04.01.2015 Views

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IGNATIUS THE MARTYR. 1 5<br />

absolute rule can be laid down, but the magistrate must exercise his<br />

own discretion. The refusal to accept anonymous accusations is the<br />

only point in this rescript which suggests the appearance of novelty.<br />

There seems to be only one escape from this conclusion. Trajan<br />

may have inaugurated his new policy at a previous stage. The proceedings<br />

against the Christians, which Pliny mentions as having taken<br />

place before this time, may refer, not as is<br />

commonly supposed, to the<br />

persecution of Domitian, but to earlier transactions in the reign of<br />

Trajan himself. This however is not contended by those who maintain<br />

the theory which I am combating. Nor would it afford any support<br />

for their hypothesis, which has no other basis but this rescript of<br />

Trajan.<br />

But, it will be said, if from the time of Nero Christianity was a<br />

forbidden religion, how is it that from that date to the age of Trajan—<br />

a period of nearly half a century<br />

— the Church enjoyed unbroken peace,<br />

only disturbed for a moment by the capricious onslaught of the last<br />

Flavins How do we account for the fact that, under Vespasian and<br />

Titus more especially, the laws lay dormant and were never put<br />

into force The answer is twofold. In the first place we do not<br />

know that they were never put<br />

in force. Our<br />

information with respect<br />

to these early ages of the Church is singularly defective and capricious.<br />

We shall see presently by what a slender thread of accident the record<br />

of the sharp and fierce persecution in Bithynia under Trajan has been<br />

preserved to us. But we may go further than this. Hilary of Poitiers<br />

ranks Vespasian between Nero and Decius as a persecutor of the<br />

faith'. What may be the ground of this exceptional notice in the<br />

1<br />

Hilar. Pictav. c. Avian, c. 3, Op. Judaeorum et Christianorum religio tol-<br />

II. p. 594 (ed. Bened., Veron. 1730). leretur :<br />

quippe has religiones, licet con-<br />

'<br />

Quibusnam suffragiis ad praedicandum trarias sibi, isdem tamen ab auctoribus<br />

evangelium apostoli usi sunt anne profectas : Christianos ex Judaeis extialiquam<br />

sibi assumebant e palatio dig- tisse : radice sublata stirpem facile perinitatem,<br />

hymnum Deo in carcere inter turam. ' If Sulpicius Severus has borcatenas<br />

et post flagella cantantes e- rowed from Tacitus here, as Bemays<br />

dictisque regis Paulus, cum in theatro (Ueber die Chronik d. Sidpic, Sever.<br />

spectaculum ipse esset, Christo ecclesiam p. 57) supposes, and as seems probable,<br />

congregabat Nerone se credo aut Ves- his statement deserves some attention ;<br />

pasiano aut Decio patrocinantibus tue- but it does not go<br />

far. The case is difbatur,<br />

quorum in nos odiis confessio ferent with the testimony of Hilary,<br />

divinae praedicationis effloruit,' etc. See Gorres {Das Christenthutn unter Vesalso<br />

Sulpic. Sev. Chron. ii.<br />

30 'At con- pa siamis ^p. ^o^, in Zeitschr.f. Wissensch.<br />

tra alii et Titus ipse evertendum in Theol. xxi. 1878), while attempting to<br />

primis templum censebant, quo plenius invalidate this testimony, betrays a naive

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!