04.01.2015 Views

N O T E B O O K 2002 – 2003 ARCHITECTURE C U H K - School of ...

N O T E B O O K 2002 – 2003 ARCHITECTURE C U H K - School of ...

N O T E B O O K 2002 – 2003 ARCHITECTURE C U H K - School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ARCHITECTURE</strong><br />

C U H K<br />

N O T E B O O K<br />

2 0 0 2 – 2 0 0 3<br />

1


Notebook II<br />

This is the second working notebook <strong>of</strong><br />

the architecture programme. The first book<br />

noted the ideas underlying the programme,<br />

and described the fundamental structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> the programme and its various parts in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> studios and courses.<br />

It provided a relatively simple description<br />

<strong>of</strong> the programme, the common ground<br />

in the department for discourse as well as<br />

education and research.<br />

The present notebook is an extension, not<br />

a repetition, <strong>of</strong> the first one, and in a sense<br />

it reflects some <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> the year’s<br />

experience.<br />

It is intended to present the programme<br />

from a more direct, specific, and operational<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view. In reflecting the results<br />

<strong>of</strong> the experience <strong>of</strong> the first year, it shows<br />

total changes in some parts, clarification<br />

and revisions or reaffirmation <strong>of</strong> other<br />

parts. In addition, it includes a small selection<br />

<strong>of</strong> the student work as illustration <strong>of</strong><br />

how the various studios have developed<br />

their approaches.<br />

The key aspect <strong>of</strong> the new programme<br />

was the approach to the design pedagogy<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> four studios. This approach was<br />

new to most – almost all – teachers. There<br />

was also some concern to see if the<br />

finite number <strong>of</strong> studios, while bringing<br />

focus to the work, would have a limiting<br />

effect on the scope <strong>of</strong> architectural exploration.<br />

The general observation about the<br />

operation <strong>of</strong> the studios and the resulting<br />

work is that the four studios seemed to<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer sufficient choice, not to compromise<br />

the comprehensive nature <strong>of</strong> design in<br />

general, to <strong>of</strong>fer an effective pedagogical<br />

approach, and to encourage depth through<br />

greater focus.<br />

By and large, the year has led to the view<br />

that the programme has served the vision<br />

<strong>of</strong> the department well. It has provided<br />

the basis for focused work in design and<br />

can serve increasingly greater intensity and<br />

quality.<br />

In the coming year, the programme will<br />

continue fundamentally as it has in the first<br />

year, but will reflect several developments<br />

in the light <strong>of</strong> the experience <strong>of</strong> the year.<br />

All studios will develop a more formal<br />

presentation <strong>of</strong> the theoretical and historical<br />

material related to the work to be<br />

presented as a supporting module within<br />

the studio. This is intended to advance and<br />

raise the level <strong>of</strong> reference to theoretical<br />

material during the occasional discussions<br />

at the drawing board.<br />

In the first year, the courses in all areas<br />

– Humanities, Technology, Communication,<br />

and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practice – will be closely<br />

related to the studio work stressing the<br />

unity <strong>of</strong> the subject <strong>of</strong> architecture<br />

and the importance <strong>of</strong> direct observation<br />

as a first step in studies which advance<br />

into separate subjects. They will share the<br />

beginning as direct observation and architecture<br />

as an undivided whole and proceed<br />

to articulated studies in their subject<br />

areas.<br />

There have been further changes also in<br />

the advanced courses in all four areas.<br />

In Communication, the course Computer-Aided<br />

Architecural Design has been<br />

further developed to provide a strong<br />

theoretical basis for later studies in computer<br />

applications and in design.<br />

In Humanities, the first course has been<br />

changed to present a more comprehensive<br />

culturally inclusive view <strong>of</strong> architecture.<br />

New electives have been introduced dealing<br />

with the relationship between architecture<br />

and other fields, such as art and<br />

socio-cultural studies.<br />

In Technology, the change is intended to<br />

start with a view <strong>of</strong> architecture as an<br />

undivided whole and lead to articulation<br />

into courses as a result <strong>of</strong> direct observation.<br />

It is also intended to embrace issues<br />

<strong>of</strong> environmental concern and sustainability<br />

right from the start.<br />

In Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practice, the courses have<br />

been revised to take note <strong>of</strong> changes in<br />

the pr<strong>of</strong>essional practice examination<br />

requirements. In addition the year out is<br />

integrated into the programme and will<br />

be supported through a series <strong>of</strong> seminars<br />

and closer connection between the work<br />

outside and the later studies in the master’s<br />

programme.<br />

The scope <strong>of</strong> independent studies has<br />

been increased by allowing students to<br />

undertake studies in other locations and<br />

institutions, not only as part <strong>of</strong> formal<br />

exchange with other schools, but also on<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> individually prepared proposals<br />

for study approved by the department.<br />

2 3


Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />

Design Education 7<br />

Architecture: The House and the City 9<br />

Programme 11<br />

Studios 12<br />

Primary Studios 13<br />

Types <strong>of</strong> Study 17<br />

Modes <strong>of</strong> Study 22<br />

Courses 25<br />

Communication 26<br />

Humanities 27<br />

Technology 28<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practice 29<br />

Research Studies 30<br />

Student Work 2001 – <strong>2002</strong> 31<br />

Foundation 32<br />

Habitation 34<br />

Urbanization 36<br />

Tectonics 38<br />

Technics 40<br />

Thesis 42<br />

Study Schemes 45<br />

A Place for Learning 46<br />

Studio Dates 48<br />

4 5


Design Education<br />

“What a scientist does at his desk or in his laboratory, what a literary critic does in reading a poem,<br />

are <strong>of</strong> the same order as what anybody else does when … engaged in like activities – if he is to<br />

achieve understanding. The difference is in degree, not in kind.”<br />

Jerome Bruner, The Process <strong>of</strong> Education<br />

“The appreciation <strong>of</strong> the structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> ideas is that side <strong>of</strong> a<br />

