachers may be addressed properly.<br />

Air, Rail and Road Transport for Chandigarh<br />

7.89 The Committee recommended that considering the growing importance <strong>of</strong> the Chandigarh city, the Government<br />

should explore the possibility <strong>of</strong> upgrading the Civil Airport to an International Airport and make it twenty-four hours


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 15 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

airport. The railway service might also be further improved keeping in view the requirement <strong>of</strong> the city and the region.<br />

Building bye-laws<br />

7.90 The Committee felt that the situation that had arisen in Chandigarh was more or less similar to the situation that<br />

arose in Delhi in the recent past. The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the serious situation that arose in Delhi when Courts passed<br />

orders for demolition/sealing <strong>of</strong> unauthorized constructions in Delhi leading to a public outburst as a large number <strong>of</strong><br />

buildings/houses were found to be affected by the said drive. Consequently, the Central Government had to step in to prevent<br />

the situation from further worsening and Parliament enacting a special legislation for the purpose. To avoid such a situation<br />

in Chandigarh where too alteration/additions in houses had been made on a large scale, the Committee felt that the<br />

Government should bring about a practical solution to the problem by having a re-look at the building bye-laws <strong>of</strong><br />

Chandigarh, which were quite old and also keeping in view the needs <strong>of</strong> expanding families. Government might also in this<br />

context consider giving a one time relaxation to the building bye-laws in Chandigarh.<br />

(e) 122 nd Report (The Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> victims) Bill, 2005<br />

7.91 The Committee considered the alternative terms for “Communal Violence” like ‘social violence’ ‘mass violence’<br />

and ‘sectarian violence’.<br />

7.92 The Committee felt that the words ‘communal violence’ were well understood by every one. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> this<br />

Bill, a violence might be called communal violence if it threatens unity, integrity, secular fabric and internal security <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country. The Bill took care <strong>of</strong> mass violence, violence between ethnic groups, religious communities (both inter and intra)<br />

and different castes. The Committee, therefore, decided that the words ‘communal violence’ might be retained.<br />

7.93 The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the drafting error as pointed out by one <strong>of</strong> the witnesses in clause 2(1)(b) viz. that the<br />

reference to sub clause (i) <strong>of</strong> clause (c) <strong>of</strong> sub-section (1) <strong>of</strong> section 3 should read as ‘sub-section (1) <strong>of</strong> Section 3’. The<br />

Committee recommended that in sub-clause (1) (b) <strong>of</strong> clause 2, the words “sub-clause (i) <strong>of</strong> clause (c) <strong>of</strong>” may be<br />

deleted.<br />

7.94 The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the proposal made by the Home Secretary for amending Clause 2 (1) (l). The<br />

Committee agreed that the Schedule actually lists the sections which prescribe the punishment and not the <strong>of</strong>fence. The<br />

Committee agreed that sub-clause (1) (l) <strong>of</strong> Clause 2 may read as under:<br />

“Scheduled <strong>of</strong>fence” means an <strong>of</strong>fence punishable under the sections specified in the Schedule.”<br />

The Committee agreed with the view that making death and destruction <strong>of</strong> property sine qua non for notification<br />

would be very restrictive. There might be a situation where a single death might not have taken place but a large number <strong>of</strong><br />

people are grievously hurt. Such a situation was not covered under this clause.The Committee, therefore, recommended that<br />

sub-clause (1) (a) <strong>of</strong> clause 3 might be amended as under:<br />

‘in such manner and on such a scale which involves the use <strong>of</strong> criminal force or violence<br />

against any group, caste or community, resulting in grievous hurt, loss <strong>of</strong> life, or extensive<br />

damage or destruction <strong>of</strong> property.’<br />

7.95 The Committee agreed to the suggestion that the word ‘danger’ be substituted by ‘threat’ and ‘may’ by ‘shall’ in<br />

clause 3 (1) (c), and recommended these amendments in the clause.<br />

7.96 The Committee recommended that a provision might be made in the proviso to sub-clause (2) <strong>of</strong> clause 3 to the<br />

effect a notification issued under sub-clause (1) shall not in any case be extended beyond six months. If, however, the<br />

situation warranted declaration <strong>of</strong> an area to be communally disturbed, beyond that period, the State Government might issue<br />

a fresh notification by following the procedure prescribed in sub-clause<br />

(1).<br />

7.97 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that there was a need to amend clause 5 (1) by adding the words “or he has received<br />

an information” after the words ‘has reason to believe’. The Committee recommended that clause 5 (1) might be amended<br />

accordingly.<br />

7.98 The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the suggestion that in sub-clause (3), the amount <strong>of</strong> fine should be mentioned. It<br />

apprehended that under the existing provision <strong>of</strong> sub-clause (3), an <strong>of</strong>fender might get away with fine only. The Committee,


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 16 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

therefore, recommended that the words “or with fine or with both” might be substituted by the words “and with fine”<br />

7.<strong>99</strong> The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the omission pointed out by the Home Secretary and recommended addition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following new sub-clause (3) in clause 6 as under:<br />

“Whoever contravenes the provisions <strong>of</strong> an order made under this section, shall be<br />

punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall<br />

also be liable to fine”.<br />

7.<strong>10</strong>0 The Committee agreed with the suggestion <strong>of</strong> deleting the words ‘whether such person has a licence to keep such<br />

arms, ammunition, explosives, corrosive substance, or not’ in Clause 7(1), as this provision is likely to be misused and the<br />

citizens may be harassed. The Home Secretary endorsed the suggestion. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the<br />

words ‘whether such person has a licence to keep such arms, ammunition, explosives, corrosive substance, or not’ in subclause<br />

(1) <strong>of</strong> clause 7 may be deleted.<br />

7.<strong>10</strong>1 The Committee felt that the suggestion <strong>of</strong> substituting the words ‘Sub-Inspector’ by the words ‘Deputy<br />

Superintendent <strong>of</strong> Police’ may not be practicable. The Committee, however, felt that the power to search, detain and seize<br />

arms etc. in communally disturbed area should be exercised by an <strong>of</strong>ficer not below the rank <strong>of</strong> Inspector <strong>of</strong> Police. The<br />

Committee, therefore, recommended that the word “Sub-Inspector” may be substituted by the word “Inspector”.<br />

7.<strong>10</strong>2 The Committee felt that the words ‘public utterances <strong>of</strong> cries’ in sub-clause (1) (e) were vague and inapt.<br />

‘Incitement’ is an appropriate word. However, the Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that incitement should be related to singing <strong>of</strong><br />

songs and playing <strong>of</strong> music as well. The Committee, accordingly, recommended that sub-clause (1) (e) <strong>of</strong> clause 9 may be<br />

amended as under:<br />

“the public utterances, singing <strong>of</strong> songs and playing <strong>of</strong> music which cause<br />

incitement”.<br />

7.<strong>10</strong>3 The Committee held detailed discussion on the implication <strong>of</strong> this clause and its likely misuse in its present form. The<br />

Committee felt that the very purpose <strong>of</strong> deleting reference to unlicenced arms in clause 7(1) may be defeated if clause 12 is<br />

allowed to remain in its present form. In order to bring clause 12 in consonance with clause 7(1), as amended by the<br />

Committee, it recommended that the words ‘is found to be in possession <strong>of</strong> or carrying’ may substitute the words ‘has in his<br />

possession’ in clause 12.<br />

7.<strong>10</strong>4 The Committee agreed with the view that the expression ‘any person who knowing or having reasonable cause to<br />

believe…’ is a loose formulation which can be misused. The Committee, therefore, recommends that after the words ‘having<br />

reasonable cause to believe’, the words ‘from the circumstances’ may be<br />

inserted.<br />

7.<strong>10</strong>5 The Committee agreed that the words ‘goods transport vehicle’ were very restrictive and did not include other<br />

vehicles. The Committee felt that there was a need to bring all the vehicles under the ambit <strong>of</strong> this clause. The Committee<br />

also took note <strong>of</strong> the explanation <strong>of</strong> the Secretary, Legislative Department that in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 there was<br />

only the definition <strong>of</strong> ‘transport vehicle’ and not ‘vehicle’. Taking into consideration the explanation given by the Legislative<br />

Secretary, the Committee recommended that the word ‘goods’ might be deleted from the clause and marginal heading<br />

thereto.<br />

7.<strong>10</strong>6 The Committee also took note <strong>of</strong> the Home Secretary’s submission that the Government propose to add the words ‘or<br />

arms, explosives or corrosive substance’ after the words ‘rules made thereunder’. The Committee agreed with the suggestion<br />

and recommended that the amendment may be carried out.<br />

7.<strong>10</strong>7 The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the fact that the <strong>of</strong>fences for which punishment was provided in clause 17 (1) become<br />

non-cognizable if the punishment was only one year imprisonment. The Committee felt that the <strong>of</strong>fences needed to be made<br />

cognizable and for this purpose, the punishment would have to be enhanced to three years imprisonment. By making the<br />

quantum <strong>of</strong> punishment to three years, there would be uniformity in clause 17 and clause 19. Further, if that amendment was<br />

not made in clause 17, then clause 19 becomes redundant. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the words “one<br />

year” might be substituted by the words “three years” in sub-clause (1) <strong>of</strong> clause 17.<br />

7.<strong>10</strong>8 The Committee considered the Government’s proposal. It also took note <strong>of</strong> the fact that that was the only provision in<br />

the Bill which prescribed a minimum punishment.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 17 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

7.<strong>10</strong>9 The Committee felt that the minimum punishment <strong>of</strong> imprisonment as proposed to be reduced by the Government to<br />

three years was sufficient to work as a deterrent. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the word ‘five’ in the proviso<br />

to sub-clause (2) <strong>of</strong> clause 19 might be substituted by the word “three”.<br />

7.1<strong>10</strong> The Committee felt that the Executive Magistrate would not have as much independence as the Judicial<br />

Magistrate. Moreover, Executive Magistrate was directly accountable to the Government. Therefore, the Committee<br />

recommended that the words ‘or Executive Magistrate’ in sub-clause (3) <strong>of</strong> clause 20 might be deleted.<br />

7.111 The Committee, however, felt that a Law Officer also should be associated with the Review Committee.<br />

Therefore, the Committee recommended that Government might bring suitable amendment in sub-clause (1) <strong>of</strong> clause 22 for<br />

the purpose <strong>of</strong> associating a law <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the State, with the Review Committee.<br />

7.112 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that a provision already exists in Cr. P.C. empowering State Governments to<br />

constitute SIT. The Committee, therefore, recommended that clause 23 may be deleted.<br />

7.113 The Committee discussed at length the implications <strong>of</strong> that clause. At that time Central Government or a State<br />

Government did not have the power to transfer a case from one High Court to another High Court. This was the power given<br />

to the Judiciary. Section 406 <strong>of</strong> Cr.P.C. provides that the Supreme Court can transfer a case from one High Court to another<br />

High Court. Giving that power to the Central Government was illegal and took away the powers <strong>of</strong> Judiciary. Clause 24 was<br />

repugnant to the provisions <strong>of</strong> Section 406 <strong>of</strong> Cr.P.C. The Committee was, therefore, <strong>of</strong> the strong view that such a power<br />

should remain with the judiciary only. The exigencies visualized in this clause whereunder a State Government might<br />

request the Central Government to establish an additional Special Court outside the State for trial <strong>of</strong> scheduled <strong>of</strong>fences, are<br />

impracticable and highly improbable as no State Government would indulge in self indictment stating that justice cannot be<br />

dispensed within that State. The Committee, therefore, recommended that clause 24 may be re-looked in the light <strong>of</strong> Section<br />

406 <strong>of</strong> Cr. P.C.<br />

7.114 The Committee recommended that while framing the rules, endeavour should be made for providing timely and<br />

adequate infrastructure for the Special Courts.<br />

7.115 The Committee recommended that the proviso to the clause might be deleted.<br />

7.116 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that a person holding a post in the State or the Central Government for not less<br />

than seven years having special knowledge <strong>of</strong> law might not prove himself to be effective prosecutor in cases <strong>of</strong> communal<br />

violence. Special knowledge was different from practical knowledge. Practical knowledge and experience were very<br />

important for dealing with legal cases. The Committee, therefore, felt that the eligibility for appointment as a Public<br />

Prosecutor should be confined to practice in law for not less than seven years. The Committee also did not agree with the<br />

explanation <strong>of</strong> the Home Secretary that the provision for appointment <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the Union or a State having special<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> law as public prosecutors had been made to ease burden on the already over burdened legal practitioners. The<br />

Committee, accordingly, recommended that the word ‘or has held any post, for a period <strong>of</strong> not less than seven years, under<br />

the Union or a State, requiring special knowledge <strong>of</strong> law’ might be deleted in sub-clause (2) <strong>of</strong> clause 29.<br />

7.117 The Committee held extensive discussion on the clause. The Committee considered the implications <strong>of</strong> the clause<br />

whereunder a Special Court might take cognizance <strong>of</strong> any scheduled <strong>of</strong>fence without the accused being committed to it for<br />

trial and its effect on the right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. The Committee<br />

apprehended that the receipt <strong>of</strong> complaints by Special Courts without any police report might lead to a plethora <strong>of</strong> flimsy<br />

complaints in those Courts. The Committee also took note <strong>of</strong> the fact that summary trial was well defined in Chapter XXI <strong>of</strong><br />

the Code <strong>of</strong> Criminal Procedure. The Committee was, therefore, <strong>of</strong> the view that the provision <strong>of</strong> summary trial should be<br />

deleted from the clause.<br />

7.118 In the light <strong>of</strong> the reservations <strong>of</strong> the Committee on the maintainability <strong>of</strong> the clause vis-à-vis Article 21 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution guaranteeing protection <strong>of</strong> life and personal liberty <strong>of</strong> a person and Chapters XV and XXI <strong>of</strong> the Cr.P.C., the<br />

Committee recommended that the Government might have a re-look at clause 30 to bring it in harmony with the above<br />

mentioned constitutional and statutory provisions.<br />

7.119 The Committee, after some discussion, felt that the clause is necessary for protection <strong>of</strong> witnesses and<br />

victims.<br />

7.120 The Committee felt that the powers, functions, responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the three organs <strong>of</strong> the State, i.e., Legislature,<br />

Executive and Judiciary are well demarcated in the Constitution and under Clause 34. There seemed to be an attempt to<br />

transfer the power <strong>of</strong> maintenance <strong>of</strong> law and order from Executive to the Judiciary. The Committee, therefore,


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 18 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

recommended that the words ‘suo motu or’ might be deleted in sub-clause (1) <strong>of</strong> clause 34. The Committee also<br />

recommended that the entire clause may be re-looked.<br />

7.121 The Committee felt that Clause 35 which is connected with Clause 34 was also required to be re-looked.<br />

7.122 The Committee recommended that the State Council should be presided over by the Home Minister <strong>of</strong> the<br />

concerned State. The application <strong>of</strong> mind at the political level could take place at that stage itself rather than the proposal<br />

being sent by the Council, for consideration <strong>of</strong> the Chief Minister.<br />

7.123 The Committee felt that adequate representation needs to be provided for women in the State Council with at least<br />

one woman representative each under sub-clauses (g) and (h), in view <strong>of</strong> the fact that women are the first and the worst<br />

victims <strong>of</strong> communal violence.<br />

7.124 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the composition <strong>of</strong> the Council does not provide for any representative from<br />

Banking and Insurance Sector which play a key role in relief and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> victims <strong>of</strong> communal violence. The<br />

Committee, therefore, recommended that representative from the Union Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance (Department <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />

Affairs, Banking and Insurance Divisions) might be associated as ‘Special Invitee’ in all the meetings <strong>of</strong> the State Council.<br />

7.125 The Committee recommended that women should be given adequate representation in the District Council with<br />

atleast one woman representative each under sub clauses (e) and (f).<br />

7.126 The Committee deliberated on the clause. It recommended that the National Council should be presided over by<br />

the Union Home Minister so that application <strong>of</strong> mind at the political level can take place at that stage itself. The Committee<br />

also recommended that women might given adequate representation in the National Council with at least one woman<br />

representative each under sub-clauses (iv) and (v).<br />

7.127 The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the fact that there was no uniformity in the payment <strong>of</strong> compensation to the victims<br />

which was discriminatory and causes discontentment amongst them. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the<br />

Government should come out with a policy <strong>of</strong> paying uniform compensation.<br />

7.128 The Committee held detailed discussion on both the clauses. The Committee agreed with the suggestion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Home Secretary that clauses 53 and 54 may be swapped and recommends accordingly.<br />

7.129 The Committee expressed its concern on the likely consequences <strong>of</strong> sub clause (1) <strong>of</strong> clause 53 whereunder a<br />

Special Court may order payment <strong>of</strong> compensation by the <strong>of</strong>fender to the victims. Although the victims will receive<br />

compensation from the <strong>of</strong>fender yet this might lead to further enmity between the individuals and groups and cause more<br />

social tension.<br />

7.130 The Committee also flagged the points enumerated in proviso to sub clause (1) <strong>of</strong> clause 53 and sub clause (4) <strong>of</strong><br />

clause 54 whereunder assistance/compensation shall not be paid to a person who is involved in a scheduled <strong>of</strong>fence. The<br />

Committee appreciated the intention behind these provisions that compensation should not be paid to the perpetrators <strong>of</strong><br />

communal violence. However, the Committee expressed its concern over the implications <strong>of</strong> these provisions. Sometimes, a<br />

victim <strong>of</strong> communal violence may be deliberately implicated in a case just to deprive him <strong>of</strong> the immediate compensation.<br />

Though ultimately the victim may be acquitted and compensation awarded to him, but it would be too late and its very<br />

purpose may get defeated, as he may not receive the same when it is most needed.<br />

7.131 The Committee, therefore, recommended that Government should address the above issues appropriately and bring<br />

suitable amendments in the clauses before the Bill is brought for consideration in Parliament.<br />

7.132 This has been one <strong>of</strong> the most debated clauses in the deliberations <strong>of</strong> the Committee. A large number <strong>of</strong><br />

suggestions/comments have been received on the clause. The Committee had had detailed discussion on the impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />

clause on States’ autonomy and the federal structure <strong>of</strong> our polity. In the successive rounds <strong>of</strong> in-house discussion, each<br />

member <strong>of</strong> the Committee present in those sittings expressed views on the clause and a majority <strong>of</strong> them articulated<br />

reservations thereon. In view <strong>of</strong> this the Committee thought it appropriate to ascertain the views <strong>of</strong> all the State Governments<br />

and recognized Political Parties on the Bill with particular reference to this clause.<br />

7.133 It had been noted that out <strong>of</strong> thirteen National level and State level Political Parties which responded to the request<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Committee, ten opposed the clause, two supported it and one party while supporting the Bill in principle, did not <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

any specific comment on the clauses <strong>of</strong> the Bill.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 19 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

7.134 As for the State Governments, out <strong>of</strong> twelve States which responded, eight opposed the clause, one supported it<br />

while another extended in principle support. Two States did not <strong>of</strong>fer any comment.<br />

7.135 The Committee also had the benefit <strong>of</strong> the views <strong>of</strong> some legal/constitutional experts and social/political scientists<br />

on the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Bill particularly this clause.<br />

7.136 Towards the concluding stage <strong>of</strong> discussions on the clause, the view emerged in the Committee was that the<br />

apprehension <strong>of</strong> impingement <strong>of</strong> the clause on the States’ autonomy and federal structure, enshrined in the Constitution, had<br />

been adequately addressed and necessary safeguards already provided in the clause to prevent its misuse by the Central<br />

Government.<br />

7.137 The Committee felt that the clause in its present form may be retained keeping in view the paramountcy <strong>of</strong><br />

maintaining the secular fabric, unity, integrity and internal security <strong>of</strong> the Nation.<br />

7.138 The Committee had recommended substitution <strong>of</strong> the words ‘death or’ by the words ‘grievous hurt, loss <strong>of</strong> life or<br />

extensive damage’ in sub-clause 1 (a) <strong>of</strong> clause 3, pertaining to one <strong>of</strong> the grounds for declaring an area as communally<br />

disturbed area by the State Government. Since sub-clause (1) <strong>of</strong> Clause 55 enumerates the grounds on which Central<br />

Government can give directions to the State Government and issue notification etc. to deal with communal violence, there is<br />

a necessity for carrying out consequential amendment in the said sub-clause in line with the amendment recommended in<br />

clause 3(1)(a).<br />

7.139 The Committee recommended that the amendments proposed in the Schedule may be carried out before the Bill is<br />

brought in Parliament for consideration.<br />

VI. Secretariat<br />

7.140 The Committee Section (Home Affairs) headed by Committee Officer constitutes the Secretariat <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Committee. A Joint Secretary, a Deputy Secretary and an Under Secretary remained incharge <strong>of</strong> the Section with Additional<br />

Secretary holding overall charge.<br />

7.141 To assist the Committee in its work, written material received from the Ministries/ various non-<strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

organizations and individuals were studied from which points were culled out and questionnaires were prepared for the use <strong>of</strong><br />

the Committee.<br />

7.142 The work relating to drafting, consideration and adoption <strong>of</strong> draft Reports by the Committee along with their<br />

presentation, laying, printing and distribution was undertaken. The Secretariat also dealt with the work relating to the<br />

scrutiny <strong>of</strong> action taken notes on the recommendations/observations <strong>of</strong> the Committee contained in its Reports on Demands<br />

for Grants (2004-05) while considering Demands for Grants (2005-06) <strong>of</strong> the respective Ministries/Departments received<br />

from the Ministries/Departments concerned.<br />

7.143 The Secretariat also studied material like Parliamentary Debates, Answers to Parliament Questions, Budget<br />

Documents, Five Year Plan Documents, Appropriation Accounts (Civil), Outcome Budget, CAG Reports on accounts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Union Government (Civil), Books, Journals, Newspapers etc. relevant to the subjects under examination <strong>of</strong> the Committee.<br />

The Secretariat also made use <strong>of</strong> the material downloaded from the various websites.<br />

Annexure-<strong>VII</strong><br />

(See Para 7.6)<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> the Meetings <strong>of</strong> the Committee on Home Affairs held during 2006<br />

Sl.<br />

No.<br />

Date <strong>of</strong><br />

Meeting<br />

Time devoted<br />

Main Agenda<br />

Hrs.-Mts.<br />

1. 09.01.2006 1-30 Presentation <strong>of</strong> Home Secretary on the Communal<br />

Violence (Prevention, Control & Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong><br />

Victims) Bill, 2005.<br />

2. <strong>10</strong>.01.2006 3-50 1. Internal discussion on “Administration <strong>of</strong>


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 20 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

UTs”.<br />

2. Presentation <strong>of</strong> Secretary, Ministry <strong>of</strong> DoNER<br />

on Economic & Infrastructural Development<br />

in North-eastern Region.<br />

3. 19.01.2006 3-50 1. Presentation <strong>of</strong> Home Secretary on the<br />

Protection <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Rights (Amendment) Bill, 2005.<br />

2. Presentation <strong>of</strong> Home Secretary on Internal<br />

Security<br />

Scenario in North-Eastern Region.<br />

4. 31.01.2006 0-40 Internal discussion on the Protection <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Rights (Amendment) Bill, 2005.<br />

5. 03.03.2006 0-30 Clause-by-clause consideration <strong>of</strong> the Protection <strong>of</strong><br />

Human Rights (Amendment) Bill, 2005<br />

6. 19.04.2006 3-00 1. Presentation <strong>of</strong> Secretary, Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Development <strong>of</strong><br />

North Eastern<br />

Region (DoNER) on Demand for Grants<br />

(2006-07) <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> DoNER.<br />

2. Internal discussion on Demands for Grants<br />

(2006-07) <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> DoNER.<br />

7. 25.04.2006 2-15 Presentation <strong>of</strong> Home Secretary on Demands for<br />

Grants (2006-07) <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs.<br />

8. 26.04.2006 3-45 1. Presentation <strong>of</strong> Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Police, Delhi<br />

on Demands for Grants (2006-07) and<br />

other aspects <strong>of</strong> functioning <strong>of</strong> Delhi Police.<br />

2. Internal discussion on Demands for Grants<br />

(2006-07) <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs.<br />

9. 12.05.2006 0-25 Consideration and adoption <strong>of</strong> draft reports on<br />

Demands for Grants (2006-07) <strong>of</strong> Ministries <strong>of</strong><br />

Home Affairs and DoNER.<br />

<strong>10</strong>. 05.06.2006 2-13 Further consideration <strong>of</strong> the Communal Violence<br />

(Prevention, Control & Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Victims)<br />

Bill, 2005.<br />

11. 06.06.2006 0-45 1. Discussion on the Communal Violence<br />

(Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong><br />

Victims) Bill, 2005.<br />

2. Consideration & adoption <strong>of</strong> draft report on<br />

Administration <strong>of</strong> UTs (Andaman &<br />

Nicobar Islands, Pondicherry &<br />

Chandigarh).<br />

12. 15.06.2006 1-25 Oral evidence on the Communal Violence<br />

(Prevention, Control & Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Victims)<br />

Bill, 2005:—<br />

(i)<br />

Justice Jaspal Singh, Retd. Judge, Delhi<br />

High Court<br />

(ii) Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.P. Singh, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Political Science, University <strong>of</strong> Delhi<br />

13. 16.06.2006 2 -20 Oral evidence on the Communal Violence<br />

(Prevention, Control & Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> victims)<br />

Bill, 2005:<br />

(i)<br />

Shri Fali S. Nariman, Advocate,<br />

Supreme Court


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 21 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

(ii) Pr<strong>of</strong>. Zoya Hasan, Jawaharlal Nehru<br />

University<br />

14. 28.06.2006 1-40 Consideration <strong>of</strong> the Communal Violence<br />

(Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong><br />

Victims) Bill, 2005<br />

15. 29.06.2006 0-30 Consideration <strong>of</strong> the Communal Violence<br />

(Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong><br />

Victims) Bill, 2005<br />

16. 11.07.2006 0-15 Obituary reference to the passing away <strong>of</strong> Shri<br />

Vasant Chavan, MP, Rajya Sabha<br />

17. 21.07.2006 0-45 Oral evidence <strong>of</strong> Women’s Groups on gender<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> the Communal Violence (Prevention,<br />

Control and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Victims) Bill, 2005<br />

18. 02.08.2006 0-30 Review <strong>of</strong> the progress made by the Committee so<br />

far in the examination <strong>of</strong> the Communal Violence<br />

(Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong><br />

Victims) Bill, 2005<br />

19. 04.09.2006 1-50 Oral evidence <strong>of</strong> Shri Syed Shahabuddin, Ex-MP<br />

and President, All India Muslim Majlis-e-Masha-<br />

Warat on the Communal Violence (Prevention,<br />

Control and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Victims) Bill, 2005<br />

20. 05.09.2006 1-15 Internal discussion on the Communal Violence<br />

(Prevention, Control & Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Victims)<br />

Bill, 2005<br />

21. 20.09.2006 2-15 Official presentation <strong>of</strong> the representatives <strong>of</strong><br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs on the Sashastra Seema<br />

Bal Bill, 2006.<br />

22. 28.09.2006 2 -15 1. Home Secretary apprised the Committee <strong>of</strong><br />

the Action Taken by the Government on the<br />

observations/recommendations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Committee as contained in paras 6.11.9 and<br />

6.11.<strong>10</strong> <strong>of</strong> its 116 th Report on the State<br />

Emblem <strong>of</strong> India (Prohibition <strong>of</strong> Improper)<br />

use bill, 2004.<br />

2. Committee recorded oral evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

Home Secretary on the Communal Violence<br />

(Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong><br />

Victims) Bill, 2005<br />

23. 29.09.2006 1-40 Oral evidence <strong>of</strong> Home Secretary on the<br />

Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and<br />

Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> victims) Bill, 2005.<br />

24. 06.<strong>10</strong>.2006 1-45 1. Oral evidence <strong>of</strong> Shri H.S. Phoolka,<br />

Advocate, Delhi High Court on the<br />

Communal Violence (Prevention, Control<br />

and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Victims) Bill 2005.<br />

2. Brief by Home Secretary on the<br />

Communally sensitive Districts <strong>of</strong> India in<br />

connection with the Communal Violence<br />

(Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong><br />

Victims) Bill, 2005.<br />

25. 17.<strong>10</strong>.2006 0-15 Obituary reference to the passing away <strong>of</strong> Shri<br />

Kanshi Ram, former Member and Shri Lalit Suri, a<br />

sitting Member <strong>of</strong> Rajya Sabha.<br />

26. 18.<strong>10</strong>.2006 4-00 Clause-by-clause consideration <strong>of</strong> the Communal<br />

Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Victims) Bill, 2005.<br />

27. 30.<strong>10</strong>.2006 2-40 Clause-by-clause consideration <strong>of</strong> Communal<br />

Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Victims) Bill, 2005<br />

28. 16.11.2006 2-00 Clause-by-clause consideration <strong>of</strong> the Communal


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 22 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Victims) Bill, 2005<br />

29. 17.11.2006 1-20 Clause-by-clause consideration <strong>of</strong> the Communal<br />

Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Victims) Bill, 2005.<br />

30. 07.12.2006 0-30 Consideration and adoption <strong>of</strong> draft One Hundred<br />

Twenty Second Report on the Communal Violence<br />

(Prevention, Control & Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Victims)<br />

Bill, 2005.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 23 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong>I<br />

COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT<br />

I. Composition <strong>of</strong> the Committee<br />

8. The Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Human Resource Development was reconstituted<br />

on the 4 th August, 2006 in the year 2006. The first meeting <strong>of</strong> the newly constituted Committee was held on the 8 th<br />

September, 2006.<br />

The Committee consisted <strong>of</strong> the following Members: —<br />

COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE<br />

(As on 1 st January, 2006)<br />

1. Shri Vayalar Ravi — Chairman<br />

2. @Shri Janardan Dwivedi<br />

RAJYA SABHA<br />

3. Shri Dwijendra Nath Sharmah<br />

4. Shri Shantaram Laxman Naik<br />

5. @@Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad<br />

6. Smt. Brinda Karat<br />

7. Shri S. Anbalagan<br />

8. Shri Uday Pratap Singh<br />

9. ^^Shri M.P. Abdussamad Samadani<br />

<strong>10</strong>. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ram Deo Bhandary<br />

11. ^^^Shri Anil Dhirubhai Ambani<br />

12. ***Shri Vijay Kumar Rupani<br />

13. ***Shri Ali Anwar<br />

LOK SABHA<br />

14. Shri Basudeb Barman<br />

15. Shri Hari Sinh Chavda<br />

16. Shri G.V. Harsha Kumar<br />

17. Shri R. L. Jalappa<br />

18. Shri Ramswarup Koli<br />

19. Shri Manjunath Kunnur<br />

20. %Shri Babu Lal Marandi<br />

21. Dr. Thokchom Meinya<br />

22. Shri Krishna Murari Moghe<br />

23. Mohd. Mukim<br />

24. Shri Tukaram Ganpatrao Rengepatil<br />

25. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Rasa Singh Rawat<br />

26. Shri M. Rajamohan Reddy<br />

27. Shri Tufani Saroj<br />

28. Smt. P. Satheedevi<br />

29. Shri A.R. Shaheen<br />

30. Smt. Jyotirmoyee Sikdar<br />

31. Shri K. Virupaxappa<br />

32. Shri Devendra Singh Yadav<br />

33. %%Shri Ganesh Prasad Singh<br />

@ appointed as Chairman w.e.f. 24.3.2006 on the vacancy caused due to the relinquishment <strong>of</strong> Chairmanship by Shri<br />

Vayalar Ravi w.e.f 29.1.2006 consequent on his induction into the Union Cabinet<br />

@@ Ceased to be a member <strong>of</strong> the Committee on expiry <strong>of</strong> his term in Rajya Sabha w.e.f. 2.4.2006<br />

^^^ Ceased to be member w.e.f. 29.3.2006<br />

*** nominated w.e.f. 6.6.2006<br />

% Ceased to be member w.e.f. 22.5.2006<br />

%% nominated w.e.f 31.5.2006<br />

^^ Ceased to be a member <strong>of</strong> the Committee on expiry <strong>of</strong> his term in Rajya Sabha w.e.f. 1.7.2006<br />

COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE<br />

(Constituted on 4 th August, 2006)


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 24 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

1 Shri Janardan Dwivedi — Chairman<br />

RAJYA SABHA<br />

2 Shri Dwijendra Nath Sharmah<br />

3 Shri Shantaram Laxman Naik<br />

4 Shri Vijay Kumar Rupani<br />

5 Shri Laxminarayan Sharma<br />

6 Shri Uday Pratap Singh<br />

7 Shrimati Brinda Karat<br />

8 Shri S. Anbalagan<br />

9 Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ram Deo Bhandary<br />

<strong>10</strong> Shri Ali Anwar<br />

LOK SABHA<br />

11 Shri Ashok Argal<br />

12 Shri Basudeb Barman<br />

13 Shri Harishchandra Chavan<br />

14 Shri Harisinh Chavda<br />

15 Smt. Paramjit Kaur Gulshan<br />

16 ^Shri R.L. Jalappa<br />

17 Shri Ramswaroop Koli<br />

18 Shri G.V. Harsha Kumar<br />

19 ##Shri Manjunath Kunnur<br />

20 Smt. Nivedita Sambhajirao Mane<br />

21 Smt. Archana Nayak<br />

22 Smt. M.S.K. Bhavani Rajenthiran<br />

23 Pr<strong>of</strong>. Rasa Singh Rawat<br />

24 #Shri M. Raja Mohan Reddy<br />

25 Shri Ganesh Prasad Singh<br />

26 Shri Chengara Surendran<br />

27 Dr. Meinya Thokchom<br />

28 Shri K. Virupakshappa<br />

29 #Dr. Kunwar Devendra Singh Yadav<br />

30 *Shri Ravi Prakash Verma<br />

31 @Shri Rahul Gandhi<br />

32 @Shri Ram Lakhan Singh<br />

^ Ceased to be a member <strong>of</strong> the committee w.e.f .28.11.2006<br />

## Ceased to be a member <strong>of</strong> the committee w.e.f. 31.8.2006<br />

# Ceased to be a member <strong>of</strong> the committee w.e.f. 25.09.2006<br />

* nominated w.e.f. 25.09.2006<br />

@ nominated w.e.f. <strong>10</strong>.<strong>10</strong>.2006<br />

II. Subjects selected for examination<br />

8.2 The Committee on Human Resource Development did not select any fresh subjects during the year 2006. It<br />

continued with examination <strong>of</strong> the following subjects selected in 2005: —<br />

Sl.<br />

Ministry/Departments<br />

No.<br />

1. Department <strong>of</strong> School Education and<br />

Literacy<br />

Subjects<br />

Problems being faced in implementation <strong>of</strong> centrally<br />

sponsored schemes vis-a-vis Mid Day Meal Scheme<br />

and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 25 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

2. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Women and Child<br />

Development<br />

Problems being faced in implementation <strong>of</strong> centrally<br />

sponsored schemes vis-a-vis Integrated Child<br />

Development Service(ICDS) Scheme<br />

Functioning <strong>of</strong> Kendriya Vidyalayas<br />

3. Department <strong>of</strong> School Education and<br />

Literacy<br />

4. Department <strong>of</strong> School Education and Functioning <strong>of</strong> Navodaya Vidyalayas<br />

Literacy<br />

5. Department <strong>of</strong> Higher Education University and Higher Education<br />

6. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Youth Affairs and Sports Promotion <strong>of</strong> Sports<br />

8.3 Besides this, the following Bills were considered by the Committee which were referred to it by Hon’ble<br />

Chairman / Hon’ble Speaker for examination and report:—<br />

Sl. Date <strong>of</strong> reference Name <strong>of</strong> the Bill<br />

No.<br />

1. 22.05.2006 The National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Technology Bill, 2006<br />

2. 01.06.2006 The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Amendment Bill, 2006<br />

3. 19.07.2006 The Central Institute <strong>of</strong> English & Foreign Languages University<br />

Bill, 2006<br />

4. 04.08.2006 The Sikkim University Bill, 2006<br />

5. 04.08.2006 The Tripura University Bill, 2006<br />

6. 04.08.2006 The Rajiv Gandhi University Bill, 2006<br />

7. 04.09.2006 The Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Bill,<br />

2006<br />

III. Constitution <strong>of</strong> Sub-Committees <strong>of</strong> the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Human<br />

Resource Development<br />

8.4 No Sub-Committee was constituted during the year 2006.<br />

IV. Review <strong>of</strong> work done<br />

(a) Sittings <strong>of</strong> the Committee<br />

8.5 During the year 2006, the Committee held 21 sittings lasting over 53 hrs 45 minutes. A statement showing the<br />

dates and duration <strong>of</strong> each sitting <strong>of</strong> the Committee, as also the subjects discussed during this period are given in Annexure<br />

<strong>VII</strong>I.<br />

(b) Sittings <strong>of</strong> Sub-Committees<br />

8.6 No Sub-Committee was constituted during the period under review.<br />

(c) Study Visits<br />

8.7 No study visits were undertaken by the Committee during the period under review.<br />

8.8 Verbatim record <strong>of</strong> proceedings <strong>of</strong> the sittings <strong>of</strong> the Committee, at which evidence was taken, was maintained.<br />

V. Reports presented<br />

(a) Reports<br />

8.9 During 2006, the Committee presented the following Reports to the House: —<br />

Sl. Number <strong>of</strong> Report and date <strong>of</strong><br />

No. presentation/laying <strong>of</strong> Report<br />

1. 172 nd<br />

22.5.2006<br />

Report<br />

Report on University and Higher Education <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Secondary and Higher Education (Ministry


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 26 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

2. 173 rd<br />

22.5.2006<br />

3. 174 th<br />

22.5.2006<br />

4. 175 th<br />

22.5.2006<br />

5. 176 th<br />

22.5.2006<br />

6. 177 th<br />

25.8.2006<br />

7. 178 th<br />

23.11.2006<br />

8. 179 th<br />

23.11.2006<br />

9. 180 th<br />

23.11.2006<br />

<strong>10</strong>. 181 st<br />

23.11.2006<br />

11. 182 nd<br />

23.11.2006<br />

12. 183 rd<br />

30.11.2006<br />

13. 184 th<br />

30.11.2006<br />

14. 185 th<br />

30.11.2006<br />

15. 186 th<br />

1.12.2006<br />

<strong>of</strong> Human Resource Development)<br />

Demands for Grants (2006-07) <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Elementary Education and Literacy (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Resource Development)<br />

Demands for Grants (2006-2007) <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Secondary and Higher Education (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Resource Development).<br />

Demands for Grants (2006-2007) <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Women and Child Development.<br />

Demands for Grants (2006-2007) <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Youth<br />

Affairs and Sports.<br />

Report on "The Central Institute <strong>of</strong> English and Foreign<br />

Languages University Bill, 2006" <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Secondary and Higher Education (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Resource Development).<br />

Report on 'The National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Technology Bill,<br />

2006' <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Higher Education (Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Human Resource Development).<br />

Report on "The Sikkim University Bill, 2006" <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Higher Education (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Resource Development)<br />

Report on "The Tripura University Bill, 2006" <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Higher Education (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Resource Development)<br />

Report on 'Rajiv Gandhi University Bill, 2006' <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Higher Education (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Resource Development)<br />

Report on 'The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Amendment<br />

Bill, 2006' <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Women and Child<br />

Development<br />

Report on Major issues concerning Kendriya Vidyalayas<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> School Education and Literacy<br />

(Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human Resource Development)<br />

Report on Major issues concerning Navodaya Vidyalayas<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> School Education and Literacy<br />

(Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human Resource Development)<br />

Report on 'Promotion <strong>of</strong> Sports in India' <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Youth Affairs and Sports<br />

Report on 'The Central Educational Institutions<br />

(Reservation in Admission) Bill, 2006' <strong>of</strong> the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Higher Education (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human Resource<br />

Development)<br />

(b) Action Taken Reports<br />

8.<strong>10</strong> No Action Taken Report could be presented to the House during 2006 since the ATNs were received very late<br />

from the respective Ministries/Departments.<br />

8.11 Minutes <strong>of</strong> sittings <strong>of</strong> the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Human Resource<br />

Development relating to various Reports presented to the House were prepared and presented to the House alongwith the<br />

relevant Reports.<br />

VI. Summary <strong>of</strong> Recommendations<br />

(a) 172 nd Report<br />

Higher Education Today: Important Issues


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 27 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.12 The Committee took up the problems as well as challenges before our Higher Education system for a special study<br />

and presented the 172 nd Report after having wide ranging discussion with all the stake-holders. It felt that if India were to<br />

achieve the developed status in this milieu <strong>of</strong> global competition, there was no option but to reorient its higher education<br />

system to be vibrant, competitive, meaningful and relevant. It would have to grow both in terms <strong>of</strong> quantity as well as<br />

quality, mainly with a view to converting its vast population as asset, rather than a liability, as had been done by China.<br />

8.13 The pressure on higher education system was going to further increase due to large number <strong>of</strong> additional students<br />

expected to join the higher education institutions in coming years, particularly due to upward pull generated by popular<br />

interventions like Sarva Siksha Abhiyan and Mid-Day Meal Scheme.<br />

Access and Equity<br />

8.14 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that the issues <strong>of</strong> access & equity, in fact, were the two core issues to the<br />

expansion <strong>of</strong> higher education and hence, to the overall progress <strong>of</strong> a nation. The Committee, therefore, underlined the urgent<br />

need for broadening access to higher education by expanding it and by making it affordable.<br />

8.15 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that if, India were to compete and survive the intense global competition in the<br />

21 st century as knowledge/information society, percentage <strong>of</strong> our students going for higher education will have to be<br />

increased sufficiently. Our target <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> per cent was unlikely to be achieved with the present level <strong>of</strong> our efforts and<br />

performance in higher education field. The Committee emphasized that we would have to set our goals high and work for it<br />

relentlessly. The Committee, therefore, recommended that our aim should be to increase the access ratio to at least 20 per<br />

cent by 2015, which could be the threshold limit for our remaining in global race as also for sustainable development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country.<br />

Major Constraints<br />

8.16 Several social, economic, administrative and other reasons seem to act together as constraints to access and equity<br />

in higher education. Factors like rural-urban divide, gender disparity, regional imbalances, decreasing public allocation,<br />

economic hardship, increasing cost due to commercialization, etc. were some <strong>of</strong> the major reasons <strong>of</strong> this phenomena. This<br />

scenario <strong>of</strong> higher education, particularly in the ever-expanding competitive environment, did not inspire required<br />

confidence, if India were to play its assigned role at the global level. The Committee, therefore, believed that India had to<br />

rise to the occasion urgently and make its higher education system not only competitive but also accessible and affordable to<br />

everyone.<br />

8.17 Dimension <strong>of</strong> this problem was not only confined to access to higher education <strong>of</strong> the age group <strong>of</strong> 18-23 years. It<br />

also extends to those in the need <strong>of</strong> continuous learning and are older than the age group <strong>of</strong> 18-23 years. The Committee felt<br />

that the demand for higher education from diverse kind <strong>of</strong> learners calls for the courses that are flexible; can be studied <strong>of</strong>fcampuses<br />

and credits received are portable. The Committee desired the Government to take proactive measures in this regard<br />

urgently.<br />

Other Imbalances<br />

8.18 The Committee was dismayed to note that there was tremendous imbalance in access to higher education in urban<br />

and rural areas. Most <strong>of</strong> the colleges and universities, the Committee noted, were located in urban or semi-urban areas.<br />

About the quality and output <strong>of</strong> the colleges in rural areas, less said was better. While only 16 out <strong>of</strong> every <strong>10</strong>00 were college<br />

graduates in rural areas, 111 out <strong>of</strong> every <strong>10</strong>00 belonged to this category in urban areas. The same trend was also<br />

discernable in relation to house-hold economic status both in rural as well as urban areas. Higher education in the country,<br />

the Committee noted, was thus largely a pro-rich and urban phenomenon.<br />

8.19 Similarly, the gender disparity in higher education in India was yet another area <strong>of</strong> concern. The Committee was <strong>of</strong><br />

the considered opinion that urban bias and gender disparity in higher education are the two main stumbling blocks to access<br />

and equity in this area. Large sections <strong>of</strong> our population, therefore, were denied access to learning for economic, cultural,<br />

religious, geographical and other reasons.<br />

Regional Disparity<br />

8.20 The Committee noted the conclusion <strong>of</strong> a study undertaken by a group <strong>of</strong> Indian scholars based in Japan and USA,<br />

which had analyzed the funding <strong>of</strong> Higher education in different states by the Department. The study had shown that Union<br />

Government’s expenditure on higher education to various states was grossly uneven. For example, last year’s budget


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 28 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

allocation for the states like Bihar, Rajasthan, Orissa etc., was highly inadequate. Per person expenditure on higher<br />

education in Bihar was Rs. 1.87, in Rajasthan Rs. 2.59 and in Orissa it was Rs. 4.07 while in States like Uttaranchal it was<br />

Rs. <strong>10</strong>5.42, in Arunachal Pradesh Rs. <strong>10</strong>5 and in Assam 77.7.<br />

8.21 Another distinctive feature <strong>of</strong> regional disparity was visible in the number <strong>of</strong> colleges/institutions located in<br />

different States. The four Southern States and Maharashtra having 32% <strong>of</strong> India’s population have 46% <strong>of</strong> total general<br />

colleges and almost 60% <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional institutions. In contrast, in the States <strong>of</strong> UP, MP and Bihar (including Jharkhand)<br />

having 34% <strong>of</strong> population, only 23% <strong>of</strong> general colleges and only 14% <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional colleges were located. The<br />

Committee was concerned to see that in the most populous States where nearly 3/4 th <strong>of</strong> our population lived, the access ratio<br />

was far below the national average. It presented quite a dismal picture about the existing status <strong>of</strong> higher education in the<br />

country.<br />

8.22 The Committee strongly felt that there was an urgent need to remove this regional disparity. It was high time that<br />

Central Government took some initiatives for encouraging and helping the State Governments to set up educational<br />

institutions in tune with the global requirements.<br />

8.23 The Committee also emphasized the special focus for improving access and equity in remote regions and<br />

geographically disadvantaged places. It also desired special funding and region-specific norms for North-East Region &<br />

Jammu & Kashmir. The Committee appreciated the efforts <strong>of</strong> the government for setting up Central universities in North-<br />

