04.01.2015 Views

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

POLYCARP THE ELDER. 475<br />

'<br />

relaxing unwavering hold of the word that was delivered to him from the<br />

beginning'— this, so far as we can read the man from his own utterances<br />

or from the notices of others, was the characteristic of Polycarp. His<br />

religious convictions were seen to be ' founded as ', Ignatius had said<br />

long before {Polyc. i),<br />

'on an immoveable rock'. He was not dismayed<br />

by the plausibilities of false teachers, but ' stood firm as an anvil under<br />

the hammer's stroke' {ib. 3).<br />

But, if the position of Polycarp was important to the early Church<br />

as a guarantee of continuity, it is not without its value to ourselves<br />

from this same point of view. Certain modern theories of early<br />

Christian history are built upon the hypothesis<br />

of an entire discontinuity,<br />

a complete dislocation, in the spiritual and intellectual<br />

life of Christendom,<br />

so that the Church of Irenseus was in the most<br />

vital points, whether of doctrine or of practice, a direct contrast to the<br />

Church of S. John. To these shadowy reconstructions of the Church,<br />

which overlook the broader facts of history and fasten on fragmentary<br />

notices and questionable interpretations, the position of Polycarp gives<br />

a direct denial. If Irenseus is only fairly honest in his representations of<br />

his master (and there is no reason to question this),<br />

all such theories of<br />

discontinuity must fall to the ground. There might be growth, progress,<br />

development, but there could be no dislocation or reversal, such as these<br />

theories postulate.<br />

While the oral tradition of the Lord's life and of the Apostolic teaching<br />

was still fresh, the believers of succeeding generations not unnaturally<br />

appealed to it for confirmation against the many counterfeits of the<br />

Gospel which offered themselves for acceptance. The authorities for<br />

this tradition were ' the elders '. To the testimony of these elders<br />

appeal was made by Papias in the first, and by Irenseus in the second<br />

generation after the Apostles. With Papias the elders were those who<br />

themselves had seen the Lord or had been eye-witnesses of the Apostolic<br />

history; with Irenseus the term included likewise persons who, Hke<br />

Among<br />

Papias himself, had been acquainted with these eye-witnesses.<br />

these Polycarp held the foremost place. It is not therefore as the<br />

martyr nor as the ruler nor as the writer, but as 'the elder', that he<br />

claims the attention of the Church.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!