cultured mind which can only<br />

grow under the influence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

special study. I mean that eye<br />

for the whole chessboard, for the<br />

bearing <strong>of</strong> one set <strong>of</strong> ideas on<br />

another. Nothing but a special<br />

study can give any appreciation<br />

for the exact formulation <strong>of</strong> general<br />

ideas, for their relation when<br />

formulated, for their service in the<br />

comprehension <strong>of</strong> life. A mind so<br />

disciplined should be both more<br />

abstract and more concrete. It<br />

has been trained in the comprehension<br />

<strong>of</strong> abstract thought and<br />

in the analysis <strong>of</strong> facts.”<br />

Alfred North Whitehead<br />

The Aims <strong>of</strong> Education<br />

Design is widely and validly regarded as the<br />

core <strong>of</strong> architectural education. However,<br />

it is not limited to the work in studios. It<br />

applies to all studies in the programme.<br />

It is a way <strong>of</strong> thinking; it is a habit <strong>of</strong> mind<br />

towards every action as a fusion <strong>of</strong> knowledge,<br />

reason, and aesthetic intention. It is<br />

an approach to education.<br />

No single part <strong>of</strong> the programme is<br />

intended intended merely as a source <strong>of</strong><br />

information or as an isolated and exhaustive<br />

presentation <strong>of</strong> a subject. The entire<br />

programme and each significant part <strong>of</strong> it<br />

are points <strong>of</strong> departure for further study, as<br />

well as examples <strong>of</strong> possible directions and<br />

established methods.<br />

Here education is a process <strong>of</strong> acquisition<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge through active engagement<br />

in its development, exercise <strong>of</strong> creative<br />

imagination and skill through design and<br />

refinement <strong>of</strong> intellectural focus through<br />

a critical approach to every part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

process.<br />

6 7


Architecture - The House and the City<br />

Architecture is the formal extension <strong>of</strong><br />

the common human instinct for building<br />

shelter in search <strong>of</strong> safety and permanence.<br />

Thus it has both a physical and a<br />

metaphorical aspect. It embodies both the<br />

physical and the meta-physical, the secular<br />

and the sacred. It forms and embraces in<br />

each single act, each single work, the past,<br />

the present, and the potential the future <strong>of</strong><br />

human culture.<br />

The school should become an increasingly<br />

active participant in its city – Hong Kong.<br />

It aims to be actively engaged in the architecture<br />

and the evolution <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, its<br />

particular conditions <strong>of</strong> time and place. It<br />

aspires to bring to this engagement a view<br />

<strong>of</strong> architecture as a field <strong>of</strong> universal presence<br />

and timeless qualities, and to draw<br />

energy and vitality from its untamed life<br />

and nature.<br />

Its history parallels the evolution <strong>of</strong> society<br />

through increasingly complex institutions<br />

and buildings from the house to the city. It<br />

is integrally bound to all other aspects and<br />

human life, since the source <strong>of</strong> its regeneration<br />

lies beyond itself, while its forms<br />

develop from within.<br />

A school <strong>of</strong> architecture is a civic and cultural<br />

institution as well as a place <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

education. The presence <strong>of</strong> a school<br />

in a city must contribute effectively to the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> architecture and the awareness<br />

<strong>of</strong> architectural issues in that city. At the<br />

same time, a school must relate to architecture<br />

as the subject <strong>of</strong> its own intellectual<br />

identity. It must negotiate between the<br />

immediate reality <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong> its location<br />

and the timeless quality <strong>of</strong> architecture as a<br />

universal presence.<br />

8 9


Programme<br />

Architecture<br />

Design: Theory – Practice – Process<br />

The study <strong>of</strong> architecture is ultimately the study <strong>of</strong> works <strong>of</strong> architecture.<br />

A work <strong>of</strong> architecture is a fact much like an object in nature. It is complete in itself. It is not an<br />

abstraction or formalized thought. Its study requires formalized thought if it is not to be merely a<br />

description <strong>of</strong> the form itself.<br />

The programme deals with one subject:<br />

architecture.<br />

The programme is not merely a collection<br />

<strong>of</strong> courses for covering information. It is<br />

itself a shaper <strong>of</strong> ideas about the subject.<br />

It is also a structure allowing study <strong>of</strong><br />

architecture at different levels <strong>of</strong> complexity<br />

and articulation, as a unified whole or<br />

in different degrees <strong>of</strong> detail and different<br />

aspects.<br />

The structure is essentially a theoretical<br />

construct, a “theory” relating form to our<br />

observations about it. Relating our observations<br />

to our actions, relating our designs<br />

to our observations. At present much <strong>of</strong><br />

this connecting thought is unstated or<br />

unarticulated. It appears as opinion and<br />

anecdote and is not explicitly stated in such<br />

a way that it can be refined with experience,<br />

can act as repository <strong>of</strong> accumulated<br />

experience in the form <strong>of</strong> knowledge. In a<br />

way the studios and their conduct afford<br />

the beginning <strong>of</strong> such a process.<br />

It consists <strong>of</strong> two main parts: courses and<br />

studios. In general studios focus on DESIGN;<br />

the courses deal with THEORETICAL MATERIAL.<br />

10 11


Architecture<br />

Design<br />

Design<br />

Primary Studios<br />

Process, Product, and Language<br />

Habitation<br />

In architecture there is little to<br />

teach and much to learn.<br />

“Students … have a limited<br />

exposure to the materials they<br />

are to learn. How can this exposure<br />

be made to count in their<br />

thinking for the rest <strong>of</strong> their<br />

lives The dominant view among<br />

men who have been engaged in<br />

preparing and teaching new curricula<br />

is that the answer to this<br />

question lies in giving students an<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the fundamental<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> whatever subjects<br />

we choose to teach.”<br />

Jerome Bruner<br />

The Process <strong>of</strong> Education<br />

Design pedagogy, if it is not limited to demonstration<br />

and apprenticeship, must involve<br />

verbal language beyond mere practical<br />

instruction. The terms <strong>of</strong> such language,<br />

while rooted in the common language,<br />

must be part <strong>of</strong> theoretical structure <strong>of</strong><br />

interrelated assumptions, concepts, and<br />

operations. They constitute the language<br />

we use in the process <strong>of</strong> design education,<br />

make discussion possible beyond mere<br />

reference to limited examples, and enable<br />

students to advance beyond immediate<br />

instruction.<br />

The process <strong>of</strong> design, in terms <strong>of</strong> cognitive<br />

activity, is the same as in any subject.<br />

Therefore in order to be useful in teaching<br />

design in a particular subject, it needs to<br />

be described in a way that relates to the<br />

specific content <strong>of</strong> its subject: <strong>ARCHITECTURE</strong>.<br />

