04.01.2015 Views

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MANUSCRIPTS AND VERSIONS.<br />

^i<br />

latter as the Short and Long recensions; but the publication of the<br />

Syriac Version of the three epistles in a still shorter form by Cureton<br />

some years ago (1845) has antiquated this mode of distinction, which<br />

should accordingly be abandoned. It will be remembered therefore<br />

that, when I speak of the Greek or Latin of the Middle or Long form,<br />

the terms correspond to what editors have hitherto called the Short or<br />

Long Greek or Latin respectively.<br />

Thus it<br />

appears that of the twelve Ignatian Epistles (excluding the<br />

Epistle of Mary to Ignatius), three (Polycarp, Ephesians, Romans) occur<br />

in three different forms ;<br />

four (Smyrn^ans, Magnesians, Philadelphians,<br />

Trallians) in two forms ;<br />

and the remaining five (Mary, Tarsians,<br />

Antiochenes, Hero, Philippians) in one form only.<br />

Besides these twelve epistles, others bearing the name of Ignatius<br />

are extant entire or in fragments, in Latin, yEthiopic, or Arabic and<br />

;<br />

I shall have occasion to refer to them hereafter.<br />

But, as they are quite<br />

distinct from the twelve and have no bearing on the textual or historical<br />

criticism with which we are immediately concerned,<br />

be dismissed<br />

for the present.<br />

they may<br />

Of the three forms thus enumerated, the Long recension is now<br />

The dispute of late years has lain<br />

universally condemned as spurious.<br />

between the remaining two. For reasons which will be stated hereafter,<br />

the Middle form has the highest claim to consideration as<br />

exhibiting the original text of Ignatius. But at present the decision<br />

must not be anticipated.<br />

In describing the several authorities for the text, a somewhat new<br />

notation is here adopted, which, I venture to hope,<br />

will commend itself<br />

by its simplicity'. The Greek character (2)<br />

is restricted to the Short<br />

form ]<br />

the Roman capitals (G, L, C, A, S) represent the Middle, and<br />

the Roman small letters (g, 1) the Long<br />

form. The letters themselves<br />

describe the language of the authority. Thus the Syriac Version of the<br />

Short form is denoted by 2, and of the Middle by S ;<br />

the Greek of the<br />

Where any of these authorities is<br />

Middle by G, and of the Long by g.<br />

represented by more than one ms presenting different readings, the mss<br />

are discriminated by a figure below the line to the right<br />

e.g, 2i, Ss, % ; Li, L. ; gi, g,, gg, g^ etc.<br />

;<br />

of the letters :<br />

^<br />

Zahn's notation is a great improve- apparatus criticus constructed long before<br />

ment on any which preceded it, and for his edition appeared. It would therefore<br />

the sake of uniformity I<br />

might perhaps have been very inconvenient to go back<br />

have contented myself with it ;<br />

but my from my own system of notation, even if<br />

own introduction was written and my it had not seemed preferable in itself.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!