05.01.2015 Views

North American Special - Trenchless International

North American Special - Trenchless International

North American Special - Trenchless International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

projects<br />

April 2009 - <strong>Trenchless</strong> <strong>International</strong><br />

Reconstructing pipes<br />

in Wajima City<br />

By Masatoshi Kasukawa, Komatsu. Translated by Kyoko Kondo<br />

In Wajima City, Noto Island Japan, an earthquake caused the destruction of more than 16 km of<br />

sewer and agricultural pipes. To restore the pipes, a new trenchless technique was applied – the<br />

IM-Rebirth method can crush and remove existing reinforced concrete pipes and install new pipes<br />

along the same trajectory.<br />

The IM-Rebirth solution successfully<br />

overcame some unexpected<br />

difficulties to reconstruct approximately<br />

1.2 km of sewer pipeline, the first pipeeating<br />

project of this scale to be carried<br />

out in Japan.<br />

The entrance of the Wajima city building.<br />

The flag says “Hang in there!” following the<br />

earthquake.<br />

The sewers to be reconstructed were<br />

located at the end of the downstream,<br />

immediately before the Monzenmachi<br />

wastewater management center. The<br />

pipeline was buried below National Route<br />

249 at a depth of 4.2 metres down to 6.3<br />

metres. The Hakkagawa River runs along<br />

the road and there were many cracks<br />

observed at the river wall. It was predicted<br />

that the whole area was affected from<br />

the ground deformation due to the earthquake.<br />

Many existing manholes had been<br />

dislocated due to the water pressure. The<br />

type of soil was water-bearing stratum,<br />

which seemed to have increased the<br />

warping of the ground. Even from above<br />

ground, it was clear that the sewers had<br />

suffered displacements.<br />

Outline of damaged pipes sagging.<br />

Choosing the right technology<br />

After considering the level of sagging<br />

and displacements, CIPP was deemed<br />

an inappropriate method to restore the<br />

sewers, therefore the choice was made<br />

to reconstruct the whole pipe. There were<br />

two options for reconstruction; open cut<br />

and trenchless. Open cut was rejected<br />

as the pipeline was too deep to excavate.<br />

Moreover, taking into account the ground<br />

water level and economic efficiency, the<br />

trenchless method was selected as the<br />

optimum solution. An alternative was to<br />

install a pipeline next to the damaged<br />

pipe using the standard microtunnelling<br />

method. However, microtunnelling needs<br />

disposal treatment of the existing sewers<br />

including removing manholes up to the 1.5<br />

metre level. Considering all of these factors<br />

the pipe eating method was selected.<br />

The types of existing sewers were;<br />

1. Humes pipe for open cut construction<br />

2. Humes pipe for microtunnelling construction<br />

– including stainless steel<br />

collar<br />

3. A Humes pipe as a casing pipe – PVC<br />

pipe of 200 mm diameter was placed<br />

inside.<br />

Pipe eating method A, from the current<br />

reconstruction method listed in the guideline<br />

issued by Japan Microtunnelling Association,<br />

was chosen to crush and remove the existing<br />

damaged pipeline (pictured).<br />

Reconstruction method<br />

The IM-Rebirth method<br />

The IM-Rebirth method is based on<br />

traditional machines, such as Slim-Ark<br />

TA50 and the Iron Mole series, which can<br />

excavate hard cobbles and rocks. The difference<br />

between these machines and the<br />

IM-Rebirth method is the cutting head with<br />

a special cutter, spiral or gear type, which<br />

can crush the existing reinforced concrete<br />

pipes and reinforcing steels bars. This<br />

method not only crushes the existing pipe<br />

but also removes the pieces. This results<br />

in a newly installed pipe. The cutter head<br />

can also crush railroad ties and stainless<br />

collar used between the pipes.<br />

The jacking head torque is high enough<br />

to crush the hard cobbles and rocks<br />

located around the pipes. The starting<br />

shaft can be very small. For pipe diameters<br />

of 250 mm up to 300 mm only a 2<br />

metre shaft is required, and for pipe diameters<br />

of 350 mm up to 500 mm a 2.5 metre<br />

shaft is required.<br />

A cutting head after the excavation test.<br />

Reconstruction methods from the<br />

Japan Microtunnelling Association<br />

Static crushing and jacking method<br />

Dynamic crushing and jacking method<br />

Rotating/ crushing and jacking method<br />

A type<br />

B type<br />

Pull-out and jacking method<br />

Scope of application<br />

Existing pipe diameter: up to 1000 mm<br />

Diameter of new pipe: 250 – 1,000 mm<br />