In architecture, an important first step in<br />

design – much like the first step in a journey<br />

– is a sense <strong>of</strong> direction. This is not<br />

predicated upon any facts within the “journey”<br />

and precedes it. The designer’s sense<br />

<strong>of</strong> direction is the “position” in architecture.<br />

Four such positions form the basis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

primary “thematic” or primary studios:<br />

HABITATION, URBANIZATION, TECTONICS, TECH-<br />

NICS.<br />

“In the house <strong>of</strong> every Greek<br />

and Roman was an altar; on this<br />

altar there had always to be a<br />

small quantity <strong>of</strong> ashes, and a<br />

few lighted coals. It was a sacred<br />

obligation for the master <strong>of</strong> every<br />

house to keep the fire up night<br />

and day. …This in turn was connected<br />

with an ancient belief.”<br />

This altar was called Vesta in<br />

Greek and Focus in Latin.<br />

Fustel de Coulanges<br />

The Ancient City<br />

Habitation begins as the routines <strong>of</strong> life<br />

take place and develop significant form. The<br />

form becomes significant as its ambiance,<br />

its conditions <strong>of</strong> light, its geometry, its relationship<br />

to other forms embody symbolic<br />

significance. It is not merely a response to<br />

immediate functions but also the embodiment<br />

<strong>of</strong> myths, customs, and beliefs. The<br />

distance between two persons in conversation,<br />

the seating arrangement around a<br />

room or a table, the place <strong>of</strong> entry into a<br />

room, the shape <strong>of</strong> gathering around an<br />

event, a procession. These are captured<br />

in art, folklore, literature, and customs in<br />

various cultures, and have given timeless<br />

significance to art, literature, and architecture.<br />

They enable a work <strong>of</strong> architecture to<br />

capture the entire history and culture <strong>of</strong> a<br />

community the past, present, and future in<br />

a single act.<br />

They not only provide an approach to the<br />

study <strong>of</strong> design; they also provide examples<br />

<strong>of</strong> “an approach,” encouraging students to<br />

formulate their own ideas and form their<br />

own approach from this primary set.<br />

12 13


Design<br />

Primary Studios<br />

Design<br />

Primary Studios<br />

Urbanization<br />

Tectonics<br />

“Every great event has its geographical<br />

epicenter - that <strong>of</strong> the<br />

American Revolution was the few<br />

city blocks around Carpenters’<br />

and Independence Halls in Philadelphia;<br />

that <strong>of</strong> the great French<br />

Revolution was the Place de la<br />

Bastille; that <strong>of</strong> the Revolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1848 was the Luxembourg<br />

Gardens”.<br />

J. K. Galbraith<br />

The Age <strong>of</strong> Uncertainty<br />

The studio studies the shaping influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> factors beyond the individual building.<br />

Although architecture may seem traditionally<br />

to have been concerned with individual<br />

monuments the ground cover, which make<br />

the fabric <strong>of</strong> the city the relationships, traditions,<br />

and common needs that shape the<br />

ground cover influence the city as a whole<br />

and provide a formal context for the<br />

design <strong>of</strong> each part <strong>of</strong>ten without individual<br />

formal articulation. The context in turn<br />

evolves with the building <strong>of</strong> each building. it<br />

in a way one is designing the city with the<br />

design <strong>of</strong> each building. Each building is a<br />

variation <strong>of</strong> the timeless architectural duality<br />

<strong>of</strong> “the city and the house.”<br />

“Paper, I understand, was<br />

invented by the Chinese, but<br />

Western paper is to us no more<br />

than something to be used, while<br />

the texture <strong>of</strong> Chinese paper<br />

and Japanese paper gives us<br />

a certain feeling <strong>of</strong> warmth, <strong>of</strong><br />

calm and repose. Even the same<br />

white could as well be one color<br />

for Western paper and another<br />

for our own. Western paper turns<br />

away the light, while our paper<br />

seems to take it in, to envelop it<br />

gently, like the s<strong>of</strong>t surface <strong>of</strong> a<br />

first snowfall. It gives <strong>of</strong>f no sound<br />

when is crumpled or folded, it is<br />

quiet and pliant to the touch as<br />

the leaf <strong>of</strong> a tree. ”<br />

Jun’ichiro Tanizaki<br />

In Praise <strong>of</strong> Shadows<br />

Tectonics is a manifestation in architecture<br />

<strong>of</strong> the aesthetic imperative as part <strong>of</strong><br />

human nature. It attends to the potential<br />

<strong>of</strong> building for qualities inherent in the<br />

material, economy in their use, potential for<br />

elegance in resolution in their juxtaposition,<br />

and the total compositional quality <strong>of</strong> form.<br />

It goes beyond necessity and responds to<br />

a sensibility <strong>of</strong> a higher order as mastery<br />

and skill.<br />

It relates to the sensibility that has characterized<br />

all fine works <strong>of</strong> architecture. It has<br />

been the quality <strong>of</strong> all work <strong>of</strong> architecture.<br />

The curvature in the entablature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Parthenon, the joints between stones at<br />

Machu Pichu, the composition <strong>of</strong> windows<br />

in the chapel at Ronchamp … are beyond<br />

functional necessity.<br />

14 15


Design<br />

Primary Studios<br />

Studios<br />

Types <strong>of</strong> Study<br />

Technics<br />

Design: Product Form and Content<br />

“One <strong>of</strong> the most obvious<br />

problems in building the dome<br />

<strong>of</strong> Santa Maria del Fiore was<br />

how to transport heavy building<br />

materials such as sandstone<br />

beams and slabs <strong>of</strong> marble<br />

several hundred feet above the<br />

ground and then place them<br />

into position with the accuracy<br />

demanded by Filippo’s design.<br />

The sandstone beam weighed<br />

some 1,700 poinds each, and<br />

hundreds <strong>of</strong> them needed to<br />

be raised on to the cupola. To<br />

solve this problem Filippo was<br />

compelled to imagine ‘some<br />

unheard-<strong>of</strong> machine’ to move<br />

and carry tremendous weights to<br />

incredible heights. The hoist that<br />

he created was to become one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the most celebrated machines<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Renaissance, a device that<br />

