Abstract The Person Picking an Apple from a Tree (PPAT) drawing ...

Abstract The Person Picking an Apple from a Tree (PPAT) drawing ... Abstract The Person Picking an Apple from a Tree (PPAT) drawing ...

xcdsystem.com
from xcdsystem.com More from this publisher
05.01.2015 Views

Abstract The Person Picking an Apple from a Tree (PPAT) drawing and Formal Elements Art Therapy Scale (FEATS) (Gantt & Tabone, 1998) had not been studied for a profile of characteristics unique to individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). There is limited quantitative research designed to identify frequent formal art elements in artwork of patients with BPD with the exception of a study by Mills (1989) who used the Diagnostic Drawing Series (DDS) to identify items in the assessment that were found in patients with BPD. Two quantitative studies established the occurrence of Axis I disorders in patients diagnosed with BPD, specifically mood disorders and major depressive disorder. In an anecdotal report based on her work with patients with BPD, Silverman (1991) observed black holes, strong outlines, and disorganization. In their anecdotal report, Cole and Robbins (1994) observed concrete and pictorial images that were repetitive, two-dimensional, dull in color, lacked organization, and included universal signs. Mills’ (1989) findings were strong enough to warrant another look at what formal art elements were characteristic of patients diagnosed with BPD. Results might be beneficial to the field of art therapy by providing art therapists with additional information regarding diagnosis, patient’s mental status, or patient’s response to treatment. Participants were five outpatient psychiatric patients diagnosed with Axis I Major Depression or Depressive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified, both previously treated, and Axis II Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Participants each completed a drawing of a Person Picking an Apple from a Tree (PPAT). The Formal Elements Art Therapy Scale (FEATS) (Gantt & Tabone, 1998) was used to rate the PPATs and identify frequent formal art elements. The Pearson r was used to calculate inter-rater reliability for each of the 14 FEATS derived from two raters’ scores. For scales with acceptable inter-rater reliability (r=0.70), the mean score for each participant was determined. Finally, a frequency count of the resulting means was conducted to identify frequent formal art elements. A 60% or higher reoccurrence of the mean score was required to identify the frequent formal art element for each scale with acceptable inter-rater reliability. Of the 14 scales, six resulted in acceptable inter-rater reliability and a 60% or higher reoccurrence of the same mean score across participants. These scales were: Space (r=0.866, p=0.0288, 60% reoccurrence of score 3.75); Integration (r=1, p=NaN, 60% reoccurrence of score 4.5); Logic (r=NaN, p=NaN, 100% reoccurrence of score 5); Line Quality (r=NaN, p=NaN, 60% reoccurrence of score 4); Rotation (r=1, p=NaN, 80% reoccurrence of score 5); and Perseveration (r=NaN, p=NaN, 60% reoccurrence of score 5). In sum, the PPATs of these five BPD patients were characterized by (1) using 50% to 75% of the paper for the drawing, (2) a visual relationship between at least three elements to a well integrated, well balanced composition, (3) no bizarre or illogical elements, (4) lines that are under control, (5) no rotation, and (6) no perseveration. It was concluded the FEATS could be used to establish a profile of characteristics typical of these five diagnosed participants with BPD. This information is applicable to clinical practice of art therapy because it provides additional information regarding diagnosis, the patient’s mental status, or the patient’s response to treatment. Having patients with BPD draw PPAT drawings throughout their treatment might be useful to identify regression or progression in treatment.

<strong>Abstract</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Person</strong> <strong>Picking</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>Apple</strong> <strong>from</strong> a <strong>Tree</strong> (<strong>PPAT</strong>) <strong>drawing</strong> <strong>an</strong>d Formal Elements Art<br />

<strong>The</strong>rapy Scale (FEATS) (G<strong>an</strong>tt & Tabone, 1998) had not been studied for a profile of<br />

characteristics unique to individuals with Borderline <strong>Person</strong>ality Disorder (BPD). <strong>The</strong>re is limited<br />

qu<strong>an</strong>titative research designed to identify frequent formal art elements in artwork of patients with<br />

BPD with the exception of a study by Mills (1989) who used the Diagnostic Drawing Series<br />

(DDS) to identify items in the assessment that were found in patients with BPD. Two<br />

qu<strong>an</strong>titative studies established the occurrence of Axis I disorders in patients diagnosed with<br />