Eastern States. The Committee recommended that such universities may be set up in the remaining States <strong>of</strong> North-Eastern<br />

region including Sikkim at the earliest. The colleges in these areas should be given special funding in addition to normal<br />

development grants by the UGC.<br />

SCs/STs in Higher Education<br />

8.24 The Committee noted that the UGC had tried to help the under-privileged sections <strong>of</strong> the society through some<br />

special schemes. A Remedial Coaching scheme for the benefit <strong>of</strong> students belonging to the SC/ST and weaker sections <strong>of</strong> the<br />

society was introduced in 1<strong>99</strong>4. Another scheme <strong>of</strong> remedial coaching was introduced with a view to improve the overall<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> these students in the examinations. The Commission introduced the scheme <strong>of</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> SC/ST cells<br />

in the universities in the year 1983, with a view to provide information regarding facilities available for SC/ST students in<br />

universities and colleges. The SC/ST Cells were closely monitoring the implementation <strong>of</strong> reservation policy in higher<br />

education. But these attempts, the Committee noted have not helped much. For example, the enrolment <strong>of</strong> SCs in higher<br />

education had ranged between 8.6 per cent in 1<strong>99</strong>0-91 to 11.3 per cent in 2002-03. Enrolment <strong>of</strong> ST students in higher<br />

education was between 2.1 per cent to 3.6 per cent in<br />

1<strong>99</strong>0-91 and 2003-04 respectively. The Committee recommended that special programmes for encouraging students from<br />

backward and minority communities also need to be prepared urgently as their participation in higher education was<br />

abysmally low, as compared to their percentage in total population. This poor situation reflects poor enrolment and retention<br />

<strong>of</strong> all children including the SC/ST students in school education. All efforts be made to ensure the enrolment and retention <strong>of</strong><br />

students right from school level.<br />

Convergence <strong>of</strong> Conventional and Distance mode<br />

8.25 The problem <strong>of</strong> access and equity was closely linked to opportunity. The Committee felt that the solution to the<br />

problem <strong>of</strong> opportunity lies in convergence <strong>of</strong> conventional with modern distance education systems with open and flexible<br />

structure. The Committee, therefore, was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that we must exploit our ICT potential for its penetration<br />

to the country’s remotest corners to expand the access to higher education. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the<br />

Government should make an earnest beginning to train the people for utilizing the latest technologies to make the higher<br />

education easily accessible. It would also cut across the rural-urban divide as well as gender disparities in this regard.<br />

System <strong>of</strong> Affiliation<br />

8.26 Another issue that Committee wished to highlight was about system <strong>of</strong> affiliation. In India most <strong>of</strong> its 16000 odd<br />

colleges were affiliated ones. In the absence <strong>of</strong> proper facilities, many <strong>of</strong> these colleges perform only classroom teaching in a<br />

traditional way. The Committee was informed that nearly 89 per cent <strong>of</strong> UG students, 66 per cent <strong>of</strong> PG students and 85 per<br />

cent <strong>of</strong> the faculty in higher educational institutions, were in these affiliated colleges. Consequently, the M.Sc., MA, Ph.Ds<br />

that were coming out <strong>of</strong> such colleges were undoubtedly <strong>of</strong> poor quality. What was worse, in India major affiliating<br />

universities were over-burdened with the administrative works which are unproductive in academic terms. The Committee<br />

was <strong>of</strong> the view that this was certainly telling upon the academic competence <strong>of</strong> our universities. The VCs <strong>of</strong> such<br />

universities were left with no time for their academic pursuits. The Committee, therefore, recommended that there should be


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 29 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

a cap on the number <strong>of</strong> colleges being affiliated to a university. For this, we would need to open more and more universities<br />

for which about <strong>10</strong>00 universities and university level institutions be set up by 2015 in the Central, State and private sector.<br />

A country like Japan, it was noted, had around 700 universities and USA had nearly 3000 <strong>of</strong> them. Besides, setting up more<br />

universities, we must encourage good colleges and institutions to acquire ‘deemed university’ or autonomous status by<br />

fulfilling the norms laid down in this regard. This, the Committee felt, would not only lessen the burden <strong>of</strong> universities but<br />

also enhance their quality and output greatly. Besides, the colleges should be encouraged to <strong>of</strong>fer more and more applied<br />

courses by <strong>of</strong>fering job-oriented courses particularly after <strong>10</strong>+2. These measures, if taken up in a planned and fixed schedule<br />

would go a long way in decreasing the unnecessary burden on our universities.<br />

Open Universities<br />

8.27 The Committee believed that for a vast country like India where accessibility to higher education was quite low,<br />

Open Universities had the vast potential for taking higher education to more and more people irrespective <strong>of</strong> different<br />

barriers. This system catered also for in-service persons for whom it was a second chance as well as for regular learners. It,<br />

therefore, needed to be provided greater thrust by integrating utility courses with personal development and socio-economic<br />

problems. The courses <strong>of</strong>fered should be mainly job-oriented as far as possible. High priority should be given for opening<br />

more study centres particularly covering rural and remote areas with concentration <strong>of</strong> SC/ST and other backward<br />

communities’ students.<br />

8.28 In view <strong>of</strong> many other Open Universities run by the State governments, the Committee felt the need for closer<br />

relationship and regular interaction between them and the IGNOU, with a view to avoiding unnecessary duplication in the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> course material etc. For this, a strong networking had to be developed amongst them. This also called for<br />

uniformity with regard to the structure <strong>of</strong> the courses leaving adequate scope for region-specific variations.<br />

8.29 The Committee’s attention had been drawn to some inherent drawbacks present in the system <strong>of</strong> education. Lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> quality faculty, non-availability <strong>of</strong> relevant study material, lack <strong>of</strong> basic facilities like good libraries, modern labs,<br />

computer, multimedia facilities, etc. were the major issues that needed immediate redressal. Absence <strong>of</strong> an effective and<br />

efficient information dissemination system to the students about various types <strong>of</strong> courses, examination schedules, results,<br />

degrees, etc. caused great hardship to students. Even at the IGNOU (HQ), students had to run from pillar to post for these<br />

things. The Committee, therefore, recommended that these aspects be looked into urgently with a view to provide an<br />

adequate and efficient delivery mechanism and support system in the IGNOU and other Open Universities. The Committee<br />

was <strong>of</strong> the considered view that to make Open Universities more attractive and relevant, efforts be made to ensure quality <strong>of</strong><br />

study material, timely dispatch there<strong>of</strong>, dedicated teachers at the study centres, provision <strong>of</strong> necessary infrastructure, use <strong>of</strong><br />

ICT, etc.<br />

8.30 The Committee found that there was no accreditation system in IGNOU. It was surprised to note that the work <strong>of</strong><br />

neither IGNOU nor any other State Open University, any Correspondence Course Institutes (CCI) had ever been assessed<br />

since they started functioning. As a result, credibility <strong>of</strong> these institutions vis-à-vis mainstream education system was poor.<br />

The Committee, therefore, emphasized the urgent need for an effective assessment and accreditation system for these<br />

institutions so as to enhance and maintain quality <strong>of</strong> education provided through the distance mode.<br />

8.31 The Committee was concerned over the plight <strong>of</strong> students <strong>of</strong> open universities who were in different areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country. The Committee noted that they did not have a platform at present to voice their grievances effectively. The<br />

Committee, therefore, emphasized an urgent need for putting a mechanism in place for the students to highlight/redress their<br />

grievances. Such a machinery could also be utilized for a regular feedback on the efficacy <strong>of</strong> open learning programmes.<br />

8.32 The Committee noted that the students <strong>of</strong> Open and Distance Learning (ODL) are projected as poor cousins <strong>of</strong><br />

mainstream students. It had been reported that students coming through ODL channel were found to be lower in ability and<br />

performance as compared to the mainstream students. The Committee was perturbed to note that pass percentage <strong>of</strong> ODL<br />

students was very unsatisfactory. It strongly felt that this situation needed to be corrected urgently for instilling confidence in<br />

the public about the ODL system. The Committee recommended that all necessary steps be taken urgently for improving<br />

quality as well as standard <strong>of</strong> education imparted through ODL channel so that it could be made a popular and affordable<br />

system.<br />

8.33 The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the fact that though the open universities were able to raise some revenue by running<br />

various courses <strong>of</strong>fered through distance mode, there was no facility <strong>of</strong> fee concession available to eligible students in the<br />

ODL system. The Committee found such a system to be discriminatory. It felt strongly that the fees in the system should also<br />

be rationalised and the poor and meritorious students be given some kind <strong>of</strong> fee concessions or assistance.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 30 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Distance Education Council<br />

8.34 The Distance Education Council (DEC) had been created under the IGNOU Act for the promotion and coordination<br />

<strong>of</strong> Open University and distance education system and for the determination <strong>of</strong> its standard. The Committee found that the<br />

opinion was divided on the power <strong>of</strong> the DEC to recognize/approve the courses/degrees being <strong>of</strong>fered by the various other<br />

universities/institutions in the country by distance mode. It was argued that the DEC having been created under the Act <strong>of</strong> a<br />

university should not have such jurisdiction in respect <strong>of</strong> courses/degrees <strong>of</strong>fered by the other universities. It may be pointed<br />

that the DEC had been issuing notifications to universities asking them to get their programmes approved quoting a particular<br />

Gazette Notification regarding students not being eligible for Central Government jobs, if they pursue courses not approved<br />

by the DEC. Many <strong>of</strong> the universities were not prepared to accept the DEC jurisdiction in this regard mainly on the ground<br />

that the DEC was a body under IGNOU Act. As a result, a lot <strong>of</strong> confusion had been created. The Committee felt that to<br />

make the decision explicit, there was a need to have a separate Act for the DEC for making it a regulatory body for open<br />

university and open learning system and distance mode on the lines <strong>of</strong> AICTE or UGC.<br />

8.35 The DEC also provided development funds to open universities and other such institutions from the funds given by<br />

the Central Government. The Committee was happy to note the several initiatives taken by the DEC, such as common pool<br />

<strong>of</strong> programmes, evolving common standards, system <strong>of</strong> credit transfer, etc. The Committee was also <strong>of</strong> the view that the<br />

DEC should be developed as an apex body for promoting, coordinating and determining standards in distance education more<br />

or less on the lines <strong>of</strong> the UGC in the case <strong>of</strong> conventional education.<br />

Women and Higher Education<br />

8.36 National Policy on Education, 1986 had emphasized to gear the entire education system to play a positive role for<br />

the empowerment <strong>of</strong> women by providing special support services for their education and also by removing factors, which<br />

impede the spread <strong>of</strong> women education. The ‘Programme <strong>of</strong> Action, 1<strong>99</strong>2’ also proposed to use education as an agent <strong>of</strong><br />

basic change in the status <strong>of</strong> women for neutralizing all the distortions to have a well-conceived edge in favour <strong>of</strong> the<br />

women. These well meaning proclamations by the landmark documents, the Committee felt, have remained on paper only<br />

even after more than two decades they were made. Women’s participation in higher education had been quite disappointing,<br />

despite significant contributions made by them in different areas <strong>of</strong> life. They constituted almost half <strong>of</strong> the total population<br />

<strong>of</strong> India, yet a large proportion <strong>of</strong> them was still illiterate and ignorant. In Committee’s opinion, the overall picture <strong>of</strong> women<br />

education, in fact, was <strong>of</strong> discrimination, limited opportunity, numerous obstacles and utter neglect.<br />

8.37 The Department sought to make out a case before the Committee that there had been significant improvement in<br />

the position <strong>of</strong> women in higher education. The Committee was informed that the enrolment <strong>of</strong> women in higher education<br />

had increased from <strong>10</strong> per cent <strong>of</strong> the total enrolment in higher education in 1950-51 to 40 per cent in 2004-05. It had also<br />

been informed that the number <strong>of</strong> women colleges has increased from <strong>10</strong>03 in 1<strong>99</strong>3-94 to 1849 in 2004-05. The Committee<br />

felt that it was not a realistic way <strong>of</strong> projecting the position <strong>of</strong> women in the higher education. These figures become<br />

meaningless if compared with the proportion <strong>of</strong> women in the age group <strong>of</strong> 18 to 23 years to the total population in this<br />

group. Secondly, their participation (40 per cent) in higher education became abysmally low because this percentage was, in<br />

fact, <strong>of</strong> the 7 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total youth in the eligible age group that was currently in higher education.<br />

8.38 Of the total women enrolled during 2004-05, as may be noted, more than 50 per cent were in Arts and Humanities.<br />

Of the remaining 50 per cent 20 per cent were in Sciences; 16 per cent in Commerce and Management; just 1.86 per cent in<br />

education; 4.15 per cent in Engineering and Technology and 3.6 per cent in Medicine. The presence <strong>of</strong> women in agriculture,<br />

mainstay <strong>of</strong> Indian economy, was just negligible. It was a matter <strong>of</strong> great concern that the participation <strong>of</strong> women in the<br />

areas with great demand such as management, engineering/technology, medicine, etc. was very low in India. Such a<br />

situation, the Committee felt, did not augur well for the future <strong>of</strong> this nation. Can a nation progress in real terms and catch up<br />

with others in this fiercely competitive world with their women-folk remaining virtually outside the higher education<br />

system The Committee, therefore, recommended that the participation <strong>of</strong> women in pr<strong>of</strong>essional courses, which was<br />

abysmally low at present, needed to be improved manifold without further delay. More and more women as Engineers,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essors, Lawyers, Doctors, Architects and Entrepreneurs could mould the face <strong>of</strong> India to a great extent.<br />

8.39 The representation <strong>of</strong> women in higher education, the Committee recommended, needed to be increased<br />

proportionately particularly, when their performance as well as number at the senior secondary level had improved greatly.<br />

Some kind <strong>of</strong> institutional mechanism for looking into this problem and coordinating various efforts made in this regard at<br />

the national level needed to be put in place. It is high time that the curriculum was redesigned to remove all gender biases as<br />

also to gender sensitize education personnel and administrators. A pro-girl-child climate in the community needed to be<br />

created for this. Provision for enough scholarships, fee concession, hostels, staff quarters, provision for transportation, etc.<br />

for women needed to be provided in the institutions <strong>of</strong> higher learning.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 31 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.40 The Department appeared to have no relevant and accurate statistics in respect <strong>of</strong> women’s participation in higher<br />

education. Information given by the Department to the Committee was simply taken out <strong>of</strong> UGC Annual Report 2004-05.<br />

The Committee expected the Department to provide every relevant data in respect <strong>of</strong> different components reflecting exact<br />

status <strong>of</strong> women in higher education. So much so, the allocations and expenditure made for the women-specific programmes,<br />

which form a part <strong>of</strong> gender-budgeting that every Department had to have, was conspicuous by absence in the note supplied<br />

to the Committee. The Committee was at a loss to see as to how the Department was planning for the expeditious<br />

development <strong>of</strong> women in higher education in the absence <strong>of</strong> relevant statistics/information.<br />

8.41 The Department in its notes had mentioned the following schemes that were currently being run for the women:<br />

Special scheme for construction <strong>of</strong> women hostels; establishment <strong>of</strong> women’s studies centres; Day Care centres in<br />

universities, etc. The Committee noted that neither the Department nor the UGC had any concrete and targeted scheme or<br />

programme for improving the participation <strong>of</strong> women in higher education. Such an indifferent approach for this very crucial<br />

aspect was almost perilous. The Committee, therefore, recommended that formulation <strong>of</strong> targeted/specific schemes and<br />

programmes for this purpose needs to be done by the Government urgently. The Committee had learnt that a very good<br />

scheme for supporting single girl child <strong>of</strong> a parent for higher education had been announced. The Committee emphasized the<br />

need for its wide publicity. Sufficient funds should be provided for this purpose.<br />

8.42 The UGC scheme for opening women study centres in the universities, the Committee found, could not pick up and<br />

precious little appeared to have been done in this regard. The Committee recommended that it must be ensured that all the<br />

universities both Central as well as State, have these centres in one form or the other, by the end <strong>of</strong> Tenth Plan period. For<br />

this, adequate funds need to be provided urgently.<br />

8.43 The open distance learning, the Committee felt, could be a very potent method to fight gender disability in higher<br />

education. Studies in different areas may be promoted for women in user-friendly manner in the language they prefer with<br />

suitable study materials. Training rural women for the purpose <strong>of</strong> involving them through community participation in our<br />

development process should also be promoted. Their involvement in Sarva Siksha Abhiyan more particularly the Mid-Day<br />

Meal could make these schemes a great success. For achieving these objectives, the Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered view,<br />

Government would have to play a pro-active, positive, interventionist role to ensure access <strong>of</strong> all eligible women to the<br />

higher education.<br />

Relevance<br />

8.44 Education, be it primary, secondary or higher, if it was not contextual and relevant, will not be able to meet the<br />

challenges and demands <strong>of</strong> the time. The Committee noted that in today’s world, things in every walk <strong>of</strong> life are changing at<br />

a very fast pace. It has, therefore, become a daunting task for education to keep pace with the challenges posed by the<br />

contemporary socio-economic transformation. Higher education, in fact, faced this impact more than other levels. Relevance<br />

<strong>of</strong> higher education, therefore, becomes <strong>of</strong> utmost significance for the development and survival <strong>of</strong> a nation in the changed<br />

global/liberal context. In the Committee’s view, its relevance should be seen with reference to marketability <strong>of</strong> the graduate<br />

and post-graduate students it produces; with reference to its reach to marginalized sections; and its relevance for the socioeconomic<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a society.<br />

8.45 The Committee noted that the problem <strong>of</strong> relevance <strong>of</strong> higher education was mainly with reference to general<br />

education i.e., Arts, Humanities and Social Science and Law and Commerce, wherein 83 per cent <strong>of</strong> the 92 lakhs students,<br />

i.e., 76 lakhs are enrolled. However, in today’s new economic environment, need for knowledge-workers and graduates with<br />

sound fundamentals, good analytical abilities and appropriate utility-oriented skills were on rise and they were in great<br />

demand. The Committee found that most <strong>of</strong> our universities and colleges were providing out-dated, if not sub-standard<br />

education in these disciplines, leading to the degrees and diplomas <strong>of</strong> little or no substance. The content as well as the quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> education was mostly out <strong>of</strong> context and even if the curriculum was relevant, the teaching process was unscientific and<br />

sub-optimal. Not only this, the Committee came to know that our institutions sometimes copy syllabi from Western<br />

Universities. Standard books used for teaching were from the West and those written indigenously were usually without an<br />

original view on the subject. As a result, solutions to our problems turn out to be highly misplaced. Such an education, the<br />

Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view, would not have much relevance to our conditions and demands. It was, in fact, one <strong>of</strong> the main<br />

reasons for increasing disinterest and frustration amongst the country’s youth. The Committee recommended that the<br />

Government must take necessary measures, in consultation with experts, to ensure that required revision in the content and<br />

curriculum was carried out periodically. It has to be in keeping with indigenous conditions and requirements. There has to<br />

be an institutional mechanism to ensure that higher education remained relevant to the changing times. Process <strong>of</strong> such<br />

revision, the Committee felt, should be an on-going one for making higher education relevant and useful.<br />

Vocational Education<br />

8.46 The Committee noted that as envisaged in the National Policy on Education as also in the revised Plan <strong>of</strong> Action-<br />

1<strong>99</strong>2, the UGC implemented the recommendations made by the Core Committee on Vocationalisation (Career Orientation)


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 32 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Education. This was to ensure that the students at the first degree level develop knowledge, skills and attitudes for gainful<br />

employment with emphasis on self-employment. Since 1<strong>99</strong>4-95, a large number <strong>of</strong> colleges and universities, the Committee<br />

was informed, had been identified to provide assistance under the scheme on selective basis. The Committee was informed<br />

that the UGC, in fact, had been receiving very good response from the universities/colleges to start vocational courses in<br />

various subjects, but not all such requests from the universities/colleges could be agreed to because <strong>of</strong> the inadequacy <strong>of</strong><br />

funds. This, according to the Committee, indicated that the students are accepting the concept <strong>of</strong> Vocationalisation <strong>of</strong><br />

Education as it is job-oriented and a move towards entrepreneurship. The Committee, therefore, recommended that<br />

inadequacy <strong>of</strong> funds should not act as an obstacle to vocationalisation <strong>of</strong> education. It would, in fact, reduce the undesired<br />

pressure on universities and institutions <strong>of</strong> higher learning. Adequate funds be allocated for this purpose.<br />

8.47 The scheme <strong>of</strong> vocationalisation <strong>of</strong> education actually, stipulate a close coordination between the industries and<br />

educational institutions. The institutions intending to avail <strong>of</strong> the scheme <strong>of</strong> Vocationalisation <strong>of</strong> Education and applying to<br />

the UGC for financial assistance, are required to submit a letter <strong>of</strong> intent to UGC duly signed by the industries that the<br />

students will have on-the-job training and other practical experiences in their industries and that they will pick up some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

students after completion <strong>of</strong> particular vocational course. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that linking <strong>of</strong> education with<br />

industry was something very desirable today. The Committee believed that industry-institution linkages be encouraged as<br />

this will take care <strong>of</strong> many problems simultaneously - promote relevance in the curriculum, enhance the employability <strong>of</strong><br />

students, provide training facilities and mobilising some resources. Such an interface with industries, Committee believed,<br />

would encourage more and more students to opt for the vocational streams instead <strong>of</strong> going for the general courses, which<br />

have not much demand in the job-market. In the process, industry will also get suitable trained manpower relevant and<br />

dedicated to its needs. A body consisting <strong>of</strong> eminent persons from industry and academia be formed to lay down necessary<br />

modalities for such a partnership as soon as possible.<br />

Dual Degree<br />

8.48 The Committee was informed that UGC had allowed the system <strong>of</strong> earning certificate/diploma in utility-oriented<br />

programmes through parallel mode alongwith the regular degree. This is to provide an alternative to the students just in<br />

case. The AICTE had also allowed the system <strong>of</strong> earning dual degrees simultaneously. The Committee welcomed this and<br />

felt that the system <strong>of</strong> degree plus certificate/diploma in utility oriented programme appeared to be quite germane to the<br />

emerging scenario where demand for skilled manpower in different disciplines was increasing at the global level. The<br />

Committee felt that our ultimate objective should be to ensure that students do not merely have to look for a job; instead they<br />

are able to create jobs for themselves and many others. Need <strong>of</strong> the hour, according to the Committee, was to develop inhouse<br />

faculty and other facilities in the colleges for this purpose. This will make our colleges more vibrant and attractive.<br />

This was an area, the Committee felt, where public-private partnership could play a creative role in augmenting the activities<br />

<strong>of</strong> our colleges. The Committee at the same time expressed its apprehension about the possibility <strong>of</strong> main degree neglected at<br />

the cost <strong>of</strong> utility-oriented one, as a result, a student may not be able to show his best in either. This aspect needed to be<br />

taken care <strong>of</strong> by the UGC and AICTE. We must also put a system <strong>of</strong> accreditation for such courses.<br />

Promoting Research<br />

8.49 Research performance is one <strong>of</strong> the parameters for deciding world ranking <strong>of</strong> the universities. The fact that only<br />

one <strong>of</strong> our universities founds place in top 500 universities <strong>of</strong> the world, speaks volumes about the status <strong>of</strong> research in our<br />

country. The Committee found that the research activities were not getting due attention in our universities, which should<br />

have been one <strong>of</strong> their real bases. In fact, there have emerged the system <strong>of</strong> premier institutes and laboratories, both in pure<br />

sciences and the social sciences and humanities, where research was moved away from our universities. As a result <strong>of</strong><br />

separation <strong>of</strong> research from teaching, the latter acquired gradually a secondary importance. The Committee, therefore, was <strong>of</strong><br />

the opinion that research needs to be closely linked with teaching for which scientific base in our universities needs to be<br />

strengthened that will attract not only talented students but also industry to our university laboratories.<br />

8.50 Private people are not inclined to support research in universities and research being a capital-intensive activity,<br />

their participation would help greatly. The needs <strong>of</strong> the institutions, research labs and industries are mutually common.<br />

Therefore, there need to have greater degree <strong>of</strong> connectivity and cooperation. The Committee strongly felt that needs <strong>of</strong><br />

these three entities may be interlinked to make research more relevant and productive. Inability <strong>of</strong> researchers to secure<br />

employment for themselves was also one <strong>of</strong> the reasons for such a state <strong>of</strong> affairs in this area.<br />

8.51 Lack <strong>of</strong> allocation from state kitty was also a reason for poor research activities in the universities. The Committee<br />

observed that only a fraction <strong>of</strong> UGC fund is spent on research. This was one <strong>of</strong> the reasons that universities do not have<br />

much <strong>of</strong> R&D efforts. Smaller outlays mean UGC assistance to only a handful <strong>of</strong> universities. Secondly, <strong>of</strong> the research<br />

assistance that UGC extends, only a small fraction goes to specific projects; a sizable proportion there<strong>of</strong> goes in the form <strong>of</strong><br />

individual fellowships. The Committee felt that it would be worthwhile if the bulk <strong>of</strong> research funds from the UGC went to


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 33 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

specific projects which have been found to be more fruitful and result-oriented the world over.<br />

8.52 The Committee, therefore, proposed the following measures to help make research a mainstay <strong>of</strong> our higher<br />

education. Governments, both Central and State and other funding agencies should provide organized support to research<br />

activities for modernizing laboratories and removal <strong>of</strong> obsolescence in equipments on regular basis. A Research Council in<br />

UGC needs to be set up; the UGC should launch a network for access to research material and data across the universities.<br />

8.53 The Committee also emphasized the need for monitoring and evaluation <strong>of</strong> research in universities by setting up<br />

Monitoring and Evaluation (ME) units under the supervision <strong>of</strong> a Committee <strong>of</strong> eminent pr<strong>of</strong>essors from different<br />

disciplines. It needs coordination with national laboratories. Number <strong>of</strong> fellowships also needs to be suitably enhanced so<br />

that students are attracted to undertake research in newer areas.<br />

Promoting Basic Sciences<br />

8.54 India has had a long tradition <strong>of</strong> pure sciences, the Committee was concerned to notice the increasing disinterest<br />

among the younger generations in this area. It was mainly because <strong>of</strong> non-availability <strong>of</strong> suitable job opportunities and other<br />

incentives in the pure sciences. The Committee found this situation disquieting because India badly needs to integrate R&D<br />

activities in sciences with its economic and social programmes, because science must serve the socio-economic and other<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> our society. Science and Technology has to play a greater role in prevention, mitigation and management <strong>of</strong> the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> natural disasters like earthquakes and Tsunamis. The Committee, therefore, felt that we must find ways <strong>of</strong> making<br />

the study <strong>of</strong> pure as well as applied sciences, both in teaching and research, more attractive for our students, if India was to<br />

use science for the welfare <strong>of</strong> its people. We must augment further our efforts in critical areas like agricultural production,<br />

food processing, energy, transportation, communication, etc. so as to be able to compete and excel in the global arena.<br />

Immediate steps, therefore, need to be taken for popularizing the study <strong>of</strong> basic sciences by having career-oriented<br />

programmes in applied sciences. Adequate incentives and infrastructure for research and development is needed urgently.<br />

The base for sciences in the universities needed to be rebuilt and strengthened by taking newer initiatives in the frontier areas.<br />

8.55 The de-bureaucratization in most <strong>of</strong> the scientific and technological institutions, would have to be ensured for<br />

promoting research activities and preserving their academic autonomy.<br />

8.56 The entire science and technological support system, in Committee’s view, needed to be restructured for making<br />

the study <strong>of</strong> basic sciences more attractive. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that all research institutes may also be persuaded<br />

to have under-graduate teaching programmes. Another feasible approach could be to have a co-coordinating mechanism<br />

whereunder research institutes participate in teaching as well as take up collaborative research projects with university faculty<br />

and students. Secondly, regular exchange <strong>of</strong> faculty could be managed between the research institutes and universities.<br />

8.57 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that there was urgent need for building more centres <strong>of</strong> excellence in science like<br />

Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Sciences. The Committee was happy to learn that two such institutions have already been proposed to be<br />

established at Kolkata and Pune. More such institutions should be provided in other regions <strong>of</strong> the country. The<br />

Government would have to provide necessary resources and funds for research and development for inventing required<br />

technologies for agriculture, food processing, energy, bio-technology, pharmaceutical and health. These must be treated as<br />

priority areas for such funding.<br />

Social Sciences and Humanities<br />

8.58 The processes <strong>of</strong> privatization and liberalization had generated new demands, particularly in higher education. It<br />

had led to considerable neglect <strong>of</strong> social sciences. These disciplines were such branches <strong>of</strong> knowledge which did not have<br />

any immediate market value. Private participation had been mainly confined to pr<strong>of</strong>essional courses. Government funding,<br />

therefore, remains the only source available for social sciences. What was more disturbing was that Government funding is<br />

increasingly being diverted for pr<strong>of</strong>essional institutions, thus leaving the social sciences in the state <strong>of</strong> utter neglect. The<br />

Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that utility <strong>of</strong> social sciences to our society, polity, economy, etc. could not be overlooked. They<br />

add value to one’s life and any study that is value-free, in fact, tends to become sterile. The Committee, therefore, was <strong>of</strong> the<br />

considered opinion that this imbalance needs to be corrected immediately by making the study <strong>of</strong> social sciences scientific,<br />

interesting and relevant to present situation. The Government and the UGC may set up an Expert Committee for presenting a<br />

blueprint for this purpose.<br />

Quality and Excellence<br />

8.59 Such a situation, the Committee felt, does not augur well for the future <strong>of</strong> higher education in the country. The


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 34 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Committee, therefore, felt that the issue <strong>of</strong> quality and excellence <strong>of</strong> higher education should have been given more<br />

importance in India. Academic ambience in our universities, etc. needed to be improved a great deal. India had to create its<br />

new identity as knowledge-creator so as to face the challenges posed by the GATS as also to promote Indian higher education<br />

abroad. Quality and excellence were the watch-words in today’s liberalized environment. Making higher education globally<br />

competitive, therefore, could not be postponed any further.<br />

8.60 The Committee at the same time could not overlook the fact that India despite severe limitations had created a large<br />

scientific/technical manpower, who have earned a pride <strong>of</strong> place in the world community. India had not only to sustain its<br />

position but also to be a front-runner in the global competition. That could be done, according to the Committee, only when<br />

the standard and quality <strong>of</strong> our educational institutions and its graduates were greatly improved. They would have to be<br />

instilled with a high level <strong>of</strong> creativity, innovation, dedication, patriotism, etc.<br />

8.61 Quality in education did not necessarily connote its demand in the job market only. It also required students to<br />

acquire basic values and norms <strong>of</strong> life. Our education system unfortunately, appeared to be neglecting this aspect greatly. As<br />

a result, deviant behaviour, particularly amongst our youth is increasing at alarming proportion that needed to be arrested.<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> our education system for this purpose must be restored, before it was too late.<br />

8.62 Question <strong>of</strong> quality was also linked directly with the quality <strong>of</strong> teachers, curriculum design and development;<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> teachers’ and students’ performance; teacher’s training; and other infrastructure such as good labs, libraries,<br />

sports facilities, etc. Greater and regular sharing <strong>of</strong> experiences through networking and otherwise between different<br />

institutions at the national and global plane was highly recommended. Multi-disciplinary curriculum with stress on<br />

developing problem-solving abilities, augmenting knowledge skills and group activities were essential to provide relevance<br />

and usefulness to real life situations. Quality <strong>of</strong> higher education could be greatly enhanced through the use <strong>of</strong> audio-visual<br />

techniques and the modern information and communication technologies.<br />

8.63 Providing adequate exposure to teachers and students by holding more and more conferences and seminars,<br />

orientation and refresher courses for teachers; making selection process <strong>of</strong> Lecturers/Readers/Pr<strong>of</strong>essors more transparent and<br />

shifting from incremental budgeting to performance budgeting are some <strong>of</strong> the areas, the Committee felt, if implemented,<br />

could go a long way in improving the quality and standard <strong>of</strong> higher education.<br />

8.64 The Committee felt that there was a need for instilling a sense <strong>of</strong> accountability in teaching community. The<br />

Committee found that the quality <strong>of</strong> many teachers, if not all, did not inspire confidence as scholars or researchers or as<br />

educationists. The Committee recommended to carry out some kind <strong>of</strong> performance-audit <strong>of</strong> the teachers and in that process,<br />

the students’ participation must also be ensured. The Committee strongly felt that the conditions <strong>of</strong> service, remuneration and<br />

career advancement <strong>of</strong> the teachers be linked with their overall performance.<br />

8.65 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that examination reforms be carried out so that “learning by rot” is replaced by<br />

“learning for joy”. The Committee strongly felt that semester system should be introduced instead <strong>of</strong> the one-time final<br />

examination. The advantage <strong>of</strong> the semester system was that assessment <strong>of</strong> student performance becomes a continuous and<br />

integral part <strong>of</strong> the teaching-learning process. Also, a mechanism for joint conferring <strong>of</strong> degree by the university as well as<br />

colleges concerned would make colleges more responsible as their name would also appear on the degree.<br />

Assessment and Accreditation<br />

8.66 A major weakness in the existing institutional assessment, the Committee noted, is that while it assessed the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> the university or colleges as a whole; it did not do it Department-wise. What was known to the people was<br />

the grades and stars, which signify only averages. Academic performance <strong>of</strong> a university, in fact, was mostly departmentspecific.<br />

As a result, weaker ones were not exposed. Therefore, the idea <strong>of</strong> grouping them together for assessment, the<br />

Committee felt, needed to be reconsidered. The Committee recommended that the NAAC should start accrediting individual<br />

departments also <strong>of</strong> a university in addition to its overall grading, at the earliest.<br />

8.67 The Committee was informed that accreditation being voluntary, many institutions that have secured accreditation<br />

may not turn up for re-accreditation after five years and may still continue to use the grade obtained earlier. Others do not<br />

turn up for accreditation at all. The Committee was aware that it would be difficult to enforce, if accreditation was made<br />

mandatory. The Committee proposed, as incentive for this purpose, that the accreditation must be linked with the grants or<br />

special assistance/recognition by the UGC and other bodies so that institutions turn up for accreditation. In USA, the<br />

Committee learnt, federal grants were available only to the accredited institutions.<br />

8.68 The Committee was informed that the process and procedure <strong>of</strong> assessment and accreditation by the NAAC took a<br />

long time. It, therefore, emphasized the urgent need to identify efficient ways and effective strategies for expediting the<br />

assessment and accreditation by NAAC within a stipulated time frame.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 35 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.69 The Committee learnt that parameters adopted by the NAAC for evaluating the quality, although useful, left some<br />

scope for subjectivity in this exercise. The Committee recommended that this aspect should be re-examined with a view to<br />

making these parameters transparent and objective.<br />

8.70 The Committee also underlined the greater need for evolving an internal self-regulatory quality assurance<br />

mechanism by the accredited institutions for maintaining and upgrading their quality level. This mechanism may also<br />

monitor both academic excellence as well as administrative efficiency <strong>of</strong> that institution. Periodic assessment <strong>of</strong> accredited<br />

institution should also be carried out regularly by the NAAC.<br />

8.71 The Committee, in view <strong>of</strong> the emerging scenario, was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that a Government agency like NAAC for<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> standards and accreditation <strong>of</strong> higher educational institutions may not have the desired credibility/acceptability<br />

to our higher education institutions at the international level. In fact, the need for a third party evaluation model with<br />

participation <strong>of</strong> all the stakeholders in higher education was underlined by some experts who appeared before the<br />

Committee. The Committee also felt that the establishment <strong>of</strong> an independent accreditation agency having regional <strong>of</strong>fices in<br />

different areas <strong>of</strong> the country should also be considered. The industry should also have its participation in such a machinery.<br />

It should be, more or less, on the lines <strong>of</strong> quality assurance bodies like ISO and other rating agencies like CRISIL and ICRA.<br />

National Board <strong>of</strong> Accreditation<br />

8.72 The accreditation <strong>of</strong> technical institution was done by the National Board <strong>of</strong> Accreditation (NBA) established by<br />

AICTE. Although the procedure adopted by the NBA was comprehensive yet the accreditation was a time-taking process.<br />

The Committee felt that this process needed to be streamlined and accelerated to complete the backlog which is building up.<br />

The accreditation work needed to have a global interface which had become important in the emerging regime under WTO.<br />

8.73 In view <strong>of</strong> mushrooming <strong>of</strong> private pr<strong>of</strong>essional institutions in different parts <strong>of</strong> the country having little regard for<br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> teaching, infrastructure, etc. the Committee emphasized that every institution must be required to have its<br />

quality assessment done by the NBA within three years <strong>of</strong> their existence.<br />

Governance and Management<br />

8.74 With major interventions by the State for universalisation <strong>of</strong> education, latest being the SSA and MDM, the<br />

Committee felt, the secondary and then the higher secondary education was bound to face in the coming years unprecedented<br />

pressure <strong>of</strong> numbers as well as quality. Besides, the emerging new regime under GATS had also posed newer challenges<br />

before higher education. Such a situation called for a modern system <strong>of</strong> management for the higher education to enable India<br />

to compete and survive at the global level. The Committee felt that our universities and institutions <strong>of</strong> higher learning should<br />

be prepared to respond to such demands and challenges, and this cannot be done without making suitable changes in the<br />

system <strong>of</strong> governance and administrative structures <strong>of</strong> higher education in the country.<br />

8.75 The Committee noted that management in education though not unknown in India, worked more or less, on old<br />

structure and concepts. It was a matter <strong>of</strong> concern that most <strong>of</strong> our universities have become merely examination boards for<br />

conducting examinations and conferring degrees, apart from the major work <strong>of</strong> granting affiliations. The Committee was<br />

dismayed to note that research as well as pedagogical innovations seemed to have taken a back seat in the universities. The<br />

Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that in such a scenario what was needed was the greater autonomy,<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism, transparency and accountability in the administration <strong>of</strong> higher education.<br />

8.76 The Committee felt that it was high time that aspects like performance measurement, quality improvement,<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional development, institutional and cultural change, resource mobilization, marketing <strong>of</strong> the intellectual products,<br />

public relations etc. were imbued in the practices <strong>of</strong> higher education management in our country.<br />

8.77 The Committee believed that there was an urgent need to adopt best managerial practices in the structure <strong>of</strong> higher<br />

education institutions and universities, since these were no longer traditional institutions engaged only in creation,<br />

presentation and dissemination <strong>of</strong> knowledge. Rather they were progressively being called upon to involve themselves in a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> problems and concerns <strong>of</strong> national development, especially in the social and economic spheres.<br />

8.78 The Committee found that there was no effective planning body in universities both central as well as State. The<br />

Committee felt that was only by better planning and optimum use <strong>of</strong> resources that universities can improve their efficiency<br />

and can excel. It was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that proper strategic planning keeping in view the priorities and options available be<br />

adopted in the planning activities <strong>of</strong> the universities.<br />

8.79 The Committee was also <strong>of</strong> the view that autonomy to the universities be made inviolable because it was, the life-


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 36 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

breath to intellectual and academic initiatives and innovations. This autonomy, however, should not lead to autocracy and it<br />

must be ensured that academic bodies were kept away from any kind <strong>of</strong> interference, political, bureaucratic and any other.<br />

Views <strong>of</strong> academicians should have effective say in the management <strong>of</strong> higher education.<br />

8.80 The Committee also recommended to ensure that academic decision in the institutions <strong>of</strong> higher learning is taken<br />

on merit and the government control must be reduced. Any outside interference in appointments <strong>of</strong> university teachers and<br />

administrators should be totally avoided. Direct interference <strong>of</strong> Finance Department in financial management <strong>of</strong> the<br />

universities must also be avoided as it proves to be counterproductive.<br />

8.81 The Committee was informed that instances <strong>of</strong> uneasy relationship between various bodies, particularly the<br />

Academic Council and the Executive Council in the universities are not very uncommon. This, the Committee felt, prepares<br />

grounds for internal bickering and outside interference that ultimately vitiates the academic atmosphere in the campuses. All<br />

possible measures be taken for avoiding such situations.<br />

8.82 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that the role <strong>of</strong> a Vice-Chancellor in a university system was very<br />

crucial. In today’s complex university environment, the person to be appointed as Vice-Chancellor must be the one who is<br />

not only an academic leader but also trained in sound management practices. The Committee during its visit to IIM,<br />

Ahmedabad came to know that the Institute was running an orientation programme for the CBSE school Principals. The<br />

Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that all the IIMs may be requested to develop and run suitable modules for the orientation and<br />

refresher courses for the Vice-Chancellors and Registrars <strong>of</strong> the universities as also for the heads <strong>of</strong> other institutions <strong>of</strong><br />

higher learning. The Committee also emphasized the need for running such programmes in education management specially<br />

designed for the Government-<strong>of</strong>ficials responsible for implementing/supervising primary, secondary and higher education.<br />

8.83 The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the fact that there were a number <strong>of</strong> regulatory bodies like the UGC, ICAR, AICTE,<br />

MCI, NCTE concerning various areas <strong>of</strong> higher education. These bodies fall under different Ministries/Departments. It was<br />

argued before the Committee that the existence <strong>of</strong> various regulatory bodies not only made the system complex, but also gave<br />

it a fragmented character. The Committee, therefore, recommended that some kind <strong>of</strong> coordinating mechanism at the<br />

national level be put in place in the best interest <strong>of</strong> efficiency and effectiveness. A Board <strong>of</strong> Higher Education at national<br />

level for the purpose as visualized by the NPE 1986, could not be set up so far, for the reasons not known to the Committee.<br />

The Committee recommended that the Union Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human Resource Development initiate and coordinate with other<br />

Ministries like Agriculture, Health, Law and Finance to create a National Apex body for coordination among the various<br />

regulatory agencies.<br />

8.84 Most <strong>of</strong> those who gave input to the Committee, verbal or written, mentioned about the cumbersome procedure and<br />

large scale corruption prevailing in the regulatory bodies mentioned above. The Committee while appreciating the work<br />

being done by these bodies, took such allegations seriously. Besides, the procedure for granting necessary clearances, etc.<br />

needed to be streamlined and made easier so that institutions/individuals did not feel deterred to approach these bodies. In<br />

view <strong>of</strong> increasing private participation in technical, medical and management education, these bodies needed to be made<br />

more alert, transparent and pro-active in performing their mandate. Their regional <strong>of</strong>fices needed to be increased and made<br />

more responsive and efficient. Cases <strong>of</strong> corruption, deliberate delay, etc. must be dealt with sternly to establish credibility <strong>of</strong><br />

these bodies.<br />

8.85 Besides, there was no systematic planning and objective statewide assessments <strong>of</strong> demands and needed for higher<br />

education institutions and facilities. The Committee was, therefore, <strong>of</strong> the view that a state level mechanism – Higher<br />

Education Council as is functioning in some States, be put in place for coordinated development <strong>of</strong> higher education in all the<br />

States.<br />

8.86 The Committee was informed that many a time, it had been experienced that University Acts in different States had<br />

provisions which were no longer relevant or were not keeping with the emerging challenges. The Committee recommended<br />

that Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human Resource Development should advise the State governments to review, from time to time, their<br />

University Acts and amend them in the light <strong>of</strong> new requirements and challenges being faced by the universities. UGC must<br />

take a lead in this exercise.<br />

8.87 The Committee was also <strong>of</strong> the opinion that for good governance, there was an urgent need for the use <strong>of</strong><br />

Management Information System in the universities. The Committee noted that majority <strong>of</strong> the universities had done it in<br />

reference to examination and general administration. However academic governance had not been covered under this. The<br />

Committee desired that academic governance be also brought in the Management Information System.<br />

8.88 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> considered view that system <strong>of</strong> micro-management be given up and structures <strong>of</strong>


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 37 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

governance outside universities also need reform. The Committee strongly felt that the internal management <strong>of</strong> institutions<br />

needed to be strengthened. More autonomy and greater authority to the head <strong>of</strong> institutions may also be given. There was a<br />

need to create a legal and conducive environment to initiate changes at the institutional level. It also needed to be underlined<br />

that the government worked as a facilitator rather than controller in the affairs <strong>of</strong> institutions <strong>of</strong> higher learning.<br />

Funding<br />

8.89 The Committee recalled that the Education Commission (1964-66) had strongly argued for devoting 6 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

the GDP to education which was reiterated by National Policy on Education, 1968 also. The NCMP had also promised this<br />

target. However, the goal <strong>of</strong> allocating 6 per cent <strong>of</strong> the GDP to education, in Committee’s view, had since remained merely<br />

an ambition than a realized commitment. While, only 4 per cent <strong>of</strong> the GNP was currently being spent on education, 0.4 per<br />

cent <strong>of</strong> GNP was being spent on higher education.<br />

8.90 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the declining public finances for higher education coupled with the inflation<br />

and increase in the number <strong>of</strong> students aspiring for it, severely impair its growth, both quantitative as well as qualitative. And<br />

this was what had happened in our country. Reduction in expenditure on higher education, in fact, had affected not only<br />

recruitment <strong>of</strong> the teachers and creation <strong>of</strong> physical infrastructure but had also restricted to a great deal access to higher<br />

education particularly, by the poor people. The Committee felt that for the economic and technological progress <strong>of</strong> a country<br />

in this era <strong>of</strong> intense global competition, the country can ill-afford to ignore the higher education sector. It was argued before<br />

the Committee that lately, we have witnessed shifting <strong>of</strong> emphasis from higher education to primary education. The<br />

Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that while universalizing primary education was the constitutional mandate, the<br />

higher education also needed to be supported by increased allocations in the coming years, was India to provide higher<br />

education <strong>of</strong> world class standard.<br />

8.91 The Committee was aware <strong>of</strong> the resource constraints both with the Central and State Governments which cannot<br />

fill the gap between the supply and demand <strong>of</strong> the higher education sector. The Committee, therefore, was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that<br />

new sources <strong>of</strong> financing higher education have to be found for bridging this gap.<br />

8.92 In the light <strong>of</strong> this, the Committee felt that mobilizing resources from non-government sources had become<br />

imperative now, not only to sustain the system <strong>of</strong> higher education at its present level but also for its further expansion both<br />

in its qualitative as well as quantitative dimensions.<br />

8.93 An estimate put this demand at Rs. 3,400 crores for the remaining period <strong>of</strong> Tenth Plan. Managing such a huge<br />

sum was an uphill task. That can be achieved inter alia by promoting distance education, private participation and cost<br />

recovery methods. Besides, the universities needed to recognize the importance <strong>of</strong> helping themselves through their internal<br />

resource generation. The Committee also felt that Income Tax concessions can be given to philanthropists and to the<br />

community, should they invest in higher education.<br />

8.94 The need for the cost recovery in higher education to fight the fiscal crunch in system was emphasized before the<br />