would be studied and sketched<br />

by numerous other architects and<br />

engineers, including Leonardo da<br />

Vinci.”<br />

The studio studies and practices the innovative<br />

processes and skills to design buildings<br />

one might say from first principles,<br />

based on specific technologies or needs.<br />

Architecture owes much to buildings and<br />

works designed outside the architectural<br />

tradition. New needs, new technologies, or<br />

new environments all have led to examples<br />

such as the Crystal Palace, the 19 th century<br />

railway arches, the viaducts and bridges.<br />

They best illustrate the point <strong>of</strong> exploration<br />

in the Technics studio.<br />

The bold and innovative approach to their<br />

design is no doubt an integral part <strong>of</strong> any<br />

work. But the power <strong>of</strong> such works is evident<br />

in the ready place they find in many<br />

derivative designs that seem to follow from<br />

them.<br />

“A building is a world within a<br />

world. Buildings personify places<br />

<strong>of</strong> worship, or <strong>of</strong> home, or other<br />

institutions <strong>of</strong> man.”<br />

Louis I. Kahn<br />

The shed and the cathedral are<br />

two points in a continuum <strong>of</strong><br />

evolution, just as the house and<br />

the city. There’s a shed in every<br />

cathedral; a cathedral in every<br />

shed.<br />

In the face <strong>of</strong> infinite variety <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

situations it seems necessary to seek a<br />

deep structure in terms <strong>of</strong> which to understand<br />

and act on them. At the same time it<br />

is necessary to recognize the unique quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> every work. Design becomes a fusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the universal and the particular. This is<br />

the challenge <strong>of</strong> the approach to design.<br />

Buildings and the functions or institutions<br />

they serve, though infinite in number and<br />

boundless in time and place, can be seen in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> evolution or permutations rooted<br />

in a limited number <strong>of</strong> primary human<br />

activities, PLACE OF GATHERING, PLACE OF WORK,<br />

PLACE OF SOLITUDE.<br />

Ross King<br />

Brunelleschi’s Dome<br />

16 17


Types <strong>of</strong> Study<br />

Projects<br />

<strong>School</strong> Project<br />

Places<br />

Two Types <strong>of</strong> Study<br />

Live<br />

Design is not merely problemsolving.<br />

The scope <strong>of</strong> a solution<br />

to a problem is confined to its<br />

description. Design is an act <strong>of</strong><br />

creating a new and concrete<br />

“fact.” It is related to needs,<br />

limits, potentials, and intentions.<br />

But it is not reducible to any such<br />

abstraction or produceable in<br />

direct response to them.<br />

Studio projects are occasions for study and<br />

exercise based on the studio as “positions,”<br />

not as dogma.<br />

The scope <strong>of</strong> the projects varies to suit the<br />

particular approach and pedagogical strategy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the studio. They provide the possibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> exercises which are particularly<br />

suited to the issues in the studio. Beyond<br />

the daily and immediate educational objectives,<br />

the studies and their results make<br />

a cumulative contribution to an implicit<br />

discourse between different positions in<br />

architecture.<br />

However, in all studios the exercises remain<br />

as design exercises within the scope <strong>of</strong><br />

architecture.<br />

<strong>School</strong> projects are formulated independently<br />

<strong>of</strong> the studio positions and are<br />

occasions for the application <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

design positions to general designs. As in<br />

other parts <strong>of</strong> the programme they are<br />

not only statements <strong>of</strong> “design projects,”<br />

but are themselves a way <strong>of</strong> seeing and<br />

interpreting building types.<br />

At the simplest level three kinds <strong>of</strong> places<br />

seem to define the human world: place<br />

<strong>of</strong> work, place <strong>of</strong> gathering, and place <strong>of</strong><br />

solitude. They are the necessary elements<br />

<strong>of</strong> any complete human environment; the<br />

house, the school, the factory, the temple.<br />

… The following list is a second level in the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> primary functions. It provides<br />

the basic definition <strong>of</strong> sets <strong>of</strong> “school<br />

projects.”<br />

Each set consists <strong>of</strong> three “projects.”<br />

These are seen as essentially one project<br />

manifested at different levels <strong>of</strong> complexity<br />

which as a nested set inform one another.<br />

All places <strong>of</strong> habitation are places for living.<br />

And a place <strong>of</strong> living must at a basic level<br />

provide for all essential routines <strong>of</strong> habitation.<br />

These can be seen in terms <strong>of</strong> three<br />

modes <strong>of</strong> daily life: gathering, work, and<br />

solitude. They are the necessary constituent<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> a dwelling <strong>of</strong> any size, a oneroom<br />

apartment or an extensive house.<br />

The study and design <strong>of</strong> places <strong>of</strong> living<br />

involves the entire scope <strong>of</strong> architecture at<br />

the most fundamental level. It touches on<br />

narrowly defined functions and embodies<br />

timeless and far-reaching customs and<br />

beliefs. The house is perhaps the most<br />

symbolically significant <strong>of</strong> any form in architecture.<br />

It is the seminal idea in architecture,<br />

as the family might be regarded as the<br />

seminal unit <strong>of</strong> human society. The hearth,<br />

the altar, the window, the doorway are in<br />

the house, more distinctly than in any other<br />

work <strong>of</strong> architecture, routines <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

Projects:<br />

Year 2: Individual house<br />

Year 3: Hostel<br />

Year 4. Housing<br />

18 19


<strong>School</strong> Project<br />

Places<br />

Work<br />

Learn<br />

Worship<br />

Perform<br />

Travel<br />

Exchange<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> human life is spent in working,<br />

much <strong>of</strong> human thought is preoccupied<br />

with work. Much <strong>of</strong> human history is the<br />

record <strong>of</strong> working conditions. Much <strong>of</strong><br />

architecture deals with places <strong>of</strong> work.<br />

Projects for places for working serve two<br />

aims. In one way, they serve as occasions<br />

for the study <strong>of</strong> this major aspect <strong>of</strong> human<br />

life: its history, its influence in human<br />

attitudes, its impact on other aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

culture, etc. In another way they serve to<br />

bring all such study into focus as occasions<br />

for study and practice <strong>of</strong> design.<br />

Year 2: A weaving studio for two weavers.<br />

Year 3: A “factory” for industrial production<br />

or manufacturing <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> 50 persons.<br />

