04.01.2015 Views

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE GENUINENESS. 375<br />

that they can only be regarded as different sides of one and the same<br />

heresy.<br />

In the first place, it is a significant fact that our author uses the<br />

same general terms when speaking of the one and of the other. Of the<br />

Judaism and the Docetism alike he says that '<br />

they are not the planting<br />

of the Father' {Trail. 11, Pliilad. 3); both alike are rank and noxious<br />

weeds which his readers must avoid {Trail. 6, Philad. 3). The teachers<br />

of the one and of the other are described as 'speaking apart from,<br />

speaking otherwise than of, Jesus Christ' {Trail. 9, Philad. 6); both<br />

alike are warned to 'repent unto unity,' 'to repent unto God' {Philad.<br />

8, Smyrii. 9).<br />

The Judaism and the Docetism equally are called<br />

'<br />

heterodoxy ' {Magn. 8, Smyrn. 6). In both cases equally he bids his<br />

readers ' Be not deceived ' {Magn. 8, Smyrn. 6, Philad. 3 ; comp.<br />

Ephes. 16) ;<br />

he charges them to 'flee division' {Philad. 2, 7, Smyrn. 8);<br />

and he tells them in identical language that he does not speak because<br />

he accuses them of complicity in these errors {Magn. 11, 7rall. 8),<br />

but because he wishes to 'forewarn' them (Magn. 11, Trail. 8, Sinyrn.<br />

4).<br />

And generally<br />

it may be said that there is no perceptible difference<br />

in his language when describing the position of the false teachers in the<br />

two cases with regard to the true believer and to the Church. These<br />

facts furnish a strong presumption that he is<br />

describing the same thing<br />

in the two sets of passages.<br />

And this presumption becomes a certainty when we examine more<br />

closely the passages in which Judaism is directly attacked.<br />

In the passage in the letter to the Magnesians (§§ 8, 9, 10) the<br />

author begins by warning his readers 'not to be led astray by heterodoxies<br />

nor by antiquated fables (fxv6e-ifx,ao-iv rots TraAatots)<br />

which are<br />

unprofitable'; 'for,', he continues, 'if to the present hour (/^expi<br />

vvv) we live in the observance of Judaic rites {Kara. 'louSatV/xo'v), we<br />

confess that we have not received grace,' i.e. that the merits of Christ's<br />

death do not appertain to us, for we have chosen another way of<br />

working out our salvation. By the expression ' antiquated fables ' or<br />

'myths' we are reminded of the language in the Pastoral Epistles,<br />

'endless fables {ixvOol

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!