Committee. Cost-recovery, according to the Committee, would imply among others, a reduction in subsidies to higher<br />

education. That, the Committee felt, would shift the financial burden either to the beneficiaries (students) or to their users<br />

(employers). Student loans, graduate tax, enhancing fees and education cess were some other suggestions made in this regard.<br />

Student Fees<br />

8.95 The Tenth Five-Year Plan had emphasized the shift <strong>of</strong> resources from higher to primary education leaving thereby<br />

lesser funds for the former. Besides, due to increasing enrolment at upper primary and secondary levels, the pressure on<br />

higher education is likely to increase manifold in coming years. In such a situation, the Committee felt that it was high time<br />

that the universities made greater efforts to supplement their resources by generating their own resources, apart from what<br />

they may be getting from the UGC and the government. The industry-academia interface, the Committee felt, can be<br />

valuable source <strong>of</strong> resource mobilization, relevant curricula, R&D, practical training including employment <strong>of</strong> our graduates.<br />

8.96 The Committee was fully aware <strong>of</strong> the implications <strong>of</strong> hike in fee paid by students, as it might restrict the access to<br />

the higher education. There was a possibility that beneficiaries, particularly from vulnerable groups, social and economic,<br />

would found it difficult to afford the higher education affecting thereby their upward mobility adversely. The Committee,<br />

therefore, felt that raising <strong>of</strong> fee and other charges should be considered only after examining its social and economic<br />

implications on the poor people. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the Government should emphasize on other<br />

options also. If the raise in the fee becomes unavoidable, it must be gradual and supplemented/supported by other assistance.<br />

8.97 The Committee at the same time was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that it was not prudent to charge same fees from all students,


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 38 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> their socio-economic status. It was true that the daily pocket-expenses <strong>of</strong> some students were much more than<br />

the fee they pay per month. It was an anomaly. Therefore, there was urgent need for having a rational and just policy in this<br />

regard. Meritorious students coming from weaker sections <strong>of</strong> the society need to be financially supported through effective<br />

mechanisms so that their inability to afford the cost <strong>of</strong> education does not deprive them <strong>of</strong> higher education. Therefore,<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> adequate and liberal free-ships and merit-cum-means scholarships to the students coming from the<br />

disadvantaged groups was considered imperative.<br />

8.98 What was a matter <strong>of</strong> concern to the Committee was the high fee structure <strong>of</strong> private colleges/universities. The<br />

Committee emphasized that we must keep in mind the social and economic milieu <strong>of</strong> the students while deciding fee and<br />

other charges. The private institutions particularly unaided/self-financing colleges must ensure that education was not made<br />

unaffordable to poor and meritorious student. The Committee felt that a suitable formula for fixing/regulating fees in private<br />

institutions <strong>of</strong> higher learning needed to be worked out in consultation and agreement with their management. The<br />

Committee notes that Courts had already suggested some mechanism in this regard.<br />

8.<strong>99</strong> The Committee appreciated the contribution <strong>of</strong> unaided institutions in supplementing the efforts and resources <strong>of</strong><br />

the governments in providing higher education. While working out any formula for this purpose, their interest needed also to<br />

be kept in mind for avoiding the risk <strong>of</strong> losing this option.<br />

8.<strong>10</strong>0 The Committee was also <strong>of</strong> firm belief that the universities' fees be restructured and the UGC may bring necessary<br />

modifications in its formula for computing grants, which at present did not adjust the fees for capital expenditure.<br />

Student Loan<br />

8.<strong>10</strong>1 Student loan was envisaged by some as one <strong>of</strong> the means to mobilize resources for higher education. It was<br />

argued that such a loan would enable those meritorious students whose parents were not in a position to afford higher<br />

education. The Committee felt that one <strong>of</strong> the crucial aspects that was overlooked was that the student loan shifted the<br />

burden <strong>of</strong> higher education from society to the beneficiary under the scheme, individual students had to repay the loan<br />

themselves. The Committee was, therefore, <strong>of</strong> the view that the student loan programme would not be very popular as it was<br />

fraught with many risks. There is a high possibility that student loans would act as disincentives for students from lowincome<br />

families willing to go for higher education. The Committee was particularly apprehensive <strong>of</strong> student loan for women,<br />

which might be regarded as negative dowry in the Indian society.<br />

8.<strong>10</strong>2 The Committee noted that various Commercial Banks charged prohibitive rates <strong>of</strong> interest and demand<br />

collateral guarantee, etc., which rendered it highly unattractive proposition. This scheme did not provide for any exemptions<br />

for the weaker sections in terms <strong>of</strong> security, guarantee, repayment period, repayment as per earnings, waivers, etc.<br />

8.<strong>10</strong>3 Further, the high administrative cost <strong>of</strong> the loan makes the scheme susceptible to failure. The Committee<br />

recommended that the Government must take necessary measures to study the financial viability <strong>of</strong> the programme to make it<br />

a success and a convenient alternative to public finances.<br />

8.<strong>10</strong>4 The Committee also felt that a student loan could create two types <strong>of</strong> distortions. First, only those courses,<br />

which enjoyed a premium market, would be preferred, both by loan providers and borrowers. The pr<strong>of</strong>essional courses might<br />

get priority at the expense <strong>of</strong> others, which were important from the point <strong>of</strong> social and national concerns but did not enjoy a<br />

premium in the labour market. Second, the educational credit market in India was not well developed. It was recommended<br />

that necessary correctives be initiated to take care <strong>of</strong> distortions and adverse implications <strong>of</strong> the student loan by providing<br />

some kind <strong>of</strong> shield to the poor and meritorious students. The Committee also recommended that setting up <strong>of</strong> an<br />

Educational Development Bank <strong>of</strong> India as suggested from time to time for helping financially poor and needy students<br />

should be considered urgently.<br />

Graduate/Exit Tax<br />

8.<strong>10</strong>5 Other measures suggested to the Committee to recover the cost <strong>of</strong> higher education were what may be called as<br />

“graduate tax”, “exit tax”, “education cess” etc. Such taxes were already in vogue in some countries. Graduate tax is levied<br />

on those who use the services <strong>of</strong> skilled and trained manpower. An employer is required to pay an annual tax to the<br />

government for each graduate recruited by it. The major drawback, the Committee felt, with the scheme was that it might<br />

lead to substitution <strong>of</strong> university graduates by lower level educated manpower. Nevertheless, the Committee felt, that taxing<br />

employers based on the type and number <strong>of</strong> manpower they use had a good rationale and should be considered seriously for<br />

implementation.<br />

8.<strong>10</strong>6 Imposition <strong>of</strong> Exit Tax on our students immigrating to other countries for taking up jobs after obtaining their<br />

degrees, particularly from our premier institutions which are run on massive State subsidies, was suggested by some experts<br />

who appeared before the Committee. They argued that the expenditure incurred on those students go without any return to<br />

the country. The Committee desired to point out the changed perception about the traditional brain-drain theory in the wake


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 39 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> globalization which recognized certain indirect benefits – developing one’s skill further, remittances in foreign exchange,<br />

etc. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that students passing out from premier Government institutions got the best education<br />

on payment <strong>of</strong> nominal fees. In the event <strong>of</strong> their leaving the country for good, imposition <strong>of</strong> Exit Tax on them must be<br />

considered. The Committee, therefore, recommended that feasibility <strong>of</strong> the proposal needed to be examined and<br />

implemented in the larger interest <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />

8.<strong>10</strong>7 As regards the education cess for higher education, the Committee felt that the proposal would not be<br />

conducive in the present scenario when people are already paying another cess for primary education.<br />

Private Initiative in Higher Education<br />

8.<strong>10</strong>8 The Committee noted that private participation in higher education was not new in India. Colleges set up by public<br />

spirited/philanthropic persons had been there for a long time. Most <strong>of</strong> these colleges, however, enjoyed large-scale grants<br />

from the public exchequer. The public funding, the Committee noted, had its own constraints and the State support alone<br />

would not be sufficient to meet the requirement in this area. In the long run, therefore, the involvement <strong>of</strong> private initiatives<br />

became imperative to meet the challenging demands <strong>of</strong> expansion and diversification <strong>of</strong> higher education in India. However,<br />

the Committee was at the same time fully aware <strong>of</strong> the adverse impact <strong>of</strong> privatization <strong>of</strong> education; it might lead to pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

orientation and commercialization <strong>of</strong> higher education. As had been seen in a few cases recently, there was an attempt to full<br />

cost recovery or more from students. As a result, only those who were able to pay exorbitant amount <strong>of</strong> fees are able to go,<br />

particularly for engineering, medical and management education and this was certainly an unacceptable situation.<br />

8.<strong>10</strong>9 The Committee understood that a high level <strong>of</strong> public subsidy reduced the scope for the Government to mobilize<br />

additional resources. It was also <strong>of</strong> the opinion that only the State can have long-term perspective and focus on social<br />

concerns in promoting higher education. The State, therefore, could not shy away from investing in higher education, as it<br />

was a long-term investment for the overall economic development <strong>of</strong> the country and its people. Only State could invest in<br />

basic research and development without any pr<strong>of</strong>it motive in financial terms. The Committee, therefore, was <strong>of</strong> the view that<br />

until the private participation and the concerns associated with it were taken care <strong>of</strong>, necessary legal framework were put in<br />

place and adequate safeguards were provided for protecting interest <strong>of</strong> vulnerable sections <strong>of</strong> our society, the Government<br />

must continue to provide necessary resources for the purpose. Any indiscriminate reduction in subsidies would leave the<br />

sector to the vagaries <strong>of</strong> market forces. The Committee, therefore, called upon the Planning Commission, Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Finance and Department to spare adequate funds for higher education.<br />

Private Universities<br />

8.1<strong>10</strong> The Committee was concerned over the fact that neither there was any regulatory mechanism in the States nor was<br />

there any policy/legislation at Centre for regulation and control <strong>of</strong> private universities in India. As a result, it was very<br />

difficult to ensure transparency and accountability in the working <strong>of</strong> private universities. Regulatory bodies like UGC,<br />

AICTE, MCI, DCI, etc., have proved to be ineffective in this case. The Committee in the light <strong>of</strong> these developments was <strong>of</strong><br />

the considered opinion that there was an urgent need for proper policy and mechanism to regulate aspects such as admission,<br />

fee structure, quality control, teachers’ qualifications, physical infrastructure, etc. <strong>of</strong> the private universities. The regulatory<br />

mechanism must see that higher education was not commercialized to the detriment <strong>of</strong> the students.<br />

8.111 The Committee was cautioned that some corporate entities might try to open private universities to enhance their<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>its under that garb. The possibility <strong>of</strong> a company opening a private university for the purpose <strong>of</strong> creating an affiliating<br />

body to get all frivolous or sub-standard courses <strong>of</strong>fered by it affiliated, cannot be ruled out. The Committee, therefore,<br />

desired that the Government should bring a comprehensive legislation for providing effective machinery to ensure that only<br />

genuine and quality private providers <strong>of</strong> higher education services remain in the field.<br />

Unaided Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals Institutions<br />

8.112 The Committee noted that self-financing institutions were functioning under various authorities, State as well as<br />

Central as education is a Concurrent Subject. As a result, we have different syllabi, admission and examination systems<br />

throughout the country. The existing system <strong>of</strong> diverse regulatory authorities, the Committee felt, was creating avoidable<br />

problems in this regard. This situation gave rise to confusion among the students which undermined the delicate balance<br />

between merit, affordability and equity in pr<strong>of</strong>essional education. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that this state-<strong>of</strong>-affairs<br />

was mainly due to absence <strong>of</strong> a national policy in respect <strong>of</strong> the self-financing pr<strong>of</strong>essional institutions. This called for a<br />

unified control and regulatory mechanism, having regard to our federal character, for looking after different aspects <strong>of</strong> their<br />

functioning. The Committee, therefore, emphasized the need for a transparent national framework for the regulation &


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 40 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

nurturing <strong>of</strong> such institutions. There was an urgent need for rationalizing the existing plethora <strong>of</strong> admission tests, which are<br />

creating lot <strong>of</strong> problems for the students. The admission to these institutions should be on merit in which total transparency<br />

needs to be maintained. Besides, there was also an urgent need to provide a legal mechanism for regulating/fixing fees and<br />

management and other quota with a view to removing any uncertainty in this regard.<br />

8.113 While doing so, we must give due regard to views/concerns <strong>of</strong> the people opening these institutions. Otherwise,<br />

good spirited people would feel discouraged to come forward in this regard.<br />

8.114 Steps should be taken to ensure that these institutions are properly assessed and accredited by the respective<br />

agencies. Furthermore, the private institutions be rated by independent rating agencies and their ratings be disseminated<br />

through print and internet across the country. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered view that such a publicly announced<br />

ratings would help the students in selecting an institution to enroll in; the institutions in upgrading its standards; and the<br />

employers in assessing the quality <strong>of</strong> students graduating from these institutions. The Committee also desired that all such<br />

educational institutions need to come out with their Annual Reports containing necessary details about the courses <strong>of</strong>fered,<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> faculty, teaching, student strength, examination results, infrastructure and facilities available, the corpus available<br />

and the source <strong>of</strong> funding, accreditation ratings, etc.<br />

8.115 These institutions, particularly in the field <strong>of</strong> engineering and management need to have effective partnership with<br />

trade and industry to ensure that the product emerging out <strong>of</strong> these institutions would be better suited for the job which they<br />

would eventually take up. Such a partnership, the Committee felt, shall not only make the curricula more relevant and<br />

contextual, increase the employability <strong>of</strong> students and would also enable the sponsors to get some resources.<br />

Globalisation and Liberalisation<br />

GATS and Higher Education<br />

8.116 It was argued before the Committee that the liberalization allowed in the area like allowing <strong>10</strong>0 per cent FDI on<br />

automatic route and permitting foreign participation in higher education was essentially a domestic decision and had not yet<br />

been included under the obligations <strong>of</strong> GATS since India was yet to commit its education services under GATS framework.<br />

The Committee appreciated that the liberalization allowed was basically due to our capacity constraints in higher education.<br />

However, the Committee was concerned about the less reputed, fly-by-night operators who lure the gullible students through<br />

their tall claims in glossy advertisements making away with their hard-earned money and spoiling their future. The<br />

Committee was <strong>of</strong> the strong opinion that the capacity constraints cannot be an excuse for the survival <strong>of</strong> sub-standard<br />

institutions. The Government should immediately come up with a proper supportive regulatory mechanism with a view to<br />

ensuring that only accredited and known foreign institutions enter the Indian market and by creating a level playing field for<br />

foreign and domestic institutions. The Committee felt that by putting such a mechanism in place, the country would be better<br />

placed to schedule education services under GATS.<br />

8.117 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered view that markets and globalisation represent the key where opportunity<br />

and danger exists and both are closely intertwined. While the importance <strong>of</strong> competition and striving to do better are the<br />

pluses, motivation <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it only is the minus. The Committee felt that the country should brace itself up to take the<br />

maximum advantage <strong>of</strong> the opportunities opening with the globalisation <strong>of</strong> education services. The Government was advised<br />

to adopt an aggressive and pro-active, rather than defensive approach on both import as well as export fronts to take the<br />

benefit under GATS and concomitant process <strong>of</strong> liberalization <strong>of</strong> higher education. The Committee noted that Indian export<br />

<strong>of</strong> higher education to other countries was very low as compared to its import. Our students were queuing up to go for higher<br />

studies to countries like US, UK, Canada and Australia in large numbers. In US, they formed the largest group.<br />

8.118 The Committee noted that the Government had constituted a Committee for Promotion <strong>of</strong> Indian Education Abroad<br />

(COPIE) with the twin objectives <strong>of</strong> promoting Indian education abroad and regulating operations <strong>of</strong> foreign educational<br />

institutions in India. The Committee desired that the COPIE took steps to safeguard the larger national interest and the<br />

interest <strong>of</strong> the student community in particular.<br />

Foreign Universities<br />

8.119 The Committee noted that the existing laws and regulations <strong>of</strong> the country did not provide any statutory mechanism<br />

for regulating the operation <strong>of</strong> such foreign institutions in this country. It was only the AICTE that had come up with a<br />

notification that carried revised regulations for the entry and operation <strong>of</strong> foreign universities/institutions imparting technical<br />

education in India. The Committee was aware that the C. N. R. Rao Committee had been set up by the Government for<br />

reviewing this aspect. The Committee noted that the Rao Committee was yet to submit its reports. The Committee only<br />

hoped that the Government would take necessary interim measures in this regard before the Rao Committee’s<br />

recommendations were considered and accepted.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 41 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.120 The Committee was perturbed to note that there was still no authentic database on operation <strong>of</strong> foreign educational<br />

institutions in the country, which was a grim reminder <strong>of</strong> our concern for higher education and our preparedness towards<br />

maximizing the fruits <strong>of</strong> liberalization in education sector.<br />

8.121 According to the information compiled by the Association <strong>of</strong> Indian Universities during the year 2000 on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> advertisements appearing in the Indian newspapers, 144 foreign universities and colleges/institutions had been <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

various courses <strong>of</strong> study to the Indian students. Out <strong>of</strong> them, 117 <strong>of</strong>fered programmes on their home campuses and the<br />

remaining 27 were conducting programmes in India through their Indian partners. The largest number <strong>of</strong> these institutions<br />

was from UK and Australia followed by USA and Canada and New Zealand. The remaining 14 institutions were from other<br />

countries like Bulgaria, Cyprus, Hong-Kong, France Ireland, Mauritius, Nepal, Romania, Russia and Switzerland. The<br />

Committee was astonished to note that over <strong>10</strong>0 foreign institutions were <strong>of</strong>fering different courses without any regulation on<br />

their operations, quality <strong>of</strong> education, management, etc. The Committee noted that the AICTE regulation that permits the<br />

entry <strong>of</strong> a foreign university/institution either directly or through collaborative arrangement with an Indian<br />

university/institution extended only to technical education. The law was silent on foreign university/institution <strong>of</strong>fering nontechnical<br />

education including medicine, law, arts, sciences, social sciences, etc. The Committee felt that this gap needed to be<br />

filled at the earliest. It was incumbent upon the Government and related regulatory bodies like the UGC, the MCI, etc. to<br />

come out with a definite policy/legislation for regulating the entry and operation <strong>of</strong> foreign university/institution as soon as<br />

possible. Only good institutions, which were accredited in their countries should be allowed to operate and they needed to<br />

get clearance from respective authorities. Fee, etc. charged by these foreign institutions also needed to be regulated.<br />

8.122 The Committee noted the possibilities <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> these institutions <strong>of</strong> doubtful credibility hoodwinking the gullible<br />

students cannot be completely ruled out. The Committee, therefore, desired that an inquiry into the antecedents and<br />

credentials <strong>of</strong> these institutions be thoroughly made and if any <strong>of</strong> them are found to be <strong>of</strong> fake/fictitious nature, strict action<br />

be taken against it and due publicity be given against them.<br />

8.123 The Committee was also <strong>of</strong> the opinion that permission to foreign university/institution to operate in the country<br />

should be granted with caution as there is every possibility that even a good foreign university/institution could adopt double<br />

standards in quality so much so that the learning that they provide at their home countries was <strong>of</strong> high standard while the<br />

distance learning in developing countries by them was sub-standard. The Committee recommended the establishment <strong>of</strong> a<br />

body that oversees all the activities <strong>of</strong> a foreign university/institution and allows only the bona fides to take a plunge in the<br />

Indian market having all sensitivities to the moorings and culture <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />

State Universities<br />

8.124 The Committee during its visits to some <strong>of</strong> the State universities found that they were facing serious financial<br />

crunch mainly due to inadequate allocation by their respective State Governments. The Committee noted that for every Rs.<br />

<strong>10</strong>0 - Rs. 70 went to salaries & superannuation payments; <strong>of</strong> the remaining Rs. 30; Rs. 15 went into pre-emptive claims like<br />

rent, taxes, electricity bills, examination expenses and so on. Thus, precious little was left for maintenance, let alone<br />

development. As a result, libraries & laboratories languished and quality <strong>of</strong> education was severely affected. This grim<br />

scenario was further aggravated with the UGC ceiling <strong>of</strong> Plan expenditure to mere 3% <strong>of</strong> the total allocation. The Committee<br />

felt that this ceiling on Plan expenditure was really unrealistic and it desired that the UGC should increase this ceiling so that<br />

development <strong>of</strong> infrastructure in the universities could be taken up with a view to improving the quality <strong>of</strong> our institutions <strong>of</strong><br />

higher learning. The Committee also noted that for corpus creation, the universities are <strong>of</strong>fered to raise one crore to get an<br />

additional grant <strong>of</strong> the same amount from the UGC with the condition to use the interest on that corpus fund for<br />

developmental activities. With ever decreasing decline in the interest rate, this fund also was shrinking day by day.<br />

8.125 The Committee expressed its concern about large number <strong>of</strong> vacancies at different levels in teaching community.<br />

Presently, there was a serious shortage <strong>of</strong> faculty at the current level <strong>of</strong> demands. The Committee found that most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

State universities and colleges were ill equipped lacking required infrastructure and trained teachers. The Committee viewed<br />

with serious concern the status <strong>of</strong> vacant teaching posts. As per the information available with the Committee, in the 16<br />

Central universities, there were 1988 vacancies as on 31-03-2005, with the Banaras Hindu University and Delhi University<br />

having as many as 687 and 396 vacancies respectively. Situation was also far from satisfactory in JNU, Visva Bharti and<br />

Mizoram University. The Committee observed that out <strong>of</strong> total vacant 1988 posts, <strong>10</strong>56 posts belong to Lecturer category.<br />

The Committee failed to understand the reasons for such a large number <strong>of</strong> posts <strong>of</strong> Lecturer lying vacant which was the<br />

entry point to a university. The Committee apprehended that situation might be worse in State universities. The Committee<br />

was <strong>of</strong> the view that drastic steps needed to be taken so that students were not deprived <strong>of</strong> proper guidance.<br />

8.126 The Committee at the same time felt that we need not only more qualified but also highly motivated teachers. In<br />

order to attract/retain them, we have to supplement their salaries with an attractive package <strong>of</strong> perquisites and support for<br />

academic activities coupled with appropriate recognition with outstanding achievement.<br />

8.127 The Committee’s attention was also drawn towards the need for relaxing the requirement <strong>of</strong> NET qualification for a<br />

person to be appointed as a Lecturer in a university/college because this sometimes prohibited the qualified and outstanding


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 42 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

persons from being inducted in the teaching community, if they have not cleared the NET. The Committee, therefore,<br />

recommended that this issue needed to be considered by the Department and the UGC in a positive spirit.<br />

Fake Universities/Institutions<br />

8.128 As per the information available with the Committee, there were 21 fake universities/institutions located in<br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> the country, UP having the highest number <strong>of</strong> such universities (8), closely followed by Delhi (7). The<br />

Committee took a serious view that these fake universities continue to operate with impunity cheating the innocent students.<br />

Government seemed to be totally helpless. Section 22 <strong>of</strong> the UGC Act, 1956 provides that the right to conferring/granting<br />

degrees can be exercised only by a university established or incorporated by or under a Central Act, Provincial Act or a State<br />

Act or an institution specially empowered by an Act <strong>of</strong> Parliament to confer or grant degrees. Section 23 further provides<br />

that word ‘university’ can be associated only with those bodies covered under Section 22. The Committee noted that as per<br />

Section 24, a penalty <strong>of</strong> Rs. <strong>10</strong>00/- was liable to be imposed in case <strong>of</strong> violation <strong>of</strong> these provisions. This mild penalty had<br />

failed to make any impact for obvious reasons. The Committee had been given to understand that State Governments were<br />

being regularly requested by UGC to institute criminal proceedings against fake institutions. Even UGC had also decided to<br />

take action. The Committee desired, to point out that criminal proceedings would not make any difference in the status <strong>of</strong><br />

such institutions due to the continuation <strong>of</strong> very mild penalty provisions.<br />

8.129 The Committee understood that pursuant to the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee on Petitions (Lok Sabha), a<br />

Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha in December, 1<strong>99</strong>1 providing for imprisonment upto six months and a fine <strong>of</strong> not less<br />

than Rs. 1 lakh which may extend to Rs. <strong>10</strong> lakhs. This Bill was subsequently withdrawn on 1 st June, 1<strong>99</strong>5. Thereafter, no<br />

further project seemed to have been made on such a vital issue. The Committee desired to emphasize that urgent steps<br />

needed to be taken for bringing a legislation providing for more stringent penalties for running fake universities.<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> the UGC<br />

8.130 The UGC was established to promote, coordinate and determine standards in respect <strong>of</strong> higher education in the<br />

country. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that the UGC had not been able to live upto the expectations. It had become<br />

unequal to the task and challenges before it. It was now functioning mainly as grant disbursing body than a body for the<br />

promotion <strong>of</strong> teaching/research and maintenance <strong>of</strong> standards in higher education. The institutions <strong>of</strong> higher learning in India<br />

had become just degree conferring bodies than academic and intellectual entity.<br />

8.131 The Committee was perturbed to see that after nearly 50 years <strong>of</strong> the UGC’s existence, there was no set <strong>of</strong> rules<br />

regulating the establishment <strong>of</strong> sub-standard colleges. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that the UGC should not act as a<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> the Government but should act as a pr<strong>of</strong>essional body in which the university interests should be fully<br />

represented.<br />

8.132 The Committee was informed that the UGC did not have the power to de-recognize degrees awarded by any<br />

university. Absence <strong>of</strong> such power had made it difficult for the UGC to ensure compliance with its priorities and directives.<br />

The Committee, however, was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that the so-called fitness-to-function-norms for the universities be defined more<br />

precisely as this will take care <strong>of</strong> the unworthy universities even without taking on the power <strong>of</strong> de-recognising a degree.<br />

8.133 The Committee recommended a national level body <strong>of</strong> higher education be established to advise the Government<br />

on policy matters, coordinate the activities <strong>of</strong> the various pr<strong>of</strong>essional bodies, encourage interface among different areas,<br />

allocate resources in terms <strong>of</strong> national needs and manpower planning, and establish and manage common infrastructure and<br />

institutions and primacy <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional opinion over other considerations be ensured.<br />

8.134 The Committee noted that not only are there disputes about the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the various regulatory bodies, the<br />

fact remained that the Centre is cagey about asserting its rights more than are minimally necessary. Example <strong>of</strong> Chhattisgarh<br />

are there. A situation had arisen where the Centre was feeling outmaneuvered by the initiatives being taken by certain States.<br />

Foreign institutions too had penetrated the Indian market quite extensively and the UGC was unable to do anything than<br />

being a helpless spectator. The Committee strongly felt that the UGC even in the existing mandate under the UGC Act could<br />

have adopted a number <strong>of</strong> measures for regulating mushrooming <strong>of</strong> sub-standard private/foreign institutions.<br />

8.135 The Committee desired that prescription <strong>of</strong> minimum standards <strong>of</strong> fitness for admission to universities or to<br />

technical and pr<strong>of</strong>essional institutions as well as direct inspection <strong>of</strong> colleges and other institutions in order to maintain<br />

standards be undertaken by the UGC. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the UGC should put in place a better system <strong>of</strong><br />

monitoring and take decisions on the basis <strong>of</strong> feedback obtained from it. Throughout its existence, UGC had not even once<br />

insisted that State Government must prepare a Plan <strong>of</strong> Action in respect <strong>of</strong> both universities and colleges. The UGC could<br />

ask the State Governments to send it a plan <strong>of</strong> development for higher education every year. Thereafter, a meeting could be<br />

fixed at the UGC Headquarters. The Committee felt that the UGC’s interaction with States should be more frequent so that


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 43 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

there was no space <strong>of</strong> doubts in anyone’s mind about the other’s intention. It was suggested that State Councils <strong>of</strong> Higher<br />

Education be established for the purpose <strong>of</strong> interaction with the UGC.<br />

8.136 It was suggested that full-time members <strong>of</strong> the UGC to look after different portfolios falling under higher education<br />

be provided for and their numbers be increased in comparison to the present system, which permit for only a full-time Vice-<br />

Chairman to assist the Chairman. Further, these members should be chosen from the top three-four experts in a particular<br />

field.<br />

8.137 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that the existing structure and functioning <strong>of</strong> the UGC needed a re-look as the<br />

education scenario had changed drastically. The Committee emphasized the need for revisiting the UGC Act and amending it<br />

suitably. The Committee noted that in 1<strong>99</strong>8, a Committee was appointed by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> HRD to examine amendments to<br />

the UGC Act. Report <strong>of</strong> the Committee was submitted to the Ministry <strong>of</strong> HRD but Amendment Bill was yet to be brought<br />

before Parliament. Even the Committee on Autonomy <strong>of</strong> Higher Education Institutions, recently constituted by the Central<br />

Advisory Board <strong>of</strong> Education (CABE), had also desired for setting up a task force to re-examine the existing UGC Act to<br />

provide for incorporation <strong>of</strong> new provisions to suit the emerging concerns and realities <strong>of</strong> higher education and to make the<br />

UGC Act a more significant body. The Committee felt that the Amendment Bill to amend the UGC Act be brought in after<br />

consulting the expert opinion for making the UGC a purposeful and relevant body in the existing conditions. The<br />

Committee also felt that it was a high time to rechristen the UGC to project it mainly as a developmental body rather than as<br />

a grant disbursal one. It might, therefore, be renamed as Higher Education Development Commission or any other similar<br />

name which was in keeping with the changed dimensions in this area.<br />

Conclusion<br />

8.138 In view <strong>of</strong> the new situations and the resulting challenges before higher education in the emerging scenario, the<br />

need for preparing ourselves to face them successfully brooks no delay. India would have to take various measures, legal,<br />

institutional, financial and others well in time so that we are not left behind in this fast changing world. For this, there was an<br />

urgent need for reform and revitalization <strong>of</strong> education sector to make it relevant and suitable to the emerging socio-economic<br />

and other realities. The National Policy on Education that was formulated nearly two decades ago even before the process <strong>of</strong><br />

liberalization had begun, the Committee felt, needed to be revisited with a view to making it more forward-looking and<br />

vibrant. The new concerns also would have to be included in it. Besides, the existing legal framework in the higher<br />

education sector particularly, the UGC Act and the Acts <strong>of</strong> various State Universities also needed to be made more relevant<br />

and effective in the present context.<br />

8.139 This Report, in fact, had attempted to suggest mechanisms/measures for tackling most <strong>of</strong> the problems and<br />

challenges, if not all, before higher education. The Committee was aware <strong>of</strong> the fact that doing all this would need huge<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> resources. And how to manage that resources, was a million dollar question today. To begin with, till the concerns<br />

relating to private funding were taken care <strong>of</strong>, the major share <strong>of</strong> the required money, the Committee felt, would have to be<br />

primarily provided by the government. As per an estimate, nearly 3400 crores <strong>of</strong> rupees would be required for improving the<br />

infrastructure in the existing universities, filling vacancies <strong>of</strong> the teachers, upgrading the libraries and laboratories, providing<br />

broadband connectivity as also for opening more universities in the coming years. The State universities and colleges also<br />

needed to be supported in a big way with a view to bring them at a particular standard. The Committee, therefore, was <strong>of</strong> the<br />

opinion that efforts should be made for mobilizing this amount for the higher education by the government, both Centre and<br />

State. This may certainly not be impossible to arrange the required resources, if the Planning Commission, Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Finance, Department <strong>of</strong> Secondary and Higher Education sat together and applied their mind on this issue. This investment<br />

should not be a big price for the benefits that would accrue to the country. Socio-economic benefits <strong>of</strong> higher education are<br />

immense and radiate to various areas <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

(b) 173 rd Report<br />

Budgetary Allocation<br />

8.140 The trend <strong>of</strong> expenditure during the first four years <strong>of</strong> the Tenth Plan clearly indicated that the Department had<br />

been successful in optimum utilization <strong>of</strong> funds allocated in the elementary education sector, quantum increase in the<br />

allocation notwithstanding. However, the Committee was constrained to observe that the position with the entire Adult<br />

Education sector was different. The Department had not been able to sustain the level <strong>of</strong> expenditure, particularly during the<br />

last two years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, inspite <strong>of</strong> there being only a marginal increase. In fact, it would not be wrong to say<br />

that Adult Education sector appeared to be the worst affected during 2004-05. Less than 50% <strong>of</strong> the total outlay (Rs. 261.00<br />

crore) for Adult Education had been spent upto December, 2005. During the first three quarters <strong>of</strong> the year upto December,


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 44 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

2005, expenditure reported is Rs. 115.66 crore. The Committee was surprised to note that within a span <strong>of</strong> about one and a<br />

half month i.e. upto 17.2.2006, utilisation figures were Rs. 211.78 crore. The Committee could only conclude that different<br />

programmes <strong>of</strong> Adult Education were not being implemented as per the prescribed norms. One example would be sufficient<br />

to confirm the view. Under the scheme <strong>of</strong> `Literacy Campaigns and Operation Restoration’ expenditure reported upto<br />

December, 2005 was nil. However, by 17 th February, 2006 implementing agencies could manage to incur an expenditure <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs. 30.00 crore.<br />

8.141 Twin problems <strong>of</strong> pending utilization certificates and unspent balances available with the implementing agencies<br />

continued to persist. The Committee had been observing that increase in the allocated funds had indirectly contributed in<br />

aggravating these two problem areas. The Committee had been given to understand that due to sustained efforts made by the<br />

Department, level <strong>of</strong> pending Utilization Certificates has been somewhat restricted. The Department had succeeded in<br />

extracting 471 UCs during the period from 1 st April to 31 st December, 2005. An amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3461.78 crores was still<br />

blocked as outstanding Utilization Certificates in respect <strong>of</strong> Grants/Loan released upto 31 st March, 2004. However, no<br />

information had been provided by the Department about the amount parked as outstanding UCs for the year 2004-05 which<br />

must have increased further by the end <strong>of</strong> 2005-06. The Committee found this situation to be very alarming and strongly felt<br />

that urgent steps need to be taken to eliminate the pending UCs. At the same time, the Department should also take up with<br />

the concerned State Governments, the problems, if any being faced by them in timely submission <strong>of</strong> UCs.<br />

8.142 The Committee noted that the total unspent balances with implementing agencies under different schemes as on<br />

1.4.05 was Rs. 1,680.96 crore which increased to the tune <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3,3<strong>10</strong>.29 crore within a span <strong>of</strong> six months, i.e., on<br />

30.9.2005. What was more worrisome was that these unspent balances were available with implementing agencies other<br />

than State Governments/UTs, mainly in the voluntary sector. The Committee wondered about the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the monitoring<br />

mechanism, which was supposed to be activated right from the level <strong>of</strong> Centre to district/panchayat level. The Committee<br />

was <strong>of</strong> the firm opinion that remedial measures needed to be initiated without any further delay. The Committee also liked<br />

to be apprised about the latest details <strong>of</strong> Utilization Certificates and unspent balances scheme-wise and State wise.<br />

Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan<br />

8.143 The Committee had been given to understand that provision <strong>of</strong> State share by States had improved over the years.<br />

Presently, only Kerala (Rs. 21.67 crores), Manipur (Rs.2.07 crores) and Sikkim (Rs. 3.89 crore) had outstanding State share<br />

for 2004-05. The Committee liked to be apprised about the status <strong>of</strong> State share during 2005-06. The Committee also liked<br />

to be informed about the final decision <strong>of</strong> the Government in respect <strong>of</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> some relief to NE States and Sikkim in<br />

the percentage <strong>of</strong> their contribution to SSA.<br />

8.144 The above details clearly indicated that the ground realities were varying from State to State about the actual status<br />

<strong>of</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> SSA. The Committee was compelled to claim that unspent balances would be available in respect <strong>of</strong> other<br />

States/UTs also. If that be so, the Committee could only conclude that States/UTs had simply not succeeded in sustaining the<br />

expenditure level. The Committee could only hope that with the accounting procedure being streamlined and monitoring<br />

mechanism fully activated, status <strong>of</strong> fund utilization under SSA would improve.<br />

8.145 The Committee noted that the Mid-Term Appraisal <strong>of</strong> the Tenth Plan by the Planning Commission indicated that<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the major States like U.P., Punjab, West Bengal, Orissa, Bihar and Jharkhand were experiencing a problem <strong>of</strong><br />

resource absorption under SSA. The Department had informed that due to concerted efforts by State Governments and<br />

intensive monitoring and capacity building initiatives <strong>of</strong> the Central Government, the position <strong>of</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> funds had<br />

improved and fund utilization upto December, 2005 by UP was 74%, Punjab was 55%, West Bengal was 65%, Orissa was<br />

57 % and Jharkhand was 74%. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that fund utilization by the Punjab, West Bengal and<br />

Orissa was still unsatisfactory. To this list State like Maharashtra may also be added which had utilized the funds to the tune<br />

<strong>of</strong> 50% only upto December, 2005. The Committee expressed its reservation against slow pace <strong>of</strong> implementation and<br />

utilization <strong>of</strong> funds. The Committee liked the Department to ensure timely utilization <strong>of</strong> funds at least by the third fiscal<br />

quarter and restrain itself from last minute rush in the utilization <strong>of</strong> funds that resulted in poor infrastructure and quality. The<br />

Committee hoped that the Department would take all possible steps to ensure allotment <strong>of</strong> land for schools in J&K, Nagaland<br />

and Andaman and Nicobar Islands and utilization <strong>of</strong> sanctioned amount for civil construction in these States by July during<br />

the year as promised by the Secretary before the Committee.<br />

8.146 The Committee noted that utilization <strong>of</strong> funds under SSA was not commensurately reflected in the achievements<br />

made in respect <strong>of</strong> physical targets. The Committee failed to understand as to why the physical targets like construction <strong>of</strong><br />

school buildings, additional classrooms, drinking water facilities, toilets, etc. were not completed despite one-third (34.21%)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the total outlay being assigned for civil works. In fact, a Work Bank- Harvard University study had found poor<br />

infrastructure to be one <strong>of</strong> the factors behind teacher absenteeism. The Committee felt that this may also be a factor for<br />

student drop-out.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 45 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.147 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view that alongwith the Central assistance being released, progress <strong>of</strong> achievement<br />

level <strong>of</strong> physical targets had to be vigorously pursued with special focus on States/UTs lagging behind. Both inherent<br />

drawbacks in the Scheme itself and lack <strong>of</strong> initiative on the part <strong>of</strong> implementing agencies had to be attended to at the highest<br />

level, if need was felt. Only then, it could be claimed that SSA had started achieving its goal <strong>of</strong> reaching to the neediest.<br />

The Committee understood that the targets for the year 2006-07 were being decided and would be finalized by the month <strong>of</strong><br />

May, 2006 through the process <strong>of</strong> approval <strong>of</strong> Annual Work Plans <strong>of</strong> States/UTs by the Project Approval Board <strong>of</strong> SSA.<br />

The Committee felt that this exercise needed to be completed in the last quarter <strong>of</strong> previous year so that work starts from the<br />

first quarter <strong>of</strong> the next year itself.<br />

8.148 The Committee was informed that due to delay in finalization <strong>of</strong> tender for free textbooks by the State Government,<br />

eligible students <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand were deprived <strong>of</strong> free textbooks. The Committee hoped that before the start <strong>of</strong> the next<br />

academic session, free textbooks would be available for the students. The Committee also recommended that the Department<br />

should pursue the fulfillment <strong>of</strong> this target with the concerned State Governments.<br />

8.149 The Committee had been informed that there had been a decline in the number <strong>of</strong> out-<strong>of</strong>-school children since 2001<br />

when Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan was launched. The Committee noted that all India sample survey <strong>of</strong> out <strong>of</strong> school children<br />

commissioned by the Ministry were conducted by the Social and Rural Research Institute in all the States and UTs during<br />

July to October, 2005. As per the survey, 8.09% children were out <strong>of</strong> school in the country. The Committee noted that the<br />

survey besides the normal children, had also assessed the disabled children. As per findings, 38.92% disabled children did<br />

not go to school. The Committee strongly felt that time had come when a serious attempt was made to bring the disabled<br />

children also in the mainstream. The Committee recommended that all inclusive education for disabled and differently abled<br />

children should become a focused component under SSA.<br />

8.150 The fact that more than a crore (1,34,59,734) children in the age-group <strong>of</strong> 6-14 years were still reeling under the<br />

stigma <strong>of</strong> illiteracy was an area <strong>of</strong> great concern and the Department needed to brace itself to cover these left-outs. The<br />

Committee found that Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Jharkhand were still to go a long<br />

way to bring every child in school. The Committee recommended that the Department take up the matter with these States<br />

urgently and make special arrangements for education with them. In fact, the Committee desired that this special<br />

arrangement be made for all the twelve States where percentage <strong>of</strong> out <strong>of</strong> school children was more than the national level.<br />

8.151 The Committee noted that the Department had targeted 48 districts with highest number <strong>of</strong> out <strong>of</strong> school children<br />

with specific interventions for the year 2006-07. The Committee appreciated this proposal <strong>of</strong> the Department and at the same<br />

time desired that the Department must come out with innovative techniques to ensure that once a child is enrolled, he does<br />

not drop out. The Department needed to take stock <strong>of</strong> the situation because it had been noticed by the Committee that though<br />

enrolment ratio in schools was quite impressive, drop-out rates were equally discouraging. Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal<br />

Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Manipur, Meghalaya, Rajasthan, Sikkim and Tripura had higher drop-out rates (class 1-V) when<br />

compared with the All India average <strong>of</strong> 31.47 %. The Committee strongly felt that effective and urgent action had to be<br />

initiated to reduce the drop-out rates.<br />

8.152 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that States having the maximum number <strong>of</strong> out <strong>of</strong> school children and also having<br />

a higher drop out rate needed to be focussed more. The Committee noted that though the Mid-Day Meal was one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

major attraction for children and it had to some extent even increased the enrolment in the schools. But the SSA needed<br />

more interventions such as inclusion <strong>of</strong> sports as an integral part <strong>of</strong> the syllabus, so as to maintain the interest <strong>of</strong> children.<br />

That would not only make school attractive but also prepare the children psychologically as well as physically strong to feel<br />

motivated to go to schools. Another intervention, according to the Committee, should be to make anti-child labour campaign<br />

an integral part <strong>of</strong> SSA. The Committee felt that social mobilization programme to check child labour could help in<br />

withdrawing the children engaged as labourers to alternate sources <strong>of</strong> education. The INDUS project was a welcome step in<br />

this direction and the Committee appreciated the Department’s association with the project. The Committee opined that<br />

eradication <strong>of</strong> child labour should become one <strong>of</strong> the prominent objectives <strong>of</strong> SSA so as to ensure inclination <strong>of</strong> the society<br />

towards educational needs <strong>of</strong> the children. A step in this direction could be to work in coordination with the Ministries <strong>of</strong><br />

Labour and Social Justice and Empowerment.<br />

8.153 As per the national survey on “Learning Achievement <strong>of</strong> Students at the end <strong>of</strong> Class V” conducted by the NCERT<br />

in 2002, whose report showed that the mean achievement <strong>of</strong> students in Language, Mathematics and EVS at the national<br />

level was 58.57%, 46.51% and 50.30% respectively. The Committee found this mean achievement to be a cause <strong>of</strong> concern<br />

and felt that the Department needs to take care that the quality aspect should not be sacrificed in the race for achieving<br />

targets.<br />

8.154 The Committee observed that under SSA there were already a number <strong>of</strong> components which took care <strong>of</strong>


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 46 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

infrastructure to be in place at schools and also required number <strong>of</strong> teachers. The Committee would, however, like to point<br />

out lack <strong>of</strong> qualified teachers and also their low motivation level failed to attract and retain students. In service training at<br />

regular intervals could successfully fill this gap. More emphasis was required to be made on the training component under<br />

SSA. The Committee understood that the Department with the help <strong>of</strong> NCERT had recently operationalised a quarterly<br />

quality monitoring system. The Committee felt that with all these measures, things would improve. Perhaps what was<br />

required then has an element <strong>of</strong> accountability and sense <strong>of</strong> involvement by all concerned.<br />

8.155 Teachers at primary and upper primary level under SSA are supposed to possess NCERT prescribed<br />

qualifications. However, ground realities seem to be quite different. The Committee had been observing that in order to<br />

meet the increasing demand <strong>of</strong> teachers, they were being recruited on temporary basis. In some States, such teachers had<br />

gone to Courts. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm opinion that alongwith the fulfillment <strong>of</strong> targets, quality aspect also needed<br />

to be given its due importance. The Committee did not share the Department’s explanation that a two-month in-service<br />

training was sufficient to enable these para-teachers qualified enough to undertake the task <strong>of</strong> teaching. The Committee<br />

recommended that the Department take initiatives to stop this type <strong>of</strong> ad-hocism. The Committee opined that in the event <strong>of</strong><br />

unavoidable appointment <strong>of</strong> para-teachers it should be ensured that they are qualified to be appointed as teachers. The<br />

Committee recommended that such teachers may be given better emoluments. It would not be out <strong>of</strong> context to point out that<br />

since Education is on Concurrent List, the Centre can prevail upon the States in the larger interest <strong>of</strong> education and the<br />

society.<br />

National Programme <strong>of</strong> Nutritional Support to Primary Education (Mid-Day Meal Scheme)<br />

8.156 The Committee welcomed the enhancement in cooking cost as that would bring an improvement in the variety and<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> the food served. However, the Committee had its doubts about the matching contribution required from the<br />

States/UTs. The Committee desired that the Department should prevail upon all the States/UTs to give their share towards<br />

cooking cost. Further, the Committee was a little worried about the impact this little enhancement would have on the variety<br />

and quality <strong>of</strong> the meal served. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that even the increased Central assistance towards<br />

cooking cost was not adequate. The Committee understood that there are other Ministries/Departments that were<br />

implementing other schemes for providing nutritious food to our children. The Committee recommended that convergence<br />

and close coordination may be brought among these schemes so as to have the best results.<br />

8.157 The Committee however, was apprehensive <strong>of</strong> the quality, variety and hygiene <strong>of</strong> the food served under the<br />

scheme in view <strong>of</strong> the fact that there were many reported and unreported cases <strong>of</strong> children falling ill after taking their midday<br />

meal. Such incidents took away the spirit out <strong>of</strong> the scheme. On a specific query about cases <strong>of</strong> irregularity notice in<br />

MDM scheme, the Department had given details <strong>of</strong> instances which had taken place in some States during 2005-06. All<br />

these cases indicated diversion misuse <strong>of</strong> foodgrains by those very authorities which were responsible for implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

the scheme. The Committee liked to have full details <strong>of</strong> all these cases alongwith the follow up action taken thereon. The<br />