Year 4: A community <strong>of</strong> 100 persons working<br />

in groups <strong>of</strong> up to 4 in various lines <strong>of</strong><br />

work – innovative technology, design, etc.<br />

Learning as one <strong>of</strong> the main human activities<br />

has been the focus <strong>of</strong> a major part <strong>of</strong><br />

human civilization, has led to the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> a distinct line <strong>of</strong> social institutions,<br />

and has occupied a distinct section <strong>of</strong><br />

architectural history. Despite the extensive<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the institutions and their<br />

many forms, the place <strong>of</strong> the individual student<br />

remain central to all such institutions.<br />

Year 2: A kindergarten for two groups <strong>of</strong><br />

20 children.<br />

Year 3: A local library with a collection <strong>of</strong><br />

60’000 – 80’000 books.<br />

Year 4: A design school for 200 – 250<br />

students.<br />

Worship is a fundamental aspect <strong>of</strong> human<br />

life. The places <strong>of</strong> worship, when not limited<br />

to the individual, have had much in<br />

common to other places <strong>of</strong> gathering and<br />

performance. Despite many forms and<br />

doctrines, the architecture <strong>of</strong> worship in all<br />

cultures has several common underlying<br />

characteristics, even while it responds to<br />

important symbolic and doctrinal differences.<br />

The history <strong>of</strong> the architecture <strong>of</strong><br />

worship responds also to ceremony and<br />

ritual. In some way it celebrates universal<br />

existence by placing the human being in<br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> timeless and constant<br />

natural elements: light, earth, water, and<br />

air. Yet the essential condition <strong>of</strong> worship<br />

remains solitude.<br />

Year 2: Memorial chapel for private worship<br />

<strong>of</strong> up to 10 persons.<br />

Year 3: A university college chapel for<br />

assemblies <strong>of</strong> up to 200 persons.<br />

Year 4: A temple complex for a rural community.<br />

Performance is an integral part <strong>of</strong> human<br />

gathering, communication, and social action.<br />

Seen this way, a place <strong>of</strong> performance is a<br />

place <strong>of</strong> gathering with more or less specific<br />

requirements. But, like social activity,<br />

the form <strong>of</strong> the place, and <strong>of</strong> the building<br />

giving place to the performance seems to<br />

come from the gathering and its symbolic<br />

implications as much as from its functional<br />

requirements. It is expected that the design<br />

<strong>of</strong> places <strong>of</strong> performance would <strong>of</strong>fer an<br />

occasion for studies at a fundamental level<br />

<strong>of</strong> performance as a part <strong>of</strong> human civilizing<br />

act as well as an exercise in design with<br />

functional requirements <strong>of</strong> design.<br />

Year 2: A music teaching studio for up to<br />

five musicians, a coach, and 10 listeners.<br />

Year 3: A community gathering place suited<br />

to various occasions including impromptu<br />

theatre for up to 100 persons.<br />

Year 4: A performance theatre for live<br />

drama for an audience <strong>of</strong> up to 300 persons.<br />

Movement – physically moving from one<br />

place to another – is an abstract human<br />

activity pervasive through many human<br />

functions. Often it is difficult to distinguish<br />

from the content <strong>of</strong> movement and it<br />

seems to be the life force <strong>of</strong> public places<br />

relating in an intricate way with the particular<br />

function they seem to perform. Places<br />

<strong>of</strong> arrival, departure, promenades, etc.<br />

Year 2: A pedestrian bridge providing<br />

places <strong>of</strong> rest and exchange.<br />

Year 3: A public promenade providing for<br />

a semi-private sailing club (200 members)<br />

and public facilities.<br />

Year 4: A road/highway passenger facility<br />

providing for short periods <strong>of</strong> rest, break<br />

from driving, and public amenities <strong>of</strong> up<br />

to 200 private and 100 public vehicles per<br />

hour.<br />

Exchange is the predominant mode <strong>of</strong><br />

social contact in the human community.<br />

The market place and the basilica share<br />

much in the early social activities and<br />

endure to our time in the shape <strong>of</strong> many<br />

public places. The hawkers,the street vendors,<br />

the shop keepers, and the shopping<br />

centres have long been the hub <strong>of</strong> social<br />

activity and represent more than the material<br />

they <strong>of</strong>fer for sale. In subtle ways they<br />

act as training posts, as playgrounds, as<br />

places <strong>of</strong> social gathering, and as various<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> a collective forum accommodating<br />

and embodying urban life. They accommodate<br />

a way <strong>of</strong> conducting public life.<br />

Year 2: A small store for specialized goods.<br />

Year 3: A local market 20 small and independent<br />

merchants/craftsmen.<br />

Year 4: A neghbourhood market including a<br />

major supermarket branch and 20 specialized<br />

shops.<br />

20 21


Studios<br />

Modes <strong>of</strong> Study<br />

Year 1<br />

Years 2, 3, and 4 Year 5<br />

Independent Studies<br />

Year Out<br />

Design teaching, research, and<br />

practice are inseparable. They are<br />

conducted in four primary studios<br />

each focused on one <strong>of</strong> four<br />

primary positions or themes.<br />

To learn to see what exists is the key to<br />

creative engagement in the study and<br />

design <strong>of</strong> architecture.<br />

The first year deals with the fundamental<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the programme, its concepts<br />

and requisite methods and skills. It provides<br />

the ground for later more advanced and<br />

more focused studies.<br />

The work <strong>of</strong> the year consists <strong>of</strong> studies <strong>of</strong><br />

existing communities, and basic concepts<br />

in architecture. These studies are informed<br />

by three courses <strong>of</strong> lectures: architectural<br />

theory and history, technology, and communication.<br />

Architectural design – research, study, and<br />

practice – is studied in four studios, each<br />

focused on one <strong>of</strong> four themes.<br />

Each studio comprises students from<br />

all three levels, although the groups are<br />

organized in different ways according to<br />

the approach in the studio. The internal<br />

organization <strong>of</strong> the studios may vary in<br />

response to the particular circumstances <strong>of</strong><br />

each studio.<br />

The culmination <strong>of</strong> the programme is an<br />

extended period <strong>of</strong> self-directed study<br />

giving the student the opportunity for<br />

focused reflection, consolidation <strong>of</strong> various<br />

studies in earlier years, and expression<br />

<strong>of</strong> one’s position through investigation<br />

<strong>of</strong> selected architectural issues through<br />

research and design: the thesis.<br />

In a sense, the thesis is a collective manifestation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the work <strong>of</strong> the school. It provides<br />

