04.01.2015 Views

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 14 .<br />

EPISTLE<br />

OF S. POLYCARP.<br />

Smyrngean captain of police, who takes Polycarp into custody, and<br />

the GaUlean king, whose part in the passion was confined to insolent<br />

mockery and who pronounced Jesus innocent of the charges brought<br />

against him (Luke xxiii. 15). Here again a fabricator would have<br />

secured a better parallel. We may say generally that the violence of the<br />

parallelism is a guarafitee of the accuracy of the facts.<br />

2. The miraculous element has also been urged in some quarters<br />

as an objection to the genuineness of the document. Yet, considering<br />

all the circumstances of the case, we have more occasion to be surprised<br />

at the comparative absence than at the special prominence of the<br />

supernatural in the narrative. Compared<br />

with records of early Christian<br />

martyrs or with biographies of medieval saints or with notices of religious<br />

heroes at any great crisis, even in the more recent history of the<br />

Church, as for instance the rise of Jesuitism or of Wesleyanism ',<br />

this document contains nothing which ought to excite a suspicion of its<br />

authenticity.<br />

The one miraculous incident, which creates a real diificulty, is the<br />

dove issuing from the wounded side of the martyr. Yet even this might<br />

be accounted for by an illusion, and under any circumstances it would<br />

be quite inadequate to condemn the document as a forgery. But it<br />

will be shown hereafter (p. 643) that there are excellent reasons for<br />

regarding the incident as a later interpolation, which had no place in<br />

the original document. Beyond<br />

this we have the voice from heaven<br />

calling to Polycarp in the stadium to play the man (§ 9). But the very<br />

simplicity of the narrative here disarms criticism. The brethren present<br />

heard the voice, but no one saw the speaker. This was the sole ground<br />

for the belief that it was not a human utterance. Again there is the<br />

arching of the fire round the martyr like a sail swelled by the wind (§ 15).<br />

But this may be explained as a strictly natural occurrence, and similar<br />

phenomena have been witnessed more than once on like occasions".<br />

1 See for instance Southey's Life of pyram lumen circumquaque refulgens, ita<br />

Wesley p. 277 sq, II. pp. 153, 199. ut nemo eorum qui ignem succensuri<br />

These are miracles attested by Wesley erant accedere auderet ;<br />

atque ita sacrum<br />

himself.<br />

corpus intra pyram illaesum mansit';<br />

-<br />

See for instance Acta Tlieodoti comp. ib. 34 (p. 385) ' pyra incensa,<br />

32 (Ruinart Act. Sine. Mart. p. 384) circum ignem<br />

facta sunt miracula nullis<br />

'<br />

Tum vero, pyra ingenti constructa, ca- verbis explicanda, vidimusque lumen in<br />

daver sancti martyris in ipsam conjecere ciicuitu magnum, neque flamma Theodolectores,<br />

multam materiam circumpo- tum attigit.' This is<br />

apparently<br />

nentes]; sed quadam Dei hominibus con- account of an eyewitness,<br />

sulentis providentia subito apparuit supra<br />

the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!