Committee wondered, that inspite <strong>of</strong> such well-planned monitoring mechanism, how such instances could have taken place.<br />

The Committee could only conclude that monitoring and surprise inspections needed to be done vigorously. The<br />

Department needed to be more proactive instead <strong>of</strong> acting only after receipt <strong>of</strong> complaints.<br />

8.158 Committee’s attention had been drawn by a survey conducted by the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Nutrition, Hyderabad<br />

which had pointed out that the growth <strong>of</strong> 50% children was adversely affected due to poor level <strong>of</strong> nutrition in the MDM<br />

served in the country. The Committee recommended that the Department take earnest measure to provide wholesome meal.<br />

For the purpose, the Committee felt that good quality cereal be released from the FCI godowns and this should be<br />

supplemented by fruits and vitamin and iron tablets.<br />

8.159 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the community participation was not very effective or else the meal served<br />

under scheme would not have suffered in quality, variety and hygiene or there would have been no misappropriation. There<br />

was also a feeling in the Committee that education had taken a backseat in schools serving mid-day meal. The Committee<br />

had been given to understand that the involvement <strong>of</strong> teachers in preparation and distribution <strong>of</strong> meal had adversely affected<br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> education. The guidelines clearly specify that a teacher’s main responsibility is to teach and not engage<br />

themselves in cooking process. In fact there is a provision for engaging workers for the cooking <strong>of</strong> meals. The Committee<br />

regretted that the remuneration to these workers were not only low but also varied from place to place. Even this meager<br />

amount was not given regularly. The Committee therefore, recommended upward revision <strong>of</strong> wages/remuneration for those<br />

who were cooking food and also to ensure uniform rate. Strict monitoring <strong>of</strong> the guidelines was the need <strong>of</strong> hour.<br />

8.160 It had been noted that attendance in the schools drops drastically during post-lunch session. This, the Committee,<br />

felt was a big challenge to the entire objective <strong>of</strong> the programme and no intervention except vibrant community participation<br />

could check this malice. The Committee strongly urged the Department to take the matter with States which could actually<br />

ensure community participation through Panchayat in true sense. At the same time, the Department was advised to carry out


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 47 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

a scientific assessment <strong>of</strong> community participation in the Mid-Day Meal Scheme.<br />

Strengthening <strong>of</strong> Teachers Education<br />

8.161 This situation, the Committee felt, was more worrisome because the DIETs had also been assigned the role <strong>of</strong><br />

monitoring the implementation <strong>of</strong> the MDM scheme. The fact that many districts in poorly performing States still did not<br />

have DIET would have an adverse impact on the monitoring activity in the district. The Committee noted that in many<br />

DIETs, vacancies were there which affect various training programme. The Committee liked to draw the attention <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Department to the observation <strong>of</strong> Planning Commission made in the Mid Term Appraisal <strong>of</strong> Tenth Plan. “The institutional<br />

support organizations for teacher education and development <strong>of</strong> curriculums are closely linked with the learning<br />

achievements <strong>of</strong> children and performance <strong>of</strong> teachers. Teachers vacancies at all levels should be filled up urgently and there<br />

should be advance planning for future requirement too.”<br />

8.162 The very fact that the vacancy position <strong>of</strong> DIETs was now being reviewed in national meeting <strong>of</strong> Education<br />

Secretaries and meetings <strong>of</strong> Teacher Education Approval Board indicated that the position was quite grim. The Committee<br />

was disturbed to note that expeditious releases <strong>of</strong> Central assistance towards salaries was being ensured through regular<br />

meetings <strong>of</strong> TEAB. The Committee liked to have full details about existing vacancies in DIETs, since when and number <strong>of</strong><br />

vacancies filled during 2005-06 (State-wise). The Committee hoped that all remedial measures were being taken by the<br />

Centre so that the DIETs could become functional in the real sense for carrying out their assigned task.<br />

8.163 NCTE was also the statutory body for recognition <strong>of</strong> institutions for conducting various teacher education<br />

programmes. In pursuance <strong>of</strong> this mandate, as on January, 2006, 5854 teacher education institutions <strong>of</strong>fering 6647 courses<br />

had been recognized by the council with an approved intake <strong>of</strong> about 5.22 lakh teacher trainees. The Committee liked to<br />

have full details <strong>of</strong> institutions State-wise, recognized during the last two years by the Council.<br />

8.164 The Committee understood that the Planning Commission had suggested that the Teacher Education Programme<br />

should be merged with SSA in the Eleventh Plan. The Committee observed that to maintain the quality <strong>of</strong> education under<br />

SSA, training <strong>of</strong> teachers needed to be given due focus which had been hitherto lacking. The Committee hoped that 2006-07<br />

being the last year <strong>of</strong> the Tenth Plan, the Department would have taken a decision by now.<br />

District Primary Education Programme (DPEP)<br />

8.165 The Committee took note <strong>of</strong> the targets and achievements made under DPEP till the year<br />

2005-06. The Committee noted that as per the table given above, the achievements <strong>of</strong> the Department as such was not very<br />

impressive, especially as regards free text book distribution, in service training <strong>of</strong> teachers, drinking water facility. The<br />

Committee recommended the Department to undertake sincere steps to achieve the targets fixed under DPEP.<br />

8.166 The Committee was further at a loss to find out the level <strong>of</strong> achievements against the various targets fixed for 2005-<br />

06, particularly in respect <strong>of</strong> Bihar, Jharkhand, UP and Uttaranchal whose project period was completed on 31.3.2006. The<br />

Committee was not happy with the attempt <strong>of</strong> the Department to give data on targets and achievements in cumulative format<br />

as that prevented the Committee from drawing conclusive inference. The Committee recommended the Department to give<br />

data on targets and achievement on yearly basis.<br />

8.167 The Committee was dismayed to note that the four States viz., Bihar, Jharkhand, U.P. and Uttaranchal where the<br />

external assistance was going to close on 31 st March, 2006 had not made any significant stride towards the goal <strong>of</strong><br />

universalization <strong>of</strong> primary education. As regard total number <strong>of</strong> children admitted in a AIE centres, the cumulative<br />

achievement upto 2005-06 was little more than 50 per cent in Bihar and less than 50 per cent in Uttaranchal. Again, the total<br />

cumulative achievement upto 2005-06 for construction <strong>of</strong> toilets was a poor 30 per cent in Bihar. Similarly, as regards<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> additional classrooms, Bihar had 2016 class rooms as against a cumulative target <strong>of</strong> 2297 classrooms<br />

Uttaranchal had 866 classrooms against a target <strong>of</strong> 1219 classrooms. The Committee desired that the Department submit a<br />

status paper within one month <strong>of</strong> the presentation <strong>of</strong> the Report as to why there had been no achievement <strong>of</strong> the targets fixed<br />

for the above-mentioned States under DPEP despite massive funding and its complete utilization. One <strong>of</strong> the major<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> DPEP was to reduce drop out rate to less than <strong>10</strong> per cent. The Committee was interested to have an idea about<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> achievement (district-wise) in the four states where project period had ended on 31.3.2006.<br />

Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya (KGVB) Scheme


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 48 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.168 The Committee observed that the scheme had not taken <strong>of</strong>f as yet. Fund utilization position seemed to be<br />

satisfactory in the first year <strong>of</strong> the scheme i.e. 2004-05. However, in the very next year, against a provision <strong>of</strong> Rs. 225.00<br />

crore, utilization status stood at Rs. 27.93 crore as on 17.2.06. Committee’s apprehension was further confirmed by the fact<br />

that as on 1.4.2005, unspent balances <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs. 92.00 crore were available with different states which increased to Rs. <strong>10</strong>3.29 crore within a period <strong>of</strong> six months. The<br />

Committee viewed this development with serious concern and felt that position as on today instead <strong>of</strong> showing any<br />

improvement must have deteriorated further.<br />

8.169 The Committee observed that the functional status <strong>of</strong> KGBV school as on 31 st December, 2005, revealed that out<br />

<strong>of</strong> 722 sanctioned schools, 649 had become functional. Bihar and J & K were the two major defaulter states having only 29<br />

and 1 school functional out <strong>of</strong> 62 and 14 sanctioned respectively. The Committee was further constrained to note that in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> Arunachal Pradesh, Tripura and Uttaranchal, inspite <strong>of</strong> school becoming operational, status <strong>of</strong> land availability was<br />

not known. Details regarding construction agencies revealed that it could be long before construction would start and schools<br />

would be having their own building.<br />

8.170 The Committee urged the Department to take up this matter with State Governments on priority basis and ensure<br />

the process <strong>of</strong> land availability and completion <strong>of</strong> preliminary exercise for construction work expedited. Otherwise, there was<br />

a looming danger <strong>of</strong> this scheme getting stuck causing undue delay in delivering the noble aims the scheme stands for.<br />

Mahila Samkhya<br />

8.171 The Committee was dismayed to note that the Department could not even spend the reduced allocation as its total<br />

expenditure which had been a mere Rs.19.00 crore. The Committee was more astonished to see that despite non-utilization,<br />

the States getting the grants had more or less achieved the targets fixed, in some cases, the targets had been surpassed over<br />

and above the limit. The Committee failed to understand this phenomenon and desired to be enlightened.<br />

8.172 The Committee had been informed that Rs.30.00 crores had been projected as BE for 2006-07 since the MS<br />

programme was set to expand to two new States <strong>of</strong> MP and Chhatisgarh as well as to 20 additional districts in the existing<br />

States. Apart from that funding for Bihar and Jharkhand would also be made from the MS Budget in 2006-07, which was<br />

earlier being made from DPEP funds. This projected BE in the Department’s opinion would be sufficient to cater to the needs<br />

<strong>of</strong> existing programme as well as the proposed new districts under the MS programme. The Committee felt that the present<br />

allocation was not sufficient to run the scheme efficaciously. It recommended that the Department ensure that the scheme<br />

did not get affected for want <strong>of</strong> funds.<br />

Continuing Education for Neo-literates<br />

8.173 The Committee noted that Plan allocation for Continuing Education for Neo-literates was reduced from Rs.165.92<br />

crore in BE 2005-2006 to Rs. 149.12 crore in RE 2005-2006. The Department had informed that this was done in view <strong>of</strong><br />

the priority given to covering the illiterates in 150 low literacy districts. For this purpose, an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 15 crore was reappropriated<br />

from the Scheme <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education for Neo-literates to the Scheme <strong>of</strong> Literacy Campaigns and Operation<br />

Restoration for taking up Special Literacy Drive in those districts. The Committee disapproved the reappropriation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 15<br />

crore from the Plan allocation for Continuing Education Scheme. The Committee felt that given the fact that the annual<br />

expenditure per district under this scheme is Rs.2.50 crore and in view <strong>of</strong> nearly 300 districts covered under this scheme in<br />

2005-06, the BE itself could be considered less than required. Re-appropriation from this lesser amount could not be<br />

commended. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the Department should have made separate provision for the special<br />

Literacy Drive.<br />

8.174 Looking into the grants released under the scheme <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education for Neo-literates during the last three<br />

years, the Committee noted that Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharasthra, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh etc. have higher<br />

allocation in 2004-05 in comparison to 2003-04, while other States have reduced allocation for the same period. The<br />

Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that an effective implementation <strong>of</strong> the scheme should have resulted in lesser requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

funds than previous year. But the argument was that effective implementation meant larger people in the ambit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

scheme and consequent increased funding, then, States like Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Mizoram, West Bengal seemed to be<br />

poorly performing States. Whatever was the position, the Department needed to look into the performance <strong>of</strong> the Scheme<br />

sincerely and do the needful to make the scheme efficacious.<br />

8.175 The Committee also noted with concern that Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Jammu & Kashmir, Punjab, A & N Island,<br />

etc. had not been released any fund from 2002-03 to 2004-05. Also, States like Bihar, Delhi, Himachal, Jharkand, Nagaland,<br />

Orissa, Sikkim had been provided grants only once during 2002-2003 to 2004-2005. The Committee was unhappy with such


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 49 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

a pattern <strong>of</strong> funding. It recommended the Department to take urgent steps to ensure proper implementation <strong>of</strong> the scheme.<br />

Literacy Campaigns & Operation Restoration<br />

Special Literacy Drive in 150 districts<br />

8.176 The Committee learnt that the Council <strong>of</strong> the NLMA in its meeting held in April, 2005 decided to launch a special<br />

literacy drive in 150 low literacy districts <strong>of</strong> the country. All the concerned districts were requested to submit their proposals<br />

for consideration and approval <strong>of</strong> NLMA. The Project Approval Committee (PAC) <strong>of</strong> the NLMA in its meeting held in<br />

August-September, 2005 approved the proposals <strong>of</strong> 46 districts in the States <strong>of</strong> Bihar (23), Rajasthan (11) and Jharkhand<br />

(12). The proposals <strong>of</strong> 4 districts <strong>of</strong> Karnataka were approved by the PAC in its meeting held in October 2005. These<br />

proposals were under process and would be sanctioned on settlement <strong>of</strong> the accounts <strong>of</strong> earlier programme and receipt to the<br />

commitment form the State Government concerned.<br />

Projects for Residual Illiteracy (PRI)<br />

8.177 The Committee noted that the Literacy Campaigns and Operation Restoration saw an increase in allocation from<br />

Rs. 22.50 crores in BE 2005-06 to Rs. 37.50 crores in RE 2005-06. As regards the reasons for the increase, the Department<br />

informed that the main reason for increase in the allocation for the Scheme <strong>of</strong> Literacy Campaigns & Operation Restoration<br />

is to provide financial assistance for launching <strong>of</strong> Special Literacy Drive in 150 low literacy districts <strong>of</strong> the country. Based<br />

on the proposals received so far, Special Literacy Drive had been approved in 23 districts <strong>of</strong> Bihar, 23 districts <strong>of</strong> Uttar<br />

Pradesh, 11 districts <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan, 12 districts <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand, 4 districts <strong>of</strong> Karnataka and 1 district <strong>of</strong> Punjab. So far, an<br />

expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs. 27.85 crores had been incurred under this scheme. The Committee expressed its unhappiness over the<br />

non-utilization <strong>of</strong> the funds under the scheme. The Committee noted that there was an increase <strong>of</strong> Rs. 15.00 crores at the RE<br />

stage in 2005-06 mainly for the Special Literacy Drive in 150 low literacy districts, however, the Project Approval<br />

Committee (PAC) <strong>of</strong> NLMA had approved the proposals <strong>of</strong> only 74 districts. The Committee found this situation worrisome<br />

and recommended that Special Drive be conducted as a special measure. The unspent balance indicated the apathy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Department towards the scheme in general and special drive in particular. The Committee desired the Department eradicated<br />

illiteracy in an effective manner and did not sink the drive in the whirlpool <strong>of</strong> rules and regulations. The Committee<br />

recommended the Department to simplify and rationalize the rules and be accommodative to the genuine constraints <strong>of</strong> states<br />

and expedite the process to cover all the 150 districts.<br />

8.178 As regards the allocation for 2006-07, the Committee noted that a BE provision <strong>of</strong> Rs.30.00 crores had been made<br />

for the Scheme which included a provision <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3.00 crores for NER, as against the projected requirement <strong>of</strong> Rs. 45.00<br />

crores. The Department had informed that the position would be reviewed at the Revised Estimates stage depending upon the<br />

proposals received from State governments for augmentation <strong>of</strong> funds, if needed. The Committee recommended the<br />

Department to ensure required fund for the proper implementation <strong>of</strong> the scheme and see to it that there was no unspent<br />

balances under the scheme.<br />

Support to Non-Governmental Organisations<br />

8.179 The Committee noted that the Plan allocation under the scheme <strong>of</strong> Support to NGOs in the field <strong>of</strong> Adult Education<br />

in BE 2005-2006 was 25.00 crores, but only Rs. 19.<strong>10</strong> crore was released finally on account <strong>of</strong> non-receipt <strong>of</strong> viable<br />

proposal from NGOs. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that in case <strong>of</strong> non-receipt <strong>of</strong> viable proposals, the Department should<br />

utilize the funds through Zilla Saksharta Samitis. The Committee was, however, dismayed to note that even out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reduced allocation, the Department has managed to spend only 11.<strong>10</strong> crores till 17 th February, 2006. The Committee<br />

strongly recommended that the Department should ensure timely utilization <strong>of</strong> the funds and prevent last minute rush. The<br />

Committee also noted that the allocation under the scheme in BE 2006-07 was Rs. 7.00 crores. As regard the cut in the BE<br />

2006-07, it was stated that the outlay projected for 2006-07 was Rs. 25.00 crores, against which an allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 7.00<br />

crores only had been provided. The adult neo-literates were mostly covered under Continuing Education Programme<br />

implemented by the Zilla Saksharata Samities. The Committee endorsed this reduction and was also <strong>of</strong> the considered<br />

opinion that the allocation should completely utilized.<br />

Jan Shikshan Sansthan<br />

8.180 The Committee was disappointed to see that there was reduction in the number <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries in 2004-05 by<br />

nearly 3 lakh from its previous year, 2003-2004. The Committee took this reduction very seriously, more so, in face <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fact that allocations and expenditure under JSS had increased during the said period.<br />

8.181 The Committee, however, drew attention <strong>of</strong> the Department to very strong observation made by the


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 50 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Planning Commission in its mid-term review <strong>of</strong> the Xth Plan. It had observed that only 16 JSS out <strong>of</strong> 80 could be rated very<br />

good. This was sufficient to indicate that monitoring work <strong>of</strong> JSS in particular and that <strong>of</strong> NGOs in general was not<br />

being carried out properly. The Committee recommended that the Department put in sincere efforts to see that the<br />

NGOs deliver all for which they were funded and no laxity on their part be tolerated.<br />

(c) 174 th Report<br />

Budgetary Allocation<br />

8.182 Committee’s attention had been drawn by a disturbing trend gradually taking roots along with the increase in<br />

allocation and utilisation <strong>of</strong> funds. The Committee observed that as on 1.4.2004 there were as many as 4652 pending<br />

Utilisation Certificates for an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 55<strong>10</strong>.85 crores. While appreciating the persistent efforts made by the<br />

Department in getting reduced the pending UCs to 2903 amounting to Rs.535.62 crore, the very fact that there were pending<br />

UCs highlighted the inadequacies <strong>of</strong> the accounting procedure as well as incapacity <strong>of</strong> the implementing agencies. Another<br />

comparatively more serious fall-out being noticed was increasing unspent balances lying with various Grantee institutions.<br />

The Committee was constrained to observe that there were unspent balances <strong>of</strong> Rs. 505.53 crore as on 1.4.2005 which<br />

reached the figure <strong>of</strong> Rs. 928.86 crore within a short span <strong>of</strong> 6 months. The Committee could not but conclude that this<br />

figure must have increased further by the closing <strong>of</strong> 20.5.06. What was more worrisome was that major portion <strong>of</strong> these<br />

unspent balance was from Plan funds that too with other implementing agencies (NGOs)/autonomous bodies. The<br />

Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view that along with the projection for enhanced funds, the Department needed to take every<br />

precaution not to allow such a tendency <strong>of</strong> unspent balances which was against all the financial norms.<br />

Universalisation <strong>of</strong> Secondary Eduction<br />

8.183 Allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs.<strong>10</strong>67.00 crore for secondary education sector in 2006-07 was on enhanced level when compared<br />

with the allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs.787.51 crore during 2005-06. However, this was much below the requirement for secondary<br />

education projected by the CABE Committee. Massive funding was being made for universalisation <strong>of</strong> elementary education<br />

by implementing SSA in a mission mode. The Committee felt that universalisation <strong>of</strong> secondary education was an<br />

achievable target in the near future if the government <strong>of</strong> the day had the will power to do it. The Committee, therefore,<br />

recommended that the entire planning should concentrate to achieve the Universalisation <strong>of</strong> Elementary and Secondary<br />

Education simultaneously.<br />

8.184 The Committee desired that the Department reoriented its planning and evolved a time bound strategy with strong<br />

infrastructure back up to ensure that the students passing out <strong>of</strong> the SSA continued their education in secondary level lest the<br />

entire money spent on SSA would be a national waste. Quality oriented approach towards Universalisation <strong>of</strong> Secondary<br />

Education could help in producing skilled human resources which would become a national asset.<br />

8.185 The Committee endorsed the suggestion <strong>of</strong> the CABE Committee that we should not wait till 20<strong>10</strong> to implement<br />

the universalisation <strong>of</strong> secondary education. The Department should seize the opportunities and gear up all the<br />

administrative machinery including that <strong>of</strong> the State Governments to ensure that universalisation <strong>of</strong> secondary education<br />

becomes a reality from the next financial year<br />

(2007-08).<br />

National Council <strong>of</strong> Educational Research and Training (NCERT)<br />

8.186 The Committee had been observing the very slow progress being made in the construction <strong>of</strong> building for<br />

PSSCIVE, Bhopal and NERIE, Shillong. Proposal for construction <strong>of</strong> building <strong>of</strong> PSSCIVE, Bhopal was approved at an<br />

estimated cost <strong>of</strong> Rs. 18.54 crore on 13.<strong>10</strong>.2004. However, in spite <strong>of</strong> release <strong>of</strong> initial instalment <strong>of</strong> Rs.6.82 crore to<br />

CPWD for starting the construction in 2004-05, not much progress seemed to have been made thereafter. It took almost a<br />

year to decide the rate <strong>of</strong> consultancy fee to be paid to the School <strong>of</strong> Planning and Architecture. As per the latest<br />

information, complete architectural and structural design and detailed estimate were to be made available by SPA by the first<br />

week <strong>of</strong> March, 2006. With regard to NERIE, Shillong to be constructed at an estimated cost <strong>of</strong> Rs. 15.62 crores, approval<br />

for which was given by SFC on 29.4.2005, preliminary exercise for structural designs were under preparation by SPA. The<br />

progress so far made clearly indicated that buildings for both the institutes would not be ready by the end <strong>of</strong> Tenth Plan.<br />

The Committee was not very happy with the handling <strong>of</strong> these two prestigious projects. It would be appropriate if NCERT<br />

played a more pro-active role and got the building constructed within a prescribed time schedule at the earliest.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 51 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.187 The Committee recommended that NCERT should take all possible steps to plug the loopholes in the distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> text books, as they were already aware <strong>of</strong> the weak areas in the distribution <strong>of</strong> text books and ensure that students got text<br />

books on time.<br />

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS)<br />

8.188 The Committee appreciated the initiatives taken by the Government to augment the plan allocations to KVS and<br />

desired that the increased allocation may be utilized in time for the purposes for which it was allocated.<br />

Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (NVS)<br />

8.189 The Committee recommended that new schools may be sanctioned only after assessing the possibility <strong>of</strong> obtaining<br />

the required land. The Committee also recommended that the matter <strong>of</strong> allotment <strong>of</strong> land to 32 schools may be taken up at<br />

the highest level to ensure that land is allocated without any delay. The Committee noted that as many as 28 new schools are<br />

to be set up in 2006-07 and hoped that the target <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> Navodaya Vidyalayas supposed to be complete by March,<br />

2006, must have been achieved. The Committee desired that the Department provide the Committee a status report in this<br />

regard within one month <strong>of</strong> the presentation <strong>of</strong> this Report.<br />

ICT @ Schools<br />

8.190 The Committee observed that it had taken almost three years <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> th Plan in getting the approval <strong>of</strong> CCEA for the<br />

revised ICT in School scheme. As a result funds allocated at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year continued to be reduced in the RE<br />

stage and actual expenditure reported was even less. Although the scheme was launched on 15.12.2004, it was only in the<br />

financial year 2005-06 that first instalment <strong>of</strong> grant-in-aid amounting to Rs. 30.88 crore could be released to 2580 schools in<br />

the country. The Committee hoped that benefit <strong>of</strong> this scheme would be reaching to more schools in view <strong>of</strong> enhanced<br />

allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 67 crore for 2006-07. The Committee felt that information about internet facility installed in schools<br />

covered by the scheme during the year 2005-06 must be now available with the Department. The Committee desired to<br />

have full details, state-wise.<br />

Access and Equity<br />

8.191 The Committee noted that during 2004-05 and 2005-06, NGOs from around 12 States were covered. However, the<br />

Committee noted that the scheme was not spreading to other States though there was underutilization <strong>of</strong> the allocated funds.<br />

In the year 2004-2005, out <strong>of</strong> the 89 NGOs selected for the scheme, 25 each were from the States <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh and<br />

Karnataka. In the year 2005-2006 also, there were 31 NGOs from Andhra Pradesh. Further, there was concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

NGOs in particular districts <strong>of</strong> these two States. The Committee recommended that these facts need to be verified through<br />

appropriate authorities to see that these NGOs were actually existing and the funds were utilized for the purpose it was<br />

allocated. The Committee further recommended that the Department should popularize the scheme and implement it in more<br />

and more states.<br />

8.192 The Committee noted that the Tenth Plan outlay for the Access and Equity scheme was Rs. 305 crore, out <strong>of</strong> which<br />

Rs. 33.80 crore were utilized during the first four years <strong>of</strong> the plan period. This showed that the scheme had fewer takers in<br />

the States. The Committee felt that the other States were not coming forward to utilize the scheme due to the inherent<br />

weakness in the scheme. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the scheme needed to be thoroughly revamped to<br />

ensure its acceptability by other States as well. Further, the Committee desired that the Department look into the efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

the scheme making a cost-benefit analysis and ensure optimal use <strong>of</strong> the scarce resources <strong>of</strong> the nation.<br />

Quality Improvement in Schools (QIS)<br />

8.193 The Committee noted that a conscious decision based on experience in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the above mentioned<br />

existing schemes separately was taken at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the <strong>10</strong> th Plan itself to have a composite scheme. However, it took<br />

almost three years to get the new scheme formally approved. The Committee disapproved such a tardy pace in<br />

implementing a policy decision and hoped that such tendency would not recur. The Committee also wanted to emphasize that<br />

there was a need for having a review <strong>of</strong> all existing small schemes under the secondary education sector and streamlining the<br />

same for attaining optimal benefits.<br />

8.194 The Committee found that while the composite scheme was being formulated, funds were being duly released year<br />

after year with the expenditure level going down. Not only this, the main implementing agency NCERT along with sub<br />

agencies continued to have unspent balances. The Committee failed to understand the logic behind the allocation and wanted<br />

the Department to explain this release <strong>of</strong> funds and the benefits accrued therefrom.<br />

8.195 The Committee was surprised to note that the component <strong>of</strong> ‘Improvement <strong>of</strong> Science Education in Schools’ was


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 52 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

now to be transferred to State Governments and the other four components would remain with NCERT. The Committee<br />

failed to understand the rationale behind the latest move and desired that the Department explain the same.<br />

Introduction <strong>of</strong> Yoga in Schools<br />

8.196 The Committee noted that during the financial year 2004-05, financial assistance to the tune <strong>of</strong> Rs.<strong>10</strong>.77 lakh under<br />

Plan scheme was released for five voluntary organizations and Rs. 65.00 lakh was released to Kaivalyadhama SMYM Samiti,<br />

Lonavala under Non-Plan. The Committee had no information regarding the utilization <strong>of</strong> these funds. The Committee was<br />

also apprehensive about the proper utilization <strong>of</strong> funds under the scheme. This fear <strong>of</strong> the Committee arose from the fact that<br />

Kaivalyadhama SMYM Samiti, Lonavala was also earlier provided with Rs. 65.00 lakh under Non-Plan during the financial<br />

year 2003-04. The Committee found such a pattern <strong>of</strong> financing unwarranted and desired that the Department explain the<br />

position to the Committee.<br />

8.197 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that yoga was one stream <strong>of</strong> education, which would make a permanent and<br />

positive impact on a student’s life. Yoga had been gaining immense popularity due to the short term as well as long-term<br />

benefits that it provided. Yoga helped one to achieve all round development. Considering the immense potential <strong>of</strong> this<br />

ancient knowledge <strong>of</strong> India, the Committee recommended that yoga be made compulsory for all school going children in the<br />

country.<br />

Integrated Education for Disabled Children (IEDC)<br />

8.198 While appreciating the more focused approach <strong>of</strong> the revised scheme, the Committee desired to emphasize the need<br />

for having active coordination between the agencies handling the education <strong>of</strong> disabled children under SSA and secondary<br />

education sector. The Committee noted that as many as 309 NGOs were released varying amount <strong>of</strong> central assistance under<br />

IEDC scheme during 2003-04 and<br />

2004-05. Details about 2005-06 were not available with the Committee. The Committee also observed that Rs. 33.84 crore,<br />

Rs. 38.46 crore and Rs. 36.57 crore were released both to the State Governments and NGOs during 2002-03, 2003-04 and<br />

2004-05. The Committee desired to have a statement on pending utilization certificates under the schemes during the first<br />

three years <strong>of</strong> the <strong>10</strong> th Plan, State-wise. The Committee hoped that drawbacks <strong>of</strong> the earlier scheme would not be there in<br />

the proposed new scheme.<br />

Area Intensive and Madarsa Modernization Programme<br />

8.1<strong>99</strong> The Committee noted that for infrastructure development only U.P and A.P were selected. The Committee failed<br />

to understand as to why other states were not allocated money for the purpose. Similarly, the rationale behind selecting only<br />

seven states for Madrasa Modernization Programme was also not known. Further, the Committee was at a loss in drawing<br />

out conclusions as the actual utilization figures had not been supplied by the Department. The Committee recommended that<br />

the utilization <strong>of</strong> the allocation be closely monitored and the scheme be implemented in all the states. The Committee<br />

desired that the Department furnish an explanatory note on the shortcomings pointed out as above within one month from the<br />

presentation <strong>of</strong> the report.<br />

University Grants Commission<br />

8.200 The Committee was informed that out <strong>of</strong> the total UGC expenditure amounting to Rs. 1943.56 crores for the year<br />

2004-05 an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 460.04 crore was disbursed to the state universities and colleges which constitute 23.67% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total expenditure. The Committee noted that the financial position <strong>of</strong> the state universities was poor so much so that a major<br />

chunk <strong>of</strong> allocated funds went to salary and allowances and maintenance expenditures. There was little left for these<br />

universities to undertake research and quality improvement <strong>of</strong> education. Unfortunately, University Grants Commission was<br />

not maintaining any data regarding the fund allocation by the state Governments to the State Universities which prevents in<br />

getting a clear picture <strong>of</strong> the financial position <strong>of</strong> the State Universities. The Committee recommended that the UGC should<br />

maintain a database <strong>of</strong> the funding pattern <strong>of</strong> the state universities.<br />

8.201 The Committee noted that the Plan allocation for UGC had been substantially stepped up from Rs. 785.40 crore in<br />

2005-06 to 1269.80 crore in 2006-07 representing an increase <strong>of</strong> 61.68%. The Committee hoped that the UGC would be<br />

utilizing the funds optimally helping the state universities grow qualitatively and also promote quality research in<br />

universities.<br />

8.202 The Committee felt that gender studies appeared to be a neglected area in the Higher Education sector. The<br />

women studies centres were still not existing in a number <strong>of</strong> universities. Given the increased role and contribution <strong>of</strong> women<br />

in every sphere <strong>of</strong> life, Government needed not only to popularize these centres but also advocate opening <strong>of</strong> such centres in<br />

all universities. This gesture should begin with the Central universities. Necessary funding for that purpose should be<br />

arranged. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the University Grant Commission should give more thrust to the<br />

development and progress <strong>of</strong> the Women Study Centres <strong>of</strong> various Universities and Institutes.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 53 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Vacancies in Colleges and Universities<br />

8.203 In this connection, Committee’s attention had been drawn by the observation <strong>of</strong> the Committee on CABE on<br />

Financing <strong>of</strong> Higher and Technical Education that vacant faculty position was one <strong>of</strong> the major factors affecting standards <strong>of</strong><br />

higher education in the country. The Committee observed that the tendency to allow vacancies was seriously compromising<br />

efforts on quality <strong>of</strong> higher education. Chronic shortage <strong>of</strong> faculty members too adversely affected the quality <strong>of</strong> education in<br />

colleges and universities. The Committee was given to understand that all Central Universities had been directed to fill up<br />

the backlog vacancies by 31.12.2005. The Committee desired to be apprised about the latest position in that regard.<br />

Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU)<br />

8.204 The Committee observed that allocation for IGNOU in 2006-07 was at an enhanced level <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs. <strong>10</strong>0 crore when compared with Plan allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 60 crore in 2005-06. Trend <strong>of</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong> Plan funds and<br />

utilization there<strong>of</strong> for IGNOU during the Tenth Plan so far revealed a discouraging picture. As per the details made<br />

available to the Committee, there had not been judicious and optimum utilization <strong>of</strong> allocated funds. During 2003-04,<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> Rs. 67.00 crore had to be reduced drastically to Rs. 20.00 crore at RE stage and these utilized funds also<br />

included an adjustment <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3.44 crore unspent balance available with the University. The Committee was constrained to<br />

observe that in 2004-05 and 2005-06 also, utilized funds amounting to Rs. 67.00 crore and Rs. 60.00 crore included unspent<br />

balance <strong>of</strong> Rs. 2.35 crore and Rs. 2.60 crore respectively. The Committee apprehended that during the current year also<br />

keeping in view enhanced provision <strong>of</strong> Rs. <strong>10</strong>0.00 crore, chances <strong>of</strong> under utilization was very much there in spite <strong>of</strong><br />

adjustment <strong>of</strong> unspent balance <strong>of</strong> previous year. The Committee strongly felt that there was an urgent need for monitoring <strong>of</strong><br />

achievement level <strong>of</strong> both physical and financial targets set by the University on a quarterly basis to ensure optimum and<br />

judicious utilization <strong>of</strong> funds as per the prescribed norms.<br />

8.205 The Committee while appreciating the contribution being made by IGNOU for the educational advancement <strong>of</strong> our<br />

youth, felt that there was an urgent need for having a review <strong>of</strong> the vast network <strong>of</strong> IGNOU, nature <strong>of</strong> its coordination with<br />

DEC along with the work being done by the Council, comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> performance level and quality <strong>of</strong> education in<br />

State Open Universities vis-à-vis Correspondence Course Institutes in conventional universities. The Committee desired to<br />

be apprised about the findings <strong>of</strong> any such exercise, even in a limited level done so far. The Committee also desired to be<br />

apprised about the problem areas being noticed both by the University/Council authorities and student community.<br />

National Council <strong>of</strong> Rural Institutes<br />

8.206 The Committee had been observing the functioning <strong>of</strong> this Council for considerable period <strong>of</strong> time. There seemed<br />

to be some inherent constraints in the set up <strong>of</strong> the Council, established for fulfillment <strong>of</strong> a noble ideal <strong>of</strong> Father <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Nation. The Committee had been noticing a very disturbing trend <strong>of</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong> funds for the Council during the entire<br />

Tenth Plan. Since 2002-03 funds were being duly allocated at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year to be brought down drastically at the<br />

RE stage and finally that also remain unutilized. It was only towards the end <strong>of</strong> the year 2005-06 that some activity had<br />

started in the Council with four Nai Talim Gandhian Basic Education Institutions being released an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. <strong>10</strong>.80<br />

lakhs. It was also learnt that the Governing Body in a meeting held on 20.1.2006 had approved financial assistance to nine<br />

institutions for a total amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 2.97 crore.<br />

8.207 The Committee had strong reservations on the way the Council was being run. The Committee strongly felt that<br />

final view needed to be taken and basic requirements for the effective functioning <strong>of</strong> the Council needed to be fulfilled<br />

without any further delay.<br />

All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE)<br />

8.208 The Committee was given to understand that for management courses, the institutions/universities were under the<br />

dual control <strong>of</strong> UGC and AICTE. Many a times, this dual control created problems for smooth conduct <strong>of</strong> the management<br />

courses. The Committee felt that the Department should come up with a framework to ensure that there was no conflict in<br />

the working <strong>of</strong> any statutory bodies.<br />

8.209 The Committee noted that the number <strong>of</strong> seats vacant in various states was quite significant, prominent among them<br />

being Kerala and Meghalaya where 18.8% and 30% <strong>of</strong> the seats respectively were lying vacant.<br />

8.2<strong>10</strong> The Committee observed that when the entire nation had geared up for producing more and more qualified and<br />

skilled human resources, the tendency <strong>of</strong> keeping the seats in technical institutions vacant was an unpardonable crime. Such<br />

indifferent attitude <strong>of</strong> the authorities was quite retrograde and predatory; and above all it was wastage <strong>of</strong> scarce national<br />

resource. The Committee, therefore, recommended that under no circumstances the seats in the technical institutions should


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 54 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

be left unfilled. A mechanism should be evolved whereunder those candidates who had attained the qualifying marks in the<br />

entrance exams but were placed low in the merit list could be selected to fill the vacancies.<br />

8.211 The Committee was not satisfied with the comments <strong>of</strong> the Department. The reply <strong>of</strong> the Department did not<br />

clarify why the fund were allotted to a non-existent programme. It was amply clear that a provision <strong>of</strong> Rs. 91.48 crore was<br />

made in the budget without any purpose. This, according to the Committee was a clear case <strong>of</strong> financial/budgetary<br />

irregularity. An enquiry may be made into the entire episode and the findings may be furnished to the<br />

Committee.<br />

Scheme <strong>of</strong> Community Polytechnics<br />

8.212 The Committee noted that more than 300 polytechnics were having unspent balances lying with them. Therefore,<br />

the budget allocation were reduced at the RE stage in 2005-06. Non utilization <strong>of</strong> the allocations to that extent indicated that<br />

the scheme was plagued with constraints/drawbacks. The Committee recommended that if need be, the scheme may be<br />

revamped to ensure that the entire allocations were utilized by the polytechnics. A serious review <strong>of</strong> the scheme <strong>of</strong> things<br />

would help in finding the utility <strong>of</strong> the scheme for the targeted beneficiaries and also the aspect <strong>of</strong> fund utilization.<br />

8.213 The Committee was also disappointed to note that the Community Polytechnics were not evenly distributed across<br />

the country. The situation was particularly poor in the Eastern Region which had the maximum rural populace but this region<br />

had been accorded with only 97 Community Polytechnics <strong>of</strong> the total 669 existing in the country. The Committee desired that<br />

the Department ensure that there was an even regional distribution <strong>of</strong> the Community Polytechnics so that technology<br />

became the real carrier <strong>of</strong> community/rural development.<br />

Indian Institutes <strong>of</strong> Management (IIMs)<br />

8.214 The Committee recommended that the Government should create more opportunities for students in the country by<br />

opening at least one IIM in each state and also increase the number <strong>of</strong> seats in existing IIMs.<br />

8.215 The Committee was informed that currently, IIMs at Ahmedabed, Bangalore and Kolkata were generating their<br />

own resources for their functioning. Government provided financial assistance both under plan and non-plan to IIMs at<br />

Indore, Lucknow and Kozhikode. The Committee recommended that the government should chalk out a plan in consultation<br />

with IIMs to ensure that over a period <strong>of</strong> time, the IIMs became self-supporting and not depend on government for normal<br />

functioning.<br />

8.216 The Committee noted that almost 15 to 20 per cent <strong>of</strong> the faculty posts were lying vacant in the IIMs. The<br />

vacancies which would arise due to retirement could always be accounted in advance and steps could be taken in advance to<br />

fill the vacancies as soon as it arose. The Committee, therefore, wondered what prevented the IIMs from filling up the<br />

vacancies. Interestingly, the Department admitted that there was no shortage <strong>of</strong> trained faculty. The Committee<br />

recommended that the Government and IIMs should ensure that all the faculty positions were filled up at the earliest. If the<br />

IIMs could not fill the vacancies, the Committee may be apprised about the reasons for the delay.<br />

National Merit Scholarship Scheme<br />

8.217 Under the scheme out <strong>of</strong> the proposed <strong>10</strong>976 total scholarships, 9012 scholarships for class IX and 13830 out <strong>of</strong><br />

proposed 17000 scholarships <strong>of</strong> class XII were granted during 2005-06, incurring an expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs.7,50,61,198. The<br />

Committee appreciated that this scheme had finally taken <strong>of</strong>f, specially in view <strong>of</strong> its non-performance under the two<br />

erstwhile schemes till 2004-05. The Committee observed that almost all the States/UTs had been covered under this scheme<br />

with varying number <strong>of</strong> scholarships granted. The Committee, however, liked to point out that number <strong>of</strong> renewal<br />

scholarships granted in 2005-06 was only 788, out <strong>of</strong> which as many as 713 went to Haryana. The Committee desired to<br />

emphasize that the very objective <strong>of</strong> the scheme would be lost if the meritorious students getting scholarship in class IX or XI<br />

did not get the benefit in the next class. The Committee was not aware about the past experience in this regard. The<br />

Committee, however, liked to emphasise that this aspect needed to be given due consideration. The Committee would<br />

appreciate if monitoring mechanism was evolved whereunder performance level <strong>of</strong> students getting scholarships could be<br />

kept under watch. The Committee was also <strong>of</strong> the view that there was a need for making the student community as well as<br />

the parents aware about this kind <strong>of</strong> schemes so that the maximum number as well as the most deserving cases could be<br />

covered.<br />

Grant-in-Aid Scheme <strong>of</strong> Scholarships to Students from non-Hindi<br />

Speaking States/UTs for Post-Matric Studies in Hindi


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 55 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.218 Under this scheme scholarships were awarded to students from non-Hindi speaking States/UTs for pursuing postmatric<br />

studies in Hindi. The Committee noted that 2426 scholarships involving an expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs. 89,63,519 were<br />

awarded to students <strong>of</strong> different States during 2005-06. The Committee had been given to understand that under this scheme,<br />

the States were reporting only total expenditure incurred by them each year. The Committee was not aware whether any<br />

exercise had been undertaken so far for making an assessment about the implementation <strong>of</strong> this scheme as per the prescribed<br />

norms. The Committee also pointed out that as per the records available for 2005-06, only 7 renewal scholarships were<br />

awarded. This clearly showed that students were not showing an inclination for pursuing the study in Hindi in the next<br />

year. If that be so, the Committee strongly felt that there was a need for taking up the issue with those States where<br />

maximum number <strong>of</strong> such scholarships had been granted.<br />

8.219 The Committee welcomed the introduction <strong>of</strong> the new scholarship schemes and hoped that wide publicity would be<br />

given to these schemes so that maximum number <strong>of</strong> students could be covered.<br />

Book Promotion<br />

8.220 The Committee noted that during 2005-06 total provision <strong>of</strong> Rs. 9.54 crores was enhanced to Rs.14.04 crore at RE<br />

stage. The major enhancement was meant for grants to NBT/institutions for book promotion from Rs.3.24 crore to Rs. 9.74<br />

crore. The Committee was, however, surprised to note that till December 2005, against RE allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs.14.04 crore,<br />

expenditure reported was only Rs.1.48 crore that too for one scheme i.e. grant to NBT. The Committee wondered whether<br />

any review so far had been made about these schemes formulated in the name <strong>of</strong> book promotion. The Committee was <strong>of</strong><br />

the view that there was a need for reassessment and formulation <strong>of</strong> one composite scheme for book promotion.<br />

(d)<br />

175 th Report<br />

Introduction<br />

8.221 The Committee appreciated the Government’s move to bring all the child related issues under one Ministry and<br />

desired that all out efforts should be made by the Ministry in implementing these schemes in an effective way.<br />

Budgetary Allocation<br />

8.222 Out <strong>of</strong> the total plan allocation for the Ministry, maximum funds were earmarked for the child welfare schemes<br />

whereas the women welfare schemes were getting the benefit <strong>of</strong> a very small proportion. However, one prominent feature<br />

being noticed by the Committee year after year was that there had been optimum utilisation <strong>of</strong> Plan funds under the child<br />

welfare sector in spite <strong>of</strong> steady increase in the allocation. In contrast, both allocation and utilisation position in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

women related schemes showed a declining trend as indicated below:-<br />

Women’s welfare<br />

Scheme<br />

Allo. – Allocation<br />

Exp. -- Expenditure<br />

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 (upto<br />

3.3.06)<br />

Allo. Exp. Allo. Exp. Allo. Exp.<br />

202.50 115.14 174.03 151.90 132.27 78.45<br />

Rs. in crores<br />

2006-07<br />

Allo. Exp.<br />

121.48 --<br />

8.223 The Committee strongly felt that women welfare related schemes needed to be reviewed as a whole to analyse the<br />

reasons for this trend <strong>of</strong> utilisation <strong>of</strong> funds. Possible reasons could be overlapping <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> these schemes, lack <strong>of</strong><br />

awareness in the targetted beneficiaries, role <strong>of</strong> implementing agencies, specially NGOs etc. The Committee would<br />

appreciate if such an exercise was initiated by the Ministry at the earliest.<br />

8.224 The Committee desired to be apprised about the pending UCs (State-wise and scheme-wise). The Committee<br />

wondered whether any action against the implementing agencies could be initiated now after a lapse <strong>of</strong> about twenty years or<br />

so. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view that financial norms needed to be strictly adhered by both the disbursing and<br />

implementing authorities. The Ministry should initiate an exercise for procurement <strong>of</strong> pending UCs without any further delay.<br />

The Committee was also <strong>of</strong> the view that the Ministry should not be satisfied with the timely submission <strong>of</strong> Utilization<br />

Certificates by the implementing agencies. There was a need for evolving a system <strong>of</strong> random checking <strong>of</strong> utilization<br />

certificates so as to ensure that funds released were being utilized for the intended purposes. That would also give an idea to<br />

the Ministry about the constraints being faced by the implementing agencies in proper utilization <strong>of</strong> allocated funds.<br />

8.225 Taking a serious view <strong>of</strong> this alarming situation, the Committee emphasized that the Ministry pursued the issue <strong>of</strong>


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 56 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

unspent balances with the concerned States Governments/Autonomous Bodies. The Committee failed to comprehend the<br />

reason for unspent balances. Funds were released in accordance with well-planned projections made by the implementing<br />

agencies. Then why was it so, that they remained unspent thus defeating the very objective <strong>of</strong> the scheme itself. Being the<br />

nodal authority for carrying out children and women welfare related schemes, it was for the Ministry to ensure optimum and<br />

judicious utilisation <strong>of</strong> Central funds.<br />

8.226 The Committee desired to have details <strong>of</strong> expenditure scheme-wise for the year 2005-2006. The Committee also<br />

added that since most <strong>of</strong> the schemes were run with the assistance <strong>of</strong> State Governments/NGOs, necessary measures should<br />

be taken to coordinate the activities with the concerned implementing agencies so that a transparent picture <strong>of</strong> detailed<br />

expenditure could emerge and a proper feedback helped in understanding the absorption <strong>of</strong> allocations.<br />