the grounds for examination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme and informs discussion about<br />

all levels and aspects.<br />

A student enrolled at the department may<br />

carry out studies, based on an approved<br />

proposal, independently or in any other<br />

institution. This applies to students who<br />

may take part in exchanges or carry out<br />

special studies and field research.<br />

A year out <strong>of</strong> the formal studies in the<br />

school separates the undergraduate from<br />

the graduate part <strong>of</strong> the programme. This<br />

year is intended as a period <strong>of</strong> practical<br />

experience and essentially independent<br />

study. The experience in practice seems to<br />

help synthesize the studies up to this point<br />

and ground them in more direct understanding<br />

through practical application.<br />

It is possible for students also to spend all<br />

or any part <strong>of</strong> this year in individually proposed<br />

studies or work based on research,<br />

working with community groups in developing<br />

countries or other architecturally<br />

related activities.<br />

In the first year these courses are closely<br />

related to the work in the studio while<br />

growing more independent and specialized<br />

as they advance.<br />

22 23


Architecture<br />

Theory<br />

Design: Language <strong>of</strong> Discourse<br />

In what terms do we discuss design and works <strong>of</strong><br />

architecture<br />

It appears that we use the common language. In fact we<br />

adopt the common language in developing a special one the<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> which embody specialized meaning and knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> architecture and can serve for advancement <strong>of</strong> architecture<br />

through its refinement. What are the terms <strong>of</strong> this<br />

specialized language<br />

The courses are studied at three levels in each <strong>of</strong> the following<br />

four areas: COMMUNICATIONS, HUMANITIES, TECHNOLOGIES, and<br />

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE.<br />

The three levels are:<br />

1. Mandatory courses. The minimum number <strong>of</strong> courses<br />

possible dealing with fundamentals, principles, and premises<br />

underlying the area <strong>of</strong> those courses. These apply to humanities<br />

as well as technology.<br />

2. Elective courses. A selective core <strong>of</strong> courses as further<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the mandatory courses. There is no linear or<br />

chronological order between the mandatories and the electives.<br />

3. Research studies. A series <strong>of</strong> research-based electives<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by every member <strong>of</strong> faculty.<br />

The studies draw continuity from the first level – fundamentals<br />

– depth from the second level, and vitality from the third<br />

level. All three levels inform one another and evolve within<br />

the balanced form <strong>of</strong> the programme.<br />

24 25


Courses<br />

Communication<br />

Courses<br />

Humanities<br />

Required<br />

Elective<br />

Required<br />

Elective<br />

“In the immediate world, everything<br />

is to be discerned, for him<br />

who can discern it, and centrally<br />

and simply, without either dissection<br />

into science, or digestion into<br />

art, but with the whole <strong>of</strong> consciousness,<br />

seeking to perceive it<br />

as it stands.”<br />

James Agee, Walker Evans<br />

Now Let Us Praise Famous<br />

Men<br />

Graphics and Visual Studies<br />

Computer-Aided Architectural Design<br />

Studies in Selected Topics<br />

Visual Design<br />

Digital Design Media<br />

“The whole cultural world, in all<br />

its forms, exists through tradition.”<br />

Edmund Husserl<br />

Introduction to Architecture<br />

Architectural History and Theory I<br />

Architectural History and Theory II<br />

Architectural History and Theory III<br />

Land and City<br />

Urban Design and Planning<br />

Architectural Theory and Criticism<br />

Studies in Selected Topics<br />

Issues in Architectural Theory and<br />

Design<br />

Periods or Works <strong>of</strong> Architecture<br />

Aspects <strong>of</strong> Asian Architecture<br />

26 27


Courses<br />

Technology<br />

Courses<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practice<br />

Required<br />

Elective<br />

Required<br />

Elective<br />

“The aim <strong>of</strong> the architect is … to<br />

infuse into his works something<br />

<strong>of</strong> this order and method which<br />

is to found in nature. Ancient<br />

architects rightly maintained that<br />

nature, the greatest <strong>of</strong> all artists<br />

in the invention <strong>of</strong> forms, was<br />

always their model. Therefore,<br />

they collected the laws according<br />

to which she works in her<br />

production as far as humanly<br />

possible … the principle: such<br />

qualities as harmony, proportion,<br />

symmetry.”<br />

Leon Battista Alberti<br />

Ten Books on Architecture<br />

Introduction to Building Technology<br />

Building Technology<br />

I Materials and Construction<br />

II Building Structure<br />

III Environmental Technology<br />

Building Systems Integration<br />

Advanced Construction<br />

Advanced Building Services<br />

Studies in Selected Topics<br />

Structural Design and Building Structures<br />

Materials and Methods <strong>of</strong> Construction<br />

Environmental Systems and Design<br />

Building Performance Simulation<br />

“In ancient Greece the term<br />

architekton originally meant<br />

a ‘master carpenter’; building<br />

arisans, shipwrights, and temple<br />

designers, all <strong>of</strong> whom worked<br />

in wood, were architects. Certain<br />

Greek artists also became known<br />

as architects – for example,<br />

Theodoros <strong>of</strong> Samos, renowned<br />

as a sculptor, metalsmith, and<br />

architect in the sixth century B.C.<br />

Roman architects, too, came from<br />

a variety <strong>of</strong> backgrounds: private<br />

training and apprenticeship;<br />

military engineering; and the civil<br />

service. Although the Emperor<br />

Hadrian dabbled in architecture,<br />

it was not really, Cicero has written,<br />

an appropriate calling for<br />

Roman aristocrats. Former slaves,<br />

released from imperial service,<br />

became architects. Yet Vitruvius, a<br />

self-made man with experience<br />

in military engineering, tried to<br />

dignify architecture, describing it<br />

as a learned career in his treatise.<br />

The architect alone, he wrote,<br />

combined firmness and utility<br />

with beauty.”<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practice<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practice and Management<br />

