04.01.2015 Views

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

398 EPISTLES OF S. IGNATIUS.<br />

Asia Minor, the remaining<br />

one to Rome. The six are full of exhortations<br />

urging obedience to the bishops; the letter to Rome is entirely<br />

free from any such command. Indeed, if Ignatius had not incidentally<br />

mentioned himself as 'the bishop of or<br />

'from Syria', the letter to the<br />

Romans would have contained no indication of the existence of the<br />

episcopal office. It is addressed to the Church of Rome. It assigns<br />

to this church a preeminence of rank as well as of love (inscr.).<br />

There<br />

are obviously in Rome persons in high quarters so influential that the<br />

saint fears lest their intervention should rob him of the crown of martyrdom.<br />

With all this importance attributed to the Romish Church, it<br />

is the more remarkable that not a word is said about the Roman bishop.<br />

Indeed there is not even the faintest hint that a bishop of Rome existed<br />

at this time. To ourselves the Church of Rome has been so entirely<br />

merged in the Bishop of Rome, that this silence is the more surprising.<br />

Yet startling as this omission is, it entirely accords with the information<br />

derived from other trustworthy sources. All the ancient notices point<br />

to the mature development of episcopacy in Asia Minor at this time.<br />

On the other hand, all the earliest notices of the Church in Rome point<br />

in the opposite direction.<br />

In the Epistle of Clement, which was written<br />

a few years before these Ignatian letters purport to be penned, there is<br />

no mention of the bishop. The letter is written in the name of the<br />

Church ;<br />

it<br />

speaks with the authority of the Church. It is strenuous,<br />

even peremptory, in the authoritative tone which it assumes ;<br />

but it<br />

pleads the authority not of the chief minister, but of the whole body'.<br />

The next document emanating from the Roman Church after the assumed<br />

date of the Ignatian Epistles is the Shepherd of Hermas. Here<br />

again we are met with similar phenomena. If we had no other information,<br />

we should be at a loss to say what was the form of Church<br />

government at Rome when the Shepherd was written ^ Thus the contrast<br />

between Asia Minor and Rome in the Ignatian letters exactly<br />

reproduces the contrast to be found elsewhere in the earliest and most<br />

authentic sources of information. This contrast moreover admits of<br />

an easy and natural explanation. As S.<br />

Jerome said long ago, the<br />

episcopal government was matured as a safeguard against heresy and<br />

schism. As such it<br />

appears in the Ignatian letters. But Asia Minor<br />

the hot-bed of false doctrine and schismatical<br />

was in the earliest ages<br />

teachers. Hence the early and rapid adoption of episcopacy there.<br />

On the other hand, Rome was at this time remarkably free from such<br />

troubles. It was not till the middle of the second century that heresiarclis<br />

found it worth their while to make Rome their centre of opera-<br />

^<br />

.See .9. Ckiiievt of Rome, I. p. 67 sq.<br />

"<br />

See ridlippians p. 219 sq.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!