8.227 The Committee was constrained to observe that none <strong>of</strong> the strategies as mentioned above seemed to have been<br />

implemented upon by the Ministry during the Tenth Plan. Had it been done, some noticeable changes would have been<br />

visible by now. Final year <strong>of</strong> the Tenth Plan had started and position remained unchanged. This was a classic example <strong>of</strong> how<br />

strategies on the paper became fruitless in the absence <strong>of</strong> strong willpower and mechanism to implement them. The<br />

Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that these strategies had become all the more relevant in the present scenario. The Committee<br />

would appreciate if the Ministry initiated action without any further delay.<br />

Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme<br />

8.228 The Committee was informed that the Inter-Ministerial Task Force set up in 2004 to review the existing population<br />

norms for sanction <strong>of</strong> an ICDS Project/AWC and suggest revised norms had submitted its reports/recommendations in May<br />

2005. The Committee found that so far 23 States/UTs had undertaken a micro-level Survey/Planning and forwarded<br />

information regarding location specific requirement <strong>of</strong> additional ICDS Projects and Anganwadi Centres. The Committee had<br />

been given to understand that information submitted by some States was incomplete and not in the prescribed format. One<br />

year had passed since the submission <strong>of</strong> the Report <strong>of</strong> the Task Force, and the required information was still awaited from<br />

States/UTs. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the Ministry should make concerted efforts so that AWCs could be set up as<br />

per the revised population norms.<br />

8.229 The Committee noted that from 2005-2006, the Government <strong>of</strong> India were to support States upto 50% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

financial norms or 50% <strong>of</strong> the expenditure incurred by them on supplementary nutrition. The Committee was surprised to<br />

note that the Ministry had not held pre-budget discussions with the States on this issue so far. Ministry’s clarification that<br />

States could present their resource position during their discussion on the States Annual Plan with the Planning Commission<br />

was not at all convincing.<br />

8.230 In the absence <strong>of</strong> any detail about the supplementary nutrition met by the States/UTs, it was difficult to assess the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> the new initiative. The Committee desired to be apprised <strong>of</strong> the implementation status <strong>of</strong> this initiative during 2005-<br />

06.<br />

8.231 The Committee agreed that increasing the number <strong>of</strong> Anganwadi Centres from existing 7.44 lakhs to 14 lakhs<br />

might be a gigantic task but the Ministry could no longer afford to sit on the problem and delay the process. Instead a plan <strong>of</strong><br />

action needed to be formulated by the Ministry expeditiously for achieving the targets set by the Supreme Court.<br />

Implementation <strong>of</strong> the SC directives would catapulate the health <strong>of</strong> the Indian population comparable to the standards <strong>of</strong> any<br />

<strong>of</strong> the developed countries. The Committee therefore felt that the Ministry should study the suggestion in its entirety and<br />

chalk out a road map to implement the same. Lack <strong>of</strong> funds could not be the sole excuse to not implement the suggestion.<br />

The Committee also desired to be apprised <strong>of</strong> the reply given to the Supreme Court by the Ministry in this regard. The<br />

Committee desired that Anganwadi Centres may be immediately made operational in hemlets and tribal areas where<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> Dalits, SC/ST population was high.<br />

8.232 Keeping in view the special needs in NE States, the Central Government sanctioned construction <strong>of</strong> 4800 AWCs at<br />

the cost <strong>of</strong> Rs. 60 crore in 2001-2002 and 7600 AWCs at a cost <strong>of</strong> Rs. 95 crore in 2002-2003. Another 7600 AWCs at a cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rs. 95 crore had been sanctioned in 2004-2005. Further it had been decided to undertake construction <strong>of</strong> AWCs @ Rs.<br />

1.75 lakh per centre. Funds would be allocated out <strong>of</strong> savings available in the NE component <strong>of</strong> plan budget <strong>of</strong> the Ministry.<br />

The Committee hoped that in NE States all the AWCs would be provided with pucca buildings.<br />

8.233 The Committee was equally shocked to see the findings <strong>of</strong> the NCAER. The Committee liked to point out that<br />

these findings were not restricted to the infrastructure status <strong>of</strong> AWCs. It was very clear that each aspect about the AWCs had<br />

been assessed and reported upon. This Report had been received by the Ministry sometime in March-April 2005. The<br />

Committee hoped that findings <strong>of</strong> this survey must have been shared with the State Governments and follow-up action<br />

started. If not, it may be done at the earliest. The Committee desired to be apprised in this regard at the earliest.<br />

8.234 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that the large number <strong>of</strong> responsibilities entrusted with the


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 57 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Anganwadi Workers (AWWs) would seriously affect the primary work <strong>of</strong> the Anganwadi Centres (AWCs) for which they<br />

were mainly appointed. With the burden <strong>of</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> additional duties, the AWW could do justice neither to AWCs<br />

nor to the additional responsibilities. The Committee noted that the Central Government provided an honorarium <strong>of</strong> Rs. <strong>10</strong>00<br />

p.m and Rs. 500 p.m to an AWW and AWH respectively. This was quite meager an amount compared to the burden <strong>of</strong><br />

responsibilities entrusted on them. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the honorarium paid to these two important<br />

functionaries <strong>of</strong> AWCs may be suitably increased. A hike in their remuneration would help in increasing their motivation for<br />

better results. Resource constraints should not come in the way <strong>of</strong> such justified increase.<br />

8.235 The Committee expressed its deep anguish over the large number <strong>of</strong> vacancies <strong>of</strong> AWWs, AWHs and Supervisors.<br />

It would not be wrong to conclude that the vacancies have hampered the functioning <strong>of</strong> AWCs and adversely affected the<br />

scheme itself. The Committee was not aware about the factors responsible for such a state <strong>of</strong> affairs. In the absence <strong>of</strong> these<br />

key functionaries, an AWC could not be considered to be operational. The Committee wondered in what manner and by<br />

when it would be possible to fill up this big gap, specially in view <strong>of</strong> 1,88,055 AWCs sanctioned in 2005-06, with the figure<br />

likely to increase further. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view that the exercise <strong>of</strong> sanctioning and filling up <strong>of</strong> these posts<br />

should start simultaneously with the sanctioning <strong>of</strong> AWCs. Otherwise this shortfall would always persist. The Committee,<br />

therefore, strongly recommended that an intense drive needed to be launched for filling up the vacancies within a fixed time<br />

frame. This could be accomplished if a strategy was worked out in collaboration with the State Governments/local bodies.<br />

Those States which were not willing to follow the time schedule may be pursued on regular basis, if need be, at the highest<br />

level, till the vacancies were filled up. The Committee desired to be apprised <strong>of</strong> the steps proposed to be taken.<br />

8.236 The Committee was happy to note the decision <strong>of</strong> convergence between ICDS scheme and SSA & DPEP. The<br />

success <strong>of</strong> ICDS programme depended purely on effective supervision, monitoring, co-ordination and convergence with other<br />

Departments and also with better and effective participation <strong>of</strong> local bodies and community. Convergence <strong>of</strong> various<br />

components was a good idea. The Committee recommended that the revised guidelines, if need be, may be issued without<br />

any delay and the State Governments and implementing agencies be pursued for smooth implementation <strong>of</strong> the converged<br />

scheme. Keeping in view the expansion <strong>of</strong> the ICDS scheme and its proposed convergence with other programmes, the<br />

Committee strongly felt that an effective monitoring mechanism at all levels need to be put in place at the earliest. Only then,<br />

services envisaged under ICDS scheme could reach the intended beneficiaries. The Committee demanded to be apprised<br />

about the steps taken in this direction.<br />

8.237 The Committee would like the Ministry to take cognizance <strong>of</strong> the observations contained in the Mid Term<br />

Appraisal and take immediate remedial measures to streamline the scheme. The Committee desired that it may be apprised<br />

about the steps taken in this direction.<br />

8.238 The Committee observed that in 17 States/UTs, Co-ordination Committees at state, district, block and village levels<br />

have been set up to ensure convergence between ICDS, Health, Drinking Water and Sanitation, Panchayati Raj, Primary<br />

Education, Rural Development etc. Welcoming the initiative taken by these 17 States, the Committee pointed out that NE<br />

States, Sikkim, J&K, Orissa and Southern States had not come forward so far. The Committee hoped that with the matter<br />

being pursued by the Ministry, these States would be covered very soon.<br />

8.239 The Committee understood that a study on ‘Three Decades <strong>of</strong> ICDS: An Appraisal’ had been conducted in all the<br />

States/UTs. Draft Report was likely to be completed by the end <strong>of</strong> March 2006. The Committee desired to be apprised about<br />

the findings <strong>of</strong> this study as and when finalised and reported.<br />

Training Programme under ICDS (UDISHA)<br />

8.240 The plan allocation in BE 2005-2006 was Rs. 40.00 crore and raised to Rs. 82.50 crore due to extension <strong>of</strong> project<br />

from 1.7.2005 to 31.3.2006. The actual expenditure incurred upto 3.3.2006 was<br />

Rs. 62.77 crore (Statement VI-BE, RE and Actuals for 2005-06). The Committee however, liked to point out that on a<br />

specific query, the Ministry, while giving the State wise allocation <strong>of</strong> funds under UDISHA during 2005-06, had informed<br />

that as on 16.3.06, there was an expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs. 60.<strong>99</strong> crores. The Committee desired to know the actual expenditure<br />

incurred under the scheme.<br />

8.241 There was no denying the fact that judicious utilization <strong>of</strong> the allocation alone would yield desired results. The<br />

Ministry could better monitor the utilization by way <strong>of</strong> getting UCs and monthly progress reports from all the States/UTs and<br />

other agencies on quarterly basis. The Committee strongly felt that regular interaction with the States facing constraints<br />

would help in achieving the desired results.<br />

8.242 The Committee opined that training was the most crucial element in ICDS as achievement <strong>of</strong> Programme goals<br />

depends upon the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> frontline workers in improved delivery <strong>of</strong> packages <strong>of</strong> services under ICDS. The<br />

Committee noted that the gap between trained and untrained functionaries was increasing every year. The following physical


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 58 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

achievement <strong>of</strong> target and trained confirmed this:-<br />

Upto 31.12.2005<br />

Job Training<br />

Refresher Training<br />

Revised Trained % <strong>of</strong> Revised Trained % <strong>of</strong><br />

Target<br />

Actual Target<br />

Actual<br />

Target<br />

Target<br />

AWWs 432143 330942 76.58 646226 433913 67.15<br />

Supervisors 14931 11466 76.79 26304 20358 77.40<br />

CDPO/ACDPOs 4592 3548 77.26 4394 1452 33.50<br />

AWHs 612957 518682 84.62<br />

All Functionaries <strong>10</strong>64623 864638 81.22 676924 455723 67.32<br />

8.243 The Committee however, liked to point out that considering the huge backlog <strong>of</strong> untrained AWWs and AWHs, the<br />

steps initiated by the Ministry to train all the workers and Helpers have not yielded the desired results so far. The Committee<br />

observed that State Governments/UTs played the most important role in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the ICDS Training<br />

Programme. The State Governments were responsible for setting up <strong>of</strong> Anganwadi Training Centres and Middle Level<br />

Training Centres (MLTCs), working <strong>of</strong> these centres were also monitored by them. State Governments were also<br />

responsible for identifying NGOs/other organizations for running the Training Centres. The Committee felt that the status <strong>of</strong><br />

these Training Centres both existing and required in different states was an important aspect <strong>of</strong> the Training Programme<br />

which perhaps had not been given due impetus so far. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that an on the spot assessment <strong>of</strong> all<br />

the existing Training Centres with priority being given to states lagging behind needed to be made and remedial measures<br />

taken at the earliest. Mere release <strong>of</strong> central funds would not serve the purpose. The Ministry had to play a more pro-active<br />

role in the implementation <strong>of</strong> training <strong>of</strong> ICDS functionaries, the most vital aspect <strong>of</strong> the ICDS programme.<br />

Rajiv Gandhi National Creche Scheme for the Children <strong>of</strong> Working Mothers<br />

8.244 The Committee noted that the Ministry kept an ambitious target <strong>of</strong> 14719 creches by the end <strong>of</strong> Tenth Plan i.e. by<br />

2006-2007; the new creeches would be allocated to the Central Social Welfare Board, Indian Council for Child Welfare and<br />

Bharatiya Adim Jati Sevak Sangh in the ratio <strong>of</strong> 80:11:9. The Committee desired to be apprised about the rationale <strong>of</strong><br />

selecting only three agencies for operationalising the Creeche Scheme. The Committee further recommended that more and<br />

more reputed and established NGOs may be selected for implementing the Creche Scheme.<br />

8.245 The Committee was satisfied with the steps taken to strengthen the monitoring <strong>of</strong> scheme, but had its reservations<br />

about the actual implementation aspect. It was surprising that the scheme had started functioning but consultations with State<br />

Governments were yet to take place. The Committee recommended that a time schedule may be prepared urgently in<br />

consultation with State Governments and implementing agencies for implementing its various aspects <strong>of</strong> the scheme. The<br />

aspect <strong>of</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> funds also needed to be addressed properly.<br />

8.246 The Committee recommended that the Ministry should ensure that 2514 creches which were earlier provided grants<br />

were not given further grants under the New Scheme. The monitoring process needed to be strengthened and responsibility<br />

fixed for any delay.<br />

8.247 The Committee recommended that the training module should be finalised in a time frame and a suitable plan <strong>of</strong><br />

action devised so that the targets <strong>of</strong> the training were achieved.<br />

Condensed Courses for Women Education<br />

8.248 Plan allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 5.40 crore was made for this programme in 2005-2006. The actual expenditure incurred upto<br />

3 rd March 2006 was Rs. 2.70 crore. The Ministry had informed that sanctions were being issued and entire allocation was to<br />

be utilized by 31.3.2006. The Committee had, however, some reservations on the last minute spending by the Department.<br />

Rushing the expenditure in the last few days needed to be discouraged for effective utilization <strong>of</strong> resources.<br />

8.249 The Ministry informed that in pursuance <strong>of</strong> the recommendations <strong>of</strong> National/State level workshops, a National<br />

Working Group had been constituted for revamping/evaluation <strong>of</strong> the scheme in the changing socio-economic and work<br />

environment. The report <strong>of</strong> the Working Group which was expected in August 2005 was yet to be submitted. The Committee<br />

was unhappy over the delay in submission <strong>of</strong> the Report and recommended that the matter be expedited without further delay.<br />

The Committee also desired to be apprised <strong>of</strong> its contents as and when the report was finalized.<br />

8.250 The Committee was not happy with the present state <strong>of</strong> affairs. It felt that residential courses on selected basis<br />

should be sanctioned in those States where the response was encouraging. Obviously the girls/women were unable to pursue<br />

their studies further because <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> hostels. The residential courses could help them fill the gap. The Committee further


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 59 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

recommended that additional funds may be sought for the purpose.<br />

8.251 The Committee may be apprised <strong>of</strong> the criteria/reasons for variations in selection <strong>of</strong> targetted beneficiaries and<br />

sanction <strong>of</strong> funds to various States.<br />

8.252 The Committee had been given to understand that the Ministry had been getting the state-wise feedback in respect<br />

<strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> courses sanctioned, amount sanctioned and released alongwith the targetted/actual beneficiaries. Figures<br />

regarding 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 had also been made available to the Committee. It was, however, surprising to note<br />

that no information was available with the Ministry about the utilized funds, accounts for which were being settled at the<br />

State Board level. The Committee strongly felt that non-availability <strong>of</strong> utilization details and availability <strong>of</strong> unspent<br />

balances with the State Governments could not be considered a healthy sign. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that in the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> such a vital information, whatever monitoring was being done at present could not be effective enough. Status <strong>of</strong><br />

funds released and unspent balances with some State Boards was self-revealing.<br />

(Rs. in lakh)<br />

2003-04 2004-05<br />

State Amount released Amount released Unspent balances<br />

Andhra Pradesh 9.56 18.96 24.42 (31.3.05)<br />

Arunachal Pradesh 6.45 7.48 6.97(31.3.05)<br />

Bihar 57.27 61.62 4.85(15.9.05)<br />

Gujarat 5.63 9.47 21.94(31.3.05)<br />

Karnataka <strong>10</strong>.36 19.54 45.78(31.3.05)<br />

Rajasthan 12.28 18.09 24.83(31.3.05)<br />

Tamil Nadu 8.93 12.86 30.29(30.11.05)<br />

Delhi 18.85 8.78 24.32(31.3.05)<br />

8.253 The Committee recommended that strict monitoring was required to keep check on the unspent balances. It seemed<br />

that either the implementing agencies did not have the capacity to utilize the allocated funds or there were inherent flaws in<br />

the scheme which should be removed. The Committee desired to be apprised <strong>of</strong> the specific steps taken by the Ministry for<br />

utilization <strong>of</strong> unspent balances lying with the State Governments. The Committee recommended that funds may be allocated<br />

only for viable projects/schemes.<br />

Balika Samriddhi Yojana<br />

8.254 In 2004-05, funds were released to States, however no funds were kept in BE 2005-2006 and 2006-2007. The<br />

Ministry had informed that no monitoring/publicity was undertaken at central level. The Committee observed that total funds<br />

released as on 1.3.06 was Rs. 216.15 crore whereas unspent balance as on 30.9.2005 was Rs. 74.97 crore lying with different<br />

States like Bihar, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Orissa and Uttaranchal.<br />

8.255 Earlier the Committee in its 160 th Report had expressed serious concern about the implementation as well as the<br />

aspect <strong>of</strong> uncertainty in the transfer <strong>of</strong> BSY to the States. The Committee observed that situation instead <strong>of</strong> improving had<br />

worsened since no decision had been taken in this regard so far. The Secretary in her appearance before the Committee also<br />

conceded that this was a very unsatisfactory status.<br />

8.256 The Committee was not happy with the uncertainty status <strong>of</strong> the BSY scheme, continuing for so long. The<br />

Committee failed to understand as why Planning Commission had taken such a long time to take a decision on transferring<br />

the Balika Samriddhi Yojana to states. A decision taken by the Planning Commission at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the Tenth Plan was<br />

yet to be finalized even though Tenth Plan period was in its last year. The Committee was also not aware as to how the<br />

Committed Liability <strong>of</strong> Rs. 74.97 crore lying with different states was going to be adjusted. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view<br />

that this was a classic case <strong>of</strong> improper formulation <strong>of</strong> a scheme launched in haste and inherent flaws being noticed during<br />

the course <strong>of</strong> its implementation. The Committee did not have much hope about this scheme being effectively implemented<br />

by states, with some States already facing severe financial constraints. The Committee therefore again reiterated that fate <strong>of</strong><br />

BSY scheme needed to be decided at the earliest. The Ministry being the nodal authority had to vigorously pursue this issue<br />

with the Planning Commission.<br />

Assistance for Construction/Expansion <strong>of</strong> Hostel Buildings for Working Women with Day Care Centres for Children<br />

8.257 The Committee found that both the financial and physical performance under the scheme have shown declining<br />

trend over the years. The utilization had been below the target. It seemed that there was no activity under this scheme in the<br />

NE region as there was an expenditure <strong>of</strong> only Rs.9 lakhs against an allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs.1.00 crore in 2004-05 and nil<br />

expenditure had been reported in 2005-06 as on 3.3.2006. The Committee was not aware whether any exercise had been


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 60 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

initiated so far to make an assessment about the unsatisfactory performance <strong>of</strong> this scheme and take remedial measures. If<br />

not done so far, the Committee felt that this was the right time to initiate the same.<br />

8.258 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered view that the Ministry should not finance such projects or scheme, wherein it<br />

has no control over its implementation. In the present scheme, the Committee felt the accountability was lacking and control<br />

was missing. Implementation Agencies should not have the sole discretion to select construction agencies. In any case,<br />

projects needed to be handled by Government agencies. The Committee also liked to point out that there was an increasing<br />

need for setting up more Hostels. If need be, norms for opening <strong>of</strong> Hostels could be reviewed and revised. The Committee,<br />

therefore, recommended that the scheme needed to revamped and started afresh.<br />

Support to Training and Employment Programme for Women (STEP)<br />

8.259 The Ministry had cited the inadequate number <strong>of</strong> staff as one <strong>of</strong> the reasons for underutilization <strong>of</strong> funds. Lack <strong>of</strong><br />

staff for a national level programmes aimed to benefit thousands <strong>of</strong> women in traditional sectors was hardly a convincing<br />

argument. The Committee also noted that the technical team was taking undue time in clearing the projects. The Committee<br />

recommended that the Ministry should initiate assessment <strong>of</strong> the scheme so that procedural bottlenecks could be removed and<br />

scheme could be implemented effectively.<br />

Swawlamban<br />

8.260 The Committee found that as many as 1988 utilization certificates were pending with the implementation agencies<br />

spread over in different States with the maximum number <strong>of</strong> UCs being in Andhra Pradesh (321), Uttar Pradesh (206), J & K<br />

(180) and M.P. (148). The Committee was surprised to note that even Central Social Welfare Board had to account for 173<br />

Utilization Certificates.<br />

8.261 The Committee in its 160 th Report had expressed its concern that transfer <strong>of</strong> the schemes not performing well to the<br />

States cannot be considered a wise decision. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that perhaps no efforts were made by the<br />

Ministry to sensitize the State/UTs before the transfer <strong>of</strong> the scheme. As per the Performance Budget (2005-06), Rs. 2.00<br />

crore had been provided under the scheme for 2006-07 also. The Committee failed to comprehend the reason for allocating<br />

fund for 2006-07 when the scheme stood transferred to the States from 1.4.2006. The Committee desired the Department to<br />

clear the air <strong>of</strong> confusion about its committed liabilities as well as the mechanism concerning flow <strong>of</strong> funds under the<br />

scheme.<br />

Central Social Welfare Board (CSWB)<br />

8.262 The Committee observed that CSWB was entrusted with the implementation <strong>of</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> schemes. The<br />

assignments had been spread to such an extent that CSWB had failed to devise proper monitoring mechanism for such<br />

schemes. CSWB was a central organisation directly under Ministry’s control and it was very surprising to the Committee that<br />

the Ministry had not made any effort to strengthen the network <strong>of</strong> CSWB. It would be a better situation, according to the<br />

Committee, if CSWB was asked to focus its attention on one specific assignment for a particular period <strong>of</strong> time. Declining<br />

Girl child ratio was a problem which was assuming alarming proportion nation-wide. The Committee noted some initiative<br />

had been taken by a few States for improving the lot <strong>of</strong> girl child. But some sort <strong>of</strong> scheme totally dedicated for development<br />

<strong>of</strong> girl child needed to be initiated at national level. The Committee felt that CSWB could play a major role by focusing on<br />

this social problem. Nationwide campaign by CSWB in co-ordination with all States Boards and other concerned agencies<br />

would have a lasting impact on the thinking <strong>of</strong> public at large. The issue <strong>of</strong> huge unspent balances with the different agencies<br />

<strong>of</strong> CSWB would be addressed in case its mandate was specifically defined. The Committee would, therefore, appreciate if the<br />

Ministry identified some focused subjects for implementation by CSWB.<br />

Short Stay Homes (SSHs)<br />

8.263 The Committee observed that a number <strong>of</strong> Short Stay Homes had to be discontinued due to bad performance. <strong>10</strong><br />

organizations spread over in different States had been issued show cause notices. This confirmed Committee’s apprehension<br />

about the shortcomings <strong>of</strong> a scheme which was meant for the welfare <strong>of</strong> the down-trodden. The Committee strongly felt that<br />

the Government needed to play a more pro-active role in co-ordination with the State Governments so that the scheme was<br />

strengthened. Scheme may therefore be evaluated and revamped.<br />

Swadhar<br />

8.264 Although the scheme was picking up, however keeping in view the needy women <strong>of</strong> such categories, this<br />

achievement was just a drop in the ocean. The existence <strong>of</strong> such Homes needed more publicity. The scheme may be allocated<br />

more fund to finance more number <strong>of</strong> projects. The Committee recommended that at least one shelter home may be<br />

constructed in each Districts in the country.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 61 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Rashtriya Mahila Kosh (RMK)<br />

8.265 Progress in micr<strong>of</strong>inance activity was pre-dominantly measured in terms <strong>of</strong> numbers covered, amounts saved,<br />

amounts lent and repayment rates, and not by results achieved in genuine economic development. There was need to assess<br />

the impact on the upliftment <strong>of</strong> women. The RMK should evaluate the scheme on these parameters. The Committee<br />

recommended that RMK should develop a pool <strong>of</strong> projects/ schemes/activities which were locally viable and implementable<br />

and which could generate income. The RMK could advise the beneficiaries to opt for any <strong>of</strong> these schemes which would be<br />

beneficial for them. The Committee felt that if such an option was available, the disbursement level would increase and the<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> the scheme could be achieved.<br />

8.266 The Committee was given to understand that a Sub Committee had been setup to examine different aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

micro credit programmes, economic viability and sustainability <strong>of</strong> Kosh under RMK. In this connection, the Committee<br />

liked to recall its earlier recommendation with regard to lowering <strong>of</strong> interest rate on loans to be given by RMK. The<br />

Committee was surprised to note that Governing Body <strong>of</strong> RMK in its meeting held on 21.12.2005 decided that constitution <strong>of</strong><br />

a Sub Committee for examination <strong>of</strong> various operational issues including lowering <strong>of</strong> interest rate be left to the discretion <strong>of</strong><br />

MOS, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Women and Child Development and Chairperson, RMK. The Committee expressed its serious<br />

reservation on the handling <strong>of</strong> such a sensitive issue. The Committee strongly felt that the existing system under which<br />

RMK charges interest @ 8 % on reducing balance from borrowing agency which in turn charges any rate on or above 8% on<br />

reducing balance from the ultimate beneficiaries subject to maximum upto 18% needed to be reviewed at the earliest. One<br />

should not forget that the main objective <strong>of</strong> RMK was to provide micro credit support to poor women.<br />

New Schemes<br />

Scheme for Rescue <strong>of</strong> Victims <strong>of</strong> Trafficking<br />

8.267 The Committee observed that allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3.00 crore for this scheme was made in 2004-05 which was reduced<br />

to Rs. 30 lakhs in 2005-06. Allocation in 2006-07 stood at Rs. 45 lakhs. The Committee was not happy with the undue<br />

delay in launching <strong>of</strong> this scheme. The scheme needed more publicity and proper implementation. Since the scheme was to<br />

be implemented through NGOs, the Ministry had to be very careful while releasing funds. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> the scheme was to<br />

be strictly followed. The publicity should focus on protection and awareness-raising among parents and guardians.<br />

Relief and Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> Victims <strong>of</strong> Rape<br />

8.268 The Committee felt that the victims <strong>of</strong> rape underwent the conditions <strong>of</strong> psychological stress and trauma<br />

notwithstanding the physical assault. The rehabilitation process <strong>of</strong> such victim involved psychological support as well as<br />

economic assistance. The Committee would like the Ministry to create a separate rehabilitation fund for victims <strong>of</strong> rape to<br />

ensure that they get all sort <strong>of</strong> psychological and economic assistance in time.<br />

Prevention <strong>of</strong> Sexual Harassment at Workplace<br />

8.269 The Government <strong>of</strong> India constituted a Central Committee under the Chairpersonship <strong>of</strong> the Secretary, Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Women and Child Development to monitor the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Supreme Court’s Guidelines for prevention <strong>of</strong> Sexual<br />

Harassment <strong>of</strong> Women at Workplace. The Committee in its Meeting held on 29.<strong>10</strong>.2002 recommended that awareness<br />

needed to be given on this issue and this task had been assigned to National Commission for Women (NCW) and Central<br />

Social Welfare Board alongwith Ministry <strong>of</strong> Information and Broadcasting. The National Commission for Women had taken<br />

up sexual harassment <strong>of</strong> women at work place as one <strong>of</strong> the focal issues in the realm <strong>of</strong> promotion <strong>of</strong> gender equality and<br />

women's empowerment. The Commission had widely circulated the Visakha Judgement for compliance along with a code <strong>of</strong><br />

conduct for workplace formulated by the NCW. The Committee was not aware <strong>of</strong> the activities/initiatives undertaken by the<br />

CSWB and Ministry <strong>of</strong> Information and Broadcasting to create awareness on the SC Guidelines. This had become all the<br />

more important in view <strong>of</strong> increasing incidents <strong>of</strong> sexual harassment in BPOs and other private institutions.<br />

8.270 The Committee was constrained to observe that that the Supreme Court Guidelines had not been properly followed<br />

both by the Government Departments. In a number <strong>of</strong> cases, Complaint Committees had not been formed. Where these<br />

committees existed, they did not have 50 per cent reservation for women. Also in many cases the Committees were headed<br />

by men instead <strong>of</strong> women and without the involvement <strong>of</strong> a third party (NGO). Lack <strong>of</strong> awareness among the Members <strong>of</strong><br />

the complaint Committee was also noticed. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view that Supreme Court directive needed to be<br />

implemented in letter and spirit. The Committee desired to have full details about the 7<strong>99</strong> organisations covered so far by<br />

the NCW alongwith the organizations where complaint Committees were yet to be set up. The Committee also desired to<br />

have an idea about the additional organizations covered by NCW. The Committee also recommended that the Ministry


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 62 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

should come forward with a comprehensive legislation for prevention <strong>of</strong> sexual harassment in work places. The private<br />

institutions may also be brought under the purview <strong>of</strong> the legislations related to prevention <strong>of</strong> sexual harassment.<br />

Nutrition<br />

8.271 The Committee noted that the FNB provided training to the Anganwadi functionaries. However the Committee<br />

noticed huge gap between the target and achievement especially in case <strong>of</strong> training <strong>of</strong> grassroot level functionaries. The<br />

Committee wondered how the Ministry could take a casual approach to the gap reflected and let on increase in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

malnourished children.<br />

8.272 The Committee’s attention was drawn by the media reports appearing on regular basis about large number <strong>of</strong><br />

deaths <strong>of</strong> children due to malnourishment in the tribal belts <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> the country. Such incidents showed the non<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> Government machinery in those areas which could effectively cater to the nutrition requirement <strong>of</strong> the poor and<br />

deprived sections <strong>of</strong> the Society. The Committee recommended that it was the bounden duty <strong>of</strong> the Government to ensure<br />

that not a single child was dying due to malnourishment especially in view <strong>of</strong> the facilities being provided through AWCs<br />

under ICDS. The Committee strongly felt that the FNB needed to train maximum number <strong>of</strong> functionaries <strong>of</strong> AWCs so as to<br />

sensitize them about the preventive measures to be taken in malnutrition cases <strong>of</strong> children and mothers. The Committee<br />

would appreciate if FNB made an effective beginning by targetting the functionaries <strong>of</strong> AWCs located in tribal belts.<br />

National Nutrition Mission (NNM)<br />

8.273 Committee noted that not much progress had been achieved in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the scheme. The Committee<br />

noted that the objectives <strong>of</strong> the mission were realistic in nature and if implemented in its totality a healthy child population<br />

would be the result. The Committee emphasized that the Ministry should make the scheme functional so as to achieve the<br />

desired result <strong>of</strong> nutrition in a time bound manner.<br />

Gender Budgeting<br />

8.274 The Committee recommended that being the nodal Ministry, the Ministry <strong>of</strong> WCD should ensure that Gender<br />

Budget Cells which were set up in the Ministries have become operational and also pursue this issue with the remaining<br />

Ministries.<br />

8.275 The Committee desired to be apprised about the implementation status <strong>of</strong> the aforesaid initiatives taken by the<br />

Ministry.<br />

8.276 Committee’s attention had been drawn by the details regarding scheme-wise provisions and physical targets<br />

benefiting women in the Budget <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Women and Child Development as given in the Performance Budget (2006-<br />

07). The Committee found that all the schemes whether targeting children or women have been shown to be providing <strong>10</strong>0%<br />

benefit to women alone. The Committee does not dispute the fact that welfare <strong>of</strong> the child was ultimately the welfare <strong>of</strong> its<br />

mother. However, in view <strong>of</strong> the emerging concept <strong>of</strong> child budgeting, it cannot be claimed that flagship schemes like ICDS<br />

were benefiting cent percent women. The Committee recommended that the allocation on programmes and schemes<br />

benefiting women may be delineated specifically. The Committee also recommended that the components <strong>of</strong> gender<br />

budgeting may be made more clear and included in the guidelines for gender budgeting.<br />

(e) 176 th Report<br />

Budgetary Allocation<br />

8.277 The Committee noted that no allocation had been made for Training <strong>of</strong> Indian Athletes against its proposed<br />

allocation for Rs. 75 crores. Such sweeping cut might have some concrete reason. The Committee presumed that the Ministry<br />

had some contingency plans to arrange the finance for the Training <strong>of</strong> Indian Athletes for the forthcoming Asian,<br />

Commonwealth Games and other International events. The Committee desired to be apprised <strong>of</strong> such plans/scheme.<br />

8.278 The Committee failed to understand the constraints being faced by the Department in the optimum utilisation <strong>of</strong><br />

allocated funds for Youth and Sports related schemes. It remained a guess work for the Committee whether the underutilisation<br />

is due to the inability <strong>of</strong> implementing agencies (both Govt. & private sector) to take the full benefit <strong>of</strong> these<br />

schemes or inherent flaws in the scheme itself are attributed to the same. The Committee observed that funds remained<br />

underutilised under the schemes <strong>of</strong> Promotion <strong>of</strong> Adventure Activities, Promotion <strong>of</strong> Scouting and Guiding, National Service<br />

Volunteer Scheme, Promotion <strong>of</strong> Youth Activities and Training, Rashtriya Sadhbhavna Yojana, Assistance to Rural Youth<br />

and Sports Clubs, Scheme for welfare and development <strong>of</strong> Adolescents, Grants to Sports Federations. What was more<br />

worrisome was that under Schemes like National Sports Championship for Women, National Welfare Fund for


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 63 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Sportspersons, Promotion <strong>of</strong> Sports among Disabled, Scheme relating to Talent Search and Training, Scheme for Dope Test,<br />

All India Council for Physical Education, and States Sports Academy expenditure remained nil. The Committee also found<br />

that provision made both under Youth and Sports Scheme for NE States remained underutilized.<br />

8.279 The Committee could afford to conclude that even the formulation <strong>of</strong> a quarterly annual action plan for 2005-<br />

2006 by the Ministry had not been able to achieve the desired results. It was the case <strong>of</strong> failure in planning. It appeared<br />

to the Committee that the Ministry remained engaged in projecting higher requirements and launching new schemes<br />

without any considerations <strong>of</strong> the judicious and optimum utilisation <strong>of</strong> funds allocated for the existing schemes. It was<br />

quite contradictory that on one hand the Ministry talk <strong>of</strong> resource crunch and on other hand the allocated resources were not<br />

fully utilized. Huge unspent balances were lying with the Ministry under various schemes. This fiscal disorder in the<br />

Ministry had done more harm. The case for higher allocations had weakened to a great extent. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the<br />

view that a detailed review <strong>of</strong> all the ongoing schemes should be undertaken so as to assess the shortcomings being noticed<br />

and remedial steps be taken for removal <strong>of</strong> the same. Active involvement <strong>of</strong> the State Governments and other implementing<br />

agencies in this exercise is called for. The Committee would like the Ministry to adopt better fiscal management practices to<br />

avoid the last minute spending for achieving the targets.<br />

National Commission for Youth<br />

8.280 The Committee found the recommendations made by the Commission very useful in empowering the youth.<br />

Unfortunately not much progress had been made in the implementation <strong>of</strong> these recommendations. No follow-up action<br />

appeared to have been taken after the meeting with the <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> the Rashtriya Mahila Kosh on the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

formulation <strong>of</strong> Rashtriya Yuva Kosh. Similarly the proposal with regard to amalgamation <strong>of</strong> NSS and NCC sent to the<br />

Planning Commission simply remained a referral. The Committee would like the Ministry to expedite the action on all<br />

recommendations particularly with regard to setting up <strong>of</strong> Rashtriya Yuva Kosh. The Committee felt that either the NCC or<br />

NSS should be made compulsory from class IXth.<br />

Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan<br />

8.281 The Committee noted that the achievement level both physical and financial under most <strong>of</strong> the programmes<br />

undertaken by NYKS did not present a healthy picture. In most <strong>of</strong> the cases the targets were fixed at very high level and the<br />

achievement level was very low. In some programmes the achievement level was even less than <strong>10</strong>%. The Committee took<br />

a serious note <strong>of</strong> it and recommended that in future more realistic target level should be fixed. The Committee was<br />

constrained to note that the percentage <strong>of</strong> women beneficiaries in some <strong>of</strong> the States under certain programmes was even nil.<br />

The overall coverage <strong>of</strong> women amongst 8 million rural youth covered presently under NYKS was also poor. The<br />

Committee reiterated its earlier recommendation to enhance the level <strong>of</strong> female beneficiaries under various programmes run<br />

by<br />

NYKS.<br />

8.282 The Committee appreciated successful operation <strong>of</strong> these two schemes aiming at computer awareness amongst the<br />

rural youth. However, the coverage as well as the spread <strong>of</strong> centers was not quite encouraging. Only 164 RITYDCs was<br />

put in place upto December, 2005 against a target <strong>of</strong> 500 centres during the entire plan period. The Committee had all doubts<br />

that the remaining 336 RITYDC would be set up by the end <strong>of</strong> <strong>10</strong> th five-year plan. There was no denying the fact that the<br />

Ministry needed to fix such realistic targets, which were achievable.<br />

8.283 The Committee regretted that this unhealthy trend <strong>of</strong> unspent balances in NYKS goes against the Ministry’s<br />

mandate for youth development planning. Under-utilisation <strong>of</strong> funds not only undervalued the scheme but also de-motivated<br />

the implementing agencies as well as the beneficiaries. It reflected poor level <strong>of</strong> coordination amongst the implementing<br />

agencies and ineffective monitoring at the Ministry’s level. The Ministry needed to take constructive steps to encourage the<br />

field level functionaries with a view to effectively plan the programmes round the year and implement them as per the<br />

prescribed norms.<br />

8.284 The Committee noted that Nehru Yuvak Kendras were proposed to be set up in 123 uncovered Districts, 15 being<br />

in Orissa, 16 in UP, <strong>10</strong> in Arunachal Pradesh, 8 in Chhattisgarh and 8 in MP. The Committee was informed that a proposal<br />

involving annual expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs. 492.67 lakhs and non-recurring one time expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs. 123 lakhs for creation <strong>of</strong><br />

123x3 posts for these Kendras has been submitted to Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance. The Committee would like to remind the Ministry<br />

on the controversies that arose during its last selection process <strong>of</strong> Youth Coordinators. The confusion and uncertainity over<br />

the last recruitment process was still not over. The Committee felt that the court cases pertaining to last recruitment <strong>of</strong> Youth<br />

Coordinators needed to be pursued vigorously for early settlement. The Ministry, needed to be equally cautious about its<br />

fresh proposal <strong>of</strong> recruitment with the Finance Ministry so that the process <strong>of</strong> selection remains transparent and does not<br />

raise any doubts. The Committee desired a status report on the issue to be submitted for its


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 64 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

consideration.<br />

8.285 The Committee had been emphasizing in its earlier Reports the need for strengthening the monitoring mechanism<br />

<strong>of</strong> NYKS by association <strong>of</strong> elected representatives. The Committee understood that instructions had been issued to the<br />

District Youth Coordinators to involve MPs, MLAs and other public representatives in the activities <strong>of</strong> NYKS. District<br />

Youth Coordinators were also supposed to send the minutes <strong>of</strong> the meetings <strong>of</strong> the District Advisory Committee for Youth<br />

Programmes to respective MPs/MLAs. The Committee desired to have an idea about the level <strong>of</strong> compliance <strong>of</strong> these<br />

instructions by the District Youth Coordinators.<br />

National Service Scheme<br />

8.286 An allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 31.50 crores was made for NSS under plan in 2006-2007 against a provision <strong>of</strong> Rs. 26.<strong>10</strong><br />

crores last year. The allocation for the year had been kept on higher side due to the increase in the enrolment <strong>of</strong> students in<br />

various universities and colleges. Also there was a proposal to introduce National Service Scheme from IXth class onwards.<br />

The Committee would like the Ministry to consider introduction <strong>of</strong> NSS from class IX itself in the light <strong>of</strong> noble objectives<br />

<strong>of</strong> the scheme.<br />

8.287 The Committee understood that there was a need to deploy more number <strong>of</strong> National Service Volunteers who act<br />

as link between the Kendra and village based Rural Youth Clubs. The Committee strongly felt that it was high time for<br />

acknowledging the good work being done by NSS volunteers. Their efforts needed to be encouraged and commensurated<br />

with good incentives. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the incentive given to NSS volunteers should be<br />

enhanced and brought at par with the incentives provided to the NCC cadets so that they performed their duties with greater<br />

zest and vigour.<br />

8.288 The role <strong>of</strong> State Liaison Cells was conceived as the fountainhead for ensuring timely release <strong>of</strong> grants, monitoring<br />

and liaison with the universities and +2 level councils. Non-existence <strong>of</strong> such Liaison Cells in some States itself indicated<br />

the plight <strong>of</strong> NSS activities. Perhaps the Ministry had failed to persuade the States/UTs in setting up such an important<br />

functionary <strong>of</strong> the scheme. The Committee would like the Ministry to impress upon the States the importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Liaisoning Cells and take up the matter at the highest level <strong>of</strong> those States not having set up these cells so far.<br />

8.289 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the Ministry could no longer afford to be a mere spectator on the sensitive<br />

issues involving release <strong>of</strong> finances from the national exchequer. There was an urgent need to review the accounting<br />

procedure under NSS so that the defaulting States adopt proper fiscal disciplines.<br />

National Discipline Scheme<br />

8.290 The Committee regretted that repeated reminders from the Department to some States had not evinced any<br />

response and the issue <strong>of</strong> committed liabilities remains un-resolved for years together. The Committee felt that this situation<br />

<strong>of</strong> uncertainty should come to a halt. A time had come when the Ministry could fix a final deadline for such States to avoid<br />

this never-ending chaotic scenario. The Ministry should settle the issue once for all after paying the liabilities to those States<br />

who had furnished the information. The States who did not respond had to forgo their claims. The Committee hoped that the<br />

Ministry would plan the whole process to ensure settlement <strong>of</strong> committed liabilities within the financial year itself. The<br />

Committee would also like the Ministry to appeal to the States to avail this opportunity and expedite their claims without<br />

further loss <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

Youth Hostels<br />

8.291 The Committee noted that the allocations had not been utilised optimally. Main areas <strong>of</strong> concern had been the<br />

inordinate delay in construction process <strong>of</strong> Youth Hostels. The status <strong>of</strong> 18 Youth Hostels under construction indicated<br />

shocking revelations. There were Youth Hostels which were approved long back in 1986 and even instalments <strong>of</strong> central<br />

funds for construction were released. For instance an instalment <strong>of</strong> Rs.15 lakhs was released in March 1989 in respect <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Youth Hostel in Himachal Pradesh and the State Govt. had not even handed over the developed plot <strong>of</strong> land for construction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the project. Construction <strong>of</strong> Youth Hostel in Allahabad was approved in principle in April 1988, and State Government<br />

identified the land in 1<strong>99</strong>8. First instalment <strong>of</strong> central funds amounting to Rs. 20.00 lakhs was released in March 1<strong>99</strong>0 and<br />

the construction was yet to be completed. Position with regard to the remaining Youth Hostels was more or less the same.<br />

The Committee noted that even pursuing the issue with the concerned State Chief Secretaries had not brought any noticeable<br />

impact. The Committee observed that with the passage <strong>of</strong> time, estimates for construction kept on increasing steadily,<br />

leading to criminal wastage <strong>of</strong> Government funds.<br />

8.292 The Committee recommended that specific action needed to be initiated to remedy the problem. Stringent action<br />

was required to be taken in respect <strong>of</strong> some places which ultimately will have its impact in other places also. Even the<br />

extreme step for recovery <strong>of</strong> the instalment to central pool may be contemplated in such cases where the construction work


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 65 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

had not started even 3 years after the release <strong>of</strong> instalments(s). The Committee would like to have a status note on the<br />

utilisation <strong>of</strong> instalments released for all such incomplete projects.<br />

Promotion <strong>of</strong> Youth Activities and Training<br />

8.293 The Committee apprehended that the above pendency must have increased further in view <strong>of</strong> an expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />

9.66 crores being incurred under this scheme during 2004-05. The Committee had been given to understand that action had<br />

been taken to stop further grants to such organizations. The Committee would like to have the feedback from those NGOs<br />

who were not released further grant due to their past performance.<br />

National Integration Programme<br />

8.294 The Scheme provides the framework for greater exchange and understanding among the youth belonging to<br />

different regions <strong>of</strong> the country. The two components <strong>of</strong> this scheme were National Integration Camp and Inter State Youth<br />

Exchange Programme administered by NGOs and other agencies. The Committee noted that achievement level for both<br />

physical and financial targets had been by and large satisfactory. Additional funds were also being provided due to the<br />

tremendous response being received from the implementing agencies. During 2005-06, plan allocation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 4.95 crore<br />

was enhanced to Rs. 5.50 crore and actual expenditure reported upto 20 th March 2006 was Rs. 5.11 crore. The Committee<br />

noted that provision <strong>of</strong> Rs. <strong>10</strong>.00 crore had been made for the scheme for 2006-07. The Committee’s attention however, has<br />

been drawn by the status <strong>of</strong> pendency <strong>of</strong> utilization certificates spread over different States under this programme. As many<br />

as 27 UCs, 1<strong>10</strong> UCs and 120 UCs for 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 respectively were yet to be received from<br />

implementing agencies. These were the figures in respect <strong>of</strong> NGOs. Status <strong>of</strong> other implementing agencies was not known<br />

to the Committee. The Committee strongly felt that urgent action was required to be taken in this matter. Under no<br />

circumstances, defaulter NGOs should be provided further assistance.<br />

Miscellaneous<br />

8.295 The Committee would like to reiterate its earlier recommendation that any new scheme should be launched only<br />

after the completion <strong>of</strong> all the preliminary formalities.<br />

Sports Authority <strong>of</strong> India (SAI)<br />

8.296 The Committee was not convinced with the Ministry’s excuse for inadequate resources, when the allocation so<br />

received remain underutilised. Unfortunately the Ministry had not shared the utilization figures for the previous year with the<br />