Studies in Selected Topics <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Practice<br />

Mary N. Wods<br />

From Craft to Pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

28 29


Courses<br />

Research Studies<br />

Studios<br />

Student Work<br />

Areas <strong>of</strong> Interest<br />

2001 – <strong>2002</strong><br />

Research studies are based on<br />

the current research work <strong>of</strong><br />

each faculty member. They are<br />

occasions for focused collaboration<br />

between students and faculty.<br />

They <strong>of</strong>fer the students an<br />

opportunity to apply and extend<br />

their knowledge and develop<br />

skills in research through design<br />

or analytical methods.<br />

Essy Baniassad<br />

Design education,<br />

community development<br />

Vito Bertin<br />

Design, geometry, and structure <strong>of</strong> space<br />

Freeman Chan<br />

Architecture and spiritual tradition<br />

Wallace Chang<br />

Community design<br />

Bernard V. Lim<br />

Architecture for education and the elderly<br />

Gladys Masey-Martinez<br />

Micro 3d design<br />

Edward Ng<br />

Daylighting<br />

Nancy Sanders<br />

Drawing studies – podium and groundplane<br />

in Hong Kong’s new towns<br />

Here is a sample <strong>of</strong> the design work in the course <strong>of</strong> the<br />

year. It is intended to provide neither a comprehensive<br />

document on the work nor a precise illustration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme. But It is clearly related to the programme. It<br />

is presented here with no implicit intention <strong>of</strong> suggesting a<br />

strict linear relationship between the theory and the practice<br />

in the studios. The relationship between the word and<br />

the work is subtle in all instances. It <strong>of</strong>fers rich ground for<br />

further refinement <strong>of</strong> both as they develop in a reciprocal<br />

manner.<br />

Kelly Chow<br />

Design – practice and theory<br />

Shin Hae-won<br />

Urban landscape<br />

Jeffrey Cody<br />

Beaux-Arts architectural influences in<br />

1930s China<br />

Tsou Jin-Yeu<br />

CFD-based airflow simulation for natural<br />

ventilation<br />

Gu Daqing<br />

Strategies <strong>of</strong> space organization<br />

Woo Pui Leng<br />

Street studies<br />

Ho Puay-peng<br />

Chinese architectural history<br />

Andrew I-kang Li<br />

Formal studies in chinese architecture<br />

Liu Yuyang<br />

Places <strong>of</strong> learning: campus design and<br />

education buildings<br />

30 31


Student Work<br />

Foundation Studio<br />

Year 1<br />

The house is the seminal form in<br />

architecture. It is the significant form<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> whose transformations<br />

and evolution all other forms can be<br />

understood. Historically it has been to<br />

architecture as the family to society.<br />

32 33


Student Work<br />

Habitation Studio<br />

Years 2, 3, and 4<br />

People – The expression <strong>of</strong> the human<br />

spirit revealed through the study <strong>of</strong> the<br />

human body, its surface, and its resonance<br />

in space. How people activate<br />

architecture, from the collective to the<br />

private action or event.<br />

Place – What is the spirit <strong>of</strong> the place<br />

Its cultural implication <strong>of</strong> design within<br />

specific territories <strong>of</strong> human habitation.<br />

34 35


Student Work<br />

Urbanization Studio<br />

Years 2, 3, and 4<br />

In a sense the entire history <strong>of</strong> architecture<br />

is a story <strong>of</strong> urbanization,<br />

from the early adaptation <strong>of</strong> caves<br />

to the modification <strong>of</strong> land in search<br />

<strong>of</strong> shelter and the creation <strong>of</strong> entirely<br />

artificial worlds.<br />

36 37


Student Work<br />

Tectonics Studio<br />

Years 2, 3, and 4<br />

What is the relationship between<br />

space, surface, and mass How is the<br />

material arranged in a building Can<br />

we distinguish elements, components,<br />

and systems What is the mutual<br />

influence between structure, material,<br />

and space Can we differentiate structural<br />

and spatial types, and are they<br />

related How can space be formed,<br />

structured, and defined How does the<br />

built order express a conceived order<br />

38 39


Student Work<br />

Technics Studio<br />

Years 2, 3, and 4<br />

Technics has been defined as “the<br />

doctrine <strong>of</strong> arts in general; such<br />

branches <strong>of</strong> learning as respect the<br />

arts”; “the method <strong>of</strong> performance<br />

in any art; technical skill; artistic<br />

execution”; “technical terms or objects;<br />

things pertaining to the practice <strong>of</strong> an<br />

art or science”; “the theory, principles,<br />

or study <strong>of</strong> an art or a process”; and<br />

“the science or study <strong>of</strong> the mechanical<br />

and industrial arts.”<br />

40 41


Student Work<br />

Thesis Project<br />

Model <strong>of</strong> Variation<br />

The thesis marks the intersection<br />

between two important states in one’s<br />

work and, in a way, in one’s pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

life. It begins as a synthesis <strong>of</strong><br />

previous studies, a sum total <strong>of</strong> many<br />

questions unanswered, much information<br />

assimilated and much more set<br />

aside, skills gained and ideas received<br />

and developed. As its completion it<br />

represents a fact in its own right<br />

embodying ideas, interests, aspirations,<br />

and the student’s sense <strong>of</strong> direction. It<br />

marks a new beginning for the cycle<br />

<strong>of</strong> search beyond the formal studies in<br />

the school, with much broader scope<br />

and much greater freedom.<br />

42 43


Study Schemes<br />

Bachelor and Master<br />

Three plus Two Years<br />

Studying is a process <strong>of</strong> reconstruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> a subject. In the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> such reconstruction<br />

the process touches on the<br />

principles, the content, and the<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> a subject. The different<br />

courses in the programme<br />

each deal with the same points<br />

while focusing on different contents.<br />

The way to study them<br />

is to try and understand their<br />

internal structure as well as the<br />

structure that unifies them within<br />

the programme. Take each course<br />

apart and put it back together in<br />

other possible ways. Take apart<br />

the entire programme and search<br />

for alternative orders between<br />

the courses. The internal structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> the courses and the order in<br />