BPD, specifically mood disorders <strong>an</strong>d major depressive disorder. In <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>ecdotal report based<br />

on her work with patients with BPD, Silverm<strong>an</strong> (1991) observed black holes, strong outlines,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d disorg<strong>an</strong>ization. In their <strong>an</strong>ecdotal report, Cole <strong>an</strong>d Robbins (1994) observed concrete <strong>an</strong>d<br />

pictorial images that were repetitive, two-dimensional, dull in color, lacked org<strong>an</strong>ization, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

included universal signs. Mills’ (1989) findings were strong enough to warr<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>other look at<br />

what formal art elements were characteristic of patients diagnosed with BPD. Results might be<br />

beneficial to the field of art therapy by providing art therapists with additional information<br />

regarding diagnosis, patient’s mental status, or patient’s response to treatment.<br />

Particip<strong>an</strong>ts were five outpatient psychiatric patients diagnosed with Axis I Major<br />

Depression or Depressive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified, both previously treated, <strong>an</strong>d Axis II<br />

Borderline <strong>Person</strong>ality Disorder (BPD). Particip<strong>an</strong>ts each completed a <strong>drawing</strong> of a <strong>Person</strong><br />

<strong>Picking</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>Apple</strong> <strong>from</strong> a <strong>Tree</strong> (<strong>PPAT</strong>). <strong>The</strong> Formal Elements Art <strong>The</strong>rapy Scale (FEATS) (G<strong>an</strong>tt<br />

& Tabone, 1998) was used to rate the <strong>PPAT</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d identify frequent formal art elements.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Pearson r was used to calculate inter-rater reliability for each of the 14 FEATS<br />

derived <strong>from</strong> two raters’ scores. For scales with acceptable inter-rater reliability (r=0.70), the<br />

me<strong>an</strong> score for each particip<strong>an</strong>t was determined. Finally, a frequency count of the resulting<br />

me<strong>an</strong>s was conducted to identify frequent formal art elements. A 60% or higher reoccurrence of<br />

the me<strong>an</strong> score was required to identify the frequent formal art element for each scale with<br />

acceptable inter-rater reliability.<br />

Of the 14 scales, six resulted in acceptable inter-rater reliability <strong>an</strong>d a 60% or higher<br />

reoccurrence of the same me<strong>an</strong> score across particip<strong>an</strong>ts. <strong>The</strong>se scales were: Space (r=0.866,<br />

p=0.0288, 60% reoccurrence of score 3.75); Integration (r=1, p=NaN, 60% reoccurrence of<br />

score 4.5); Logic (r=NaN, p=NaN, 100% reoccurrence of score 5); Line Quality (r=NaN, p=NaN,<br />

60% reoccurrence of score 4); Rotation (r=1, p=NaN, 80% reoccurrence of score 5); <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Perseveration (r=NaN, p=NaN, 60% reoccurrence of score 5).<br />

In sum, the <strong>PPAT</strong>s of these five BPD patients were characterized by (1) using 50% to<br />

75% of the paper for the <strong>drawing</strong>, (2) a visual relationship between at least three elements to a<br />

well integrated, well bal<strong>an</strong>ced composition, (3) no bizarre or illogical elements, (4) lines that are<br />

under control, (5) no rotation, <strong>an</strong>d (6) no perseveration. It was concluded the FEATS could be<br />

used to establish a profile of characteristics typical of these five diagnosed particip<strong>an</strong>ts with<br />

BPD.<br />

This information is applicable to clinical practice of art therapy because it provides<br />

additional information regarding diagnosis, the patient’s mental status, or the patient’s response<br />

to treatment. Having patients with BPD draw <strong>PPAT</strong> <strong>drawing</strong>s throughout their treatment might<br />

be useful to identify regression or progression in treatment.


References<br />

Cole, M. D., & Robbins, A. (1994). Diagnostic indicators in the artwork of borderline <strong>an</strong>d<br />

dissociative patients. In A. Robbins, (Ed.), A multi-modal approach to creative art<br />

therapy (pp. 124-140). Bristol, PA: Jessica Kingsley.<br />

G<strong>an</strong>tt, L., & Tabone, C. (1998). Formal Elements Art <strong>The</strong>rapy Scale: <strong>The</strong> rating m<strong>an</strong>ual.<br />

Morg<strong>an</strong>town, WV: Gargoyle Press.<br />

Mills, A. (1989). A statistical study of the formal aspects of the Diagnostic Drawing Series of<br />

borderline personality disordered patients, <strong>an</strong>d its context in contemporary art therapy.<br />

Unpublished master’s thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, C<strong>an</strong>ada.<br />

Silverm<strong>an</strong>, D. (1991). Art psychotherapy: An approach to borderline adults. In H. B. L<strong>an</strong>dgarten,<br />

& D. Lubbers, (Eds.), Adult art psychotherapy: Issues <strong>an</strong>d applications (pp. 83-110).<br />

Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!