Committee. Needless to say, the trend <strong>of</strong> unspent balances with SAI was quite disappointing a fact to suggest serious steps<br />

for restructuring <strong>of</strong> SAI to make it a more effective and pr<strong>of</strong>essional body.<br />

8.297 The Committee was dismayed to note that after conversion <strong>of</strong> NSTC Scheme from residential to day boarding, the<br />

intake <strong>of</strong> children in the scheme in most <strong>of</strong> the adopted regular schools both in individual as well as team event was quite<br />

less. The Committee was not sure whether proper consultations with all the stakeholders had taken place before finally<br />

converting the mode <strong>of</strong> scheme. The Committee was also not inclined to agree with Ministry’s argument that intake <strong>of</strong><br />

children in the Navodaya Vidyalayas was far from satisfactory due to non-availability <strong>of</strong> talented children. Most <strong>of</strong> the NVs<br />

were located in the rural areas and it would be the weakness <strong>of</strong> Government’s Rural Sports Programme in case they fail to tap<br />

rural talent. The Committee, however, appreciated the role <strong>of</strong> ABSCs in providing job opportunities to those excelling in<br />

performance after attaining the age <strong>of</strong> 17 ½ years in the Indian Army. The Committee would like the Ministry to expand the<br />

coverage <strong>of</strong> the scheme in all States in view <strong>of</strong> its utility.<br />

8.298 The Committee was unhappy with the low expenditure on traditional/indigenous games during the last three years.<br />

This fact was reflected in the drastic reduction <strong>of</strong> funds to these federations over the years. The Committee felt that there are<br />

no clear-cut guidelines to either State Governments or SAI centres about the promotion <strong>of</strong> indigenous games. The appraisal<br />

<strong>of</strong> these games was also not possible as no State-wise grant was released for the purpose. The continuous decline in<br />

allocation over the years itself indicates reluctance <strong>of</strong> Government towards these disciplines. The Committee was surprised<br />

on Ministry’s assertion that they were not short <strong>of</strong> funds. In fact, if it was so the Ministry should not have any problem in<br />

persuading the federations to avail optimum funds from the Government for promotion <strong>of</strong> indigenous games.<br />

8.2<strong>99</strong> The Committee had been concerned about poor level <strong>of</strong> achievement in Olympics inspite <strong>of</strong> good performance at<br />

Asian and Commonwealth Games. The representatives <strong>of</strong> the Ministry clarified that pre-qualification standards in Olympic<br />

Games were very tough. To overcome the problem, the numbers <strong>of</strong> trainees were proposed to be increased from <strong>10</strong>,000 to<br />

15,000 in SAI training centers. Efforts were also on to strengthen the rural sports. At Panchayat level efforts were initiated


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 66 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

so that the children from rural areas could also be benefited and got encouragement to join sports. It would be helpful in<br />

upgrading the skills <strong>of</strong> the talented, which was in abundance in rural areas. He assured that by adopting such measures more<br />

medals could be achieved in 20<strong>10</strong> and 2014 Games.<br />

8.300 The Committee understood that there were 5 main SAI centers in the country. However, <strong>of</strong> these centres i.e.<br />

NERC, Imphal still continued to function as a sub-centre as there was no full-fledged Director. The Committee was surprised<br />

at such peculiar status <strong>of</strong> the centre. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that this centre would work better if it is declared as a<br />

full-fledged centre with adequate manpower and infrastructure.<br />

8.301 The Committee was aware that there was no dearth <strong>of</strong> sporting talent in the country. Proper hunting/searching and<br />

nurturing <strong>of</strong> the talent was required. Talent was in abundance in schools and educational institutions. States were allocated<br />

funds for development <strong>of</strong> sports. But educational institutions did not have physical instructors. The Committee felt that the<br />

talent search process was not able to get the reach it required. People remain in dark about such exercise. Present system <strong>of</strong><br />

selection had not yielded the desired results and the talent had still remained unspotted. The Central Government, State<br />

Government and the sport authorities should, therefore, give adequate publicity through advertisement to such events.<br />

Promotion <strong>of</strong> Sports among Disabled<br />

8.302 Only a token provision was made for the scheme in 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06 as the scheme had not been<br />

formulated. The Committee had been given to understand that the scheme was likely to be included in the umbrella scheme<br />

related to events. Accordingly, no provision had been made in 2006-07. The Committee took strong exception to this kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> approach. This clearly indicated that the Ministry was not serious about the necessity <strong>of</strong> providing any kind <strong>of</strong> incentives<br />

to the disadvantaged segment <strong>of</strong> our society.<br />

Sports Infrastructure Scheme<br />

8.303 The Committee was not happy with this turn <strong>of</strong> events. The Committee liked to draw the attention <strong>of</strong> the Ministry<br />

towards its earlier recommendation about the non-advisability <strong>of</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> such a vital scheme essential for developing the<br />

sports potential <strong>of</strong> our youth. The Committee reiterated that instead <strong>of</strong> transferring the scheme to the State sector, Ministry<br />

should focus more on the monitoring and effective implementation there<strong>of</strong>. The Committee would like the Ministry to<br />

continue funding for rural sports infrastructure development to patronize the rural sports under its direct supervision.<br />

Scheme for Dope Test<br />

8.304 The Committee was constrained to note that at present, SAI had only 38 Sports Scientists including medical<br />

doctors. This strength <strong>of</strong> scientific personnel was not enough to provide optimum scientific support to the sports needs in the<br />

country. Sports-related scientific research and development in India had not been able to keep pace with international<br />

developments in various fields like Physiology, Psychology, Bio-mechanics etc. Greater attention was required to be given to<br />

research and development <strong>of</strong> sports science, in case India had to excel in sports at international level.<br />

8.305 The Committee was aware <strong>of</strong> the recent doping incidents during international sports events. It was understood that<br />

out <strong>of</strong> 11 athletes 9 were found to be positive. This had become a recurring feature during the international championships<br />

and during every international event the country’s prestige was thus put at stake. Perhaps our sports administration had failed<br />

to make the players aware <strong>of</strong> the dire consequences if they were tested positive. These performance enhancing drugs had an<br />

adverse affect on their health and could even ruin them pr<strong>of</strong>essionally. With the advent <strong>of</strong> technology dope testing methods<br />

have also faced new challenges. Undoubtedly it was a constant battle with technology. Test methods have become more and<br />

more sophisticated. To generate awareness amongst the players education was the best cure. The Committee felt that though<br />

the Ministry claimed that overall the doping instances had decreased from 4% to 2-½% but the recent instances put a shadow<br />

on such claims. The Committee hoped that the Ministry would endeavour to achieve all the international standards <strong>of</strong> dope<br />

testing towards fighting the malice <strong>of</strong> doping which degrades the prestige <strong>of</strong> the nation.<br />

Grants to National Sports Federations<br />

8.306 Undoubtedly the existing guidelines/byelaws did not have provision to recover the dues from the federations but<br />

this issue <strong>of</strong> prolonged non-payment needed to be addressed with some sort <strong>of</strong> authority. The Ministry should, therefore,<br />

revise its guidelines by either adding a clause for derecognition <strong>of</strong> defaulting NSF or authorising SAI to recover the dues<br />

from the NSF. A beginning should be made by recovery <strong>of</strong> outstanding electricity and water charges from such federations.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 67 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Scheme Relating to ‘HIV/AIDS’<br />

8.307 The Committee was happy to note the introduction <strong>of</strong> the scheme aimed at achieving victory over AIDS in India.<br />

The Committee felt that proper strategy should be developed to achieve the objectives <strong>of</strong> the scheme. Adolescent/youth<br />

clubs and youth information centers require proper back up <strong>of</strong> counseling and resource materials. The Committee<br />

underlined the need for establishment <strong>of</strong> linkages amongst all the field organizations with health facilities and VCTCs for<br />

service access. The Committee would like the Ministry to pursue the Planning Commission to seek in principle approval in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the scheme.<br />

Commonwealth Games, 20<strong>10</strong><br />

8.308 The Committee recommended that the concerned agencies should be asked to expedite its planning and projections<br />

so that the annual break-up <strong>of</strong> funds required during next four years could be worked out. The special plan <strong>of</strong> action prepared<br />

in respect <strong>of</strong> imparting training to athletes should be finalized at the earliest. Committee would like to be apprised about the<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> Indian athletes in the Commonwealth Games, 2006.<br />

(f) 177 th Report<br />

Clause 1 (1)<br />

8.309 The Committee, felt that the use <strong>of</strong> words ‘institute’ and ‘university’ together should be avoided. Instead it would<br />

be more appropriate to call the proposed Act in Clause 1(1) as “The English and Foreign Languages University Act,<br />

2006”.<br />

Clause 3(1)<br />

8.3<strong>10</strong> In view <strong>of</strong> its recommendations for clause 1(1), the Committee proposed that the name <strong>of</strong> the proposed University<br />

be “English and Foreign Languages University”.<br />

Clause 6(viii)<br />

8.311 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that the word “organization” in this clause left enough scope for<br />

including extraneous agencies/bodies as well. The Department clarified that the word ‘organization’ generally meant “a<br />

teaching or a research institution, other than a university”. The Committee felt that it needs to specified. It therefore,<br />

recommended that the word ‘organization’ may be substituted by the words ‘educational institution’ so as to remove any<br />

ambiguity about the nature <strong>of</strong> the organization.<br />

Clause 30(1)(i)<br />

8.312 The Committee recommended that the words ‘discipline and’ be deleted from line 12 <strong>of</strong> clause 30 (1) (i) <strong>of</strong> the Bill.<br />

Clause 30(1)(j)<br />

8.313 The Committee, therefore, recommended that the words ‘not for pr<strong>of</strong>it’ may be added before the word ‘agencies’ in<br />

page <strong>10</strong>, line 15 <strong>of</strong> Clause 30 (1) (j).<br />

Clause 35(3)<br />

8.314 The Committee, recommended that the following explanation may be added in the said sub-clause for removing the<br />

erroneous impression in this regard.<br />

“This does not preclude the employees from availing the remedies provided for under Articles 226 & 32 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution.”<br />

Clause 39<br />

8.315 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> considered opinion that ideally the composition/membership <strong>of</strong> these bodies should have


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 68 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

been provided in the Statute itself as was done in the case <strong>of</strong> Allahabad University. In view <strong>of</strong> the fact that the composition <strong>of</strong><br />

authorities <strong>of</strong> the university would be subsequently decided by the university bodies, the Committee wished to emphasise the<br />

need for having elected elements in all the bodies/authority <strong>of</strong> the university. The Committee, therefore, recommended that<br />

suitable mention for the purpose be made in the Bill at appropriate places. The Committee further recommended that an<br />

enabling provision must be provided in the Act itself to ensure democratization in true spirit.<br />

Clause 46<br />

8.316 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that since the first <strong>of</strong>ficers and authorities <strong>of</strong> the university was to be<br />

appointed or nominated by the Central Government, their term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fices as provided in transitional provisions should not be<br />

long enough. The Committee noted that in some cases it was five years and in others it was three years. It, therefore,<br />

recommended that the term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the first Chancellor, the first Vice-Chancellor as well as other <strong>of</strong>ficers and bodies<br />

provided in various sub-clauses <strong>of</strong> Clause 46 on page 13 should be reduced from five and three years to three and two years<br />

respectively.<br />

Clause 6 and 7 (b), (c) and (d) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.317 The Committee noted that these provision <strong>of</strong> the Statute provided in the Schedule mention about College<br />

Development Council but this body was not amongst the authorities <strong>of</strong> the university. The Department clarified that it was<br />

mentioned ‘erroneously’. The Committee, therefore, recommended that name <strong>of</strong> this body be deleted from the above clauses.<br />

Clause 17 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.318 The Committee, recommended that a new sub-clause “atleast one person to be nominated by the Court” may be<br />

added immediately after line 11 <strong>of</strong> Clause 17 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes on page 22 <strong>of</strong> the Bill.<br />

Clause 37 <strong>of</strong> Statutes<br />

8.319 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> considered opinion that the Act must provide for elected representation <strong>of</strong> students, teachers<br />

and non-teaching staff in all authoritative bodies <strong>of</strong> the University and ensure their right to form associations. However, the<br />

Committee found no such provision for students. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the words ‘two elected<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> students’ should found place in the constitution <strong>of</strong> the Student Council and Clause 37 be redrafted<br />

accordingly.<br />

(g) 178 th Report<br />

Clause 5 (d)<br />

8.320 The Committee recommended that the service conditions <strong>of</strong> the employees should have uniform application in all<br />

the NITs. Accordingly, the Department should bring necessary change in the clause with a view to ensuring uniformity in<br />

service conditions, pensions etc. in all the Institutes.<br />

8.321 The Committee was also wary <strong>of</strong> the words “duly altered by the statutes” in page 2, line 45 <strong>of</strong> Clause 5 (d). The<br />

Committee felt that this provided scope to alter to the disadvantage <strong>of</strong> the tenure employees in terms <strong>of</strong> their remuneration<br />

and conditions <strong>of</strong> service. The Committee recommended that it must be ensured that alteration in service conditions should<br />

not be to the disadvantage <strong>of</strong> the employees. Accordingly, clause 5 (d) may be redrafted.<br />

8.322 The Committee strongly felt that the Pension Scheme should be made applicable to all the NITs only exception<br />

being those employees who joined service on or after 01.01.2004. All the RECs after getting the status <strong>of</strong> NITs had the same<br />

mandate and enjoyed the same status and performed the same functions. This uniformity should be extended to the service<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> employees also. One time exception can be made and the Department should pursue this issue if need be, at the<br />

highest level so that rightful demands <strong>of</strong> employees <strong>of</strong> NITs <strong>of</strong> Kurukshetra, Jalandhar and Silchar were accepted.<br />

Clause 6<br />

8.323 The Committee recommended that a new sub clause enabling the Institutes to undertake consultancy in the areas/<br />

disciplines relevant to the Institutes may be added.<br />

Clause 6 (1) (n)<br />

8.324 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that objects <strong>of</strong> the Institute be clearly defined in the Bill itself at


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 69 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

appropriate place.<br />

Clause 9 (3)<br />

8.325 As per clause 9(3), the Institute shall be bound to comply with the directions issued by the Visitor. However, no<br />

time-frame had been indicated. The Committee therefore, recommended that the words “within reasonable time” may be<br />

added in page 4, line 9 <strong>of</strong> Clause 9 (3) after the words “.... with such directions”.<br />

Clause 11<br />

8.326 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that State’s say in representation in BOG appears to be negligible in<br />

the Bill. The Committee recommended that suitable addition be made for consultation with State Governments in Clause 11.<br />

Clause 11 (a)<br />

8.327 Clause 11 specified the composition <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Governors. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the<br />

Chairperson <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Governor should be an eminent person in the technical field. The Committee recommended that<br />

this fact must be mentioned appropriately in clause 11 (a) itself.<br />

Clause 11 (f)<br />

8.328 The Committee recommended that instead <strong>of</strong> two pr<strong>of</strong>essors, one Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and one Reader/Lecturer may be<br />

nominated to the Board <strong>of</strong> Governors. Clause 11 (f) may be modified accordingly.<br />

Clause 12 (c)<br />

8.329 The Committee recommended that the term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> a member nominated under clause (f) <strong>of</strong> Section 11 shall be<br />

made two years from the date <strong>of</strong> his/her nomination.<br />

Clause 12 (f)<br />

8.330 The Committee recommended that the Bill should clearly specify maximum period in which such nomination had<br />

to be done. The Committee recommended that insertion to this effect be made in the Bill at appropriate places.<br />

Clause 13 (2) (f)<br />

8.331 The Committee felt that it would be better if this power <strong>of</strong> the Council were a little moderated. The Committee,<br />

therefore, recommended that the words “and the Council shall ordinarily accept the statement made to it” be added after the<br />

words “…development plans” in page 5, line 15 <strong>of</strong> Clause 13 (2) (f).<br />

Clause 14 (d)<br />

8.332 Clause 14 provided for the constitution <strong>of</strong> the Senate. As per sub-clause (d), three persons, not being employees <strong>of</strong><br />

the Institute were to be nominated by the Chairperson in consultation with the Director. The Committee strongly felt that<br />

under this category, one member should be a woman. The Committee, accordingly, recommended that the words “one <strong>of</strong><br />

whom to be woman” may be added after the words “three persons” in page 5, line 25 <strong>of</strong> clause 14 (d).<br />

Clause 14 (e)<br />

8.333 The Committee recommended that the Statutes must provide for the representation <strong>of</strong> students in the Senate. The<br />

Committee accordingly, recommended that the words “and students” be added after the words “…<strong>of</strong> the Staff ” in page 5,<br />

line 28 <strong>of</strong> clause 14 (e).<br />

8.334 The Committee further recommended that the Statutes in this regard must also provide for election <strong>of</strong> staff and<br />

students on the Senate. The staff and students should be elected rather than being nominated on the Senate.<br />

Clause 17<br />

8.335 The Committee, therefore, recommended that a term <strong>of</strong> five years may be specified for the Director and Deputy


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 70 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Director in Clause 17 <strong>of</strong> the Bill.<br />

Clause 18<br />

8.336 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that the Registrar should be taken on deputation for a period <strong>of</strong> three<br />

years. The Committee, accordingly, recommended the Department to redraft Clause 18 suitably.<br />

Clause 25<br />

8.337 The Committee, therefore, recommended that Clause 25 (g) be suitably amended in the Bill so that there was<br />

uniformity on the subject contained in Clause 25 (g) across the board.<br />

8.338 The Committee also took note <strong>of</strong> Clause 25 (n) whereunder matters regarding the meetings <strong>of</strong> the Board, the<br />

Senate, or any Committee, the quorum at such meetings and the procedure to be followed in the conduct <strong>of</strong> their business was<br />

to be laid down in the Statutes. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the subject matter contained in Clause 25 (n) be placed<br />

in the Bill itself and laid out clearly. Necessary amendments may, accordingly, be made in the Bill.<br />

Clause 26(1)<br />

8.339 The Committee recommended that the words “Central Government” be substituted by the word ‘Council’ in page<br />

7, line 33 <strong>of</strong> clause 26 (1).<br />

Clause 29<br />

8.340 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that the option granted to the Institute to refer the dispute for<br />

arbitration can be exploited against the wishes <strong>of</strong> the aggrieved employee who might be inclined to approach the court. The<br />

Committee, therefore, recommended that the words “or at the instance <strong>of</strong> the Institute” may be deleted from page 8, line 26 <strong>of</strong><br />

clause 29 (1).<br />

8.341 The Committee was aware that no Act can debar the remedies available under Articles 226 and 32 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution. The Bill also doesn’t intend to do this. The Committee, however, recommended that the following Explanation<br />

may be added in the said sub-clause for removing the erroneous impression in this regard.<br />

“This does not preclude the employees from availing the remedies provided for under Articles 226 & 32 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution.”<br />

Chapter III — The Council<br />

Clause 30<br />

8.342 The Committee recommended that the Department may suitably redraft the Bill to ensure that the Council meets at<br />

least once every year.<br />

Clause 35 (a)<br />

8.343 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that saving any act or proceeding <strong>of</strong> a body despite a defect in its<br />

constitution was likely to be misused. The Committee, therefore, recommended that this provision may be redrafted suitably<br />

so that no act or proceeding gets validated despite a defect in the constitution <strong>of</strong> any decision-making bodies or any defect in<br />

the election, nomination or appointment <strong>of</strong> a person acting as a member <strong>of</strong> these bodies.<br />

(h) 179 th Report<br />

Clause 5(ix)<br />

8.344 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that the word ‘organization’ in this clause left some scope for<br />

different interpretations. The Department clarified that the word ‘organization’ generally meant ‘a teaching or a research<br />

institution, other than a university.’ The Committee felt that this needs to be specified in the Bill with a view to remove any<br />

ambiguity about the nature <strong>of</strong> the organization.<br />

Clause 5(xix)


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 71 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.345 The Committee felt that the provision <strong>of</strong> the clause amounts to giving unbridled powers to the University for<br />

conferring autonomous status on a College, an Institution or a Department. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that some<br />

kind <strong>of</strong> requirements and conditions necessary for making an institution autonomous may be specified. The Committee,<br />

therefore, recommended that Clause 5(xix) may be suitably amended.<br />

Clause 21 (1)<br />

8.346 The Committee felt that the Court being the apex body <strong>of</strong> the university, provision for its constitution and term <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> its members be provided in the first statutes itself.<br />

Clauses 22(2), 23(2), 24(2), 25 and 26<br />

8.347 The Committee noted that the Executive Council, Academic Council, College Development Council, Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Studies and Finance Committee are the important decision-making bodies <strong>of</strong> the University. The Statutes appended to the<br />

Bill contain provisions only about the powers and functions <strong>of</strong> these bodies but was silent about their constitution and term <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fice. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the provisions for the constitution and term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the Executive<br />

Council, Academic Council, College Development Council, Board <strong>of</strong> Studies and Finance Committee, also be included<br />

within corpus <strong>of</strong> the first Statutes itself.<br />

Clause 30(1)(i)<br />

8.348 The Committee found that this sub-clause provides for making special arrangements ‘for the residence, discipline<br />

and teaching <strong>of</strong> women students.’ The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that while this was valid in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

residence and specific courses for women students, the word ‘discipline’ in this clause appears to be discriminatory; hence<br />

unnecessary. Accordingly, the Committee recommended that the word ‘discipline’ be deleted from clause 30 (1) (i), page <strong>10</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> the Bill.<br />

Clause 30(1)(k)<br />

8.349 The Committee felt that the words ‘other agencies’ left ample scope for associating with agencies which might be<br />

private and for pr<strong>of</strong>it. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the words ‘not for pr<strong>of</strong>it’ may be appropriately added in<br />

page <strong>10</strong>, line 25 <strong>of</strong> Clause 30 (1) (k).<br />

Clause 35(3)<br />

8.350 The Committee felt that Clause 35(3) gave an impression that the employees are debarred from all other judicial<br />

remedies against the decision <strong>of</strong> the Tribunal. The Committee was aware that no Act can debar the remedies available under<br />

Articles 226 and 32 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. The Bill also did not intend to do this. The Committee, however, recommended that<br />

the following explanation may be added in the said Clause for removing the erroneous impression in this regard.<br />

Clause 39<br />

‘This does not preclude the employees from availing the remedies provided under Articles 226 and 32 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution’<br />

Clause 35 (3) may, accordingly, be amended.<br />

8.351 The Committee noted that the Bill nowhere mentions about an elected membership <strong>of</strong> any authority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> considered opinion that ideally, the composition/membership <strong>of</strong> these bodies should have<br />

been provided in the Statute itself as was done in the case <strong>of</strong> Allahabad University. In view <strong>of</strong> the fact that the composition <strong>of</strong><br />

authorities <strong>of</strong> the university would be subsequently decided by the university bodies, the Committee wished to emphasize the<br />

need for having elected elements in all the bodies/authorities <strong>of</strong> the university. The Committee, therefore, recommended that<br />

suitable mention for the purpose be made in the Bill at appropriate places. The Committee further recommended that an<br />

enabling provision must be provided in the Act itself to ensure democratization <strong>of</strong> various bodies <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

Clause 42


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 72 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.352 The Committee felt that the words ‘good faith or intended to be done in pursuance <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> this<br />

Act, the Statutes or the Ordinances’ were vague and left scope for misuse as interpretation <strong>of</strong> ‘good faith’ could be subjective.<br />

The Committee, therefore, recommended that the ambit <strong>of</strong> the words ‘good faith or intended to be done in pursuance <strong>of</strong> any<br />

<strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> this Act, the Statutes or the Ordinances’ may be spelt out in clear terms.<br />

Clause 46<br />

8.353 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that since the first <strong>of</strong>ficers and authorities <strong>of</strong> the university were to<br />

be appointed or nominated by the Central Government, their term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fices as provided in transitional provisions should not<br />

be long enough. The Committee noted that in some cases it was five years and in others it was three years. It, therefore,<br />

recommended that the term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the first Chancellor, the first Vice-Chancellor as well as other <strong>of</strong>ficers and bodies<br />

provided in various sub-clauses <strong>of</strong> Clause 46 on page 13 should be reduced from five and three years to three and two years<br />

respectively.<br />

The Schedule<br />

Clauses 2(1) and 2(2) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.354 The Committee found that the Statute were silent about the background <strong>of</strong> the persons to be placed on the panel for<br />

appointment as Vice-Chancellor. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the background <strong>of</strong> the persons who could be<br />

placed on the panel for appointment as Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> the University may be indicated in the Bill itself. The Committee<br />

further recommended that a nominee <strong>of</strong> the Court should also be included in the Selection Committee for appointment to the<br />

post <strong>of</strong> Vice-Chancellor.<br />

Clause 9 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.355 The Committee recommended that the Librarian’s retirement age should also find place in the Bill.<br />

Clause 17 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.356 The Committee opined that University Court being an important body should have representation in the Finance<br />

Committee. The Committee, therefore, recommended that a new sub-clause ‘at least one person to be nominated by the<br />

Court’ may be added immediately after line 43 <strong>of</strong> Clause 17 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes on page 21 <strong>of</strong> the Bill.<br />

Clause 18(2) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.357 The Committee was aware that the Heads <strong>of</strong> the Department are appointed generally by seniority and rotation. It<br />

could, therefore, be possible that a Reader happens to be the Head <strong>of</strong> the Department when the process for appointment to the<br />

post <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor was underway. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the words ‘if he was a pr<strong>of</strong>essor’ may be<br />

appended to (ii) <strong>of</strong> Column 2 <strong>of</strong> Table against the heading ‘Pr<strong>of</strong>essor’.<br />

Clause 29(1) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.358 The Committee felt that the provisions <strong>of</strong> Clause 29(1) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes and Clause 36(1) <strong>of</strong> the principal Act appear<br />

to be contradictory. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Clauses may be suitably re-drafted to<br />

remove the inherent contradictions, if any.<br />

Clause 39(1) <strong>of</strong> Statutes<br />

8.359 The Committee recommended that the words ‘two elected representatives <strong>of</strong> students’ should find place in the<br />

constitution <strong>of</strong> the Student Council and Clause 39, page 29, be re-drafted accordingly.<br />

(i) 180 th Report<br />

Clause 6(ix)<br />

8.360 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that the word ‘organization’ in this clause left some scope for<br />

different interpretations. The Department clarified that the word ‘organization’ generally meant ‘a teaching or a research


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 73 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

institution, other than a university.’ The Committee felt that this needs to be specified in the Bill with a view to remove any<br />

ambiguity about the nature <strong>of</strong> the organization.<br />

Clause 6(xix)<br />

8.361 The Committee felt that the provision <strong>of</strong> the clause amounted to giving unbridled powers to the University for<br />

conferring autonomous status on a College, an Institution or a Department. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that<br />

some kind <strong>of</strong> requirements and conditions necessary for making an institution autonomous may be specified. The<br />

Committee, therefore, recommended that Clause 6(xix) may be suitably amended.<br />

Clause 22 (1)<br />

8.362 The Committee felt that the Court being the apex body <strong>of</strong> the university, provision for its constitution and term <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> its members be provided in the first statutes itself.<br />

Clauses 23(2), 24(2), 25(2), 26 and 27<br />

8.363 The Committee noted that the Executive Council, Academic Council, College Development Council, Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Studies and Finance Committee were the important decision-making bodies <strong>of</strong> the University. The Statutes appended to the<br />

Bill contain provisions only about the powers and functions <strong>of</strong> these bodies but was silent about their constitution and term <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fice. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the provisions for the constitution and term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the Executive<br />

Council, Academic Council, College Development Council, Board <strong>of</strong> Studies and Finance Committee, also be included<br />

within corpus <strong>of</strong> the first Statutes itself.<br />

Clause 31(1)(i)<br />

8.364 The Committee found that this sub-clause provides for making special arrangements ‘for the residence, discipline<br />

and teaching <strong>of</strong> women students.’ The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that while this was valid in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

residence and specific courses for women students, the word ‘discipline’ in this clause appears to be discriminatory; hence<br />

unnecessary. Accordingly, the Committee recommended that the word ‘discipline’ be deleted from clause 31 (1) (i) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bill.<br />

Clause 31(1)(k)<br />

8.365 The Committee felt that the words ‘other agencies’ left ample scope for associating with agencies which might be<br />

private and for pr<strong>of</strong>it. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the words ‘not for pr<strong>of</strong>it’ might be appropriately added<br />

in page 11, line 17 <strong>of</strong> Clause 31 (1) (k).<br />

Clause 36(3)<br />

8.366 The Committee felt that Clause 36(3) gave an impression that the employees were debarred from all other judicial<br />

remedies against the decision <strong>of</strong> the Tribunal. The Committee was aware that no Act could debar the remedies available<br />

under Articles 226 and 32 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. The Bill also did not intend to do this. The Committee, however,<br />

recommended that the following explanation might be added in the said Clause for removing the erroneous impression in this<br />

regard.<br />

Clause 40<br />

‘This does not preclude the employees from availing the remedies provided under Articles 226 and 32 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution’<br />

Clause 36 (3) may, accordingly, be amended.<br />

8.367 The Committee noted that the Bill nowhere mentions about an elected membership <strong>of</strong> any authority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> considered opinion that ideally, the composition/membership <strong>of</strong> these bodies should have<br />

been provided in the Statute itself as was done in the case <strong>of</strong> Allahabad University. In view <strong>of</strong> the fact that the composition <strong>of</strong><br />

authorities <strong>of</strong> the university would be subsequently decided by the university bodies, the Committee wished to emphasize the<br />

need for having elected elements in all the bodies/authorities <strong>of</strong> the university. The Committee, therefore, recommended that<br />

suitable mention for the purpose be made in the Bill at appropriate places. The Committee further recommended that an<br />

enabling provision must be provided in the Act itself to ensure democratization <strong>of</strong> various bodies <strong>of</strong> the University.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 74 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Clause 43<br />

8.368 The Committee felt that the words ‘good faith or intended to be done in pursuance <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> this<br />

Act, the Statutes or the Ordinances’ were vague and left scope for misuse as interpretation <strong>of</strong> ‘good faith’ could be subjective.<br />

The Committee, therefore, recommended that the ambit <strong>of</strong> the words ‘good faith or intended to be done in pursuance <strong>of</strong> any<br />

<strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> this Act, the Statutes or the Ordinances’ may be spelt out in clear terms.<br />

Clause 47<br />

8.369 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that since the first <strong>of</strong>ficers and authorities <strong>of</strong> the university were to<br />

be appointed or nominated by the Central Government, their term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fices as provided in transitional provisions should not<br />

be long enough. The Committee noted that in some cases it was five years and in others it was three years. It, therefore,<br />

recommended that the term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the first Chancellor, the first Vice-Chancellor as well as other <strong>of</strong>ficers and bodies<br />

provided in various sub-clauses <strong>of</strong> Clause 47 on page 14 should be reduced from five and three years to three and two years<br />

respectively.<br />

The Schedule<br />

Clauses 2(1) and 2(2) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.370 The Committee found that the Statute were silent about the background <strong>of</strong> the persons to be placed on the panel for<br />

appointment as Vice-Chancellor. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the background <strong>of</strong> the persons who could be<br />

placed on the panel for appointment as Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> the University might be indicated in the Bill itself. The<br />

Committee further recommended that a nominee <strong>of</strong> the Court should also be included in the Selection Committee for<br />

appointment to the post <strong>of</strong> Vice-Chancellor.<br />

Clauses 9 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.371 The Committee recommended that the Librarian’s retirement age should also find place in th<br />

Bill.<br />

Clause 17 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.372 The Committee opined that University Court being an important body should have representation in the Finance<br />

Committee. The Committee, therefore, recommended that a new sub-clause ‘at least one person to be nominated by the<br />

Court’ might be added immediately after line 6 <strong>of</strong> Clause 17 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes on page 23 <strong>of</strong> the Bill.<br />

Clause 18(2) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.373 The Committee was aware that the Heads <strong>of</strong> the Department were appointed generally by seniority and rotation. It<br />

could, therefore, be possible that a Reader happened to be the Head <strong>of</strong> the Department when the process for appointment to<br />

the post <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor was underway. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the words ‘if he was a pr<strong>of</strong>essor’ might<br />

be appended to (ii) <strong>of</strong> Column 2 <strong>of</strong> Table against the heading ‘Pr<strong>of</strong>essor’.<br />

Clause 29 (1) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.374 The Committee felt that the provisions <strong>of</strong> Clause 29(1) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes and Clause 37(1) <strong>of</strong> the Principal Act<br />

appeared to be contradictory. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Clauses might be suitably<br />

re-drafted to remove the inherent contradictions, if any.<br />

Clause 39 (1) <strong>of</strong> Statutes<br />

8.375 The Committee recommended that the words ‘two elected representatives <strong>of</strong> students’ should find place in the<br />

constitution <strong>of</strong> the Student Council and Clause 39, page 30 be re-drafted<br />

accordingly.<br />

(j) 181 st Report


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 75 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Clause 2(d) & 2(e)<br />

8.376 The Committee noted that the definitions for ‘Approved Institution’ and ‘Approved Teachers’ provided in 2(d) and<br />

2(e) on page 2 were not explicit and left some scope for confusion. On a specific query in this regard, the Committee was<br />

informed that the basis for inclusion <strong>of</strong> these two definitions in the Bill was the existing provision under the State University<br />

Act. It was clarified that due to lack <strong>of</strong> higher educational institutions in the State, some institutions in the State were<br />

approved for grant <strong>of</strong> certificate and diploma courses. It was envisaged to continue with the existing facilities till the time<br />

higher educational institutions were made operational. The Committee was, however, not convinced by the justification<br />

given by the Department. With the State University getting the status <strong>of</strong> Central University, any institution existing<br />

anywhere could get the approved status. The Committee, therefore, was <strong>of</strong> the view that there was need to amplify the<br />

definitions <strong>of</strong> the terms ‘Approved Institution’ and ‘Approved Teachers’ with a view to removing possible ambiguities in<br />

these regards. The Committee, therefore, recommended that necessary amendments should be brought in the relevant<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> the Bill for this purpose.<br />

Clause 6(ix)<br />

8.377 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that the word ‘organization’ in this clause left some scope for<br />

different interpretations. The Department clarified that the word ‘organization’ generally meant ‘a teaching or a research<br />

institution, other than a university’. The Committee felt that this needed to be specified in the Bill with a view to remove any<br />

ambiguity about the nature <strong>of</strong> the organization.<br />

Clause 6(xix)<br />

8.378 The Committee felt that the provision <strong>of</strong> the clause amounted to giving unbridled powers to the University for<br />

conferring autonomous status on a College, an Institution or a Department. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that some<br />

kind <strong>of</strong> requirements and conditions necessary for making any institution autonomous may be specified. The Committee,<br />

therefore, recommended that Clause 6(xix) may be suitably amended.<br />

Clause 22(1)<br />

8.379 The Committee felt that the Court being the apex body <strong>of</strong> the university, provision for its constitution and term <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> its members be provided in the first statutes itself.<br />

Clauses 23(2), 24(2), 25(2), 26 and 27<br />

8.380 The Committee noted that the Executive Council, Academic Council, College Development Council, Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Studies and Finance Committee are the important decision-making bodies <strong>of</strong> the University. The Statutes appended to the<br />

Bill contain provisions only about the powers and functions <strong>of</strong> these bodies but is silent about their constitution and term <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fice. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the provisions for the constitution and term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the Executive<br />

Council, Academic Council, College Development Council, Board <strong>of</strong> Studies and Finance Committee, also be included<br />

within corpus <strong>of</strong> the first Statutes itself.<br />

Clause 31(1)(i)<br />

8.381 The Committee found that sub-clause (i) on page 11 provides for making special arrangements “for residence,<br />

discipline and teaching <strong>of</strong> women students.” The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that while this was valid in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> residence and specific courses for women students, the word ‘discipline’ in this clause appeared to be discriminatory;<br />

hence unnecessary. Accordingly, the Committee recommended that the words ‘discipline’ be deleted from clause 31(1)(i),<br />

page 11 <strong>of</strong> the Bill.<br />

Clause 31(1)(k)<br />

8.382 The Committee felt that the word ‘other agencies’ left ample scope for associating with agencies which might be<br />

private and for pr<strong>of</strong>it. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the words ‘not for pr<strong>of</strong>it’ may be appropriately added in<br />

page 11, line 8 <strong>of</strong> Clause 31 (1) (k).<br />

Clause 36(3)<br />

8.383 The Committee felt that Clause 36(3) gave an impression that the employees were debarred from all other judicial<br />

remedies against the decision <strong>of</strong> the Tribunal. The Committee was aware that no Act could debar the remedies available<br />

under Articles 226 and 32 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. The Bill also did not intend to do this. The Committee, however,


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 76 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

recommended that the following explanation may be added in the said Clause for removing the erroneous impression in this<br />

regard.<br />

Clause 40<br />

‘This does not preclude the employees from availing the remedies provided under Articles 226 and 32 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution’<br />

Clause 36 (3) may, accordingly, be amended.<br />

8.384 The Committee noted that the Bill nowhere mentioned about an elected membership <strong>of</strong> any authority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> considered opinion that ideally, the composition/membership <strong>of</strong> these bodies should have<br />

been provided in the Statute itself as was done in the case <strong>of</strong> Allahabad University. In view <strong>of</strong> the fact that the composition <strong>of</strong><br />

authorities <strong>of</strong> the university would be subsequently decided by the university bodies, the Committee wished to emphasize the<br />

need for having elected elements in all the bodies/authorities <strong>of</strong> the university. The Committee, therefore, recommended that<br />

suitable mention for the purpose be made in the Bill at appropriate places. The Committee further recommended that an<br />

enabling provision must be provided in the Act itself to ensure democratization <strong>of</strong> various bodies <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

Clause 43<br />

8.385 The Committee felt that the words ‘good faith or intended to be done in pursuance <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> this<br />

Act, the Statutes or the Ordinances’ were vague and left scope for misuse as interpretation <strong>of</strong> ‘good faith’ could be<br />

subjective. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the ambit <strong>of</strong> the words ‘good faith or intended to be done in<br />

pursuance <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> this Act, the Statutes or the Ordinances’ may be spelt out in clear terms.<br />

Clause 47<br />

8.386 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that since the first <strong>of</strong>ficers and authorities <strong>of</strong> the university were to<br />

be appointed or nominated by the Central Government, their term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fices as provided in transitional provisions should not<br />

be long enough. The Committee noted that in some cases it was five years and in others it was three years. It, therefore,<br />

recommended that the term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the first Chancellor, the first Vice-Chancellor as well as other <strong>of</strong>ficers and bodies<br />

provided in various sub-clauses <strong>of</strong> Clause 47 on page 14 should be reduced from five and three years to three and two years<br />

respectively.<br />

The Schedule<br />

Clauses 2(1) and 2(2) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.387 The Committee found that the Statute was silent about the background <strong>of</strong> the persons to be placed on the panel for<br />

appointment as Vice-Chancellor. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the background <strong>of</strong> the persons who could be<br />

placed on the panel for appointment as Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> the University might be indicated in the Bill itself. The<br />

Committee further recommended that a nominee <strong>of</strong> the Court should also be included in the Selection Committee for<br />

appointment to the post <strong>of</strong> Vice-Chancellor.<br />

Clause 9 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.388 The Committee recommended that the Librarian’s retirement age should also find place in the Bill.<br />

Clause 17 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.389 The Committee recommended that a new sub-clause ‘at least one person to be nominated by the Court’ may be<br />

added immediately after line 1 <strong>of</strong> Clause 17 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes on page 23 <strong>of</strong> the Bill.<br />

Clause 18(2) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes<br />

8.390 The Committee recommended that the words ‘if he is a pr<strong>of</strong>essor’ may be appended to (ii) <strong>of</strong> Column 2 <strong>of</strong> Table<br />

against the heading ‘Pr<strong>of</strong>essor’.<br />

Clause 30(1) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 77 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.391 The Committee felt that the provisions <strong>of</strong> Clause 30(1) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes and Clause 37(1) <strong>of</strong> the Principal Act appear<br />

to be contradictory. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Clauses may be suitably re-drafted to<br />

remove the inherent contradictions, if any.<br />

Clause 40(1) <strong>of</strong> Statutes<br />

8.392 The Committee recommended that the words ‘two elected representatives <strong>of</strong> students’ should find place in the<br />

constitution <strong>of</strong> the Student Council and Clause 40 on page 30 be re-drafted accordingly.<br />

(k) 182 nd Report<br />

8.393 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view that confining its Report only on the proposed amendments would perhaps not<br />

serve the purpose. Keeping in view the sensitiveness <strong>of</strong> the subject, task <strong>of</strong> the Committee would hardly be complete if these<br />

issues were also not commented upon. Accordingly, some general issues inextricably linked with the problem have also<br />

found place in the Report.<br />

Clause 2 sub clause (iii)<br />

Modification <strong>of</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> prostitution under Section 2(f) <strong>of</strong> the Principal Act.<br />

8.394 The Committee felt that present definition was too wide particularly due to addition <strong>of</strong> the words "any other kind".<br />

The Committee, therefore, recommended that the proposed definition <strong>of</strong> ‘prostitution’ in section 2(f) needed a re-look,<br />

keeping in mind the purpose and intent <strong>of</strong> legislation and redrafted to avoid any ambiguity.<br />

Clause 6<br />

Insertion <strong>of</strong> new Section 5A to define trafficking in persons<br />

8.395 As regards including trafficking in areas other than for sexual purposes, in the Bill, the Committee while agreeing<br />

with the argument in principle, wished to emphasize that, it might not be possible to do so in this amending Bill. The<br />

Committee, however, felt that there was a strong case for bringing separate legislation(s) to cover other forms <strong>of</strong> trafficking<br />

in persons other than for prostitution. The Committee had been given to understand that the Ministry was in the process <strong>of</strong><br />

preparing an Omnibus Bill on Offences against the child, which would cover trafficking <strong>of</strong> all kinds. The Committee<br />

recommended that this Bill should be brought before Parliament at the earliest.<br />

8.396 The Committee, therefore, recommended that while redrafting the definition <strong>of</strong> trafficking, the words "inducement<br />

<strong>of</strong> religious and social nature" may also be included appropriately in Section 5A to prevent cases <strong>of</strong> trafficking driven by<br />

religious beliefs and other social practices.<br />

Section 5 B<br />

Punishment for trafficking in persons<br />

8.397 The Committee recommended that Section 5B (1) should accordingly be amended to read as under:<br />

Any person who commits trafficking in person shall be punishable on first conviction with rigorous imprisonment for a term<br />

which shall not be less than 7 years for trafficking in adults and not less than <strong>10</strong> years for trafficking in children and in the<br />

event <strong>of</strong> a second or a subsequent conviction with imprisonment for life.<br />

Section 5C<br />

Punishment for visiting brothel<br />

8.398 This ambiguity, the Committee noted, was further confounded, as the term "sexual exploitation" had not been<br />

defined in the Bill. The words" for the purpose <strong>of</strong> sexual exploitation <strong>of</strong> any victim <strong>of</strong> trafficking" would allow the<br />

enforcement agencies to determine "victims <strong>of</strong> trafficking" and the intention <strong>of</strong> the visitor to 'sexually exploit' at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

arresting. It would also lead to harassment <strong>of</strong> every person who visited a brothel irrespective <strong>of</strong> the object <strong>of</strong> his visit.<br />

8.3<strong>99</strong> The Committee apprehended that such ambiguous language in the provision might lead to indiscriminate arrests<br />

and harassment <strong>of</strong> any person found in a brothel.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 78 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.400 The Committee found that even the Ministry had admitted that it was very unlikely that a distinction could be made<br />

between a trafficked person and a person who was there voluntarily, as victims do not confess to be trafficked, being<br />

constantly under blackmail, threat and intimidation. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that it was a cardinal principle <strong>of</strong><br />

criminal law that what constituted an <strong>of</strong>fence must be clear, not vague. The Committee, therefore, recommended that section<br />

5C needs to be revisited for removing all the ambiguities and addressing the concerns expressed in respect thereto. It would<br />

be better if the terms "trafficked victim" and "commercial sexual exploitation" were defined precisely in the Bill itself.<br />

8.401 The Committee was inclined to agree with the contention <strong>of</strong> the Ministry that apprehensions <strong>of</strong> all concerned about<br />

the adverse impact <strong>of</strong> proposed Section 5C on HIV/AIDS control programme did not seem to be fully correct. The<br />

Committee would however, liked to point out that interventions for prevention <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS should be mainstreamed to<br />

target the sex workers who were not brothel based and not only restricted to brothels as then the majority <strong>of</strong> sex workers<br />

would be left out <strong>of</strong> the ambit <strong>of</strong> these interventions.<br />

Clause 9<br />

Deletion <strong>of</strong> Section 8<br />

8.402 The Committee in principle agreed for the removal <strong>of</strong> section 8 i.e. to protect the victims from further<br />

victimization. However, the Committee recommended that a suitable clause may be added in the Bill itself to take action<br />

against the pimps, procurers, perpetrators, agents and other exploiters with self- interest, for soliciting.<br />

Clause <strong>10</strong>, Sub Clause (ii)<br />

8.403 The Committee felt that the whole aspect <strong>of</strong> corrective homes appeared to be a medieval concept, which had to be<br />

rejected on the basis <strong>of</strong> the changing positions and changing perceptions about the women. We could not, on the one hand,<br />

say that women were victims and then send the victims for seven years incarceration on the other. This was more as<br />

imprisonment than a rehabilitation or relief. The Committee recommended that instead <strong>of</strong> corrective institutions the<br />

Government should create rehabilitation homes where opportunity for seeking an alternative livelihood with the women's<br />

consent was provided so as to prepare the victims to live life in mainstream.<br />

Clause 11<br />

8.404 The Committee found it difficult to believe that it was being done mainly due to paucity <strong>of</strong> adequate number <strong>of</strong><br />

Inspectors; whereas Sub-Inspectors were readily available. There existed a provision for appointing special police <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />

for this purpose. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the rank <strong>of</strong> the special police <strong>of</strong>ficers may be retained as<br />

Inspector. The Committee also recommended that more lady police <strong>of</strong>ficers may be appointed to deal with the crimes under<br />

ITPA. The Government should initiate a training and sensitization programme for such <strong>of</strong>ficials to ensure that the victims<br />

who were already under trauma may be saved from further harassment.<br />

Clause 12 — Insertion <strong>of</strong> Section 13A and 13B<br />

8.405 The Committee recommended that the composition and powers <strong>of</strong> the authorities might be spelt out in the Bill<br />

itself. Furthermore, it should be mandatory on the Central and State Governments to set up these authorities in a fixed time<br />

frame as at present Section 13A and 13B leave it fully at the discretion <strong>of</strong> the respective governments. Accordingly the<br />

Committee recommended that the word 'may' should be replaced by the word 'shall' in the first lines <strong>of</strong> Section 13A and<br />

13B.<br />

8.406 The Committee further recommended that these authorities should also comprise social workers including members<br />

<strong>of</strong> women's organizations, health workers, and other concerned sections <strong>of</strong> the Society including prostitutes<br />

themselves.<br />

Clause 16 ― In camera proceedings<br />

8.407 The Committee, therefore, felt that someone whom they find secure with and have trust in should always be<br />

allowed to be present with them during these proceedings. The Committee, therefore, recommended that appropriate<br />

provision in this regard should be added in Section 22 after sub-section (2).