which they are <strong>of</strong>fered are only a<br />

beginning and a most elementary<br />

and general one. The only effective<br />

study scheme is to approach<br />

it with a searching mind and to<br />

reconstruct it in your particular<br />

way.<br />

In the second and third years <strong>of</strong> the<br />

BSSc(AS) programme, students join a different<br />

studio each term. In the first year <strong>of</strong><br />

the MArch programme, students join two<br />

studios for a second time. Thesis students<br />

can join any <strong>of</strong> the four studios again.<br />

The study schemes for both BSSc(AS)<br />

major and MArch full-time programmes<br />

define the minimum units <strong>of</strong> courses<br />

required for graduation. The composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> the course groups and the number <strong>of</strong><br />

units vary according to the entry year. The<br />

respective handbooks give the full details.<br />

44 45


<strong>School</strong> Plan<br />

A Place for Learning<br />

A <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Architecture<br />

A school <strong>of</strong> architecture is not a building; it is a school <strong>of</strong><br />

thought. The school building is like a village <strong>of</strong> rooms and<br />

routes, all leading to a central public place: the market place,<br />

the agora, the exhibition room. It provides places for gathering,<br />

work and play, public display and solitary reflection. It is<br />

a collection <strong>of</strong> rooms and places with different qualities but<br />

all with the same purpose: supporting study, discourse, and<br />

learning. These rooms are equipped differently, but no room<br />

has a limited function. The limitations in how we use a room<br />

are related less to the room and more to the limitations <strong>of</strong><br />

our imagination.<br />

Design Technology Lab<br />

7<br />

Information Technology Lab<br />

Architecture Library<br />

6<br />

6<br />

Exhibitions<br />

Studio<br />

5<br />

5<br />

General Office<br />

Studio<br />

4<br />

46 47


Studio Dates<br />

Fall Term<br />

Studio Dates<br />

Spring Term<br />

Week<br />

Day<br />

1 Studio selection 02.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

Start studio project 04.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

05.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

2 09.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

11.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

12.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

3 16.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

18.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

19.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

4 23.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

25.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

26.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

5 30.09.<strong>2002</strong><br />

02.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

03.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

6 Start school project 07.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

09.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

10.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

7 Public holiday 14.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

16.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

17.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

8 21.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

23.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

24.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

Week<br />

Day<br />

9 28.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

30.10.2001<br />

31.10.<strong>2002</strong><br />

10 04.11.<strong>2002</strong><br />

06.11.<strong>2002</strong><br />

07.11.<strong>2002</strong><br />

11 11.11.<strong>2002</strong><br />

13.11.<strong>2002</strong><br />

14.11.<strong>2002</strong><br />

12 18.11.<strong>2002</strong><br />

20.11.<strong>2002</strong><br />

21.11.<strong>2002</strong><br />

13 Final review week 25.11.<strong>2002</strong><br />

27.11.<strong>2002</strong><br />

Last studio day BSSc(AS) 28.11.<strong>2002</strong><br />

14 02.12.<strong>2002</strong><br />

Last studio day MArch 04.12.<strong>2002</strong><br />

No classes 05.12.<strong>2002</strong><br />

15 09.12.<strong>2002</strong><br />

11.12.<strong>2002</strong><br />

12.12.<strong>2002</strong><br />

16 16.12.<strong>2002</strong><br />

18.12.<strong>2002</strong><br />

19.12.<strong>2002</strong><br />

Week<br />

Day<br />

1 Studio selection 06.01.<strong>2003</strong><br />

Start studio project 08.01.<strong>2003</strong><br />

09.01.<strong>2003</strong><br />

2 13.01.<strong>2003</strong><br />

15.01.<strong>2003</strong><br />

16.01.<strong>2003</strong><br />

3 20.01.<strong>2003</strong><br />

22.01.<strong>2003</strong><br />

23.01.<strong>2003</strong><br />

4 27.01.<strong>2003</strong><br />

29.01.<strong>2003</strong><br />

30.01.<strong>2003</strong><br />

5 03.02.<strong>2003</strong><br />

05.02.<strong>2003</strong><br />

06.02.<strong>2003</strong><br />

6 Start school project 10.02.<strong>2003</strong><br />

12.02.<strong>2003</strong><br />

13.02.<strong>2003</strong><br />

7 17.02.<strong>2003</strong><br />

19.02.<strong>2003</strong><br />

20.02.<strong>2003</strong><br />

8 24.02.<strong>2003</strong><br />

26.02.<strong>2003</strong><br />

27.02.<strong>2003</strong><br />

Week<br />

Day<br />

9 03.03.<strong>2002</strong><br />

05.03.<strong>2002</strong><br />

06.03.<strong>2002</strong><br />

10 10.03.<strong>2002</strong><br />

12.03.<strong>2002</strong><br />

13.03.<strong>2002</strong><br />

11 17.03.<strong>2002</strong><br />

19.03.<strong>2002</strong><br />

20.03.<strong>2002</strong><br />

12 24.03.<strong>2002</strong><br />

26.03.<strong>2002</strong><br />

27.03.<strong>2002</strong><br />

13 31.04.<strong>2002</strong><br />

02.04.<strong>2002</strong><br />

03.04.<strong>2002</strong><br />

14 07.04.<strong>2002</strong><br />

09.04.<strong>2002</strong><br />

10.04.<strong>2002</strong><br />

15 Final review week 14.04.<strong>2002</strong><br />

16.04.<strong>2002</strong><br />

Last studio day 17.04.<strong>2002</strong><br />

16 21.04.<strong>2002</strong><br />

23.04.<strong>2002</strong><br />

25.04.<strong>2002</strong><br />

48 49


Essy Baniassad<br />

Vito Bertin<br />

Freeman Chan<br />

Wallace Chang<br />

Kelly Chow<br />

Jeffrey Cody<br />

Gu Daqing<br />

Ho Puay-peng<br />

Jeff Kan<br />

Andrew I-kang Li<br />

Liu Yuyang<br />

Bernard Lim<br />

Gladys Masey-Martinez<br />

Edward Ng<br />

Nancy Sanders<br />

Shin Hae-won<br />

Jin-Yeu Tsou<br />

Woo Pui Leng<br />

Text: Essy Baniassad<br />

Images: Students and staff<br />

Design: Vito Bertin<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Architecture<br />

The Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

23 August <strong>2002</strong><br />

50 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!