05.01.2015 Views

Jim Crow in New York

Jim Crow in New York

Jim Crow in New York

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

86<br />

The current constitutional provision provides: “The legislature shall enact laws exclud<strong>in</strong>g from the right of<br />

suffrage all persons convicted of bribery or of any <strong>in</strong>famous crime.” N.Y. CONST. art. II, § 3 (amended 2001).<br />

While the current provision is nearly identical to the provision passed <strong>in</strong> 1874, the implementation of the law<br />

has changed dramatically over time. In 1822 the law resulted <strong>in</strong> permanent disenfranchisement with no avenue<br />

provided for restoration of vot<strong>in</strong>g rights. See 1822 N.Y. LAWS 280. The legislature amended the statute <strong>in</strong> 1829<br />

to provide the governor with authority to restore vot<strong>in</strong>g rights through issuance of a pardon. See N.Y. REV. STAT.<br />

chpt. VI tit. I § 3 (1829). In 1931 the law changed to allow restoration of vot<strong>in</strong>g rights by a pardon or the restoration<br />

of “the rights of citizenship.” N.Y. ELEC. LAW § 152 (McK<strong>in</strong>ney 1931). F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong> 1971 the law changed to<br />

what it is today: loss of vot<strong>in</strong>g rights while <strong>in</strong> prison and on parole. See N.Y. ELEC. LAW § 152 (McK<strong>in</strong>ney 1972).<br />

87<br />

See N.Y. ELEC. LAW § 5-106 (McK<strong>in</strong>ney 2008).<br />

88<br />

See notes 9-11, supra.<br />

89<br />

See notes 9-11, supra.<br />

90<br />

Brennan Center for Justice, My First Vote 2 (2009), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/<br />

my_first_vote/.<br />

91<br />

See ERIKA WOOD, RESTORING THE RIGHT TO VOTE 9-10, 12, 17 (2d ed. 2009), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/restor<strong>in</strong>g_the_right_to_vote/<br />

92<br />

See id. at 12-13.<br />

93<br />

See HUB SYSTEM, supra note 9, at 9 (stat<strong>in</strong>g that 52.1% of <strong>in</strong>mates were committed from <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City, comprised<br />

of K<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>, Queens, Richmond and Bronx counties).<br />

94<br />

My First Vote, supra note 90, at 16 (2009).<br />

95<br />

Interviews with county election officials <strong>in</strong> 2005 revealed that more than a third of the local boards of elections<br />

were illegally request<strong>in</strong>g documentation before allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals with crim<strong>in</strong>al convictions to register<br />

to vote, and nearly 40% <strong>in</strong>correctly responded that <strong>in</strong>dividuals on probation are not eligible to vote. See ERIKA<br />

WOOD & RACHEL BLOOM, BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE & A.C.L.U., DE FACTO DISENFRANCHISEMENT (2008)<br />

available at http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/de_facto_disenfranchisement/; see also BRENNAN<br />

CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU LAW SCHOOL & DEMOS: A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION, BOARDS OF ELEC-<br />

TIONS CONTINUE ILLEGALLY TO DISENFRANCHISE VOTERS WITH FELONY CONVICTIONS (2006), http://brennan.3cdn.<br />

net/1b81b2464bb682b017_x8m6bnh29.pdf.<br />

96<br />

See N.Y. EXEC. L. § 296 (McK<strong>in</strong>ney 2009); N.Y.C. ADMIN. CODE § 8-107 (2008).<br />

97<br />

See N.Y. EXEC. L. § 296(15), (16) (McK<strong>in</strong>ney 2009); N.Y.C. ADMIN. CODE § 8-107(10) (2008).<br />

21<br />

Brennan Center for Justice

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!