Total length: 150 metres – depending on condition<br />

Existing pipe type: hume pipe, (for open-cut , jacking pipe with SUS<br />

collar), clay, PVC, PE, FRP<br />

Ground conditions: standard soil, sand gravel, base rock layer<br />

Applications: same diameter to same diameter, reducing diameter,<br />

enlarging diameter, adjusting trajectory.<br />

Crashed pieces at the test excavation.<br />

The IM-Rebirth method was selected<br />

because of the cutter head's ability to<br />

crush reinforced pipes and SUS (stainless)<br />

collars. However, as the project<br />

progressed, it was revealed that a spacer<br />

of 5 mm thickness was used inside of<br />

the casing pipe for placing VU 200 mm.<br />

To negotiate this problem, an excavation<br />

test was carried out before the<br />

actual construction commenced. The test<br />

showed that although the jacking speed<br />

had slowed down greatly and the cutting<br />

face was abraded a little from the excavation,<br />

the machine can drive forward<br />

despite the presence of the spacer.<br />

Some parts of sewer were completely<br />

out of service and temporary bypassing<br />

was carried out. Several drives were<br />

progressing at the same time; therefore a<br />

well-planned bypassing was necessary.<br />

Bypassing of the current live sewers was<br />

carried out by using the proven technique<br />

for long-distance sewers called Mr. Autobypass.<br />

The Mr. Auto-bypass has working<br />

records of 17.5 km and out of this record,<br />

3 – 5 km were bypassed simultaneously<br />

while constructing several, mainly opencut<br />

drives.<br />

Shaft construction<br />

The existing manholes were damaged<br />

from liquefaction and needed to be<br />

replaced. Therefore, the spaces for replacing<br />

manholes were used as departing and<br />

arrival shafts. In 300 mm diameter pipes, a<br />

shaft diameter of 2 metres was used and<br />

for 350 – 400 mm pipes a shaft diameter<br />

of 2.5 metres was used, which contributed<br />

to reduced construction costs.<br />

Infilling existing pipes<br />

The existing pipes suffered displacement,<br />

sagging as well as some<br />

infiltration of waters and surrounding soils.<br />

It was anticipated that the area around<br />

the machine excavation could be a void<br />

and cave-ins might occur after the construction.<br />

To avoid this problem, infilling of<br />

existing pipes was carried out in order to<br />

prevent cave-ins. The filling material was<br />

a cement-mortar.<br />

Removal of pit-head<br />

The waterproofing equipment and sheet<br />

piles used for the first installation, buried<br />

in place, needed to be removed. The<br />

open-face jacking of 1,000 mm diameter<br />

was used to remove this equipment at the<br />

beginning of the drive and then removed<br />

manually.<br />

The cutter head<br />

The cutting head, equipped with the<br />

special cutter to crush reinforced pipes,<br />

progressed smoothly along the planned<br />

paths. At the peak, seven jacking machines<br />

were driving simultaneously. The crushed<br />

pipes, taken in by the jacking machine,<br />

consisted of materials such as reinforced<br />

steel bars, SUS collars, waterproofing<br />

rubbers and PVC pieces. Railway ties<br />

placed below the pipes were also found<br />

in small pieces. The most difficult section<br />

of excavating the 400 mm casing Humes<br />

pipe and 200 mm VU pipe plus spacers<br />

was carried out successfully, although the<br />

driving speed did not reach the planned<br />

rate. The discharged soil was treated as<br />

industrial waste since it contained steel<br />

pieces, concrete, VU and others.<br />

In total, 21 drives were carried out and<br />

there were no serious problems requiring<br />

the driving be halted. The special cutter<br />

equipped at the cutting face had some<br />

ablation from cutting spacers, but was<br />

able to continue the drive.<br />

The pipe eating [and jacking] method<br />

is normally used to replace aged pipes<br />

with new pipes. However, this construction<br />

was carried out to replace existing<br />

pipes damaged greatly from the earthquake.<br />

Many of the damaged pipes had<br />

suffered displacements and sagging and<br />

some sewers had lost function completely.<br />

Komatsu’s first pipe-replacing technology<br />

was achieved in 1995, the time of Great<br />

Hanshin-Awaji earthquake, proving that<br />

this method could be used for replacing<br />

pipes that have experienced large<br />

displacements. Smooth bypassing had<br />

also contributed a great deal in making<br />

the whole reconstruction successful.<br />

Above: Excavation test.<br />

Left: A spacer.<br />

projects<br />

April 2009 - <strong>Trenchless</strong> <strong>International</strong><br />

20<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!