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 79 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

General<br />

8.408 The Committee strongly felt that there was an urgent need for having a complete re-look at the Immoral Traffic<br />

(Prevention) Act, 1956 touching upon all conceivable aspects. An attempt had been made through the proposed amendments<br />

to bring the serious problem <strong>of</strong> trafficking under the Act. The Committee, however, liked to point out that this can be only<br />

considered a half-hearted attempt as the cross-border dimensions <strong>of</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> trafficking had remain<br />

untouched.<br />

8.409 The Committee found that ITPA did not contain any special provisions relating to children, particularly with<br />

respect to the treatment <strong>of</strong> rescued children. Secondly, the Committee was also given to understand that since the definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> ‘prostitution’ as given under the Act simply mentions persons, it was presumed to include children. Under the Act, a<br />

victim <strong>of</strong> commercial sexual exploitation could also be prosecuted because the law did not state whether children forced into<br />

prostitution were victims or <strong>of</strong>fenders. Committee’s attention was drawn to the case <strong>of</strong> Prerna V/s State <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra,<br />

Criminal Writ Petition 788 <strong>of</strong> 2002, whereunder, the Bombay High Court ordered that children who were found soliciting<br />

should be treated as children in conflict with the law under the Juvenile Justice Court. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view<br />

that this grey area about the legal position about child prostitutes needs to be thoroughly looked into and adequate provisions<br />

safeguarding the interests <strong>of</strong> child prostitutes need to be included in the Act.<br />

8.4<strong>10</strong> However, details made available to the Committee revealed a very discouraging scenario. Total number <strong>of</strong><br />

beneficiaries under these schemes which included trafficked victims was only 33,823. The Committee could only conclude<br />

that benefits <strong>of</strong> these schemes were not reaching the trafficked victims.<br />

8.411 The Committee, therefore, recommended that the law needed to be reviewed to make a distinction between living<br />

‘on’ and living ‘<strong>of</strong>f’ the earnings <strong>of</strong> a prostitute. While legal safeguards needed to be provided to prevent extortion <strong>of</strong> money<br />

from a prostitute, her right to incur expenditure voluntarily had to be safeguarded.<br />

8.412 The Committee observed that this ‘Plan <strong>of</strong> Action’ included all the action points required for rehabilitation namely,<br />

prevention, trafficking, awareness generation and social mobilization, health care services, education and child care, housing,<br />

shelter and civic amenities, economic empowerment, rescue and rehabilitation. The Committee was not aware about the<br />

status <strong>of</strong> this Plan <strong>of</strong> Action. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that implementation <strong>of</strong> this Plan <strong>of</strong> Action by all the concerned<br />

authorities with close monitoring by the Ministry would ultimately prove effective in the quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> victims <strong>of</strong><br />

trafficking.<br />

8.413 Sensitization and awareness among the prosecutors and the police, according to the committee, was one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

important component as far as implementation <strong>of</strong> this law is concerned. There are manuals <strong>of</strong> training programmes and the<br />

Committee would like the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Women and Child Development to urgently put such manuals on its website.<br />

8.414 The Committee, however, felt that time had come for NACO to reinvent its strategy to widen its reach to people<br />

other than the women in the brothels in the backdrop <strong>of</strong> the fact that commercial exploitation had widened, it had gone up<br />

from lower level to higher level.<br />

8.415 The Committee appreciated the consistent and untiring efforts <strong>of</strong> NACO in containing dreaded disease like<br />

HIV/AIDS. The Committee also emphasized the need to broad-base the current approach <strong>of</strong> National Aids Control<br />

Programme so as to include important aspects such as rescue, skill-building, rehabilitation and re-integration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

vulnerable groups. There was, therefore, need to revisit the strategy and to evolve a suitable methodology for arresting the<br />

menace. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that impact <strong>of</strong> National Aids Control Programme amongst sex-workers would be<br />

more visible if involvement <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Women and Child Development was also there. The Committee, therefore,<br />

recommended that an inbuilt component in this regard might be included in the Programme.<br />

8.416 The Committee recommended that the government should create a special fund for<br />

welfare/rehabilitation/healthcare and education <strong>of</strong> the sex workers as well as their children.<br />

8.417 The Committee found that it was mainly the attitude and mindset <strong>of</strong> the people vis-à-vis the sex workers which was<br />

largely responsible for this. People still looked down upon them as culprits not as victims; there was a clear-cut lack <strong>of</strong><br />

sympathy and cooperation with them. The Committee in such a situation strongly felt that there was an urgent need for<br />

undertaking public awareness measures at every level including the schools and colleges to treat sex workers as a normal<br />

human being. Such an environment, if generated, would go a long way in integrating the sex workers into the<br />

mainstream.<br />

8.418 The Committee recommended that the Bill may be passed after incorporating the amendments/additions suggested


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 80 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

by it.<br />

8.419 The Committee desired that the Ministry submit a note with reasons on the recommendations/suggestions made by<br />

the Committee, which could not be incorporated in the Bill.<br />

(l)<br />

183 rd Report<br />

Norms for Opening <strong>of</strong> Kendriya Vidyalayas<br />

8.420 The Committee appreciated that in view <strong>of</strong> the ever-increasing shortage <strong>of</strong> land in the present scenario, lowering<br />

the land requirement was the need <strong>of</strong> the hour. However, the Committee liked to emphasize that there should be no deviation<br />

from the need to demarcate 40% as building area and 60% as play field <strong>of</strong> the 4.00 acres provided in a metropolitan<br />

city.<br />

8.421 The Committee hoped that with the revision <strong>of</strong> land norms, situation would improve. The Committee desired that<br />

the Department <strong>of</strong> Secondary and Higher Education and KVS vigorously pursued the allotment <strong>of</strong> land with the concerned<br />

agencies and reported the progress made in this regard to the Committee within three<br />

months.<br />

8.422 The Committee took a serious view <strong>of</strong> this development because the prescribed pre-sanction procedure for the<br />

purpose were simply given a go by in these cases. The Committee was perturbed to note that these 95 KVs were opened<br />

without taking any prior approval/sanction. Even the ex-post-facto approval could not be taken. The Committee was not<br />

happy with such an approach <strong>of</strong> short circuiting the established procedures. In this case, in the absence <strong>of</strong> any formal<br />

approval and there being no fund allocation specifically for these KVs., plan funds were utilized to fulfill the salary and other<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> staff members, <strong>of</strong> these KVs. This was not a healthy fiscal practice.<br />

8.423 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the role <strong>of</strong> the Government should be to ensure that prescribed norms for<br />

opening <strong>of</strong> new KVs were strictly adhered to. Instead <strong>of</strong> giving priority to such districts where KVs were genuinely required<br />

and where there were no KVs, setting up such schools arbitrarily was certainly deplorable.<br />

8.424 As per the information made available to the Committee, out <strong>of</strong> such 95 KVs, 13 KVs were yet to be functional.<br />

The Committee found that the status <strong>of</strong> remaining 82 KVs could not be considered as fully functional. The Committee failed<br />

to understand the basis <strong>of</strong> there being surplus teachers and their adjustment in these 95 KVs. Details given by the<br />

Department indicated that out <strong>of</strong> 36 sanctioned posts <strong>of</strong> PGT, only 29 were in position; and there were 55 vacancies in the<br />

sanctioned posts <strong>of</strong> TGT. What was more disturbing was that, only 5 KVs had PGTs. On a specific query in this regard, the<br />

Committee was informed that rationale <strong>of</strong> surplus teachers was based on sanctioned posts. However, in view <strong>of</strong> the fact that<br />

number <strong>of</strong> posts filled up being less than the sanctioned posts, the Committee found this justification untenable. The<br />

Committee viewed it with serious concern and deplored such adhocism.<br />

8.425 Details about schools made available to the Committee clearly indicated that enrolment status in some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Vidyalayas was far from satisfactory. The Committee liked to emphasize that the Department ought to have been more<br />

concerned about the present status <strong>of</strong> these schools; availability <strong>of</strong> required teachers and infrastructure; and also about the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> students enrolled. It recommended that the remedial steps be taken urgently to remove all the shortcomings. The<br />

Committee emphasized the need to review these cases expeditiously. In some cases even there was no land allotted to the<br />

school; how the construction work would start. The Committee hoped that the Department must be making efforts on their<br />

own in this regard. The Committee desired that the Department took up the matter at the highest level to sort out the problem<br />

and submited a report to it within three months.<br />

Project Vidyalayas<br />

8.426 The Committee reiterated that the Department/and KVS, besides approaching the project authorities for re-opening<br />

<strong>of</strong> closed vidyalayas. Those Project Vidyalayas which could not be revived may be taken over by the Government and run as<br />

normal KVs.<br />

8.427 The Committee understood that the Ministry was pursuing with the concerned agencies for payment <strong>of</strong><br />

dues/pending against them. However, these efforts seemed to have failed, as only three PSUs had responded and these too<br />

have expressed their inability in liquidating their dues. The Committee found the situation quite discouraging. The<br />

Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that this matter needed to be taken up at the highest level. There was also a need for evolving a<br />

mechanism for release <strong>of</strong> funds by project authorities in advance on yearly/half yearly basis. Only then, this problem was<br />

likely to be solved, otherwise, this financial burden on KV Sangathan could continue to persist or might even<br />

increase.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 81 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Kendriya Vidyalaya Buildings<br />

8.428 The Committee was concerned about the position in this regard in the NE Region and felt that special efforts<br />

should be made to complete all the projects in a fixed time period.<br />

8.429 In such a situation the Committee was constrained to conclude that the construction status <strong>of</strong> these KVs would<br />

continue to remain at the same stage. It appeared that no agency was responsible and KV Sangathan itself seemed to have<br />

abdicated its responsibility/duty.<br />

8.430 The Committee, however, felt that this monitoring mechanism had not proved to be very effective so far. The<br />

Committee observed that an initiative has been taken to simplify procedural formalities. Henceforth, all sanction orders<br />

issued by KVS were to be forwarded to the concerned CPWD authorities by name. This would result in eliminating undue<br />

delay occurring at various levels in KVS as well as in CPWD.<br />

8.431 Another problem noticed by the Committee was lack <strong>of</strong> co-ordination between the civil and electrical wings <strong>of</strong><br />

CPWD. This also, the Committee found, led to unnecessary delays in this regard. The Committee was happy to note that<br />

CPWD had since introduced a composite tendering system, whereunder electrical works inside the building were to be made<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the main contract.<br />

8.432 Committee’s attention was also drawn towards another problem being faced by CPWD with regard to time taken in<br />

handing over <strong>of</strong> works by CPWD to KV authorities, which varied from state to state. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that<br />

there was an urgent need for a complete review <strong>of</strong> existing procedure at every stage---pre-construction, construction and postconstruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> KV buildings. Although some initiative has been taken by KVS and CPWD, the Committee felt that this<br />

would not serve the purpose. The Committee, therefore, emphasized that all unnecessary procedural formalities need to be<br />

done away with urgently. A regular and effective monitoring mechanism involving all the concerned authorities, the<br />

Committee felt needed to be put in place urgently. The Committee liked to impress upon KV Sangathan, CPWD and other<br />

construction agencies to complete all the pending construction works in a pre-approved fixed schedule so that there was no<br />

further cost escalation as also there was no inconvenience caused to the students and teachers.<br />

Admission Criteria for Students<br />

8.433 One <strong>of</strong> the main recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Mahajan Committee, the Committee was informed that freezing <strong>of</strong><br />

sections was neither academically sound nor administratively feasible. The Committee was also <strong>of</strong> the view that problem <strong>of</strong><br />

increasing number <strong>of</strong> students could not be solved by the freezing <strong>of</strong> sections.<br />

8.434 The Committee, however, found that as per the latest response received from the Department, the recommendations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Baldev Mahajan Committee had since been rejected in principle. The Committee failed to comprehend the reasons for<br />

the change in the stand <strong>of</strong> the Government. The Committee liked to point out that number <strong>of</strong> students in a class/section being<br />

more than the prescribed ratio, did affect the quality <strong>of</strong> education adversely; it needed to be avoided. The Committee was also<br />

in favour <strong>of</strong> more and more students getting admitted to the KVs. But overcrowding was certainly not conducive for focused<br />

attention on students performance. KVs could not be an exception to this. The Committee, therefore, felt that all efforts need<br />

to be made to avoid overcrowding in KVs by opening additional sections with all the infrastructure wherever needed.<br />

Vacancy Position<br />

8.435 The Committee noted with serious concern that the process <strong>of</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> teachers that had started in February<br />

2003, could not be completed till the time <strong>of</strong> the writing <strong>of</strong> this Report. The Committee was at a loss to see that 1571 posts <strong>of</strong><br />

teachers continued to remain vacant for several years. The Committee, while appreciating the move for giving the ad hoc<br />

appointment to the selected teachers pending the inquiry, demanded strict action against those found responsible for this<br />

fiasco. The Committee called upon the government to consider the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Satyam Committee for an early<br />

implementation so that future <strong>of</strong> those teachers was decided without further delay. The Committee was also aware that on an<br />

average about 7.5% ad hoc teachers have contractual appointment. The Committee liked to point out that teachers appointed<br />

for a short period would had no motivation to give good results, for obvious reasons. The Committee, therefore,<br />

recommended that ad-hoc appointment should be to the barest minimum and the vacancies must be filled as soon as<br />

possible. The Committee also had serious reservations about the prolonged recruitment procedure that goes on for years.<br />

There was an urgent need for having a review <strong>of</strong> the same for streamlining, decentralising and eliminating the unnecessary<br />

procedural formalities.<br />

8.436 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view that centralized recruitment system was one <strong>of</strong> the main reasons for<br />

continuance <strong>of</strong> vacancies for long time affecting the academic environment <strong>of</strong> the Vidyalayas. The Committee therefore,<br />

reiterated its recommendations <strong>of</strong> decentralization <strong>of</strong> the recruitment process for selection <strong>of</strong> candidates at zonal level so that


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 82 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

it became convenient to people <strong>of</strong> different regions to participate in the process which otherwise might not be possible for<br />

them. It would also ensure proper representation <strong>of</strong> the candidates from different parts <strong>of</strong> the country, particularly from NE<br />

States and J&K.<br />

Grievances Redressal<br />

8.437 While appreciating the initiative taken by KV Sangathan, the Committee liked to point out that there should also be<br />

a mechanism whereby a track <strong>of</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> such an outlet available to employees could be constantly monitored. The<br />

Committee felt that the ground reality in this regard seem to be somewhat different. Even public representatives such as MPs<br />

sometimes, failed to contact the concerned <strong>of</strong>ficers because most <strong>of</strong> the time they were not available. Details regarding<br />

number <strong>of</strong> Grievances received and those dealt with also did not indicate a significant improvement.<br />

8.438 The Committee had learnt that teachers union in KVS had been derecognized. The Committee liked to have a brief<br />

note on the issue for its consideration.<br />

Survey <strong>of</strong> KVs<br />

8.439 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view that this was the right time for making a comprehensive assessment <strong>of</strong> KVs<br />

spread over different parts <strong>of</strong> the country. Reason behind making such a suggestion was that Kendriya Vidyalayas having<br />

evolved into a reputed educational system since its inception in 1960s, had seen many ups and downs. Inspite <strong>of</strong> the best<br />

efforts put forth by all concerned, quite a few constraints continued to persist at the ground level. Committee’s specific<br />

recommendation for conducting a detailed survey was meant to take corrective measures based on its foundings so that KV<br />

Sangathan was better equipped in attaining its goals. Committee’s recommendations/observations on the various aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

functioning <strong>of</strong> KVS were also meant for this purpose only.<br />

8.440 The Committee was unhappy to note that the spirit <strong>of</strong> Committee’s suggestions had not been given the importance<br />

that they deserved by the Department/KV Sangathan. The Committee was afraid that development <strong>of</strong> an Information Booklet<br />

and periodical submission <strong>of</strong> duly filled-up Pr<strong>of</strong>orma by KVs would remain a routine exercise. The Committee desired again<br />

reiterated its recommendation for conducting a nation-wide survey <strong>of</strong> KVs and the information generated there from for<br />

improving the functioning <strong>of</strong> KV Sangathan.<br />

(m) 184 th Report<br />

Norms for Opening <strong>of</strong> Navodaya Vidyalayas<br />

8.441 The Committee was concerned about the <strong>of</strong>t-repeated excuse given by the Department regarding the non-functional<br />

JNVs i.e. non-availability <strong>of</strong> temporary accommodation that was to be provided by the State Governments. The Committee<br />

was perturbed over the non-challant attitude <strong>of</strong> the Government in making the JNVs functional. The Committee strongly felt<br />

that this being a Central scheme, the JNV Samiti and the Department <strong>of</strong> Secondary and Higher Education must try to see that<br />

a sanctioned JNV became functional as soon as possible and it must not be left to the States and wait till they took a<br />

decision. It was a scheme for the benefit <strong>of</strong> their students. States, therefore, must be persuaded/advised and facilitated to<br />

arrange an accommodation.<br />

8.442 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that the Department in the first place should explore all possibilities to ensure<br />

that the suitable temporary accommodations were arranged by the State Government well before the JNVs were sanctioned.<br />

Normally, sanctioning <strong>of</strong> JNVs should be made after a suitable accommodation, temporary or permanent, had been<br />

made.<br />

8.443 The Committee found that the problem <strong>of</strong> non-functioning <strong>of</strong> a JNV was endemic in North-East. Despite best<br />

efforts made by the Department to make them functional, it left lot to be desired. The Committee felt that more sincere and<br />

concerted efforts were needed to make the JNVs functional as soon as possible. Looking at peculiar topography <strong>of</strong> this<br />

region, special effort and norms must also be considered so that the schools started functioning without wasting much<br />

time.<br />

8.444 The Committee desired that the Department ensured that the districts not covered under the scheme were covered<br />

by the end <strong>of</strong> the Tenth Plan. As regards Tamil Nadu not adopting the scheme, the Committee desired that this matter may<br />

be taken up again with the State Government and place the outcome before the Committee for its information within three<br />

months.<br />

8.445 The Committee hoped that the Department and the JNV Samiti were alive to this fact. The Committee noted the<br />

procedural delay in the communication about sanctioning <strong>of</strong> the Vidyalayas taking in some cases several months. The<br />

Committee found it completely unacceptable. It, therefore, recommended that henceforth the communication regarding


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 83 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

sanctions should be sent to all relevant <strong>of</strong>fices immediately at various levels, so that the process <strong>of</strong> preparing plans, drawings,<br />

etc. could be commenced instantly.<br />

8.446 The Committee felt that though the system <strong>of</strong> composite tendering system was a welcome development, it would<br />

still not rule out completely the possibility <strong>of</strong> delays due to other reasons. The Committee felt that in order to see that civil<br />

works were not unduly delayed, this activity including the clearances, etc. from different agencies involved should be<br />

completed in a fixed time schedule. The Committee felt that help <strong>of</strong> local MPs and other representatives <strong>of</strong> the people could<br />

be sought for expediting such clearances particularly from State governments and their agencies.<br />

8.447 The Committee was also <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that the tender documents must provide for heavy penalty on the<br />

contractors if they failed to stick to the stipulated time frame fixed for this purpose.<br />

8.448 The Committee was informed that sometimes the contractors abandoned the construction due to unforeseen<br />

developments such as price escalation <strong>of</strong> iron, cement etc. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that such cases might be fewer<br />

and far between. The Committee desired that the JNV Samiti and CPWD devised some model and calculate the expected<br />

price rise and time-frame to complete the building projects. The construction work should be entrusted to those contractors<br />

who were dependable and had the capability to finish the work.<br />

8.449 The Committee was aware that several formalities were to be completed before completion/finalization <strong>of</strong> tender<br />

and awarding job to contractors was also a long process. Yet, the Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that it was possible to reduce<br />

time in all these to a large extent. The Committee, therefore, strongly recommended that the entire process from sanctioning<br />

the project and awarding the job to the construction agencies should be streamlined so as to obviate possibility <strong>of</strong> any delay.<br />

Further, on-line tendering might be tried to cut the delays drastically. There was also need to bring in transparency in the<br />

entire procedure.<br />

8.450 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that the Construction Coordination Committee should meet more<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten, but not less than once in two months. This, the Committee felt, would keep the monitoring <strong>of</strong>ficials more attentive and<br />

alert because they would have to report every two months about the progress in construction. Strict view must be taken in the<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> undue and unreasonable delays.<br />

8.451 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that such areas needed more quick attention in regard to schools, etc. than rest <strong>of</strong><br />

the regions <strong>of</strong> the country and must be ensured that the law and order aspect might not be taken as an excuse for delays in<br />

construction. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that the Department should exercise more caution in choosing the<br />

construction agencies for difficult regions. Engaging local agencies for the construction work might also be considered. All<br />

out efforts be made with the help <strong>of</strong> State Governments to ensure that the construction work was completed well within time.<br />

And if it was unduly delayed, responsibility must be fixed to check any possible carelessness in this<br />

regard.<br />

8.452 The Committee also noted that the land allotted to JNV in Kargil was partially taken over by Defence and it<br />

appeared that the Department did not take up the issue with the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Defence for a long time. Now that new site had<br />

been identified, the Department must endeavour to complete the required formalities and consultation with district and<br />

Defence authorities as soon as possible so that construction work could begin at early date.<br />

8.453 The Department while explaining the status <strong>of</strong> construction activities in J&K and North-East, had merely informed<br />

the Committee that the work was in progress in these regions. The ‘work in progress’ as such did not give a correct status <strong>of</strong><br />

work. The Department must in future give the Committee specific stages <strong>of</strong> the construction so as to enable it to get a definite<br />

view in the matter.<br />

8.454 The Committee found that the Department was silent about the efforts made by it for taking up the fund<br />

requirements with the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance. The Committee, therefore, reiterated its earlier recommendations suggesting the<br />

Department to take up the issue <strong>of</strong> funds with the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance at the earliest to expedite the construction works. At<br />

the same time, the Committee would expect NV Samiti to bring in such structural and functional changes in it as to impart<br />

efficiency and better work-culture.<br />

8.455 The Committee felt that suitable flexibility needed to be brought in the requirement <strong>of</strong> land for opening JNVs in<br />

urban, semi-urban and hilly areas. The Committee, therefore, recommended that the State and District administration should<br />

be sensitized for selecting sites that were suitable, easily accessible and free from encumbrances. After all, the children <strong>of</strong><br />

that State or district were going to be the beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> these schools. The Committee at the same time also opined that the<br />

reduced land area should not be a constraint for game and sports activities.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 84 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Infrastructure<br />

8.456 The Committee found this situation very disturbing. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> considered opinion that the sports help<br />

in improving physical and psychological strength <strong>of</strong> the children and further contribute in development <strong>of</strong> overall personality<br />

<strong>of</strong> the child. It was a means <strong>of</strong> recreation as well. Absence <strong>of</strong> playfields, therefore, put them at disadvantage in these<br />

regards. The Committee strongly emphasized the need for making play-field mandatory and where it was not possible due to<br />

small area available, alternate arrangements be made with neighbouring bodies, agencies, clubs, etc. for allowing students to<br />

make use <strong>of</strong> their facilities.<br />

8.457 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the need for special maintenance grants arose either because <strong>of</strong> poor<br />

construction quality or extremely lackadaisical attitude <strong>of</strong> those looking after the maintenance work. It spoke <strong>of</strong> near absence<br />

<strong>of</strong> monitoring mechanism for this purpose in the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti. The performance <strong>of</strong> construction wing headed<br />

by a General Manager, it appeared, was not able to deliver the good. The Committee found it difficult to believe that the<br />

Executive Engineers at the Regional Offices were regularly inspecting the Navodaya Vidyalayas to see that the buildings, etc.<br />

were properly maintained whereas it was mandatory for them to inspect at least four Navodaya Vidyalayas buildings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

region each month. The Committee deplored that the concerned authorities were not performing their assigned duty<br />

diligently by making regular inspection <strong>of</strong> these activities in each Vidyalaya that should be monitored regularly by the NV<br />

Samiti every two months.<br />

Funding<br />

8.458 The Committee felt that though the fund allocation was not upto the expectations <strong>of</strong> the Samiti, it was still<br />

sufficient enough to allow the NV Samiti carry out its activities smoothly provided it observed proper fiscal<br />

discipline.<br />

8.459 The Committee was concerned to note that NV Samiti in several cases had failed in completing its targets well<br />

within time due to lack <strong>of</strong> proper planning and effective monitoring. The time and cost-over-run <strong>of</strong> projects ultimately<br />

increased the final cost substantially. The Committee while comparing the achievements <strong>of</strong> Kendriya Vidyalayas and<br />

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas found that Kendriya Vidyalayas had been more successful in delivering better results with<br />

lesser budget. Looked from cost-benefit point, KVs, no doubt, had much more wide coverage with quality education<br />

comparable to many good public schools in the country. The performance, management and amount <strong>of</strong> funds spent for JNVs<br />

every year, raise a valid question-mark about this scheme. The principle behind it might be noble and highly desirable, its<br />

performance so far, however, had not been what was desired. The Committee liked to have the response <strong>of</strong> the Department<br />

in this regard.<br />

8.460 At the same time, the Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the Department might in the meantime take up the matter<br />

strongly with the Planning Commission for enhanced Tenth Plan outlay to complete the requirements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

JNVs.<br />

Criteria for Admission in Navodaya Vidyalayas<br />

8.461 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered view that the condition <strong>of</strong> studying and passing class III, IV and V in<br />

preceding three continuous sessions needed to be reviewed. The student aspiring for admission in a particular JNV should be<br />

asked to produce a certificate <strong>of</strong> domicile <strong>of</strong> that particular district. This would be the most reasonable way to check the<br />

influx <strong>of</strong> otherwise ineligible candidates.<br />

8.462 The Committee desired the Department to reconsider the concept <strong>of</strong> formal education and see that its aim to<br />

provide quality education to meritorious poor rural students did not get defeated in the cobweb <strong>of</strong> guidelines which seemed to<br />

be a little away from the ground reality prevailing in rural areas. The Committee strongly felt that a candidate coming out <strong>of</strong><br />

these informal centres or unrecognized school <strong>of</strong> the village be allowed to take the selection test once he or she had passed<br />

Class V.<br />

8.463 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that such requirement deprived poor and deserving students from appearing in<br />

the Selection Test. To this, the Committee was informed that a group <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers was examining this aspect. The Committee<br />

desired that the Department took suitable measures to ensure that poor, meritorious students <strong>of</strong> rural areas were able to make<br />

into the JNVs. The Committee hoped that the Department would suitably amend the eligibility conditions for Selection Test.<br />

8.464 The Committee also desired that prominent heads <strong>of</strong> village panchayats and the president <strong>of</strong> the Zilla Parishad be<br />

included as ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio members in the Vidyalaya Management Committees to ensure that interests <strong>of</strong> the poor local people <strong>of</strong><br />

rural areas were protected.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 85 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Hostel Facility<br />

8.465 The Committee failed to understand whether action if any was contemplated by the NVS/Department. The<br />

Committee liked to reiterate that entrusting the job <strong>of</strong> supervision <strong>of</strong> hostels to teachers could be considered only a stop-gap<br />

arrangement. Matrons specifically entrusted with the supervision <strong>of</strong> hostel facilities to the enrolled students need to be there.<br />

The Committee strongly felt that a review <strong>of</strong> status <strong>of</strong> manpower available for the hostels <strong>of</strong> Navodaya Vidyalayas was<br />

required to be made on an urgent basis and make the hostels functional in the real sense by providing the required staff.<br />

8.466 Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view that security aspect needed to be given priority specially in view <strong>of</strong> location <strong>of</strong><br />

Navodaya Vidyalayas. Boundary walls and lighting arrangements being the minimum requirements needed to be provided to<br />

each and every Navodaya Vidyalaya. It would be appropriate if initiative were taken by the NVS for strengthening the same.<br />

The Committee desired to have a status note in this regard.<br />

8.467 The Committee, accordingly, recommended that an assessment <strong>of</strong> existing health facilities for Navodaya<br />

Vidyalayas may be made and action for strengthening the same may be<br />

taken.<br />

Pensionary Benefits to NVS Employees<br />

8.468 The Committee reiterated its recommendation made in its 154 th Report for provision <strong>of</strong> pensionary benefits to the<br />

NVS employees on the same level as being were given to the KVS employees. The Committee strongly felt that NVS<br />

employees needed to be governed by similar service conditions including pensionary benefits as applicable to KVS<br />

employees.<br />

8.469 The Committee to emphasized that the Department should approach the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance once again in this<br />

regard.<br />

Problem <strong>of</strong> Drop-Out<br />

8.470 The Committee did not agree to this notion <strong>of</strong> adaptability <strong>of</strong> students before Class IX. It felt that the identity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

JNVs should be made special in the sense that any child who joined the Vidyalaya at any stage must feel at home rather than<br />

experiencing problem <strong>of</strong> adaptability. Adaptability for a newcomer was a natural problem. But the Samiti needed to devise<br />

such teaching methods where the newcomer got mentally and psychological settled and felt at home at the earliest.<br />

8.471 Another problem against lateral entry before Class IX as explained by the Department before the Committee was<br />

that holding an entrance test for every class every year was not a viable proposition. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that<br />

the lateral entry must be allowed to fill up vacancies, if any, in all the classes and not merely in IX and XI classes to ensure<br />

that no seat were allowed to go vacant. It was a waste <strong>of</strong> the available resources. The Committee was not inclined to agree<br />

with the argument <strong>of</strong> the Department that the number <strong>of</strong> vacancies being small, it would not be viable to hold an entrance<br />

system for every class every year. The practice <strong>of</strong> entrance test was in vogue in all schemes <strong>of</strong> school including<br />

private/public school. If entrance test could be held every year for VI, IX and XI classes other classes also could be clubbed<br />

with them. Furthermore, the Committee wished to reiterate its recommendation about admitting girl students <strong>of</strong> the area in<br />

the vacant seats. The Committee desired that no seat be allowed to go vacant when lot <strong>of</strong> our children remain out <strong>of</strong> school.<br />

Survey <strong>of</strong> JNVs<br />

8.472 Problem areas in all the aspects <strong>of</strong> running <strong>of</strong> Navodaya Vidyalayas, be its infrastructure, staff strength, their<br />

service conditions, hostel facilities, liasioning with the State authorities, funding etc. had been noticed by the Committee. The<br />

Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view that a one time exercise <strong>of</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> an education system functioning for more than two<br />

decades was bound to identity specific problem areas on an All India basis for which remedial measures could be easily<br />

initiated.<br />

(n) 185 th Report<br />

8.473 After every debacle in international sports, there starts a blame game amongst various agencies responsible for<br />

promoting sports and then forgetting everything afterwards. Such a poor performance by a country <strong>of</strong> more than <strong>10</strong>0 million<br />

people should be a matter <strong>of</strong> debate and close introspection for not only the sports administrators, policy-makers, Sports<br />

Federations, sportspersons but also amongst the people at large. There was a need to sensitize everyone in this respect.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 86 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Previous Studies & Reports<br />

8.474 The Committee would like to especially mention its 34 th and 77 th Reports on the subject presented to both Houses<br />

<strong>of</strong> Parliament in the years 1<strong>99</strong>5 and 1<strong>99</strong>8 respectively. Most <strong>of</strong> the problems and issues identified by this Committee in these<br />

Reports still remain the same; and very few <strong>of</strong> its recommendations had actually been implemented. The Committee<br />

believed that it was probably the general inertia and resistance inherent within the system against any attempt to bring about<br />

change <strong>of</strong> any kind. The Committee deprecated this tendency, particularly in a system that was concerned with promoting<br />

sports and games. It emphasized the need for bringing about reforms in sports management and governance urgently to make<br />

it more dynamic, responsive, responsible and result-oriented.<br />

Problems and Issues Hampering Sports<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> Sports Culture<br />

Generating Sports Consciousness<br />

8.475 For this, the Committee felt, that all out effort would have to be made by everyone <strong>of</strong> us at every level in every<br />

walk <strong>of</strong> life; government alone would not be able to do this. A national campaign for generating consciousness about sports<br />

would have to be launched. NGOs and local elected bodies, the Committee believed, could play an effective role in this<br />

regard. Such a campaign might start, <strong>of</strong> course, with Government patronage at the grassroot level, say from Aanganwadi<br />

Centres, primary schools, local clubs, Mahila Mandals <strong>of</strong> NYKS, Resident Welfare Associations, Gram Panchayats,<br />

Municipal Bodies, etc.<br />

Integrating Sports with Educational Curriculum<br />

8.476 The Committee felt, that unless sports became a premier category in job market - government and private,<br />

parents/students would not be attracted to it at all. Industry and private corporations alongwith the Government would have<br />

to give adequate weightage to sports and physical education, while making recruitments for them. Sportspersons are known<br />

to have been successful managers/employees due to obvious reasons.<br />

8.477 Participation in games and sports fosters qualities like sportsmanship, fairness, team spirit, etc. in the children that<br />

makes them ideal citizens. The Committee found that integrating sports with education was an old demand; even this<br />

Committee itself had underlined this point in its 34 th report submitted in the year 1<strong>99</strong>5. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that<br />

this needed to be done urgently. The Committee strongly recommended that immediate efforts be made with the help <strong>of</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Secondary and Higher Education, CBSE, State Boards <strong>of</strong> Education and the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Youth Affairs and<br />

Sports. If the need be, the matter could be put before the CABE also.<br />

8.478 The Committee felt that sports and games should be made compulsory from the primary school. The watchwords,<br />

in fact, should be “Catch them young and take sports to the grassroot level”. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that by making<br />

physical education an integral part <strong>of</strong> the educational curriculum, broad-basing <strong>of</strong> sports would be done automatically. A<br />

physical fitness programme should be drawn and implemented in the schools and colleges across the country to sensitize<br />

every child/youth about the value <strong>of</strong> fitness and good health, so that they become more disciplined as well as productive<br />

human beings.<br />

School Games Federation<br />

8.479 The Committee was concerned to learn that the School Games Federation was not functioning due to some dispute<br />

and the matter was sub-judice. Last Long-Term Development Plan (LTDP) meeting <strong>of</strong> the Federation was held on 8.5.2003<br />

and since then no Central assistance had been released to the Federation. The Committee wanted the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Youth<br />

Affairs & Sports to intervene in the matter to try and settle the problem out <strong>of</strong> Court so that the Federation starts working<br />

without further delay.<br />

Higher Education and Sports<br />

8.480 The Committee, therefore, recommended that the Government should, through UGC and Association <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

Universities (AIU) launch a nationwide strategy for increasing sports activities in the universities. An Inter-University Sports<br />

Board or such a body should be set up in every State so as to organize/support sports activities in the universities and the<br />

colleges in a phased manner with the help and support from AIU.<br />

8.481 The Committee noted that under the two centrally sponsored schemes <strong>of</strong> 'Grant to rural schools for purchase <strong>of</strong> sports<br />

equipment and development <strong>of</strong> play ground' and for ‘Promotion <strong>of</strong> sports in universities and colleges’, central assistance was<br />

provided. The Committee was, however, constrained to observe that benefit <strong>of</strong> these two schemes were not evenly spread in<br />

the different States. Some <strong>of</strong> the States in remote and inaccessible areas seem to have remained uncovered by these schemes


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 87 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

as indicated in the funding pattern for the last three years. What was more worrisome was the decision to transfer these<br />

schemes to the State sector w.e.f. 1.4.06. States so far actively involved would stand deprived. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the<br />

opinion that schools, colleges and universities were the ideal places for spotting and nurturing sports talent and they should<br />

continue to be so. The Committee, therefore, strongly felt that there was an urgent need for review <strong>of</strong> these two schemes and<br />

retaining their central character.<br />

Inadequate Incentives and Awards<br />

8.482 It was shameful to find some <strong>of</strong> our former sports person who had brought laurels to the country, selling tea/chat,<br />

etc. on roadside stalls to earn their daily bread. The Committee felt that in order to promote sports in the country we needed<br />

to provide adequate incentives, good job opportunities, economic security and social recognition to our budding, as well as<br />

existing sportspersons, so that the youth — our greatest asset was attracted to sports.<br />

8.483 Incentives and their support to our former sportspersons including pension was highly inadequate. The Committee<br />

was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that former sportspersons particularly the aged ones need to be supported in a big way for which<br />

Government must put a proper system in place at the earliest.<br />

In Academics<br />

8.484 The Committee felt that to make up for this loss, the students who perform well in sports should be given some<br />

compensatory marks in academics. Similarly, certain percentage <strong>of</strong> seats for admission in pr<strong>of</strong>essional and other<br />

institutions/colleges should be reserved for students who had achieved a certain level in sports.<br />

In Government jobs<br />

8.485 It was disheartening to note that neither the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Sports nor the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Personnel had a ready<br />

database, Ministry-wise, to show the position <strong>of</strong> sportspersons employed in this category into different<br />

Ministries/Departments. The Committee, therefore, recommended that Ministry/Department-wise position might be<br />

obtained and given to the Committee within three months for its consideration. The Committee disapproved the<br />

idea <strong>of</strong> making reservation for eminent sportspersons in only group C and D and not in A&B groups also. It was<br />

insensitive to employ eminent/international sportspersons as class three and class four employees.<br />

Cash Awards<br />

8.486 The Committee emphasized the need for increasing the numbers <strong>of</strong> cash awards by extending it to outstanding<br />

performance at national/international performances, even if they failed to win medals. This recognition would keep their<br />

morale and spirit high. The amount <strong>of</strong> cash awards also needs to be enhanced suitably.<br />

In selections<br />

8.487 The Committee’s attention was drawn towards alleged unfair selection <strong>of</strong> eminent sportspersons for Arjuna<br />

Awards/Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Awards, Dronacharya awards, etc. Such allegations, the Committee felt, point directly<br />

towards lack <strong>of</strong> transparency as well as specific norms in the selection process. The Committee, therefore, recommended that<br />

the selection process for these awards be streamlined for making it more participatory, objective and fair with no scope for<br />

any interference, political or otherwise.<br />

8.488 The Committee emphasized the need for taking adequate precaution to avoid discrimination <strong>of</strong> any type in making<br />

selection either for awards or for participating in a particular event.<br />

8.489 It might be seen that allocation made to the Ministry in 2005-06, constituted just 0.98 per cent <strong>of</strong> the entire Budget<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> India. In other words, numerically it comes to Rs. 4 per person annually. The Committee considered it<br />

disappointingly low in view <strong>of</strong> the poor and inadequate facilities/infrastructure in a vast country like ours, 40 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

which constitute the youth.<br />

8.490 The paucity <strong>of</strong> funds, in fact, appeared to be one <strong>of</strong> the major constraints, both at the Centre and in the States, in<br />

developing and promoting sports activities. Due to paucity <strong>of</strong> funds, our schools and colleges were not able to provide even<br />

the basic equipments and infrastructure required for sports and games. Non-availability <strong>of</strong> basic sports equipments and play<br />

fields for our young ones was also one <strong>of</strong> the major drawbacks in promoting sports in the country.<br />

Enhancing Allocations


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 88 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.491 The Committee understood that the overall economic crunch might make it difficult to spare enough resources for<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> sports, in view <strong>of</strong> more basic needs like water, housing, education, health etc. The Committee however<br />

felt that to achieve the objectives envisaged in the Tenth Plan approach paper and to bring Indian sports at a desirable level, a<br />

major hike in the outlay for sports was highly imperative. A multi-sectoral approach needed to be adopted for resource<br />

mobilization by tapping other sources to promote and develop sports in the country.<br />

8.492 The Committee felt that in the prevailing situation, the responsibility for providing bulk <strong>of</strong> resources for this<br />

purpose falls mainly on the Government only. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the Government should make all-out<br />

efforts for mobilizing adequate resources for promoting sports and games in the country. The Committee also recommended<br />

that the Planning Commission and Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance should take a more realistic view <strong>of</strong> the financial needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Youth Affairs and Sports and provide them more resources. To begin with the Government should provide at<br />

least 2.0 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total Annual Budget <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> India for sports only.<br />

Generating own resources<br />

8.493 The Committee, no doubt, was aware <strong>of</strong> the general resource constraint in the country but felt that less than 1% <strong>of</strong><br />

the total Budget allocated for sports was too meagre to expect any spectacular achievements. The Committee was informed<br />

that SAI was generating some resources <strong>of</strong> their own by way <strong>of</strong> renting out their stadia/buildings etc. The Committee felt that<br />

there were many other sources <strong>of</strong> collecting/generating revenue for the purpose, but not much has been done in this regard so<br />

far.<br />

8.494 The governmental efforts so far made to promote sports had not yielded the desired results. The Committee found<br />

that although various agencies were involved in the promotion <strong>of</strong> sports, most <strong>of</strong> them received funds from the States. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sports federations and associations did not have any resources <strong>of</strong> their own. In the long run, however, these<br />

associations/federations should also try to generate some revenue to become economically independent. That, the Committee<br />

felt, would help them exercise their autonomy and authority.<br />

Public-Private Partnership<br />

8.495 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the view that the Government alone would not be able to afford the required financial<br />

resources for promoting sports. In view <strong>of</strong> this, public as well as the private sector need to supplement the governmental<br />

efforts. The Committee, therefore, emphasized the need for a joint and coordinated approach by including public and private<br />

sector, in pooling their resources to promote sports in the country. This was more so necessary in the context <strong>of</strong> the financial<br />

constraints, both at the Central and State levels.<br />

8.496 It appeared to the Committee that the issue <strong>of</strong> private participation was dealt with purely in bureaucratic manner<br />

without addressing the concerns <strong>of</strong> the corporate houses. As a result, it did not evoke the desired response. The Committee,<br />

therefore, strongly recommended that this issue be discussed afresh with the corporate houses and a scheme be chalked out in<br />

consultation with them. The Committee was aware that many corporate houses had contributed directly or indirectly for<br />

sports and many more were willing to do it. But they did not come forward due to various reasons. A policy/scheme that had<br />

their participation, the Committee was sure, would certainly be fruitful and effective.<br />

8.497 The Committee recommended that major industrial/corporate houses might be requested to adopt one sports<br />

discipline for promoting in a particular area including scouting and nurturing talent in that discipline. They might be<br />

encouraged to establish in-house training and R&D facilities and ensuring participation in various national and international<br />

events. The Government might consider suitable tax holidays and other exemptions to the industrial houses for investment in<br />

the sports.<br />

Prathmik Shiksha Kosh and Sports<br />

8.498 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm view that unless the sports and the physical education were integrated into<br />

educational curricula, sports could not get the required popularity amongst our children and their parents. In other words,<br />

education and sports would have to be inextricably linked. That being so, allocation particularly, for elementary education<br />

must be spent on sports and games in schools. The Committee, therefore, recommended that sports and games be included as<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the components in Sarva Siksha Abhiyan. Not only Mid-Day Meal, sports and games in school, the Committee felt,<br />

would be equally attractive for increasing enrollment in our school and also restraining them from dropping out.<br />

8.4<strong>99</strong> Availability <strong>of</strong> modern infrastructure for sports was vital both for mass participation as well as development <strong>of</strong><br />

excellence in sports. The Committee found that the infrastructure <strong>of</strong> international standards was not available in India even<br />

to the elite sportspersons. The Government <strong>of</strong> India had sought to provide facilities and infrastructure in various parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country through its different schemes, namely, centres <strong>of</strong> excellence, special area games, SAI training centres, National<br />

sports talent contest, Army Boys Sports Company, etc. But their geographical spread was highly inadequate for a huge


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 89 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

country like India. Even the existing infrastructure at these places were poorly maintained and many <strong>of</strong> these required<br />

immediate replacement/upgradation. Several <strong>of</strong> these did not have synthetic track for athletics or the surface for hockey or<br />

indoor multi-purpose halls or swimming pool. The regional centres <strong>of</strong> the Sports Authority <strong>of</strong> India, which were the centres<br />

<strong>of</strong> excellence also were found to be lacking in many regards as far as infrastructure was concerned.<br />

8.500 The Committee felt that Government should plan the development <strong>of</strong> sports in a phased manner so that scarce<br />

resources earmarked for the purpose were optimally utilized and necessary basic infrastructure was built up over a period <strong>of</strong><br />

time. To begin with, there should be provision <strong>of</strong> a playfield in each school and colleges in rural, as well as urban areas. The<br />

Committee emphasized the need to have district level stadia and other infrastructure directly under the management <strong>of</strong><br />

district boards. Where it was not possible to have such separate playfields in the urban areas for want <strong>of</strong> space, a group <strong>of</strong><br />

schools/colleges could be allowed to use a common playfield at different timings. It should however be made mandatory for<br />

the builders and the housing societies to provide a playfield in every housing complex for the<br />

residents.<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> sports infrastructure in Rural Areas<br />

8.501 In fact, most <strong>of</strong> our efforts to develop sports, the Committee noticed, had so far been concentrated in urban areas only,<br />

and the rural areas had remained altogether neglected. We had also not been able to provide even simple play fields in all our<br />

schools and residential locations, not to speak <strong>of</strong> more. The children in rural areas used the dry fields as playground and tree<br />

branch as hockey stick and cricket bat. We had, thus, failed to encourage the rural children/youth to ensure mass<br />

participation in sports. There was no dearth <strong>of</strong> potential in rural areas; what we required today was a concerted approach for<br />

creating at least basic facilities and providing basic sports equipments in the rural areas.<br />

