05.01.2015 Views

Nuclear Proliferation TechnologyTrends Analysis - International ...

Nuclear Proliferation TechnologyTrends Analysis - International ...

Nuclear Proliferation TechnologyTrends Analysis - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PNNL -14480<br />

1) There is a very low efficiency in feed utilization, due to the tendency of<br />

ionized uranium vapor to deposit on all available surfaces inside the vacuum<br />

chamber. Only ten to fifteen percent of the feed material is actually ionized,<br />

meaning that the cut (the ratio of product flow to feed flow) is below .01 for<br />

low enriched feed.<br />

2) Control of the ion beam current is important for various physical reasons. As<br />

the collection rate is directly proportional to the ion beam strength, the amount<br />

of material deposited is limited.<br />

3) To maximize the amount of material arriving at the collectors, the beams must<br />

be focused by adjusting the magnetic fields.<br />

Table 10 lists important technologies and related technical issues.<br />

Technology<br />

Ion Source<br />

Ion Collectors<br />

Vacuum Housings<br />

Magnet Pole Pieces<br />

High-voltage Power Supplies<br />

DC Magnet Power Supplies<br />

Vacuum Pumps<br />

Uranium Recovery<br />

Technical Issues<br />

Obtain high U+ beam currents from source, control expansion of beam, properly<br />

focus ion beam on collector slits, heater life, insulator breakdown, damage to<br />

source components due to high energy ions<br />

Retain and measure collected uranium, retain shape over wide temperature range,<br />

resist sputtering, conduct heat, permit recovery of deposited uranium.<br />

Leakage rate; open and close with minimum downtime<br />

Maintain low magnetic field ripple<br />

Maintain stable voltage<br />

Maintain stable current<br />

Maintain high vacuum in large evacuated region<br />

Substantial chemical processing facility required, labor intensive<br />

Table 10 Technology and technical issues involved with EMIS<br />

3.3.2.2 Changes/improvements in technology<br />

In 1946, Swedish scientists developed an improved calutron design. By varying<br />

magnetic field focus and having the ion beam go through a 255 0 arc, the separation power<br />

could be increased by a factor of 1.5, and higher intensity ion currents could be used.<br />

This type of calutron, called a 255 0 machine, has a significantly higher production rate<br />

than the 180 0 machines 70 .<br />

Efforts to increase the performance of magnetic spectrometers have led to significant<br />

improvements in magnet design, which can increase the ability to focus the ion beams<br />

and increase production efficiency accordingly.<br />

3.3.3 Countries that have used/attempted to use technology<br />

A number of countries have acquired EMIS technology. Table 11 lists those with<br />

significant programs, but only three have actively tried to use EMIS to acquire HEU.<br />

The others acquired single or small numbers of units and used them for other purposes.<br />

70 Iraq’s calutrons: Electromagnetic isotope separation, beam technology, and nuclear weapon proliferation, Andre Gsponer and Jean-<br />

Pierre Hurni, ISRI-95-03, 10/19/95<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!