04.01.2015 Views

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

apostolicfathers0201clem - Carmel Apologetics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

202 EPISTLES OF S. IGNATIUS.<br />

additional epistles to the Armenian translator. But, if this was so, and if (as Merx<br />

maintains) it comprised the seven epistles as well, why should the Armenian<br />

translator have deserted it in part of his work and have had recourse (as Merx<br />

Curetonian '— for these seven epistles<br />

<br />

—<br />

supposes) to another Syriac Version the<br />

'<br />

Moreover it is now ascertained (see above, p. 192) that the very quotations. Trail,<br />

5, Magn. 8, 9 (in Land's Anecd. Syr. p. 32 sq), which Merx assigned to this third<br />

version, because they did not agree with the quotations of Severus, and which convinced<br />

him that this version must have comprised the seven epistles also {Zeitsch. f.<br />

Wissensch. Theol. 1.<br />

c), are taken from a work of this very Severus himself.<br />

Thus of the three translations, which Merx supposes, the first alone remains.<br />

Whether it originally included the spurious epistles (in addition to the seven Vossian<br />

letters) or whether these were a later addition, may be a matter of question.<br />

I have dealt with this theory at some length, because I wished to dispose of it once<br />

for all and to prevent the necessity of referring to it again. The question of the Ignatian<br />

writings is so intricate in itself that unless pains are taken to it<br />

disengage from<br />

artificial entanglements which critics have created, it will become hopelessly involved.<br />

Moreover it seemed necessary to protest against the vicious principle<br />

— which underlies<br />

so much recent criticism— of multiplying documents to account for accidental differences<br />

of language in quotations. [This note was written some time before the appearance<br />

of Zahn's Ignatius v. Antiochien, in which he has discussed (p. 174 sq) the theory<br />

of Merx to the same effect.]<br />

35-<br />

Ephraem of Antioch [t<br />

c. A.D, 545].<br />

(i) Episi. ad Zenobium, Photii Bibliotheca 228 (p. 246).<br />

Onep ovu eip'qTai, /caret to rpiTov Ked\aLou<br />

e/c re tcou<br />

evayy€XiKO)v (fxovoJu kol ek t(ov diroaToXiKcov, /cat St)<br />

Kat e/c<br />

ToJu fxaKapiiov TtaTepoiV t^ixcou, ^lypariov tov Seoipopov Koi<br />

lovXiov /cat ^AdavacTLOv /cat<br />

TpyjyopCcov Kat BacrtXetou,<br />

oteXey^et Tovq Svorcre/^ei^, w tcl)v rj dpdpoiv )(prjcrL

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!