8.502 With the decentralization <strong>of</strong> powers and resources to panchayats and Nagarpalikas, Government should not find it<br />

difficult to provide sports facilities at Gram Panchayat, Block, smaller towns and District levels. Sports competitions and<br />

championships could also be held periodically at these levels. Such a broad-basing <strong>of</strong> sports facilities would automatically<br />

help in scouting talent at an early age because it was easier to train the young ones. Panchayat and Nagarpalikas should be<br />

mandated and encouraged to take up this responsibility.<br />

8.503 As regards, infrastructure, a pyramidical approach needed to be adopted. First the base had to be enlarged. Major<br />

initiatives would have to be taken in creating playgrounds in rural and tribal areas at Block and District levels instead <strong>of</strong><br />

building huge stadia in big cities. It was equally important that the rural population was encouraged to participate in sports<br />

and use the facilities provided to them to acquire skills <strong>of</strong> modern games and sports. We must endeavour to ensure that<br />

millions <strong>of</strong> children were not deprived <strong>of</strong> opportunity to participate in sports due to lack <strong>of</strong> infrastructure. Victors came out<br />

<strong>of</strong> participants only. We needed to convert our huge youth manpower (around 40 per cent <strong>of</strong> total population) as our greatest<br />

strength.<br />

8.504 The Committee felt that instead <strong>of</strong> organizing the games at the State capitals, many <strong>of</strong> the games could be held in<br />

other places in the State, so that the sports infrastructure was not concentrated in one particular area. This would bring about<br />

the much-needed distribution <strong>of</strong> infrastructures all over the State. Thus, more and more people would have easy access to<br />

these infrastructures within their own State.<br />

Poor Maintenance <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure<br />

8.505 The Committee was informed that the poor maintenance <strong>of</strong> infrastructure/stadia/sports complexes was mainly due<br />

to (i) lack <strong>of</strong> resources and (ii) multiplicity <strong>of</strong> agencies responsible for the maintenance. The Government intended to go to<br />

the Planning Commission with a request for additional funds for the maintenance <strong>of</strong> stadia/sports complexes. The Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Sports had been so far placing funds at the disposal <strong>of</strong> different agencies like DDA, NDMC and CPWD for the entire<br />

maintenance work. However, given the poor maintenance <strong>of</strong> our infrastructure the Committee was not happy with level <strong>of</strong><br />

interaction and monitoring between Ministry and other agencies on the maintenance aspect <strong>of</strong> our sports<br />

infrastructure.<br />

8.506 The Committee felt that the amount available to SAI for maintenance <strong>of</strong> infrastructure facilities was quite small<br />

that should be enhanced substantially to meet the requirements in this regard. The Committee did not approve <strong>of</strong> shifting the<br />

blame to NDMC and CPWD for poor maintenance; it should be basically SAI’s responsibility to get work from them. If<br />

there were some problems relating to control and monitoring in the existing system, such issues could be resolved with their<br />

headquarters. The Committee strongly felt that ideal position would be a separate engineering wing for SAI. The<br />

Committee, accordingly, recommended that the Ministry should initiate action in this direction. Setting up <strong>of</strong> a separate<br />

engineering wing for SAI would result in timely completion <strong>of</strong> all maintenance work <strong>of</strong> SAI.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 90 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Under-utilisation <strong>of</strong> infrastructure<br />

8.507 The Committee came to know that these generally remain idle most part <strong>of</strong> the year and States found it difficult to<br />

maintain. The Committee found it ironical that on the one hand, we suffer from massive lack <strong>of</strong> infrastructure and on the<br />

other hand, our infrastructure remained un-utilized or under-utilized. This was an unfortunate situation that needed to be<br />

corrected. The Committee strongly recommended to have a plan prepared for this purpose in consultation with all the State<br />

Governments, Federations, SAI, etc. for putting our infrastructure to maximum<br />

use.<br />

Transferring infrastructure schemes to States<br />

8.508 Sports infrastructure in our country had witnessed another development <strong>of</strong> far reaching implications i.e. .the recent<br />

decision <strong>of</strong> Planning Commission to transfer four schemes viz. (i) Grants for Creation <strong>of</strong> Sports Infrastructure (ii) Grants to<br />

Rural Schools for Purchase <strong>of</strong> Sports Equipment and Development <strong>of</strong> Playground (iii) Grants for a promotion <strong>of</strong> Sports in<br />

Universities and colleges and (iv) Grants for Installation <strong>of</strong> Synthetic Playing Surfaces to the States. The Committee had<br />

some reservations about this move. The resource crunch in the States was not a hidden fact and transfer <strong>of</strong> these<br />

infrastructure schemes would put additional burden on their already scarce finances. Committee’s apprehension was based<br />

on assessment <strong>of</strong> ground realities. One example would be enough. For our North Eastern States nurturing hidden sports<br />

talent, 34 infrastructure projects were sanctioned during the period from 2000-01 to 2004-05 with 16 projects not receiving<br />

even a single paisa <strong>of</strong> Central assistance Fate <strong>of</strong> the remaining projects was no different because <strong>of</strong> very meager release <strong>of</strong><br />

Central funds. What was more disturbing was that the exact status <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> all these on-going projects as on<br />

31.1.2006 was not available in the Ministry. Reason being that State Governments could avail <strong>of</strong> Central assistance by<br />

submitting progress reports, utilization certificates etc. within two years from the date <strong>of</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> the approval. Apparently,<br />

States were having some inherent constraints in implementing these projects as per the prescribed norms. If the idea was to<br />

leave infrastructure development to the States and Centre responsible for promoting excellence, future <strong>of</strong> sports in India, the<br />

Committee felt, was going to be quite grim. States had several competing demands on their resources where sports and<br />

games did not get priority. The Committee felt that these schemes were not going to sustain without financial assistance to<br />

the States. The Government needed to devise an alternative to sustain these schemes. The Committee hoped that the<br />

Planning Commission would help out the States by enhancing the States’ annual outlay for sports to enable them to run these<br />

schemes successfully in the overall interest <strong>of</strong> the sports. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered opinion that all the on-going<br />

infrastructure schemes being run by the Centre prior to its transfer to State must continue to be funded by the Centre till these<br />

were completed. This was all the more important in view <strong>of</strong> the growing demand <strong>of</strong> infrastructure for forthcoming<br />

prestigious events <strong>of</strong> Commonwealth Games 20<strong>10</strong> and other international games that our country was planning to<br />

host.<br />

Training <strong>of</strong> Sportspersons<br />

Need for Modern Training<br />

8.509 The training system in the country, the Committee felt, needed to be re-oriented in keeping with our growing<br />

demand and fast changing techniques with adequate scientific back-up. All sports had become high-tech today; not<br />

depending only on stamina and strength. The new training system would have to take all such concern into<br />

notice.<br />

8.5<strong>10</strong> The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the opinion that training formed the core <strong>of</strong> good performance. Champions could not be<br />

produced by training the sportspersons just for few months before the actual competition. Sports training was a systematic<br />

process extending over a long period <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

Dietary Allowance<br />

8.511 The Committee was happy to note that it had been decided to increase the dietary amount in the SAI Schemes <strong>of</strong><br />

STC, SAG to Rs. <strong>10</strong>0 per day and Rs.150 for the inmates <strong>of</strong> the scheme <strong>of</strong> Centre for Excellence. The Committee, however,<br />

felt that in view <strong>of</strong> recent price hike <strong>of</strong> food items, even this enhanced amount would not be sufficient for world-class<br />

sportspersons.<br />

8.512 The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the firm opinion that the Government should still consider raising dietary amount<br />

substantially so that players could get a rich and nutritious diet. The amount <strong>of</strong> diet allowance should be periodically<br />

reviewed in the light <strong>of</strong> price escalations from time to time. It, therefore, needed to be made to minimum Rs. 250/- per<br />

person/per day. The Committee would like the Government to devise a system <strong>of</strong> evaluating the nature and quality <strong>of</strong> diet<br />

required to be given to our sportspersons.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 91 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> Modern Equipments<br />

8.513 The Committee recommended that Government should make efforts to arrange the latest technology for<br />

manufacturing the equipments indigenously. The cost <strong>of</strong> sports equipments, the Committee was told were very high which<br />

made them unaffordable. Even those equipments produced/manufactured in India become costly due to high excise duty on<br />

those items. Sports goods industry in India had been demanding for reduction <strong>of</strong> duties levied on goods produced<br />

indigenously. The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance, therefore, could be approached for rationalizing the excise and import duty on sports<br />

equipments so that not only quality <strong>of</strong> indigenous sports goods could be improved, their cost could also be brought down<br />

upto an affordable level.<br />

Problems <strong>of</strong> Coaching and Coaches<br />

Shortage <strong>of</strong> Coaches<br />

8.514 The Committee noted that about fifteen hundred coaches to cover the whole country was highly inadequate. In the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> any recruitment for coaches since 1<strong>99</strong>2, the number <strong>of</strong> coaches had further declined over years. The Committee<br />

felt that there was no dearth <strong>of</strong> coaching talent in our country. Our coaches, if given proper exposure and opportunities in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> training, could produce better results than foreign coaches. There might have been marginal improvement in our<br />

performance after engagement <strong>of</strong> foreign coaches but there have been other areas <strong>of</strong> concerns like language problem and<br />

increase in dope cases. We needed to depute our coaches for trainings at international level. We could also improve the<br />

standard <strong>of</strong> our coaching and ensure a better-secured environment for our coaching community by providing healthy social<br />

security and better avenues <strong>of</strong> advancement. This would not only enhance the level <strong>of</strong> their coaching but also reduce our<br />

expenditure on foreign coaches to some extent. The Committee would like the government to urgently start the recruitment<br />

process for coaches in view <strong>of</strong> increased demand for the forthcoming Asian and Commonwealth Games.<br />

8.515 This, the Committee felt, does hardly justify such a mass transfer <strong>of</strong> coaches. The Committee termed it a hasty<br />

decision taken without visualizing its repercussions. Abrupt withdrawal <strong>of</strong> coaches had created a genuine hue and cry<br />

amongst the affected ones. This had, in fact, affected both the coaches as well as sports persons. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the<br />

opinion that the coaching community needed a better treatment. Transfers appeared to have been effected without keeping in<br />

mind the interest <strong>of</strong> the sports leave alone the genuine difficulties <strong>of</strong> the coaches. The Committee was <strong>of</strong> the considered<br />

opinion that this happened primarily because SAI did not have a definite transfer policy for coaches, hence no transparency.<br />

Even these transfers had been done after a long time and when it was done, 700 coaches were displaced suddenly in one go.<br />

The Committee recommended that SAI must put a transfer policy in place with no further delay. The SAI should also<br />

consider requests <strong>of</strong> those coaches who have genuine problems.<br />

8.516 The Committee recommended that Government should immediately withdraw coaches from such meaningless<br />

assignments and place them in their respective areas <strong>of</strong> activities without further loss <strong>of</strong><br />

time.<br />

Withdrawal <strong>of</strong> SAI coaches from Districts<br />

8.517 The Committee also felt that Sports being in the State List, States implemented their own policies and programmes<br />

for promoting sports. The policy <strong>of</strong> posting SAI coaches with the States, therefore, witnessed one or more <strong>of</strong> the problems<br />

mentioned above. The Committee noted that for these reasons, decision to withdraw coaches from District Coaching Centres<br />

in the States was taken and State Coaching Centres still had the SAI coaches. The Committee also felt that the SAI was not<br />

able to have an effective control/monitoring <strong>of</strong> its coaches at DCCs. Position which had emerged was also equally disturbing<br />

as the DCCs had now been left to the States who might not be able to support them due to financial constraint. The<br />

Committee, therefore, pleaded strongly for Centre’s support for employing good coaches by the States.<br />

Academic courses and trainings for coaches<br />

8.518 The NIS, Patiala alongwith regional centres at Bangalore and Kolkata runs academic courses to produce coaches <strong>of</strong><br />

high caliber in different disciplines. The Committee was informed that such courses were available only for selected<br />

disciplines. The Committee recommended to have academic courses for all the sports disciplines recognized in Olympics<br />

and not confined to 22 odd ones only. This number needed to be gradually increased otherwise, need for foreign coaches<br />

would always be there in the left out disciplines.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 92 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.519 The Committee, after having seen the performance/standards <strong>of</strong> our coaches, had come to the conclusion that we<br />

have to go a long way in terms <strong>of</strong> training techniques/equipments for enabling our coaches to compete with the world’s best.<br />

The Committee emphasized the need for urgent corrective steps for improving training techniques, curriculum improvements,<br />

updating <strong>of</strong> faculty’s knowledge, etc. at our academic centres.<br />

Working condition, etc. <strong>of</strong> coaches<br />

8.520 Performance <strong>of</strong> our coaches, the Committee felt, depends upon many factors like their training, working conditions,<br />

promotions, postings, etc. The Committee found the coaches – academic as well as field, as a de-motivated cadre having<br />

meager salary, no promotions, no respectable living conditions, insufficient exposure to international and modern training<br />

facilities, lack <strong>of</strong> refresher courses at regular intervals, etc. They appeared to be the most neglected lot in the entire SAI<br />

hierarchy. In such a situation, expecting good performance from the coaches was certainly a far cry. The Committee,<br />

therefore, emphasized the need for improving service and other conditions in which the coaches functioned so that they were<br />

able to give their best to their disciplines. They might be given assured career progression after some years <strong>of</strong> experience<br />

with respectable designations. The SAI HQ should have an efficient grievance redressal mechanism to take care <strong>of</strong> their<br />

problems within a minimum possible time. There was also a need to put performance monitoring system for them at the<br />

regional centres, filling the vacancies in time and giving them social recognition at respective<br />

levels.<br />

Contract Coaches<br />

8.521 For coaches on contract basis, a definite policy had to be evolved to take care <strong>of</strong> their problems and concerns. Further<br />

extension to contract coaches should be linked with their performance/output.<br />

Spotting and Nurturing Talents<br />

8.522 Apart from creating sports culture and consciousness about sports and motivating parents/students to take up sports,<br />

there was also a need to develop minimum playing facilities in every locality and schools as had been done by the countries<br />

like China, Korea, Taiwan, etc. The genetically gifted children could be identified from each locality and schools for<br />

providing scientific training and other support to develop their motor qualities and sporting skills. Sports schools might also<br />

be set up either in government or non-government sector or jointly with a view to scouting young talents in different games<br />

and sports prevalent in a particular area and then nurturing them by admitting them in these sports schools. On the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

the performance at sports schools, students showing good potential could be admitted and further groomed in SAI training<br />

centres by providing them good nutritious food, scientific training techniques and equipments, etc.<br />

8.523 The Committee, however, felt that these schemes had not have the desired impact. Despite some increase in the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> trainees and in the number <strong>of</strong> SAI sports centres, orientation and implementation <strong>of</strong> these schemes needed a fresh<br />

look.<br />

8.524 The Committee found that the schemes, particularly those to scout talent at junior/sub-junior level and preparing<br />

them for future excellence (such as NSTC, STC, SAG etc.) suffered from the following problems: some disciplines having<br />

small number <strong>of</strong> trainees spread over a number <strong>of</strong> centres in the country, hardly providing for full team; representation <strong>of</strong><br />

girls highly inadequate; centres not evenly spread in different States/regions and not in the areas having good potential;<br />

method <strong>of</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> trainees having scope for subjectivity; not all able to participate in selection; no adequate publicity;<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> periodic review <strong>of</strong> the trainees’ performance; absence <strong>of</strong> a scientific training linked with age, strength, stamina, etc.;<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> requisite/modern facilities and equipments, physical fitness centres and good living places at most <strong>of</strong> the centres;<br />

coaches not having requisite exposure for improving training techniques; no adequate sports science back-up at the centres;<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> progressive and efficient administrative policy as well as personnel at the centres; and last but not least, excessive<br />

centralization <strong>of</strong> powers - financial and administrative, either with SAI HQ or with the Ministry.<br />

8.525 As regards the ABSC scheme, the Committee found that it could not achieve a good success ratio towards the<br />

excellence in sports. The Committee felt that if each <strong>of</strong> the ABSC centres were to confine to one specific sports discipline,<br />

with specialized facilities and inputs supported by a selection based on the specific physical and other standards, far more<br />

better results could be expected. The Committee, therefore, emphasized the need for having an evaluation <strong>of</strong> this scheme<br />

done by a competent agency/persons (s) with a view to deciding the future <strong>of</strong> this scheme.<br />

8.526 As regards the NSTC scheme, the Committee noticed that the trainees were thinly spread over without much <strong>of</strong><br />

attention to the limited sports trainees in a particular discipline. The Committee found this scheme also to be <strong>of</strong> marginal<br />

utility in building up excellence <strong>of</strong> high order; it was oriented more towards general sports promotion or distinguishing<br />

oneself at a local level. A few exceptions could hardly be generalized. The Committee felt that this scheme also needs a


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 93 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

revisit for making it more effective.<br />

8.527 The Committee further noted that the distribution <strong>of</strong> these schemes was not even in different parts <strong>of</strong> the country<br />

and as such their coverage remained, more or less, inadequate. Besides, near absence <strong>of</strong> an effective monitoring mechanism<br />

was conspicuous by its absence. The Committee felt that probably our administration machinery had not shown/taken<br />

required interest/efforts in implementing these schemes with required seriousness. We, it appeared, have continued with our<br />

schemes without their proper assessment and evaluation. Monitoring aspect also needed to be strengthened.<br />

8.528 The Committee had reached to the conclusion that the purpose <strong>of</strong> nurturing and scouting sports talents in the<br />

country through these schemes had remained elusive as they failed to make any significant impact as was initially visualized<br />

when these schemes were framed. The Committee, therefore, strongly reiterated its earlier recommendation underlining the<br />

need for proper evaluation <strong>of</strong> these schemes, preferably through an independent pr<strong>of</strong>essional agency, with a view to find out<br />

the lacunae and suggest measures for strengthening and expanding them to more and more areas <strong>of</strong> the country so as to bring<br />

out our talented children and youth to the forefront.<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> adequate funds<br />

8.529 The Committee noted that the search <strong>of</strong> talent had actually not taken up under this Scheme; it provided assistance<br />

to promising sportspersons for participation in tournaments abroad, purchase <strong>of</strong> equipments, etc. The Committee, thus, found<br />

the name <strong>of</strong> the Scheme confusing. It, however, emphasized that the actual spotting <strong>of</strong> talents be made a component <strong>of</strong> this<br />

Scheme followed by adequate enhancement <strong>of</strong> allocation for it.<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> Federations/Associations<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> Coordination, Monitoring, etc.<br />

8.530 The Committee realized that there was an apparent lack <strong>of</strong> effective coordination amongst these bodies/agencies. In<br />

the absence <strong>of</strong> such a mechanism, efforts and resources did not have a focused impact. This also led to wastage <strong>of</strong> time and<br />

resources with no optimum results. Besides, it became difficult to ensure and fix responsibility in such a situation. As a<br />

result, one body blamed the other for the poor performance. The Committee also noted that even IOA was not in a position to<br />

maintain any effective control and effect any coordination with national sports federations/associations. The Committee<br />

would like the IOA and the Ministry to emphasize upon the federations to frame their scientific Long Term Development<br />

Plan as envisaged in the National Sports Policy 2001 and also ensure its effective implementation. The Committee underlined<br />

the urgent need <strong>of</strong> fixing accountability for each sports agency. This could be enforced through enacting a suitable guideline<br />

or legislation in the overall interest <strong>of</strong> sports in the country. It must be ensured that all sports agencies perform their mandate<br />

in a more systematic manner with greater sense <strong>of</strong> accountability and transparency. This would indeed infuse the much<br />

needed pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism in their working and make their attitude result-oriented.<br />

8.531 On a specific query made by the Committee, the Ministry had categorically mentioned that during the last three<br />

years no substantiated complaint about misutilisation <strong>of</strong> funds against any NSF had been received by it. The Committee<br />

would however like to draw the attention <strong>of</strong> the Ministry to two Unstarred Questions Nos. 3274 and 1173 answered in the<br />

Rajya Sabha on 25.8.2005 and 2.3.2006 respectively, whereby Members had been informed about there being some<br />

complaints about mis-appropriation <strong>of</strong> Govt. grants by NSFs. The Committee would like to have full details in this<br />

regard. The Committee had been given to understand that accounts <strong>of</strong> NSFs getting assistance exceeding<br />

Rs. One crore in a year were audited through CAG. The Committee would like to have an idea about whether against the<br />

NSFs falling under this category, any adverse remarks were made by CAG in the audit reports and follow-up action taken<br />

during the last three years.<br />

8.532 Details given to the Committee clearly indicated that IOA had not even paid a single paise to SAI. The Committee<br />

failed to understand the reasons behind such an unhealthy and undesirable state <strong>of</strong> affairs. Committee’s specific query about<br />

derecognition /appropriate action against the erring NSFs /Associations did evoke no response from the Ministry. What was<br />

more surprising was that these bodies continued to get Government. funds year after year. The Committee took a serious<br />

view <strong>of</strong> this and emphasized that all conceivable steps need to be taken by the Ministry immediately.<br />

8.533 The Committee felt that Federations being the most vital link in the entire chain need to assume leadership role and<br />

wide range <strong>of</strong> responsibilities. The national federations must play a major role not only in identifying and nurturing the<br />

sportspersons, but also in providing adequate training and competitive exposure to<br />

them.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 94 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

8.534 Nevertheless, the need for a broader vision, greater transparency, pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism, as well as accountability in their<br />

working could hardly be denied. It was good that the government did and it must respect their autonomy, but it must also<br />

ensure that they follow necessary guidelines regarding preparation <strong>of</strong> Long Term Development Plan (LTDP), annual calendar<br />

<strong>of</strong> events, submitting Utilization Certificates and accounts, etc. The Committee had been given to understand that<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> Sports Federations was reviewed during LTDP/review meetings by the Ministry. Observers had also been<br />

appointed for various sports disciplines who were to attend selection proceedings and send report to the Govt. Thus, it was<br />

very clear that Ministry had a role to play in the functioning <strong>of</strong> Sports Federations. It was basically for the federations and<br />

associations to see that negative perception about them was erased. Associating eminent sportspersons in their major<br />

activities could help improve their functioning.<br />

Last Minute Selection<br />

8.535 The Committee deprecated the system <strong>of</strong> last minute selection and urged upon the Government and the Federations<br />

to seriously devise appropriate mechanism to select teams sufficiently in advance to ensure that the players were able to<br />

concentrate on their events. Instead <strong>of</strong> concentrating on their training, they had to waste their precious time and energies in<br />

getting visa and other clearances, etc. Timely selection would also help in sending them sufficiently in advance to the place<br />

<strong>of</strong> events for acclimatization, etc. Federations should arrange necessary support system for arranging the administrative<br />

clearances, timely release <strong>of</strong> foreign exchange, visas, etc.<br />

Prioritisation <strong>of</strong> disciplines for Olympics<br />

8.536 The Committee, therefore, recommended that our participation in international events, particularly in Olympics,<br />

should be restricted to those disciplines in which we had competence <strong>of</strong> international level to bag medals. It would be better<br />

not to participate than participating and losing in all the games. Our players should, therefore, be given enough training and<br />

exposure in the identified disciplines to meet the international level. It should not mean that we stop playing other games;<br />

we, in fact, should continue to play other games in the country and invite foreign teams to India to participate in competitions<br />

for providing much needed exposure to our players. When a discipline achieved a certain standard, we might put that in the<br />

Olympic category.<br />

Sports Authority <strong>of</strong> India<br />

8.537 The Committee was informed that the DG, Sports Authority <strong>of</strong> India was authorized to sanction projects upto Rs 50<br />

lakhs and works above Rs 3 lakh were done by CPWD, which require the concurrence <strong>of</strong> the central government through<br />

DG, SAI. The Regional Directors were entitled to approve projects costing below Rs 3 lakh. However during its visit, the<br />

Committee gathered that a number <strong>of</strong> projects from Regional Centers were pending for approval either at SAI level or at the<br />

Ministry level. Regional Centers had hardly any financial power; even for petty amounts they needed the approval <strong>of</strong> SAI<br />

Headquarters. Even in administrative matters, the problem remained the same. The system <strong>of</strong> delegated authority appeared to<br />

be missing, causing thereby inordinate delays in decision- making.<br />

8.538 Officers belonging to All India services come to the SAI mainly as DG and Secretary for short tenure. They being<br />

not necessarily from sports background take some time to get conversant with the problems <strong>of</strong> sports and sportspersons.<br />

Before they did so, they either go back or take up some other assignments. As a result, they were hardly in a position to<br />

make any worthwhile and effective contribution. Major problems, therefore, remained unattended due to frequent changes <strong>of</strong><br />

key <strong>of</strong>ficials at decision-making level. The Committee recommended that in the present system <strong>of</strong> taking All India Service<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers as DG and Secretary in Sports Authority <strong>of</strong> India, there was need for inducing some element <strong>of</strong> continuity in<br />

administrative, financial and other matters. For this, a post <strong>of</strong> Addl. DG must be provided with distinct powers and authority<br />

in all matters, which should be an ex-cadre post to be filled by the existing EDs. Such a system would ensure that Addl. DG<br />

would be sportsperson from within, not liable to transfer.<br />

8.539 The Committee noted that the SAI’s Executive Directors were burdened because there were only two posts. As a<br />

result, they had to look after several major disciplines. In such a scenario, the important works remained unattended, which<br />

adversely affected the promotional aspects <strong>of</strong> sports. The Committee, therefore, recommended to increase the posts <strong>of</strong> EDs<br />

in SAI to have a judicious distribution <strong>of</strong> work.<br />

8.540 The Committee opined that present management and administration was too complicated to effect changes tuned to<br />

the requirements <strong>of</strong> our sports. The old and traditional methods <strong>of</strong> administration in a bureaucratic atmosphere had done more<br />

harm than good to our sports. It was high time to bring pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism in our approach and induct qualified and experienced<br />

sports administrators/managers for managing operations <strong>of</strong> our sports schemes and infrastructure throughout the country. Our<br />

administrators had to be scientific, value based, progressive and receptive to the changes. There was no dearth <strong>of</strong> such<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in our country. We need to decentralize our decision making


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 95 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

process.<br />

8.541 The Committee endorsed the view <strong>of</strong> a former DG, SAI suggesting at least three years tenure for the Secretary <strong>of</strong><br />

Sports Ministry who could involve himself in the whole gamut <strong>of</strong> sports administration and feel free to take business like<br />

decisions.<br />

8.542 The Committee recommended that there could be a group <strong>of</strong> eminent sports persons including SAI <strong>of</strong>ficials for<br />

final selection <strong>of</strong> teams and in the monitoring <strong>of</strong> their performance. The Committee also underlined the need for assigning <strong>of</strong><br />

discipline wise responsibilities to the sports managers in SAI for ensuring a better coordination with Federations. This<br />

flexible approach in administration would help in overhauling the sports setup across the country. It was equally important to<br />

empower the regional centers <strong>of</strong> SAI by decentralizing the decision making process.<br />

8.543 The Committee observed that the term <strong>of</strong> the General Body <strong>of</strong> SAI was for three years and the last tenure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

General Body had expired on 20.3.04. Last information received by the Committee was that the reconstitution <strong>of</strong> General<br />

Body <strong>of</strong> SAI was in process. The Committee was not happy with this State <strong>of</strong> affairs. Reasons for undue delay in the<br />

reconstitution <strong>of</strong> such an important body which must have been anticipated well in advance were not known to the<br />

Committee. The Committee liked to be apprised about the latest position in this matter. The Committee was also <strong>of</strong> the<br />

opinion that a review <strong>of</strong> existing procedure for constitution <strong>of</strong> General Body <strong>of</strong> SAI might be undertaken and corrective steps<br />

initiated.<br />

8.544 The Committee hoped that with the appointment <strong>of</strong> statutory auditors and adherence to the prescribed accounting<br />

procedure, such deviations would not occur in future.<br />

Women’s Participation<br />

8.545 The scheme, the Committee felt, deserved wider publicity through radio, Doordarshan and print media, in order to<br />

achieve the objectives <strong>of</strong> broad-basing the sports and encouraging mass participation by women. There was a need to give<br />

good incentives in the form <strong>of</strong> cash awards and medals so as to attract mass participation by<br />

women.<br />

8.546 The Committee noted that during 2003-04, the percentage <strong>of</strong> female participation, in all the four SAI schemes such<br />

as NSTC, SAG, STC & COX was 29.47% which during 2004-05 slightly improved in comparison to last year. The women<br />

participation in All India Rural Sports Tournament and North East Sports Festival during 2003-04 was 36.94% and 37.89%<br />

respectively. The Committee opined that at present women participation in these schemes was quite low and needs to be<br />

enhanced to the optimum.<br />

8.547 The Committee learnt that the Girls were not getting time to use play field particularly in certain States. As a<br />

result, they were not able to play/practice. The Committee felt that such an attitude towards our women sportsperson was<br />

deplorable. It, therefore recommended that efforts be made to ensure that they also get equal opportunity to use the existing<br />

infrastructure at all the places.<br />

8.548 Many parents liked to send their daughters to play games but they were hesitant to do so because <strong>of</strong> security and<br />

safety reasons. The Committee noticed that out <strong>of</strong> 18 sports hostels <strong>of</strong> SAI, there was only one sports hostel for women and<br />

there was no exclusive SPDA hostel for girls. Therefore, the Committee felt that, there was a need for proper planning to<br />

develop sports amongst women, by opening more sports hostels for them and adopting more girls’ sports<br />

schools.<br />

8.549 In our male dominated system, women’s participation in sports got neglected. The Committee felt that Sports<br />

Associations/Federations must have a separate group/unit exclusively for the women and by the women. Similarly, women<br />

coaches were also in state <strong>of</strong> neglect. We must have more qualified women coaches from amongst ex-sportswomen.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> Sports Sciences<br />

8.550 The Committee found that the scientific back-up to the development <strong>of</strong> sports at most <strong>of</strong> the places was in a<br />

rudimentary stage and at others, it was virtually non-existent. Sports psychology also was not very much in vogue. Sports<br />

psychology and sports sciences, in fact, were indispensable for improving/testing physical as well as mental capabilities <strong>of</strong><br />

the sportspersons. In the present era <strong>of</strong> stiff competitions, sports had turned into more <strong>of</strong> a psychological war. Today, the


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 96 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

games were won or lost just by a fraction <strong>of</strong> seconds or millimeters. There was a very narrow margin between the winner and<br />

loser. Role <strong>of</strong> psychologists and sports medical experts could, therefore, do wonders in such a situation. A good psychologist<br />

working with a medical expert could, in fact, influence, to a large extent, the outcome <strong>of</strong> the game, as well as the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> sportspersons. The Committee noticed that the sports medicine was also not being given any priority in India.<br />

The Committee emphasized that due attention and priority must be given to these disciplines by all concerned. The<br />

Committee recommended that the services <strong>of</strong> good sports physiologists, psychologists and sports medical experts be made<br />

available to our players all the times at all the centres.<br />

8.551 Advance in technology had come into each and every sphere and sports was no exception to this. We need to<br />

accept sports as a science. Sports science system in the country needed to be developed through a well-defined network from<br />

the national to the State, District and Panchayat levels where every youth including the sportspersons could be benefited. To<br />

achieve this target, a National Sports Science Institute having State, District and Panchayat level units needed to be<br />

established for necessary research, education and awareness generation about sports science across the<br />

country.<br />

Scheme for Anti-Doping<br />

8.552 The Committee found that the pace <strong>of</strong> work at the Dope Control Centre was slow that needs to be expedited.<br />

8.553 What surprised the Committee most was that nobody seemed to take the responsibility for our sportspersons testing<br />

positive for drugs. The Ministry and the SAI argue that it was basically not their duty/responsibility to get the athletes dope<br />

tested because they were under the control <strong>of</strong> IOA and various sports federations. Federations had ready excuse about the<br />

high cost <strong>of</strong> these tests and the lack <strong>of</strong> latest sophisticated facilities for this purpose in the country. Thus, at the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

day, nobody was ready to own the responsibility for the bad name that such incidents bring to the nation. The Committee at<br />

the same time wished to appreciate the efforts <strong>of</strong> the IOA in getting some <strong>of</strong> our sportspersons cleared after they tested<br />

positive.<br />

8.554 The Committee felt extremely unhappy about the continuing indifference shown by all sports bodies – Ministry,<br />

SAI, IOA, Federations to such a serious malaise. Involving many agencies in this, the Committee felt, had only complicated<br />

the matter. They appeared to be passing the buck to each other with no serious efforts being made by any <strong>of</strong> them to clean<br />

the mess that plagued our sports.<br />

8.555 The Committee recommended to augment the testing facilities and adopting foolpro<strong>of</strong> procedure for dope testing.<br />

We should evolve a mechanism with least possibility <strong>of</strong> tempering with the samples. The entire procedure should be strictly<br />

as per the norms laid by WADA and the punishments had to be as per the World Anti-Doping Code. The Ministry should<br />

make efforts for employing experts in the area for making the test results authentic.<br />

8.556 The Committee also emphasized an urgent need for educating our athletes, coaches and other supporting personnel<br />

about the harmful effects <strong>of</strong> doping on their health as well as to the prestige <strong>of</strong> the nation.<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> Media<br />

8.557 The Committee felt that there was a need to increase the equipments and other facilities available with Doordarshan<br />

and AIR so that they did not feel handicapped in covering major sports events. With so many private TV channels around, it<br />

was necessary to inject more pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism in the quality <strong>of</strong> live coverage and commentaries on Doordarshan. There was<br />

also a need for calling eminent sportspersons in programmes on fitness, yoga, sports and games. T.V. channels might also<br />

play an effective role in projecting the techniques and style <strong>of</strong> eminent sportspersons by showing them in slow motion on the<br />

national hook-up.<br />

Putting Sports in Concurrent List<br />

8.558 The Committee appreciated the limitations <strong>of</strong> Central Government in fixing accountability amongst multiple<br />

agencies in the backdrop <strong>of</strong> present constitutional arrangements regarding division <strong>of</strong> subjects under different lists. There was<br />

hardly any law or regulation defining the roles <strong>of</strong> such agencies and as such there was a lot <strong>of</strong> duplication <strong>of</strong> efforts. Sports<br />

being in state list, the Central Government lacked legislative powers required for strict enforcement <strong>of</strong> Government<br />

guidelines.<br />

8.559 Besides, the Committee during its deliberations with some State governments found that sports hardly was a<br />

priority for them mainly due to the severe resource crunch with them. In some <strong>of</strong> the States (like Gujarat and Karnataka),


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 97 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

resources spared for sports were not increasing or were going down over the years. In such a situation, Centre’s role and<br />

contribution had to increase manifold in promoting sports at national level.<br />

8.560 The Committee also noted that while ‘Sports’ figure in the ‘State List’ <strong>of</strong> the Constitution, ‘Education’ figured in<br />

the ‘Concurrent List’. Both the activities viz Education and Sports were inter-related; in fact they were two facets <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

coin. The Committee while underlining the need for bringing sports under the ‘Concurrent List’ wished to emphasise that it<br />

should be done only with the consent <strong>of</strong> the States. While Sports in the country could be developed in an effective and<br />

coordinated manner only with Center and States as equal partners.<br />

8.561 The Committee was informed that legislation for including ‘Sports’ in the Concurrent List was introduced in the<br />

Rajya Sabha in 1988, which could not be discussed in the Parliament. The Committee was informed that in 1<strong>99</strong>6 a meeting <strong>of</strong><br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> all political parties to discuss the subject remained inconclusive. Again in 2005, the matter was placed<br />

before the conference <strong>of</strong> State Sports Ministers. Many <strong>of</strong> the participating representatives <strong>of</strong> the State Governments reported<br />

that their Governments had not firmed up their views on the subject. Written communication regarding views <strong>of</strong> some State<br />

Governments had been received while communication from some State Governments was still awaited. The Committee<br />

recommended that the views <strong>of</strong> the State Governments might be once again taken before taking a decision in this regard.<br />

8.562 In view <strong>of</strong> the greater responsibility <strong>of</strong> the Union for encouraging sports, the Committee recommended that Union<br />

had to play a pro-active role with regard to bringing sports under the Concurrent list. States’ fears in this regard would have<br />

to be removed to convince them about the utility <strong>of</strong> such a move by citing the example <strong>of</strong> education. It was only after<br />

education was brought to the Concurrent List, popular schemes like SSA and MDM could be sponsored by the Union at all<br />

India level. All the States were being benefited immensely by these schemes. A legislation might also be enacted to provide<br />

for an effective coordinating mechanism in the sports arena without impairing the autonomy <strong>of</strong> various agencies. Such<br />

legislations had greatly improved the sports scenario in countries like USA, Germany, Thailand, Sri Lanka and<br />

China.<br />

Commonwealth Games 20<strong>10</strong><br />

8.563 The Committee noted that large number <strong>of</strong> bodies/committees had been entrusted with the responsibility <strong>of</strong><br />

preparation and conduct <strong>of</strong> the Commonwealth Games, 20<strong>10</strong>. The Committee apprehended that multiplicity <strong>of</strong> authority for<br />

organizing the Games could make proper coordination and supervision very difficult. Lack <strong>of</strong> mutual coordination, among<br />

various authorities might delay the projects. The Committee was concerned about timely execution and completion <strong>of</strong><br />

various projects for Games. The Committee, therefore, recommended that all these agencies should work as a team dedicated<br />

to ensure early and smooth completion <strong>of</strong> all the works in a time-bound manner. It was equally important to identify the<br />

bottlenecks in the execution <strong>of</strong> these projects and ensure fast track clearances from different bodies. Monitoring and<br />

supervision also needed to be foolpro<strong>of</strong> and effective.<br />

8.564 As regards the private participation, the Committee, as a note <strong>of</strong> caution liked to point out about the pr<strong>of</strong>it motive<br />

behind investment by them particularly in developing residential units. While forging partnership with them in this regard,<br />

this aspect needed to be kept in mind especially in view <strong>of</strong> the fact that these residential facilities might be required for such<br />

international sporting events like Asian Games, etc. for which India was reported to have been aspiring.<br />

8.565 The Committee noted that the completion dates <strong>of</strong> the projects had been kept very close to the Games. Based on<br />

our experience <strong>of</strong> civil constructions generally being delayed, the Committee would like the agencies executing various<br />

projects to work with utmost dedication and commitment to complete the job even before the final schedule. We should take<br />

a cue from Delhi Metro in this regard.<br />

8.566 As regard the utilisation <strong>of</strong> sports infrastructure after the Games, the Committee felt that it would have to be<br />

ensured well before the Games were over. Our experience after the Asian Games in 1982 had shown that the infrastructure<br />

created then had remained unutilized/underutilised for a very long time. For avoiding this, the Committee liked to emphasize<br />

the need for having a prospective plan for this purpose ready to be implemented after the Games.<br />

8.567 The Committee expressed its concern about the manner in which the residential units would be untilised that were<br />

proposed to be constructed through private participation. The Committee liked to emphasize that a mutually agreed<br />

mechanism be devised to keep these under government control even after the Games were over.<br />

8.568 The Committee wished to emphasise that the entire amount projected for the Games should not be spent as capital<br />

expenditure only; some proportion <strong>of</strong> it must be allocated for sportspersons and coaches also in the form <strong>of</strong> incentives and<br />

other assistance to them. This was more necessary in the face <strong>of</strong> the fact that if their moral was down, their performance


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 98 <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

would be affected adversely.<br />

8.569 Training for sportspersons was another important component for such international events. Since most <strong>of</strong> our stadia<br />

and other venues in the meantime would either be under upgradation/construction, this might pose a problem regarding<br />

regular training <strong>of</strong> our sportspersons. Our new infrastructure for Commonwealth Games would be ready towards the end <strong>of</strong><br />

2009 or beginning <strong>of</strong> 20<strong>10</strong>. And till that time our sportspersons would have no option but to depend upon the existing old<br />

infrastructure and facilities. Expecting medal-winning performances from our sportspersons trained on such infrastructure as<br />

compared to those from Canada, UK, Australia, etc. would, in fact, be a wishful idea. The Committee, therefore, emphasized<br />

that the up-gradation as well as creation <strong>of</strong> infrastructure need to be completed at least a year ahead <strong>of</strong> the Games so that our<br />

sportspersons could get the benefit <strong>of</strong> such improved infrastructure till we get the Commonwealth Games<br />

infrastructure.<br />

Part - II<br />

Problems Relating to Regional and Other Centres <strong>of</strong> Sports Authority <strong>of</strong> India<br />

Dr. Shyama Prasad Mookherjee Swimming Pool Complex<br />

8.570 Following issues/problems were noticed during the visit <strong>of</strong> the Committee to the swimming pool: -<br />

- The air-conditioning plant installed at the pool was not effective as it was old.<br />

- Recycling <strong>of</strong> water was done to meet the shortage <strong>of</strong> water; heating facility was not working.<br />

- Lack <strong>of</strong> proper coordination amongst various agencies like CPWD and NDMC hampered the upkeep <strong>of</strong> the pool<br />

and its complex.<br />

- An Engineering Cell <strong>of</strong> SAI to monitor the construction/maintenance works at the complex, needed to be put in<br />

place.<br />

- Stagnant water led to breeding <strong>of</strong> the mosquitoes in and around the pool. The pool design needed to be modified.<br />

- During winter one <strong>of</strong> the pools was closed, which affected adversely the swimming practice.<br />

- Shortage <strong>of</strong> swimming coaches was the biggest problem.<br />

- There was no provision <strong>of</strong> a lift in the building.<br />

- There were no proper lights in the female change room.<br />

- The present dormitory accommodation available was not only insufficient but also very congested. A separate<br />

hostel as well as a separate swimming pool needed to be constructed to meet the requirement <strong>of</strong> the forthcoming<br />

Commonwealth Games.<br />

- Efforts should be made to tap swimming potential from the coastal belts <strong>of</strong> the country. Initiative to train the<br />

swimmers to compete in all the 96 events be made by the National Swimming Federation, as SAI had nothing to do<br />

with this. It only provided the requisite infrastructure.<br />

- The Committee was informed that a proposal for Swimming Academy for identifying the swimming talents from<br />

various far-flung areas was pending with the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Youth Affairs and Sports. The Committee recommended<br />

that the proposal be expedited in view <strong>of</strong> the forthcoming Commonwealth Games.<br />

8.571 The Committee liked to have point-wise response from the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Youth Affairs and Sports on the points<br />

made above.<br />

8.572 The Committee took special interest in the infrastructural facilities available there and particularly in the newly<br />

developed Dope Centre. The Committee however, liked the Government to improve the level <strong>of</strong> maintenance and over all<br />

cleanliness in laboratories at the Dope center so that not only the testing or experiments gave better results but the technicians<br />

also got more hygienic working conditions. The Committee felt that the Dope Centre at Jawaharlal Nehru stadium being the<br />

only one in the country should have more sports scientists and experts in the laboratories. This would help in improving the<br />

research standards <strong>of</strong> the Dope Centres. There was also need to provide more physiotherapists/doctors in human performance<br />

lab as well as in the medical center.<br />

8.573 Tenure <strong>of</strong> the Managing Committee <strong>of</strong> National Sports Development Fund (NSDF) had expired and new members<br />

had not been appointed so far. The delay in constitution <strong>of</strong> the Committee was adversely affecting the decision making<br />

process for utilisation as well as resource generation <strong>of</strong> this corpus. The Committee liked to be apprised about the status <strong>of</strong><br />

constitution <strong>of</strong> the same.


<strong>CHAPTER</strong>-<strong>VII</strong><br />

<strong>http</strong>://<strong>10</strong>.21.217.2/committeessum/2006/chapter_7_8.htm<br />

<strong>Page</strong> <strong>99</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>99</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong>/3/<strong>2008</strong><br />

SAI, Western Regional Centre, Gandhinagar<br />

8.574 The Committee deprecated the practice <strong>of</strong> lingering important proposals for unduly longer time mainly at the<br />

Headquarter. Proposal for replacement <strong>of</strong> synthetic athletic track received in the last year <strong>of</strong> the 9 th Plan remained on paper<br />

till 2005-06 (fourth year <strong>of</strong> the <strong>10</strong> th Plan) for want <strong>of</strong> funds. Fate <strong>of</strong> 25 year old swimming pool also seemed to be equally<br />

pathetic. The kind <strong>of</strong> feedback received left no doubt.<br />

8.575 The Committee recommended that immediate remedial steps be taken to renovate, upgrade and make the<br />

swimming pool functional. It also liked to be apprised about the status <strong>of</strong> laying the athletics synthetic track in the Center.<br />

8.576 The Committee was informed that SIU had assessed the strength <strong>of</strong> staff at the center as 136 instead <strong>of</strong> the original<br />

sanctioned strength <strong>of</strong> 260. Existing strength at the time <strong>of</strong> the Committee’s visit was 175. It meant the center had surplus<br />

staff. But the Committee felt that the assessment by the SIU was not at all based on objective/expert advice.<br />

8.577 The Committee was also given to understand that there was a demand for Lab Technician, Data Entry Operator and<br />

Hindi Translator at the Center. The Committee was, however, surprised to note that no progress seemed to have been made.<br />

Reason being the ban on direct recruitment and the post <strong>of</strong> Lab Technician falling under this category. Posting <strong>of</strong> Data Entry<br />

Operator was being delayed as it was to be considered under the over all assessment. The Committee was not happy with<br />

the lack <strong>of</strong> initiative on the part <strong>of</strong> SAI. Ban on recruitment <strong>of</strong> technical post was no longer there. The Committee<br />

therefore, emphasized that filling up <strong>of</strong> these posts might be pursued without any further delay.<br />

8.578 The Committee was also constrained to note that no regular Medical Officer was deployed at SAI Western Region<br />

for quite a few years. The Committee had been informed that in 1<strong>99</strong>1-92, the post <strong>of</strong> Medical Officer was merged with the<br />

cadre <strong>of</strong> Junior Scientific Officer and thus no post <strong>of</strong> Medical Officer was in existence in SAI as per the Recruitment Rules <strong>of</strong><br />

SAI. The Committee was not convinced by the assurance regarding action being initiated to post a Medical Officer at<br />

Gandhinagar. The Committee felt that posting <strong>of</strong> Medical Officers needed to be made mandatory at all centres for proper<br />

care <strong>of</strong> our sportspersons.<br />

8.579 During discussion with State Sports <strong>of</strong>ficials, a number <strong>of</strong> demands were made by Sports Authority <strong>of</strong> Gujarat: -<br />

- Discontinued regular diploma courses in Western

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!